Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Red Sox Sign Cody Ross

PHILADELPHIA - OCTOBER 17:  Cody Ross #13 of the San Francisco Giants reacts against the Philadelphia Phillies in Game Two of the NLCS during the 2010 MLB Playoffs at Citizens Bank Park on October 17 2010 in Philadelphia Pennsylvania.  (Photo by Doug Pensinger/Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Cody Ross

According to Ken Rosenthal, the Red Sox have signed outfielder Cody Ross.

The saga of Ross' free agency has come to a sudden head today, with the Mets dropping out of the race for the 31-year-old outfielder and the Sox emerging as the clear favorite. Now, it appears as though Ross will indeed be headed to Boston.

Mike Silverman says that the deal is for just one year, while Gordon Edes chips in with a figure of $3 million. It's a stiff pay cut for Ross, which seems about right given both Boston's situation and the current state of the market--the Mets were apparently not willing to go above $1 million.

Ross, a well-known masher of southpaws, will likely form a platoon with Ryan Sweeney in right field. A career .282/.349/.563 hitter against lefties, Ross' overall numbers are dragged down by a career spent in pitcher-friendly parks and an unhealthy diet of righties. A move to Fenway and a platoon with Ryan Sweeney could help him significantly, while his ability to not be completely useless against same-handed pitchers makes him a step up over the likes of Darnell McDonald.

The only question now is what the $3 million cost means for the Sox' quest for starting pitching? It seems unlikely that they would go to the lengths of trading their starting shortstop just to make an improvement to their platoon, and Edes says the Sox are still exploring all their options, so chances are we can just count this as a nice bonus when they eventually do fill the #4 spot.

Comment 141 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Saw this one coming, should have said something about it. I think we swoop in on Roy Oswalt within the next 24-48 hours (hopefully).

"SO LETS GET ON IN THIS BUS cause this is the year we are coming to KICK SOME #$^u%*$% GODZILLA IS COMING BE READY" - abayarde

by NJBillsfan on Jan 23, 2012 9:20 PM EST reply actions  

and then watch him as he collects his money while on the DL all year

by ebtek1 on Jan 24, 2012 8:35 AM EST up reply actions  

Pitching under 180 innings for the first time in a decade doesn’t exactly make him an assured season-long injury. It’s a big concern but to just assume it is going to happen is silly.

by The Name is Dalton on Jan 24, 2012 8:41 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah clearly he's spent his entire career injured

can’t ever stay off the DL. You can’t just avoid everyone who’s ever had an injury.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Reserving judgement until the dust settles at this point.

Seems like the Sox have moved around sideways a lot this offseason.

by JonnyJumpUp on Jan 23, 2012 9:21 PM EST reply actions  

Nice piece

But certainly hope/expect this to be followed up with another move for a starting pitcher

by CSimp on Jan 23, 2012 9:22 PM EST reply actions  

+1

This is just getting out of hand now. I love beefing up the role players. But damn, we need a SP!

Thanks Tito & Theo for 04 and 07.

by Fenway302 on Jan 23, 2012 9:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Opening Day is not tomorrow

They will likely sign or trade for a starter soon.

by Marc Normandin on Jan 23, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Have to think we're looking at a trade now right?

I mean, all these moves seem to be indicators that they are NOT going over the tax line, and latest calculations only had us a few million away after Scoot trade and before this signing.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 23, 2012 9:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Definitely could go that way

They could get about the same luxury tax value between Floyd and Ross as you could with Scutaro. Almost.

by South Coast Ghost on Jan 23, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that's right

there was a small bit of room to spare prior to trading Scutaro, so Floyd+Ross could come in right around that amont

by BobZupcic on Jan 23, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

A little over a million, I thought

Because of the extra cap hit Scutaro’s deal included. Speier said Scutaro’s 2012 was actually $7.67 million due to the oddity of his deal.

by Marc Normandin on Jan 23, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Floyd

Not to nitpick, but I think Floyd is $3.875M, right (15.5M / 4 yrs)? So if Ross is indeed $3M, those 2 will be just under $1M less than Scutaro.

by The Laser Show on Jan 23, 2012 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Well that's pretty good.

I can’t imagine anybody would rather have Scutaro than Floyd+Ross

by revived0103 on Jan 24, 2012 1:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Just mentioned on Twitter

(As did Tim Britton and Chris Mellen) that this probably means Floyd. Which is fine by me, as you folks know.

by Marc Normandin on Jan 23, 2012 9:42 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

I’m assuming that the starter comes soon, because they can’t seriously think that Eye-Roll followed by Terrible Pitcher Medley are legitimate options at the fourth and fifth spots.

Errrr… Can they?

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 23, 2012 9:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Come on.

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 23, 2012 9:43 PM EST up reply actions  

I'll agree, for us

but he’s certainly a good enough player to be worth that

by wolf9309 on Jan 23, 2012 9:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Don't know what year you are in

But nowadays where untility infielders like Jerry Hariston Jr can get 2 years, $6 million…this deal is very nice.

My Twitter @totheights

by totheights on Jan 23, 2012 10:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Except in context

Where it makes no sense.

Good moves in a bad context are no longer good.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 23, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly

it’s coming in the context of a Scutaro trade that at least seemed to suggest these marginal dollars were precious to the Sox.

Lots of things can be good value in the abstract but nevertheless represent suboptimal usage of finite resources.

by dennet on Jan 23, 2012 10:46 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

suboptimal usage of finite resources

New OTM tagline anyone?

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 23, 2012 10:51 PM EST up reply actions  

In fact, I'll take it a step further:

Incompetent depletion of finite resources.

John Lackey: Boston hates you
The Boston Red Sox business model: Incompetent depletion of finite resources.

by LesterJohn on Jan 23, 2012 11:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Ooh, ooh!

OTM: Two hands, one map, no ass discovered yet.

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 23, 2012 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Sure

Scutaro for Ross is a bad move
Scutaro for Ross + 4th starter is a great move.

Let’s wait until the whole situation plays out before we whine about something else.

I have been vocally against the Owners and their cheap ways this offseason, but take a step back for a second.

My Twitter @totheights

by totheights on Jan 23, 2012 11:00 PM EST up reply actions  

If you take a step back

The awful mural that is our offseason just becomes a terrible big ass painting, I still don’t want to look at it, but you didn’t order me to turn around, a step back didn’t make it look prettier though.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 23, 2012 11:05 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't quite understand this post...

… but for some reason it makes me think of the movie Event Horizon, with the role of Ben Cherington played by nude, fileted Sam Neil.

Do you see? DO YOU SEE?

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 23, 2012 11:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Ross.

Is an injury plagued season removed from being a 2 win (fWAR) player. He can play all three OF positions without embarrassing himself. Brings a strong platoon bat into the lineup when facing lefties.

Versus righties, not so great. But he’s not poor enough to offset the aforementioned.

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 23, 2012 9:47 PM EST reply actions  

Dammit

This should be a reply to the post above.

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 23, 2012 9:48 PM EST up reply actions  

these are all very good observations

I just don’t think “… and therefore the Sox should sign him for $3MM” should be appended to them.

by dennet on Jan 23, 2012 10:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Alright. Sure.

Your original indicated to me that he wasn’t “worth” $3MM as opposed to “the Red Sox shouldn’t sign him for $3MM.”

I still disagree, but there’s more room for disagreement there.

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 23, 2012 11:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Fair price, but

I’d assume Roy Oswalt is off. By my calculations (which might be entirely wrong) the Sox now have about 5-6 million left to spend. Maybe Oswalt takes this, but maybe not.

If Floyd becomes the only option, even Kenny Williams will recognize that he has a strong negotiating position and can demand a great return for Floyd.

But I can say one thing for sure: Ross + Aviles < DMac/Lin + Scutaro.

John Lackey: Boston hates you

by LesterJohn on Jan 23, 2012 9:53 PM EST reply actions  

Have to assume Crawford surgery prompted this move

I haven’t crunched numbers, but Ross can fill Crawford’s place easily for the short term, and this cheap platoon with Sweeney is brilliant.

As everyone seems to be saying though, if Roy signs elsewhere, this plan could look like a bust. Trading for Floyd is still an option, but Boston needs to keep some depth here.

Rays are still a trade option easily forgotten. Not saying I have answers, but Tampa Bay has 8 starting pitchers.

by d.russ on Jan 23, 2012 10:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

But Oswalt may not fit into the budget at this point.

Then, as I said, the White Sox can demand a king’s ransom because the FA/Trade markets are essentially dry for the Red Sox. TB wouldn’t trade with Boston, as it would greatly hurt their own division chances.

Basically, the order in which we did things may have ended up screwing us.

John Lackey: Boston hates you

by LesterJohn on Jan 23, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe, but

The White Sox want to move Floyd as much as Boston wants him. They are real short on prospects, and haven’t had much luck finding a fit all winter.

by Marc Normandin on Jan 23, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

But their negotiating position will allow them to demad so much for Floyd.

They will have a nice choice of prospects if they so choose. Even if they don’t ship him now, the market for him mid-season would likely still be good. The Sox (the red ones) are much more desperate for starting pitching, and Floyd may literally be the only one to fit their plan. Maybe I’m overestimating Kenny Williams, but any rational GM would realize the return he could get from the Red Sox at this point.

John Lackey: Boston hates you

by LesterJohn on Jan 23, 2012 10:10 PM EST up reply actions  

any rational GM

Kenny Williams is many things. Sometimes genius, sometimes lunatic. But never rational.

by wolf9309 on Jan 23, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

this more than anything

is why I think the Floyd trade is a fit for the Sox. Sure, there’s the salary, sure there’s the White Sox need for prospects. But #1 is the fact that Kenny Williams is the GM and this may present a reasonable trade opportunity for the Sox.

If this was Kenny Williams (2005) I might say Floyd is too expensive in terms of prospects to be worth trading for.

by dennet on Jan 23, 2012 10:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I have to agree, the order here is really screwy

It could be that a. Oswalt said no, or b. deal with Oswalt already pending physical and signed, and we just heard about Ross first?

Also, I bet Sox could gut TB for two pitchers for Lavarnway. Not saying sox want to do that, but it’s very possible

by d.russ on Jan 24, 2012 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't think so

TB is a division rival. Any trade to us would have to be an overpay compared to other teams. There would be no gutting of TB. Lavarnway’s future as an actual catcher is still undecided at this point, so it would likely take more than him just to get ONE of their Major League ready starters and that’s all we would really be interested in.

Tampa needs offense in theory and has a surplus of pitching, but sending it within the division would be counterproductive unless they were getting an absolutely awesome offer.

by The Name is Dalton on Jan 24, 2012 9:01 AM EST up reply actions  

The Franchise

I watched the Showtime series “The Franchise” this past season (pretty awesome show btw), which was focused on SF. Ross definitely came across as a very down-to-earth & likeable player.

by The Laser Show on Jan 23, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Edgar Renteria...

…was World Series MVP that season. Ross might have been LCS MVP.

by UltimateCranston on Jan 24, 2012 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup. I think you're right. LCS.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Luxury Tax for 2013.

I think this is really about getting under the luxury tax, which would mean paying 17% on next year’s overage instead of 42%. If not getting Oswalt this year means we can get Greinke next year, I’m all for that.

This is a 90-win team that, with some tweaks at the edges and better health, is a contender for the division and the favorite for a wild card spot. These moves could be about “settling” for a 93-win team on paper in return for getting a true ace next year.

by abbreviatedman on Jan 23, 2012 10:24 PM EST reply actions  

???????

No comprende. The only pressure cookers in Milwaukee involve sausage.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 23, 2012 10:29 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, I read it

But there is more baggage for Greinke, and a questionable track record, which would make me seriously leery. Especially coming off of the Crawford Disaster.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 23, 2012 10:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd go Brandon McCarthy.

He won’t be cheap, but he is a very good pitcher, and he appears to be very undervalued at the moment.

John Lackey: Boston hates you

by LesterJohn on Jan 23, 2012 10:45 PM EST up reply actions  

He seems like a nice enough guy

He posts on a LSU message board I frequent.

by jcorye1 on Jan 24, 2012 7:18 AM EST up reply actions  

If you wish to equate MIL with the AL East

By all means continue… but I’m not sure many would agree.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 23, 2012 10:41 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't

I wish to equate statements that Greinke can’t deal with increased pressure with statements that Greinke can’t deal with increased pressure.

It’s not proof-positive he would be A-OK in the AL East, I don’t think anything is. It’s just something to keep in mind.

by dennet on Jan 23, 2012 10:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/630660-milwaukee-brewers-trading-for-zack-greinke-is-already-looking-like-a-mistake#

“The other factor to consider in any trade for Greinke was his mental makeup. Greinke’s well-documented battles with social anxiety disorder and depression caused many to speculate he wouldn’t be able to handle pitching in a large market, like New York, or for a contending team.”

by dennet on Jan 23, 2012 10:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Thanks

Surprised to see Milwaukee labeled as a high pressure place even on a potential contender.

by The Name is Dalton on Jan 23, 2012 11:08 PM EST up reply actions  

This.

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 24, 2012 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

That's

what’s known as armchair psychiatry, right there.

We have no idea whether Greinke’s anxiety would cause problems in Boston. It’s easy to point to people who have failed in Boston and call it “east coast pressure”, but it’s far simpler and cleaner (very Occam) to posit that they failed because they had a poor year or were hurting.

Greinke meets the park’s requirements (RH GB pitcher) much better than Hamels or Cain, and I care about that fit a lot more than “can he handle the Boston spotlight,” which is always overblown, in my opinion.

by abbreviatedman on Jan 23, 2012 10:55 PM EST up reply actions  

So is assuming why that's the only reason he would fail

He has been a good, not a great pitcher, but will command great pitcher money. Meanwhile, he has an anxiety disorder, which does not just up and go away, even with treatment.

There are many red flags, so I want nothing to do with him.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 23, 2012 10:57 PM EST up reply actions  

If you think Greinke has only been good, not great

then your definition of “great” is “HOF”.

Top Ten in Pitcher WAR the last three years:

Halladay 22.2
Verlander 21.7
Lee 20.5
Sabathia 18.8
Hernandez 18.5
Greinke 18.4
Lincecum 17.3
Haren 16,8
Jimenez 15.8
Lester 15.8

by abbreviatedman on Jan 23, 2012 11:28 PM EST up reply actions  

fWAR, rWAR

Not to devalue Greinke at all, but while FIP is currently the most accurate ERA estimator (short of xFIP), it’s not reality.

Reality lies somewhere between ERA and FIP. While one metric places him 6th, the other finds him 14th over the period.

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 23, 2012 11:44 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm a big believer in FIP.

ERA measures the runs someone gives up in reality (well, sort of… it doesn’t count unearned runs, which are seriously convoluted), but it ignores team defense, ballpark effects, and the help (or hurt) given by the team’s bullpen. Those are things that happen in reality too, and they affect ERA while having nothing whatsoever to do with the pitcher’s quality.

If you want to say he’s been somewhere between the 6th best and 14th best over the last three years, though, that’s good enough for me!

by abbreviatedman on Jan 23, 2012 11:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Not pitching in front of Yuniesky...

…will likely help Greinke’s FIP and ERA come closer together.

by UltimateCranston on Jan 24, 2012 8:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Not sure I would look at WAR

probably more interested in ERA+

"There's something out there, beyond the horizon in the corner of your eye. I'm going to find out what it is."
-Thomas Solomon, Gentleman Adventurer.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 24, 2012 7:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Umm. No?

ERA+ over the three year period tells us less than WAR.

Can you explain why you think it’s more appropriate?

Twitter: @Greenlineoutfit

by John Leary on Jan 25, 2012 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm ordering Cherington's gorilla suit now.

"There's something out there, beyond the horizon in the corner of your eye. I'm going to find out what it is."
-Thomas Solomon, Gentleman Adventurer.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 23, 2012 10:56 PM EST reply actions  

What am I missing here?

We are going over the cap this year but cutting payroll to remain under in 2013? What stops us from signing a 8mil one yr deal thats off the books next year? I feel stupid but im missing it.

by AZredsoxfan on Jan 23, 2012 11:03 PM EST reply actions  

If we go over the cap this year we pay 40 something percent tax the next

and the free agent class for that year is very promising. So we are definetly going over the tax next year, but we dont want to pay 40 somthing percent tax when we can pay just 17%

"I don't put any foreign substances on the baseball. Everything I use is from the good old U.S.A."

JVSM

Pedroya Lova

by Dustin's #1 Fan on Jan 23, 2012 11:33 PM EST up reply actions  

50, I believe.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 24, 2012 12:16 AM EST up reply actions  

Yep, it goes 17.5, 30, 40, then 50

for the four consecutive years in which we hypothetically go over the luxury tax.

John Lackey: Boston hates you
The Boston Red Sox business model: Incompetent depletion of finite resources.

by LesterJohn on Jan 24, 2012 12:27 AM EST up reply actions  

Ok, I stupidly assumed

that it was the AAV of they current year dictated the tax without looking. but didn’t someone say that we are going over with arbitration salaries anyhow?

by AZredsoxfan on Jan 24, 2012 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Highly unlikely

Pre-Scutaro trade, the Sox likely had anywhere from 1 to 2 million to work with, depending on arb cases. We unloaded Scutaro’s 6 mil plus a cap hit of about 1.5, so we unloaded 7.5 there (weird clause, I know). Then, we signed Ross for 3, so by my math we are sitting at around 5.5 to 6.5 million dollars.

My concern is that Oswalt may not want that, unless there were HEAVY incentives on it, which will make us desperate for Floyd, which even Kenny Williams will understand. I’d guess we overpay for Floyd and give up one of the top 3 prospects (Bogaerts, Middlebrooks, Lavarnway) as a centerpiece.

John Lackey: Boston hates you
The Boston Red Sox business model: Incompetent depletion of finite resources.
December 8, 2010: Theo reaches the peak of stupidity

by LesterJohn on Jan 24, 2012 2:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd say it all hinges on Papi

which means they have to make up their minds about how much they care before arb hearings. Probably, if they win the case, they have an extra couple million, and if he wins, we’re already over by a decent bit.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

And frankly, by the end of the year

I can’t imagine a situation in which we don’t go over.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

And if we're over

throw money at Oswalt and anyone else, @#$%.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 10:58 AM EST up reply actions  

plus, and most importantly,

that’d mean that I win BZ’s pick 5. Cuz we gotta have priorities.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

If we are over the LuxTax

sign ’em both.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 12:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's what I would try to offer if we're worried about the luxury tax for Jackson

offer him a 3 year, $20 million dollar deal that pays him $8 million this year, $8 million next year, and $4 million the year after that, but let him opt out after either of the first two years. it would keep his luxury tax cost very low and there’s a decent chance he wouldn’t opt out after year 1 because next year’s pitching market is so strong.

I don’t know what people are offering moneywise, but that sounds like a plan that would be very beneficial for both sides.

Oswalt is a better pitcher, but I really think that Jackson is undervalued and would be a great asset.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 12:26 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm pretty desperate for warm bodies.

I’m convinced.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

If we're over, sign both ...

… and invent a time machine and un-trade Scoot.

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 24, 2012 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah!

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 1:01 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed.

Especially the @#$% bit.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

Papi

submitted 16+ for his aritration case. While I think that is too high the Red Sox were way low with what they offered. I read somewhere if it goes to the arb board/panel the outcome will be one of those two numbers. That would be an extra 3m than what everyone is figuring on him making. Thus an extra 3m towards the tax. I kow we have settled with everyone for years before it went to arb panel but Papi could well hold out and win this one.

by ThoughtsAndSox on Jan 24, 2012 10:18 AM EST up reply actions  

well I think most estimates were saying $14-$15 million

it’ll be an interesting case, and I DO think it’ll go to arbitration. I think that both sides submitted awful numbers, but ultimately, I think the Sox can make a much stronger case for a 36-year old DH to get a small raise rather than a freakin 32% one.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 10:28 AM EST up reply actions  

Does anybody know

which side the arb panel sides with more?

Quantum Woodworking: Hand crafted pens, bottle stoppers, bowls and more.
Check out our blog

by brogshan on Jan 24, 2012 2:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it tends to be about 50-50

there’s not one particular arbitration panel and different teams and agents are differently good at making arguments. If I recall, in the last two years, it’s been 2-1 players, but I really think it’s situation dependent.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 3:31 PM EST up reply actions  

...which was a needle prick

Compared to the massive knife gouge in our side our rotation is that the “doctor” in this situation has so far been able to ignore doing anything substantial about besides hand us a couple aspirin. and crossing his fingers.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 23, 2012 11:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Like I said

A needle prick against the knife wound that is the hole in our rotation. The offense made due just fine with Reddick, the rotation will not make due as it stands right now.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 24, 2012 12:46 AM EST up reply actions  

I liked Reddick.

But Bailey could be a dominating reliever for us, something we happen to have lost just now. He’s a higher upside player than Reddick. So now we have a decent looking RF and some good relief pitching.

Remember 2010? Having a shitty bullpen is a NIGHTMARE.

by revived0103 on Jan 24, 2012 1:37 AM EST up reply actions  

We wouldn't expect a shitty bullpen anchored by Bard and Melancon either.

And a bullpen can only be as good as the rotation they back, even Mariano Rivera would be a waste at $5M with the rotation the way it’s configured and I’m not exactly sold that there will be any further additions to it.

And currently, I’m not even sure, all things considered that we’ve actually improved RF in a cost effective manner either. Reddick was $400K and with his defense considered was probably at least a 3 WAR player over a season and he was replaced by two players, Ross and Sweeney who were combined to be worth 1 WAR last season, and 3.2 the year before and with a total cost of $4.75M, $4.35M more than Reddick would have cost and maybe they will be worth 1 WAR more, maybe. As I’ve said, I think he’s just moving dirt around.

I am Sandy's bitch.

Joseph Vincent Paterno 12/21/26 - 1/22/12 RIP Coach
Penn State Forever

by Rogue Nine on Jan 24, 2012 1:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Of course,

I won’t support the Ross signing at all if we don’t get another starter.

by revived0103 on Jan 24, 2012 2:39 AM EST up reply actions  

So, we just all going to ignore

How awful Ross was against lefties last year? And hopefully somebody will realize this is not a strong platoon in RF.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 24, 2012 12:33 AM EST reply actions  

94 PAs

is not in the slightest bit predictive.

by abbreviatedman on Jan 24, 2012 12:58 AM EST up reply actions  

What about the career .323 OBP?

That predictive of anything?

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 24, 2012 1:04 AM EST up reply actions  

You know the new Sox rule...

… the “small” in small sample size now stands for “small help to my argument.”

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 24, 2012 1:16 AM EST up reply actions  

I'm generally not pleased with his OBP over the career

Even understanding it’s better against lefties.

And when we’re bringing someone in (theoretically) solely to hit lefties, it would be nice if he had done so well in the last season.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 24, 2012 8:33 AM EST up reply actions  

I really think he is going to look effective

and it may be a product of Fenway, but should work for us.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:57 AM EST up reply actions  

or the career .349 against lefties?

look, if you want to not like the signing, there are plenty of stats to justify either liking or not liking someone. His career .323 OBP isn’t predictive of anything if he’s primarily used as a platoon player- which he hasn’t been in the past.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:50 AM EST up reply actions  

He's a very particular type of player

generally low BA, relatively low OBP even though he walks, and some pop. I think it’s a curious move, but I think there are some reasons to be a little leery.

My guess is we won’t even notice he’s there when the season hits, which I guess is fine.

Everything Must Go.

by Sean O on Jan 24, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah, definitely, I don't think he's going to seem like a huge cog in the team

except maybe on NESN or whatever, because reporters/media love him. But yeah, I doubt he’ll contribute a ton playing-wise; he’s basically a complementary role player who can play every day if we’re desperate and be better than, say, Daniel Nava. And this is definitely stupid if it precludes us from improving the rotation. I’d just like to think that a room full of people who spend their lives in baseball wouldn’t make this move if that were the case.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 10:10 AM EST up reply actions  

They probably prefer Floyd to Oswalt.

Younger, under control longer at a lower price, healthier.

by revived0103 on Jan 24, 2012 1:21 AM EST reply actions  

Sounds good, but

I would have liked them to get a SP or a SS before depth in the outfield. Crawford must have been a reason for this.

by EchoDanno on Jan 24, 2012 7:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I find myself unable to react

I am merely holding my breath.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 5:34 AM EST reply actions  

I hope not literally

I wouldn’t want you to pass out, since this is the team we’re going into the season with.

"There's something out there, beyond the horizon in the corner of your eye. I'm going to find out what it is."
-Thomas Solomon, Gentleman Adventurer.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 24, 2012 7:19 AM EST up reply actions  

oh please

there’s not even a remote reason to believe that. I understand a lot of the negativity, but that’s just being negative for the sake of being negative. All reports are that they’re still working hard on pitching.

by wolf9309 on Jan 24, 2012 9:58 AM EST up reply actions  

We'll see

We’ve been “working hard on pitching” since November with nothing to show for it except Aaron Cook and Vicente Padilla

"There's something out there, beyond the horizon in the corner of your eye. I'm going to find out what it is."
-Thomas Solomon, Gentleman Adventurer.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 24, 2012 10:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, they're pitchers

Maybe next time we should be more specific besides “Better than Lackey in 2011”

by South Coast Ghost on Jan 24, 2012 10:12 AM EST up reply actions  

John Lackey has a case to be the best pitcher in baseball in 2012

after all, he’s got a 0 ERA

"There's something out there, beyond the horizon in the corner of your eye. I'm going to find out what it is."
-Thomas Solomon, Gentleman Adventurer.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 24, 2012 10:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Still...

… even a week is a long time to hold your breath. It you end up with brain damage, you’ll have to start posting on DRays Bay or something.

The Year of Extreme Opinions
BLAAAAAAARGH OMFG SIGN STARTERS!!
I apologize if this post has offended you in any way. Please retroactively ignore it. Thank you for your consideration.

by nuthinboutnuthin on Jan 24, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Wuh......buh........

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven

by Bloggy on Jan 24, 2012 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi