False Start: Andrew Miller's Implosion Leaves Questions About Red Sox Rotation
So by now, the great majority of you all will know that the Sox fell to the Rays last night, 9-6.
You may also know the basic facts of the game:
- Andrew Miller was terrible, allowing seven earned runs in under three innings
- Dan Wheeler sealed the Sox' fate by giving up two more in the sixth
- Which is really unfortunate, because the Sox would end up with six runs, scoring all but one of them via four long balls.
Long story short, it was one of those terrible games which was always too close to really give up hope on, but too far out for the Sox to ever really threaten.
In the end, though, it was just one game, and with the Yankees losing as well, it didn't even cost the Sox a game against their primary competition.
So with that in mind, I wonder if perhaps the game's true significance is not found in the standings, but in what it may have done to turn Theo Epstein's opinion of what needs to be done before the month is out.
The Sox said not all that long ago that the team's priority at the trade deadline would be a right-handed outfield bat, hoping to improve the starting rotation from withing. Well, the Sox just took on one of the best lefties in the game, and put up a solid six runs against him and the bullpen. In fact, as a team, the Red Sox are fourth best in the game against left-handed pitching, with a .352 wOBA powered by huge contributions from Dustin Pedroia, Kevin Youkilis, and--of all people--David Ortiz. In fact, the team's record is actually notably better when facing a left-handed starter than a right handed one.
In the outfield, meanwhile, the Sox have:
1. Carl Crawford, who Tito wasn't sitting against lefties despite his long career history of struggles against them.
2. Jacoby Ellsbury, who isn't about to be thrown into a platoon in his All-Star year.
3. The right field slot, which Josh Reddick has staked a pretty impressive claim to, at least against right-handers (though his very small sample size numbers have actually been better against lefties, he can struggle against a good breaking ball from a southpaw).
That leaves half an outfield spot for any incoming player, unless Francona is of a mind to cast Reddick completely aside for no particularly good reason. As a result, it just wouldn't seem to be terribly efficient for the Sox to go after anything more than a bench bat type here--not the sort of guy who needs to be the focus of the trade deadline.
On the other hand, there's the rotation. Obviously, Josh Beckett and Jon Lester are set in stone, with Clay Buchholz only earning an asterisk due to his back condition lingering a worrying amount of time. After that, though, everything goes all to hell.
- John Lackey has been terrible. Even when he puts up two really good games (@PHI, vs. BAL) he does so right in the midst of two of his worst starts of the year (vs. SDP, @TOR). It would be a move as brave as it is foolish to put any real faith in him right now.
- Andrew Miller's star is fading fast. After looking alright against San Diego and Pittsburgh, Miller had a middling effort against Houston, and has been absolutely awful against Baltimore and Tampa Bay. His xFIP sits at 5.19, his breaking ball has ceased to fool batters, and his control leaves him regularly.
- Tim Wakefield is, well, Tim Wakefield. Perhaps a reasonable no. 5 guy, but not someone you depend upon in the postseason.
- Alfredo Aceves is much better as a reliever.
- Kyle Weiland is not ready. He's just not.
- Felix Doubront hasn't really had a shot to prove he can be of use to the team this year, and quite frankly it's too late to get him said opportunity.
With that in mind, who pitches game four of the ALDS?
Obviously, we're a ways away from the playoffs, but I also fully expect the Sox to make it given how well they've done so far this year despite playing injured for most of the year. Give us back Crawford in place of starts from Navarro, McDonald et. al. and Buchholz in place of any of the guys listed above and maybe we just had an 11-game winning streak come to an end instead of a six-game one. Or maybe it doesn't end at all?
But at the end of the day, we're not ready for the final challenge yet, and with some truly great rotations out there (I'm looking at you, Philadelphia), the Sox are going to need to add a really legitimate fourth starter to keep up. Hopefully, we take last night for a wake-up call.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
More on that next week from us.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jul 16, 2011 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions
Anibal Sanchez is supposedly available.
Other options who I wouldn’t mind seeing in Boston are Erik Bedard, Matt Garza, Wandy Rodriguez, Edwin Jackson, or Hiroki Kuroda.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 16, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Sanchez is definitely my #1 choice.
Forgot about Jackson and Bedard in my post below, but youj’re right. They are being shopped as well.
He's available
I don’t really want him though.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 16, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions
Saw it on ESPN and MLBTR
He’s available, but in the same way that your favorite car that needs to be replaced is available. You’ll let it go for the right price, but you’d really rather hold onto it.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 17, 2011 11:38 AM EDT up reply actions
Yikes.
Your upstanding colleague Jared Stegall described Andrew Miller’s start against baltimore as a “Very solid outing.” You, however, describe it as “absolutely awful.” That should never happen—especially not on the same website. It just makes people lose faith in your ability to tell the truth.
“Miller…has been absolutely awful against Baltimore…”
“Meanwhile, the Red Sox got a very solid outing from left-hander Andrew Miller, who turned in five innings while allowing only three Oriole runs”
Yes, this is VERY important
I totally agree with wcarlisl—the fact that two separate humans who write for this website had two different opinions on a single player’s performance in a single game of baseball makes me wonder if you are all DIRTY, DIRTY LIARS.
How DARE you, OTM.
by Jake_W on Jul 16, 2011 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I'm beginning to doubt that the new guys are all aliens.
After all, if we can’t trust Ben and Jared, can we really trust Sandy? And what about the rest? HOW DEEP DOES THIS GO, OTM?
Everse-Ray Ampires-Vay
"Laser show. So relax."
Francona is to McDonald and Jenks as Infant is to Plastic Bags and Matches
by nuthinboutnuthin on Jul 16, 2011 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Before you get nitpicky after like 3 comments on the site, define solid in way that isn't subjective.
There is no definition of ‘solid start’ in terms of baseball. There is quality start which has definite meanings with numbers but solid is just an analysis and is qualified by Jared when he says “which is fine when your offense is performing the way it is tonight”. If Andrew Miller gives up 3 runs and pitches 5 innings every game for us through the end of the season that would be very fine and for him, solid and we would win a lot of his starts.
Furthermore Jared didn’t appear to be making a statement on ‘how’ he pitched rather the results of his pitching. He may have been pitching terribly, but the results weren’t as bad, 3 ERs in 5 innings isn’t great, it’s it isn’t too bad. Furthermore, he was doing a game recap of a game we won, during a winning streak on a night when we took 1st place in the division, I’d have been pissed at Jared if he got all doom and gloom under those circumstances, he’s writing to an audience that by and large wants to be happy when good things are happening.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Pretty much this.
The distinction that needs to be made is between results and actual pitching. Three runs in five innings is what I would call “solid”. It’s not good, but it will absolutely keep you in the game every time, especially with this offense. He spoke of what happened in the game, which was that Miller survived, and did what was necessary to stay alive, even if it was due to anything from luck to sequencing.
I, on the other hand, am asking the question of “who will pitch in October,” and saying there’s not a lot about Miller’s outing that inspired confidence in his ability to repeat the performance in the future. Jared doesn’t bring up the fact that Miller’s outing was worrying when it comes to the future, but he also doesn’t claim that the outing was a good sign for future success, and that’s not really a requirement in a recap anyways. It’s a matter of personal preference.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jul 16, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions
MUST HAVE GROUPTHINK
That is, after all, what I come here for – all writers having the same perspective and churning out similar stories.
by AGuinness on Jul 16, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I love this comment.
Hi ho, Duke!
by The Duke of Silver on Jul 16, 2011 2:28 PM EDT up reply actions
Lackey
I know its hard to have faith in him, but he’s the best option in terms of being the “best for the club”. Otherwise you have to trade for another starter – further clearing out prospects from what is now a mid-level farm system. I see Theo giving Lackey a few more starts to prove himself prior to making a splash for a starter
Sox do not have a mid-level farm system.
Not with their high-ceiling, raw talents starting to break out.
Besides, Sox face a 40-man roster crunch this offseason and need to unload some close-to-the-majors talent anyways. May as well trade for someone this year.
Hi ho, Duke!
by The Duke of Silver on Jul 16, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions
Meh
Ranked 11th and 17th prior to this season. Pitchers are not doing very well at all. Hitters are doing nicely. Maybe slightly above average
Yeah, pitching is really holding us back.
Hopefully Ranuado can ease that, of all the guys we have, he’s the only one I have faith in to become something.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Who pitches Game 4? I don't know who pitches Game 3.
Buchholz’ back injury may linger, return, or reduce his effectiveness the rest of the way. Backs are a funny thing. Once injured, they flare up unless COMPLETELY healed.
The likely preferred order is currently:
1 – Beckett
2 – Lester
3 – Buchholz
4 – Lackey
5 – Aceves (my pick) or Wake
6 – The other one unless relegated to bullpen
7 – Miller (short leash to pull him quickly with #6 ready to step in for long relief if needed)
Miller’s trade value won’t get better than it is now with that false, but gaudy 3-1 W-L record. He should get long relief/mop-up duty if we have him come playoff time.
A SP is absolutely our top priority. Between Buchholz’ back and Lackey’s inconsistency, we need it. Garza? Kuroda? Pavano? Wandy Rodriguez? Francisco Liriano? Anibal Sanchez? Some could be available. Any would be an improvement on Lackey (some maybe even for a healthy Buchholz at #3).
I really think he should be converted to the Bard role next year.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 16, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Miller that is.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 16, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
That's actually a very good idea for Miller.
Limit his innings and let him throw hard. That might be his ticket.
MIller's last two outings:
7.2 IP – 0.00 K/9 10.56 BB/9 11.73 ERA/9.20 FIP
And that’s against Baltimore and TB, two below league-average run-scoring offenses. TB is exactly league-average in BB. Baltimore has the second-lowest BB-rate in the AL.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
Not the saviour.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
by Bloggy on Jul 16, 2011 11:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I think Miller has a Joba thing going on here
Hep is only going to be effective >95mph and I think he can do that out of the bullpen.
He won't be effective out of the pen with high BB-rates
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Jul 16, 2011 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
He won't be effective anywhere with what he's been showing recently
Another couple of starts like this, and the Miller experiment is going to have to go to AAA.
Bring me Matt "Hector the Alpaca" Garza
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
by Bloggy on Jul 16, 2011 11:44 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Dear Mr. Francona
Please do not let Mr.Wheeler throw versus left-handed people. The ball looks fat and juicy like a grilled steak. We thought you learned this already. If you do not listen I will boycott the next time I am asked to mangle the lineup reading at Fenway Park.
Signed
Random eight year old boy
Boy that pitch
was so fat and juicy! I kept thinking about the meaning of balls-in-play luck when you actually cannot help but center a ball thrown like that (not that Kotchman’s ball was in play…).
Matt Garza is not who we thought he was.
He is, in fact, a much better pitcher than his Tampa Bay era peripherals and is much better than his ERA this year with the Cubs.
He’s a legitimate front of the rotation starter and, in my opinion, exactly what the Sox need.
Hi ho, Duke!
by The Duke of Silver on Jul 16, 2011 2:33 PM EDT reply actions
I'd rather have Bedard or Wandy.
but that’s just because I hate, hate, HATE Matt Garza.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
by TheLoneDavid on Jul 16, 2011 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions
looking at his career his 2011 xFIP looks out of the norm
Not sure you can all of a sudden call him a “much better” pitcher as he’s likely due for some regression.
I think you might be jumping the gun on peripherals
just because they’re suddenly awesome this year doesn’t mean they’re permanently awesome. Certainly much better than his numbers look with the cubs- that comes with pitching for the cubs with that “defense” behind you.
I think he’s a mid-rotation starter, though I’ll agree, he’s just what the Sox need. I don’t see the Cubs trading him though. I think they know they traded wayyyyy too much for him this year in the hopes that they’d be playoff contenders, and they’d look too foolish (I know, Hendry does already, but I’m sure he doesn’t want to exacerbate that) trading away the same player unless they got an absolute killing on the trade market.
Yeah, his peripherals are through the roof
Compared to his 3 years with Tampa. However, I noticed something really interesting among him and other Rays pitchers since 2008. Rays starting pitchers throw a lot of fastballs up in the zone. As in, Garza, Price, and Davis each threw over 70% fastballs with their time in Tampa between 2008 and the present. Looking at their heat maps over that time, they typically threw the fastball up and away. Niemann clocked in at around 65% over that time as well. I think it’s funny especially with Davis and Niemann as they have underwhelming, albeit not exactly slow, fastballs.
Now, this is completely conjecture, but I wonder if the Rays are teaching their young pitchers to pound the upper part of the zone with fastballs to induce flyballs. This makes sense as, over that time, Garza and Davis were flyball pitchers with Price and Niemann being slight groundballers, but not by much. With that track team of a defense, especially through last season with Crawford, Upton, and Zobrist, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Rays were relying on their home park to keep the balls in play and their outfielders to catch them.
This season, Garza is throwing his fastball less than 60% of the time. His FB% has plummeted to less than 30% with his GB% rising to 50%. He’s a completely different pitcher. Oh, and his BABIP, previously a staple in the mid .270’s, has rocketed up to .321, which makes sense given the disparity in team defense of the Cubs and Rays and getting way fewer flyballs and way more grounders. Accordingly, his strikeout rate has risen to over one an inning.
I think the change is for real. Although, I would be worried about the asking price given what the Cubs paid. Still, I am also of the belief that prospects are actually getting overrated today, i.e. the first 2 Cliff Lee trades, the Greinke trade, the Halladay trade, etc. I could go further into that, but, eh, this post is already long enough.
Hi ho, Duke!
by The Duke of Silver on Jul 17, 2011 1:46 AM EDT reply actions
Buchholz may be out FOR THE YEAR. Get a freakin' SP, Theo!!!!!!
From The Globe: “The righthander, out since June 16 with a muscle strain in his lower back, didn’t respond positively when asked yesterday whether he would return this season.”
Get a SP – Anibal Sanchez, preferably.

by 





























