Great Moments in Blocking the Plate
Since the collision between Buster Posey and Scott Cousins many fans, journalists and baseball insiders have been calling for a change in the rules to prevent players from being injured on home plate collisions. The Captain is having none of that-
""Catching, you're usually not on the winning end of those. Period," Varitek said. "Some things are part of the game. But even the people who are playing hard and are in those collisions don't want to see anybody get hurt. Some things are part of the game. There's not a whole lot you can do." (from Antonio Gonzalez, The Associated Press)
In his fifteen seasons behind the plate, Jason Varitek has been a master blocking runners off the plate. Should a change in the rules make such plays a thing of the past, a few great moments in Tek’s illustrious career will live in fan’s hearts as an enduring memorial to blocking the plate.
Trailing
Unfortunately, this play doesn’t help the Sox cause all that much as
In the second inning against
With the Blue Jay’s Travis Snider on first base in the 8th inning of a tie game, John McDonald lines a Daniel Bard fast ball into the left field corner. Snider is running hard on contact, rounding third as
On his way back to the dug, with the ball still in play, Byrnes pushes Varitek as he chases down the loose ball. Recovering the baseball, Tek proceeds to tag Byrnes, who is now half way to the dugout and entirely unaware that he has yet to touch the plate. The umpire calls him out and review after review confirms what only Jason Varitek and the umpire seem to know, Tek had blocked Byrnes completely off the plate.
The Sox went on to win that game and the division series before their hearbreaking defeat in the 2003 ALCS.
While these are just a few of the fantastic plays Jason Varitek has made to help him earn his reputation as one of the best at blocking the plate, they do illustrate an important aspect of his technique. As his new protégé put it in one interview "You kind of slide sideways once you have the ball… You want to get in there and block the plate so he doesn’t try and take you out. You want him to slide.’’
This quote from Salty is a good explanation of what Varitek typically does to keep runners off the plate. Looking at the plays from above, the only one that results in an all out collision is the play against
Looking at his block on Hernandez, you get a clearer view of just why positioning makes such a difference. As the throw comes in Varitek is standing between the plate and the pitcher’s mound, about a foot from home. He remains there as long as possible as the ball rolls in. This shows Hernandez the plate and he slides. It is at the last minute that Varitek slides sideways and props his leg between Hernandez and the plate. Had he positioned himself that way earlier, Hernandez would not have slide and the play would have been a full collision like the Crawford play.
In both the Cousins-Posey collision and the Kalish-Santana collision from last season, the catcher is positioned in the base path as the ball is coming in. This is especially true in the Santana collision. Carlos Santana is nearly three feet up the base line with leg positioned between the runner and the plate. Kalish cannot see a clear path to home and knows from twenty feet away that he will need to run into Santana.
In Posey’s case, the positioning is not quite so obstructive when the ball reaches the plate, in large part because the throw is to the first base side of the catcher. His original positioning is very similar to Santana’s. Both catchers basically place their left foot on the base line even before moving to catch the throw. They are making clear from their position that a collision will take place. Varitek primes the runner to slide with his positioning and only then moves to block the plate.
Simply adjusting technique will not make blocking the plate a safe play. To protect players, the only real solution is a change in the rules barring collisions entirely. I sympathize with Giants and Indians fans who are upset about the loss of their young stars and would likely do just what Billy Beane is doing if I were a GM, but for my part, I don’t want the rule changed. For all the current publicity, collisions at the plate are a relatively rare event. Additionally, catchers can decide to avoid them with their technique if they so choose. The danger is real, but this a game played by men and men can choose the risks they are willing to take for it.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Agreed
I have no problem with Posey, he’s a great player but alot of this seems to be alot of whinnying. Players get hurt in baseball just like in any other sport, Posey’s injury is no different. This whole episode sounds just like how the media was freaking out on Sydney Crosby’s concussion.
Insert witty signature here
A few thoughts on this:
Great article and Tek’s technique seems to be a career prolonger.
I think a rule change is in order for several reasons:
1. Nobody likes it when sliding into second (mind you sliding) a player tries to take out the 2B or SS on a double play. Imagine the runner trying bowl over the 2B or SS – that seems absurd doesn’t it? But the slide can be avoided by the infielder by jumping.
Why then, is it acceptable to bowl over the catcher in an all out hit? Because a run is scoring? Perhaps, the runner should only be allowed to slide – similar to sliding into second to break up a DP. In this instance, a collision is feet first and much safer.
2. We grimace when two fielders or more collide running down a ball – but we call it tradition when a runner tries to hit the catcher.
I know the circumstances are different but the resulting injuries are similar. Baseball is not a full contact sport – the downside to this tradition is potential injuries to both players that can be career changers or enders.
3. In the early history of baseball you could throw the ball at the runner and if it hit him then he was out. This seems so comical now. So, not all traditions in baseball are beneficial and should be re-examined.
4. In the not so distant past – the pitcher could bean the hitter to keep him off the plate. This was not safe for the players and MLB began to crack down on the practice to protect the safety of the batter. Now, beaning is very rare and ejections are almost instananeous and I think the game has adjusted just fine without this dangerous tradition.
So, I ask – why bother with this tradition? If, the game can be made safer for all players and an injury could be avoided – why not change the rules? Baseball does evolve and adapt – even if it is at an incremental pace. I think the time to change the tradition is now for the safety of the players.
"Man that ball got outta here in a hurry, you know anything that travels that far oughta have a damn stewardess on it, don't you think?" - Crash Davis
1. The runner coming home is trying to avoid being called out, the slide at second is because the runner knows clearly he’ll be out, but wants to prevent the shortstop/second baseman from throwing the ball.
3. If we completely adapt the sport to what nowadays is, it would be COMPLETELY different from what its supposed to be.
Adding on, catcher collisions are only dangerous because players use poor technique. Look at Santana’s technique, then at V-tek’s. Who would you think will have a longer career at catcher? Few players will last long at catcher because they lack the technique varitek has.
"I don't put any foreign substances on the baseball. Everything I use is from the good old U.S.A."
JVSM
Pedroya Lova
by Dustin's #1 Fan on Jun 5, 2011 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions
I'm also curious how a rule change would work
If collisions are banned and one happens anyway, is the runner safe or out? Most collisions that happen now happen because the catcher is in the baseline — and note that runners can be called out for running outside the baseline.
If the catcher already has the ball and the runner initiates the collision just to try to knock the ball away, that’s one thing — this isn’t football after all. But if the runner is trying to get to the plate on a close play where the catcher doesn’t have the ball and is blocking the baseline, well, that’s why baseball players wear cups, and a catcher who gets hurt on that play only has himself to blame.
The runner doesn't bowl over the catcher
if the catcher isn’t blocking the plate. That’s the issue. If the catcher blocks access to the plate, the only way around is through. If catchers don’t wanna get hit…they shouldn’t block the plate.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
yes, this is the truth
the runners aren’t allowed to leave the basepath. In fact, the plate is the only place where a defender is allowed to stand in the basepaths in the way of the runner.
I'm not sure that's true
You still need the ball to block the plate… and with the ball you can stand anywhere. The difference at the plate is that – if you don’t aquire the ball before the contact – there’s no extra cost for blocking the plate as the run will score anyway. There isn’t any risk in over running the plate also.
There’s no perfect solution. One thing that teams need to think about is getting the pitcher (or whoever is backing up) to make a better call for the catcher who isn’t looking at anything but the ball. Though if I was catching I’m not sure I’d want to know that I’m about to be rolled.
It’s a pity Bobby Wilson wasn’t the brilliant second year catcher for the reigning champs.
by GJ on Jun 6, 2011 2:25 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





























