Red Sox, David Ortiz (Don't) Avoid Arbitration
[Update 10:45 am] Maybe not, says Buster Olney. And Paoletti's original tweet about the signing no longer exists. As of this moment, Ortiz and the Red Sox do not have a deal in place.
*****
Mary Paoletti of Comcast SportsNet New England tweets that, during an interview with sister station NECN, Larry Lucchino announced that David Ortiz and the Red Sox have an agreement in place, and will avoid Monday's scheduled arbitration hearing.
There is no word on the terms as of yet, but given the team president and CEO Lucchino dropped the news, it's likely a done deal.
Ortiz had filed for arbitration at $16.5 million after he and the Red Sox were unable to come to a deal in December. That figure marked a significant raise from last year's $12.5 million base salary, and just as far from the Red Sox' $12.65 million filing. Ortiz stood to make the most ever in an arbitration hearing, regardless of which side won, according to Maury Brown of Biz of Baseball:
The highest amount ever awarded in a hearing is $10 million (Howard won his case in 2007, while Francisco Rodriguez with the Brewers in 2007 and Alfonso Soriano with the Nationals in 2005 lost their cases). Win or lose, Ortiz smashes that number due to his long-tenure.
Both sides will avoid that, as Ortiz, like so many others who filed for a high figure prior to arbitration, settled away from the judge. This also means the Red Sox can continue their decade-long streak of avoiding arbitration -- the last arbitration case that went in front of a judge was that of Rolando Arrojo in 2002. You forgot he existed, didn't you?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interested to see what the # would be.
Midpoint is $14.575 million so I assume it is around there, maybe a little less than the midpoint with incentives that could allow him to make a little more than the midpoint. Either way, glad to hear it’s done with and they can move on.
by The Name is Dalton on Feb 10, 2012 10:38 AM EST reply actions
wow, surprised
but very happy. Hopefully closer to $12.65 than $16.5. Unless we don’t get a pitcher either way, in which case, I hope they settled on $26 million.
... and the original tweet is gone
she must’ve misunderstood what Lucchino was saying and jumped the gun
I feel twitter has been increasingly unreliability this year.
I am Sandy's bitch
We Are Because You Were
@WadePSU
Tweet about a Lucchino interview
Seemed like it should be a pretty good source. Here we are, though.
Twitter: @Marc_Normandin
by Marc Normandin on Feb 10, 2012 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
Paterno died twice, Scutaro was traded twice, Ortiz avoids arbitration
I don’t recall this many twitter flubs in all of last year.
I am Sandy's bitch
We Are Because You Were
@WadePSU
Well, Scoot was just a little early.
We’ll see if this proves the same.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Feb 10, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Cause I read the tweet too, sounded very legit. Someone somewhere believed it enough to say it.
I am Sandy's bitch
We Are Because You Were
@WadePSU
Twitter is pretty reliable
Its the twitees….in a rush to get the scoop – they are basically blasting anything out without fact checking
2 year deal?
I heard a rumor about a 2-year deal. don’t know about the money, but we know it has to be more than $16.5 for 2; maybe $20. This is not as crazy to me as it might be to many fans. Papi has held up very well and he is not easy to replace. Dunn anybody?
the Sox would leap in a second I think to sign him to a 2/$20 deal
he wants a multi-year deal, but doesn’t sound like he wants to take a big discount per year to do it

by 





























