Homer, Homer, Homer, Homer: Four Longballs Give Sox Series Win Against Rangers
So, yeah, there was this little matter of a baseball game last night between the Red Sox and the Rangers. For the Sox, it was an opportunity to push the Rays back another game in the Wild Card race. Had the Oakland Athletics not laid a gigantic egg (three grand slams, guys? REALLY?), it would have been an opportunity to open up a two-game lead against New York, but sadly they had to settle for maintaining a one-game cushion. However, with Andrew Miller on the mound, the expectation was that offense was going to be needed—and perhaps quite a lot of it.
Alexi Ogando's night, at least early on, was looking a lot like a "Three True Outcomes" kind of night: Jacoby Ellsbury struck out to open the game, followed by a sharp lineout by Jed Lowrie. However, Ogando was not nearly so lucky against batter number three—Adrian Gonzalez. Gonzalez, who has rediscovered his power stroke in Arlington, hit his fourth homer of the series, giving the Red Sox a 1-0 lead, and providing all the offense they would need that night.
At this point, you're probably scratching your head saying, "What? A shutout? With Miller on the mound?" Well, yes, that's neither a typo nor a cruel hoax being perpetrated by yours truly. Miller pitched a heck of a game: 6.1 innings of three-hit ball (all singles, by the way), allowing just two free passes against six strikeouts, and all of this on just 83 pitches.
There was a little trouble, however, as the Rangers threatened to put some runs on the board in the third, following a walk to Craig Gentry and an infield single by Ian Kinsler. However, the threat was quickly snuffed by a 5-4-3 double play. The other double play of the night came courtesy of a 2-6 combo. Once again, this is not, in fact, a typo or a hoax. The Sox actually pulled off a strike 'em out, throw 'em out! An actual baserunner was thrown out by a Sox catcher! So, perhaps this is the wacky world we find ourselves in post-"MEGAQUAKE." But we'll certainly enjoy the ride while it lasts!
So, yeah, the Rangers managed to get nothing done offensively, but the same could not be said for the Sox offense. Tonight, however, all of the damage was done via the longball. Following Gonzalez's homer in the first, David Ortiz followed up with a solo homer of his own to start the second inning. In the third inning, the Sox would add two more to the scoreboard following a Lowrie walk and another homer by Gonzalez. One of the fans of that second swing, that measured in at 448 feet? One Dustin Pedroia: "What’s it’s like? It’s awesome. It’s beautiful. I like home runs," he said, according to Peter Abraham. (Dear Adrian: Please keep the home run streak going for another, oh, 60 games or so? Thanks! —lone1c)
The remaining runs were courtesy of Jarrod Saltalamacchia, who drove in Carl Crawford (again, not a typo). Ogando's four-inning night was not a good one: six earned runs, five Soxers K'd, four home runs, three French hens, two turtle doves, and a walk to the Sox's 3B. (I'm sorry. It had to be done.)
After the starters' departures, both bullpens put in yeomans' efforts, holding both sides scoreless—Scott Feldman for four innings and Mike Adams for one inning for the Rangers, and 2.2 hitless innings by Alfredo Aceves and Dan Wheeler for the Sox.
All in all, this was a very productive road trip by any measure. Going 6-2 on the road, particularly with three strong wins against a team that is a potential playoff opponent? Always a good thing. Always. And doing it against a team that has given the Sox fits in recent years? All the better.
Now it's back to Fenway. With Sunday's game smashed into Saturday courtesy of Irene (which sounds more like it should be the name of a spurned paramour of Harry Frazee than a deadly storm), we'll have yet another (potential) round of Death by Baseball this weekend, as the Sox take on the A's, and Wakefield continues on for another shot at you-know-what-that-I-won't-say-to-avoid-any-possible-jinxing.
49 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's INCONCEIVABLE.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
Frankly,
I’m offended that ANY stat exist that says Andrew Miller is successful 85.7% of the time.
"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez
The Sox are 9-1 in games started by Miller
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Aug 26, 2011 7:15 AM EDT up reply actions
He should be the ALDS Game 1 Starter
Twitter | "Almost every organization has a guy like Papelbon or Lester" - Dave Cameron 12/29/2005
Exactly
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Aug 26, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions
Another Solid Outing
Great to see Miller show his stuff. Big win against a true contender. Of course a modern day murderers row never hurt a pitchers numbers. Go SOX!!!
by xsquid on Aug 26, 2011 5:27 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
Grand slams
If those three home runs happened with the bases empty, would you still think the A’s laid a gigantic egg?
Granted the baserunners still had to reach base to set up the grand slam, but a grand slam is just a home run that occurs when three men are on base. Does a bases-loaded walk get overblown in comparison to a walk with the bases empty?
No it doesnt. And neither should a grand slam.
by Z10 on Aug 26, 2011 5:31 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
It's not the slams in and of themselves
But the complete implosion of the bullpen implied by giving up three slams.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
by lone1c on Aug 26, 2011 6:25 AM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
If you can't tip your hat here, when can you?
It always pains me to praise anything the MFY do right, but they cleared the bags after getting them full, repeatedly. And did so after being down 7-1 early in the game. I hope we can do battle with that offensive offense in the ALCS. And win, of course.
by Zagz on Aug 26, 2011 6:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
+1
Now, I must go vomit.
"Laser show. So relax."
The first rule of Lookout Landing is you don't talk about Lookout Landing.
by nuthinboutnuthin on Aug 26, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
It is a failure of strategy.
This is fundamental baseball – and even MORE so when you are pitching from a multi-run lead.
You do NOT give the hitter anything to drive with the bases loaded. You nibble, hoping he’ll fish and if you walk him – so f’ing what?
The A’s were up 7-2 with 1 out in the bottom of the 5th. Nibble outside the zone to see if Cano will reach for something. If you walk him, it’s 7-3 and you see if you can get a double-play out of Swisher. If you walk in another, its 7-4 and you try with Martin. And so on.
You don’t throw an 86 mph splitter anywhere near the plate when the bases are loaded.
Hell, the FIRST pitch of that AB was even MORE inexcusable than the one Cano crushed.
And for this to happen THREE times in a game? Inexcusable.
The A’s manager should be ripped for this.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
To be fair, they did lose their pitching coach during the offseason.
What was his name again? . . .
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
"Does a bases-loaded walk get overblown in comparison to a walk with the bases empty?"
…Yes?
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Aug 26, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
Rays?
“For the Sox, it was an opportunity to push the Rays back another game in the Wild Card race.”
I’m not really sure what this line is supposed to mean. A game between two division leaders has no effect on the wild card race. And wouldn’t it be preferable for the sunshine state-boys to sneak up and take the WC from the Stinkees?
It's hard to one-up your rivals 22 runs and 3 Grand Slams...
but it certainly feels like 6.1 innings of 3 hit ball out of Miller and 4 home runs, 2 by Gonzo ended up being a better day.
And, of course, the guy who looked to be tracking as their #2 starter got blown up, again.
It is so funny to hear Michael Kay and the rest
giggle about Bedard and the Sox “rotation questions.” Hmm-let me see:
A)CC-awesome.
B)Hughes-totally unreliable.
C)Colon-wheels starting to fall off.
D)AJ-worse than Lackey
E)Nova-2 pitch pitcher who only seems to feast on crap teams that swing at sliders that bounce 58 feet from the mound.
F)Garcia-would you trust him?
You heard that too?
That was insane. Like they have a clue of how Bedard has pitched. I bet they look at his win loss record and go off of that.
Like I said yesterday, Bedard has been very good and I guarantee you that Kay and the rest of them would take Bedard over Hughes or AJ “Gas Can” Burnett.
A few weeks ago, they had 6 starters.
now, even their #1 continues to “struggle” (relative).
A few weeks ago, the Sox had 2 starters. Now, I feel like there are three guys capable of claiming that third spot with an outside chance that Clay could work his way into the discussion by Oct 1.
Don't think so on Clay
If he comes back it’ll be as a bullpen arm, he won’t be stretched out enough to start games
Garcia...
I have a feeling the Red Sox medical staff would pronounce him “completely healthy and prepared to pitch effectively deep into games.”
"Laser show. So relax."
The first rule of Lookout Landing is you don't talk about Lookout Landing.
by nuthinboutnuthin on Aug 26, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Miller time!?
I thought Miller looked pretty good. If he could just be consistent and do that more often. Why only 83 pitches? Do they feel he’s not fully stretched out after being in the bullpen/limbo? My question: if Miller gets another few starts and pitches like he did against Texas, does he deserve a spot in the playoff rotation? Tough decisions, but better too much pitching.
And I’m glad to see A-Gon has returned from his extended home run-less vacation he took after the All Star Break.
"It's baseball...when you rake that's what happens" -Dustin Pedroia
by Fenway302 on Aug 26, 2011 8:27 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
The pitch count is almost certainly due to inactivity
He was idle besides some bullpen work for several weeks before being called up. Putting him in for longer might be detrimental. But if they continue to use a six-ma rotation, then it stands to reason that he’d be able to go a little bit longer in future starts, if needed.
As for whether he belongs in a playoff rotation, the question is: does he overtake Bedard and Wakefield? At this point, I’d probably lean a bit toward Bedard. But if Miller keeps putting up starts like yesterday’s, it’s a tougher argument.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
Overtake Bedard?
to me Bedard is our clear #3-ahead of Lackey. Hell-if healthy I am not even sure if Bedard is that far off, if at all, from Lester/Beckett. Miller would compete with Wake, and may be better than Wake but that is for 5th-which will not really figure in the playoffs. He will not and should not (in my opinion) even be discussed w/Bedard.
Miller is a very funny pitcher-you can see early if he will be awful or good and it almost seems either-or. Last night I could see early that he was hitting the corners with a lot of sweep on his fastball with good velocity and had a good curve to match. When he has been bad he looks totally different. It is so funny to see a professional at this level and age still be that all over the place.
I agree
That it would be between Miller and Wake. Bedard has pitched well enough to be above them.
Quantum Woodworking: Hand crafted pens, bottle stoppers, bowls and more.
Check out our blog
I'm not talking about the starting rotation—just the playoff rotation
When you drop to a four-man rota instead of five or six.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
The only way Miller makes a playoff start is if ther are injuries
If he pitches well, Miller may get the nod over Wake on the playoff roster. But he’d be a long man out of the pen, not a starter.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Aug 26, 2011 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Concur.
‘Nice to have him developing into quality emergency depth, but hopefully we don’t need to go there.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
The one benefit of having so many somewhat stretched-out pitchers
The Sox won’t lack for long relievers during the playoffs.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
I believe money talks here.
Perhaps Lackey is skipped over for a DS rotation. But when it comes time for a CS or WS rotation, you have to figure he’s going to be at worst the #4, and possibly used as the #3. There’s no way that the Sox are going to be able to justify putting someone in whom they’ve invested an obscene amount of money in the bullpen—not without creating a firestorm of controversy when they don’t need it.
With respect to Miller’s “pitching schizophrenia,” it’s odd, but it’s not unheard of—we’d sort of see it with Buchholz, and the Yankees are seeing it somewhat with Hughes. At his age, it might be a rarity, but clearly the potential is there, and we’re starting to see that.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
I think
Bedard will be 3 and Lackey 4…but we will see. They indeed may switch them-but from a pitching standpoint Bedard is far superior. In his very small sample on the Sox he has a 2.95 FIP and a 2.97 xFIP and has had a ton of shit luck results-wise. he is a career 3.64 FIP pitcher who Ks 8.75/9!
Buchholz schizophrenia is different-it is more just simple command which is more common (and indeed his mechanics come and go) and Hughes has had injury issues so who knows. But even Millers velocity-for a healthy guy-is SO all over the place.
If Lackey is a liability at season's end,
I could see the Sox DLing him In order to avoid having to deal with bruised egos. But barring that, it’s his spot to lose.
(On Miller’s velocity: can the wildness in delivery speeds help? If people don’t know what to “sit” on, it’s harder to hit, right? So long as you can pinpoint—which appears to be Miller’s Achilles heel—I can’t see how speed variation doesn’t help at least a bit.)
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
I disagree
The Giants didn’t put Zito on their playoffs roster last year: It will be Beckett, Lester then Bedard (if healthy of course) then Lackey…
We’re talking about Theo here ;)
Twitter | "Almost every organization has a guy like Papelbon or Lester" - Dave Cameron 12/29/2005
I don't think Miller's problem is velocity.
It’s his leg kick. When he gets it up and step-plants with authority, he pounds it in the zone. When he gets lazy and doesn’t start it up aggressively and just sorta ‘steps casually’ into his pitch, his pitches float up and out.
You could even see that last night on the couple of times he walked guys. I made a point of watching for this. He lost his focus and his leg mechanics drifted. The awesome thing is that he regained his focus and corrected himself.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
I'd have to agree
When healthy, Bedard is among the top pitchers in the league, his talent is unquestioned, it’s that damn ‘staying healthy’ part that kill his value year in and year out. If he’s healthy in the playoffs, he starts at #3 in the playoffs bearing a very solid run by Lackey over the last few weeks here.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
I would love Theo
to try to see if Bedard would sign an incentive-laden short term contract with the Sox. Lester, Beckett, Bedard, Buchholz, Lackey…yum!
I was thinking the same thing since his 2nd start :)
I just love Lefties who pound the strike zone!
Twitter | "Almost every organization has a guy like Papelbon or Lester" - Dave Cameron 12/29/2005
Wakefields 200
What are the odds of Tito yanking Wake for Fat Albers, the 95 mile per hour batting practice machine, in the middle innings of a one run game tonight?
Hopefully slim to none.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
Won't happen.
They’ve been going out of there way to make sure Wake gets his win, I think they recognize that Albers in a tight game, especially a tight potential win #200, isn’t a good idea now that they’ve burnt him out this year. He needs to hit the DL and comeback for playoffs with some rest. He’s truly been a revelation this year and deserves a break.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Crawford Batting 6th
Feels like Tito’s Ego is getting the better of him. Feels like he is wadding into a cold pool versus taking what Karl Popper professed, “A Leap of Faith”. Lets move the square peg from the round hole to the oval one.
Oh by the Ellsbury sniffers, he was 0 for last night and has absolutelty no chance of being named MVP of the American League this season , other than in Boston. A. Gonzales is the only player who has not only a good chance but a great chance. Two person race between he and Granderson for MVP. Merely a microcosom of the Sox, Yankees division race.
So where to start here.
Well let’s see, first off, Ellsbury being 0 fer in a game has no bearing on his MVP running, he is VERY much a candidate. I would say that Gonzalez, Pedrioa and Ellsbury all have equal claim from the Sox right now. Pedroia is hitting better than his MVP year and fielding better than anyone. Gonzalez is hot again after a long power slump and Ellsbury is having an incredible offensive season in his own right. Ultimately, MVP will come down to Granderson and Bautista and will rather be a microcosm of the MVP discussion as to whether the MVP has to be on a competing team. If one of those 5 players gets way hotter than the others though over the next few weeks that’s where the MVP is going, a Verlander perfect game could also shift the race.
As for Crawford’s place in the lineup, he works fine where he is. He’s only just now beginning to show life after sucking for so long. I can’t mess with the top of the lineup, Ells, Pedey, Gonzo, Youk, Ortiz is a murderers row in it’s own right, tossing Crawford up there might kill chemistry. Could move him down, but he’s showing life and he could use confidence, 6th is a perfect spot for him.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Erm, Pedroia and Bautista have horses in the race, too.
Again, the writers are starting to look beyond batting stats in determining MVP. If that’s the case, then you can’t leave Pedroia out, and I’d argue Ellsbury has to get a look (though I agree that he’s unlikely to win). Bautista has had the best bat in baseball this year—so he has to be in, even if you don’t think someone on a non-playoff team should be a contender. Basically, what happens in September will determine who wins the AL MVP. If one of those guys goes on a hot streak, it will make probably decide things.
As for Crawford, I’m not a huge fan of putting him directly behind Ortiz, only because it makes it harder for Crawford to be a threat on the basepaths. But clearly it’s better if he isn’t being asked to produce as if he were at the top of the lineup.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
Pedroia likely won't finish better than 6th.
Gonzo/Ells/Granderson/Bautista are near locks to finish higher in the voting than Pedey. Miggy Cabrera is probably pretty close. If Verlander finishes up at the same pace, he will get some votes. And, I know it’s painful, most people still see Cano as the superior player to Pedroia.
Sure, the writers are looking at more advanced metrics….or at least they did once, when there was no clear Cy Young guy. But I don’t think Pedey gets serious consideration since you need to use advance metrics to even get him in the conversation. Look at that list, there are 6 position players with distinct advantages with regards to the Triple Crown stats to Pedroia, and none of them are seen as a (minus) defender. Well, maybe Cabrera, but he won’t win. He will just end up with more votes than Pedey.
Yes, Pedey has better stats than his MVP year, but this is totally different competition. There are a full handful of guys that are ahead of him.
This doesn’t even consider the Red Sox vote splitting, which will happen because nobody is sure who the MVP of this team is.
The Red Sox vote splitting is the probable killer.
Right now, it’s hard for me not to give the nod to Joey Bats.
For what it’s worth, here are the current fWar rankings:
Bautista 7.8
Pedroia 6.9
Ellsbury 6.6
Granderson 6.2
Zobrist 6.1
Gonzalez 5.7
Based on WAR, JB has jumped out to a huge lead based on Pedey’s being relatively ‘quiet’ this last week or two.
Zobrist has just as much right to being in the discussion as anybody – his WAR is up there and he’s on a contender.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
Vote split will definitely kill 'em.
Gonzalez / Granderson get traditionalist votes that include team results
Bautista gets traditionalist votes that don’t
Ellsbury/Pedroia get new-school votes that include team results
Bautista gets new-school votes that don’t.
I’d say the first and fourth groups are biggest, with Ells and Pedroia’s being the smallest.
Likely outcome might be
Bautista
Granderson
Ellsbury
Gonzalez
Pedroia
Or something like that.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Aug 26, 2011 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Dear Lords of Baseball,
All I want for October is for Adrian Gonzalez to get hot during the postseason. That’s it. Thanks.
Hrmmm.... I'm greedy. I want ALL the Red Sox players to get hot from now _through_ the post season ....
‘Just sayin’ …
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by 




























