Should the Red Sox sign Justin Masterson?

He's not a free agent until after 2014, but bringing back the former Sox pitcher is something to consider.

The Red Sox are going to have an open rotation spot heading into 2015, when Jake Peavy either leaves as a free agent or retires as he has hinted could happen. Should Jon Lester take off as well when his contract is up -- as unlikely as that might seem -- there will be a second open rotation spot. Boston has the prospects to fill both holes if there is indeed a pair, and could realistically have even more arms ready for it. At the same time, however, prospects do falter, and it's just as easy to believe that the arms closest to ready right now both find themselves better suited for relief work a year from now.

With that in mind, it's fair to consider if the Red Sox should bring back one of their former prospects, Justin Masterson. The Indians right-hander, dealt to Cleveland back in 2009 in the Victor Martinez swap, is looking more likely to be a free agent now that the Indians rejected his modest three-year extension proposal that would have paid him $17 million annually. Now's now the time to get into how surprising it is that Cleveland would reject the proposal of a pitcher who was not looking to be locked up for eternity, but instead is the moment where we wonder if this is something the Red Sox can take advantage of come next off-season.

Let's set the stage where Masterson might be necessary for the Sox. The Red Sox and Lester are very likely to enter into an extension with one another given their not-so-secret affinity for one another, but let's consider that the deal never gets done because the Red Sox won't add that extra year or that few extra million per season that Lester, who is already willing to pitch for a discount, is entitled to. It can happen, as you know, since such a thing is exactly what has Masterson set for free agency himself. Without Lester or the $20 million or so per year it would take to retain him on the books, the Sox would have both the rotation spot and the financial space to acquire Masterson. While Masterson has been a bit inconsistent in his career, he took serious steps forward with strikeouts -- crossing the one per inning threshold -- and against the lefties who once plagued him in 2013, thanks to changes in his approach that saw him pitching inside in a much more dedicated and successful manner. Getting to work with John Farrell -- his former pitching coach -- and his staff would be unlikely to impede on that progress.

179378083Photo credit: Jason Miller

Remember, too, that he has all of 2014 to show that his performance was for real, and not a one-off. He might not completely replace Lester atop the rotation, but Masterson has the capability to be a durable number two starter, something the Sox are going to need during this transition period for the rotation.

Even if the Sox do re-sign Lester, there could be room for Masterson in the rotation. Again, a spot is opening up when Peavy departs, and the likely replacements are Brandon Workman or Allen Webster at this time. Both of these pitchers -- and another pitching prospect, Anthony Ranaudo, who desperately needs a working change-up -- might not be big-league starters. They have the stuff, but the quality of their command remains a question, and if it doesn't improve or become more consistent, there is a chance one or both could spend their major-league careers in the bullpen. As assets in the bullpen, mind you, but still of no help to the rotation.

The Red Sox would have all of 2014 to see this, too, so it's not like it's a decision that would need to be made today with the information known right now: maybe Workman and Webster both take that extra step, and fight it out to be in the rotation next spring. Maybe one of them does and the other does not, but that's enough. Maybe Matt Barnes handles Triple-A much better than Double-A, and doesn't need to wait until 2016 when John Lackey's time in Boston is over in order to earn a big-league spot. A whole lot could change, so this isn't saying that Masterson has to be signed: it's simply just one more option to consider, depending on how well the prospects develop during the upcoming season.

Whether Masterson would want more than the three-year deal he offered the Indians is unknown, but if it had to be bumped up to four or even five, depending on how his 2014 goes, it could still be a quality play by the Sox. It might all turn out to be pointless for a number of reasons -- accelerated prospect development, Lester re-upping, Masterson and the Indians coming to terms despite this setback -- but it's worth thinking about in the interim.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Over the Monster

You must be a member of Over the Monster to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Over the Monster. You should read them.

Join Over the Monster

You must be a member of Over the Monster to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Over the Monster. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker