Let Me Throw it Out There
Ok. I might get a big slap across the face for suggesting this, but just hear me out for a minute, OK? Just one minute.
Instead of calling up Jeremi Gonzalez or Abe Alvarez to get a start before Wade Miller is ready, why don't we have Keith Foulke take a shot and start a game?
Call me crazy, but it might just work. Foulke was originally a starter, so we know he has the stamina. Foulke started 70 games in the minors and finished with an ERA around 3.29. He also started in eight games for the San Francisco Giants back in 1997, but those results weren't anything to talk about (1-5 record, 8.26 ERA). But that was before Foulke was Foulke. So why not give him another shot?
Foulke could seriously snap out of his slump if he puts together one good start for the Red Sox. What do we have to lose? Nothing. Have Mike Timlin be the closer for one night -- it won't kill us. I think it would be great for Foulke and the Sox to try this just once. Foulke could end up having a great game and then head back to the bullpen where he would have the confidence to close out games.
I've thrown out a poll for Red Sox Nation. Click "Entry Link" at the bottom of this post to participate in it. And be sure to give me some feedback in the comments section.
0 recs |
18 comments
Comments
Crazy......
by Rob Booth on
Apr 28, 2005 7:30 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah...
by la belle vie on
Apr 28, 2005 8:42 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
It would also set a tone for the pitching staff
It would also give him room to experiment a bit more with his pitches to see where he can make a fix.
by WooRat on
Apr 28, 2005 8:46 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Foulke
by Randy Booth on
Apr 28, 2005 9:12 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I dunno...
Besides, that wouldn't screw us out of a closer for one night, it'd use him up for at least a week. He'd have to take some time off before the start to prepare and then he would need to rest up for a few days before he could pitch again.
I don't like the idea.
by Brian Martin on
Apr 28, 2005 9:25 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Foulke
by Randy Booth on
Apr 28, 2005 9:33 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Right now...
by Tony the pony on
Apr 28, 2005 9:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Theo
by absolutelax395 on
Apr 28, 2005 10:06 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Bad idea
Also, Foulke has two pitches. If you think he's doing poorly when these guys get one look at him a night, think how they'll start teeing off on him the second and third time through the lineup.
Trust me. Foulke will get back on target. He'll be fine. Back away from the ledge.
by djslippyb on
Apr 29, 2005 12:31 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Foulke
But there are starting pitcher that can get away by just throwing 3 pitches. With a start, Foulke could work on his slider more often and then maybe use it more in closing situations.
by Randy Booth on
Apr 29, 2005 1:09 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
2 pitches, but...
And, ahem, our best pitcher right now is only throwing one pitch.
by Tony the pony on
Apr 30, 2005 5:36 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wake
by Randy Booth on
May 1, 2005 12:05 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Very Bad Idea
It's very unlikely that Foulke would use such an opportunity to build momentum. His approach to every hitter would be different; as a closer the goal is perfection - get three outs before anyone can score, but as a starter it's ok to give up a few runs, and it's bout getting out of jams with as little damage as possible. If Foulke gives up two runs through 5 innings that is a solid start but it would probably hurt him mentally, if anything. If he goes perfect for 5 innings it might make him feel great, but he was pitching under completely different circumstances, perhaps with a solid lead or at least with little pressure to be perfect.
It's really, flat-out, an awful idea, and far more likely to be the day Keith Foulke never recovered from, than the day that sparked his rejuvenation.
by Nick T on
Apr 29, 2005 4:53 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
devil's advocate
As far as preparation of relievers/starters, it's certainly true there's a difference, but isn't Halama a (long) reliever that Tito is planning on trying out as a starter?
Personally, I like the idea, for a short time period, because of the surprise factor involved. I wouldn't want Foulke a permanent starter, though.
Question: Isn't Wakefield able to recover quicker than "normal" starting pitchers, and pitch on 3, maybe 4, days rest? Couldn't Wakefield be given more starts (a personal 3-4 day rotation) during this time period?
by etg630 on
Apr 29, 2005 5:41 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Wakefield
by Randy Booth on
Apr 29, 2005 6:00 PM EDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Poll
by Randy Booth on
Apr 29, 2005 5:20 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
I honestly hadn't thought of this.
by Boston Fan in Michigan on
Apr 29, 2005 5:45 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs
NO!!!!
by redsoxnationwest on
Apr 29, 2005 6:13 PM EDT
reply
actions
0 recs













