Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Win or Lose, Boston Celtics' New Big 3 Era A Success

Should The Sox Extend Ellsbury.




A freak injury resulted in a lost 2010 season for Jacoby Ellsbury. To go along with the injury he left the team to rehab in Arizona which only ruined his image even more in the eyes of Red Sox fans. 2011 has been a different story for the former first round pick.  Ellsbury has enjoyed a resurgence in 2011 as he has hit for a solid .296 average and compiled 15 stolen bases to go with his 22RBIs. Many fans expected the Sox to let go of Ellsbury after his last year of arbitration in 2012 but maybe fans should start to reconsider.

Star-divide

The main reason I think the Sox should extend Ellsbury is because he is proven. Despite the bad 2010 season, he was a solid player in 2008 and 2009, and looks to be doing even better in 2011. Carl Crawford is prof that no matter how great a player the replacement may be there still is a chance he won't be better then the incumbent. John Lackey is another example of a free agent signing bust. Now, although the Sox are looking to maybe replace Ellsbury with one of their younger prospects like Ryan Kalish or Josh Reddick (depending on which guy plays right for Drew), neither of these players are quite proven enough either. I think the sox should let the 2 prospects battle for J.D Drew's spot while definitely holding on to Ellsbury. By the time Bryce Brentz and Kolbrin Vitek are ready for the majors( 3 or 4 years from now), The Red Sox will have a better look at how to approach their outfield situation.

 

My Verdict: Extend Ellsbury to a 4 year deal worth 36 million ( 2 years of the deal will cover the remaining arbitration years).

Poll
Should The Red Sox extend Jacoby Ellsbury?
Yes go ahead do it now
74 votes
Wait till the end of the season
34 votes
No don't extend him at all
5 votes

113 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 89 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

18-Team Mixed Auction Results

Mar 2012 from Fake Teams - 14 comments

Differences Of Opinion

Mar 2012 from Fake Teams - 9 comments

Tout Wars AL-Only Draft Results

Mar 2012 from Fake Teams - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Ellsbury definitely needs an extension

But baring injury, I think the Sox should do it at the end of the season.

Ellsbury is really shown he is one of the best all-around centerfielders in the game, and Theo could give him a Dustin Pedroia discounted extension.

Contributor To Over The Monster, SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site.

by Jared Stegall on May 22, 2011 5:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Scott Boras isn't likely to sign a discount contract

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 22, 2011 6:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agreed.

Boras loves his free-agency.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on May 22, 2011 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Els probably won’t get a huge deal with any other team..

   Economically, baseball is hurting. Attendance is way down, except in Philly, MFYs, the Giants and a couple other clubs like the Sox. High revenue teams like the Mets and the Dodgers are complete basket cases, So they can’t be pushing up the price. I just see the team that really wants Els, the Sox, will just bid against themselves as Boras tries to pretend there is a huge market for him.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I've thought this every year for a while now

and yet somehow. Boras keeps convincing everyone to pay out crazy huge contracts

by wolf9309 on May 23, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

The teams that drive up Ellsbury’s price

already have center fielders locked down for years, or they are in the Albert Pujols sweepstakes race. Other teams like the Phillies and Mets are probably going to dump a bunch of salaries to carry a lighter payload.

  Els’s strength (speed) doesn’t bring in people to the stadium. He is mainly a flare ball hitter, who tends to strike out alot for a table setter.

 I hope the Sox can keep Els, mainly because he has been steady, and it is one less problem to worry about.

I just see that the only team bidding the highest for Els would be the Sox, and they probably be bidding against themselves, or Boras trying to push up the price by creating as he does, artificial anxiety and tension.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Albert Pujols race is in no way related

He’s a FA after this year.

I don’t really think your analysis there is necessarily correct. I see plenty of teams who would be interested in a center fielder, who would be in bidding on him (the Phillies are an example who only have about half their current payroll committed after 2012, but I see plenty of other teams there).

Ells strength doesn’t bring people to the stadiums? Have you been to Fenway and seen the amount of Ellsbury jerseys there are out there? He’s a pretty well beloved player.

by wolf9309 on May 23, 2011 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

It is cost benefits.

 
The Pujols sweepstakes will effect the entire baseball FA market for 2012.

I wouldn’t go by what player numbers people are wearing. Major League baseball is a pretty unsentimental business, and as much as Els scored some huge brownie points by stealing home against Pettite, Posada and the MFYs, he will go where the team is paying him the most money. Much like Damon was a pretty popular player for the Sox, before he became Judas

I hope the Sox sign him, mainly because he has been steady and a proven MLB player, however I don’t think he is a superstar who should get a huge long term deal or a huge contract. I just don’t see the market for Els as one of the top signings for 2012.. If his OBP was higher, maybe.. but he is a decent to so-so lead off hitter.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree he'll go where he gets the most money

but he certainly brings people to games is what I was saying there.

by wolf9309 on May 23, 2011 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are there men who wear Ellsbury jersey's?

I saw a couple of women in Ells jersey’s this weekend and I wondered if they even sold them in men’s sizes.

by cds7c on May 23, 2011 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

haha a few, not many

I do see a lot of kids wearing them though as well- And I know a couple of little kids that want to be just like him.

by wolf9309 on May 23, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Look around baseball

Most teams are carrying players that are massively overpaid. If Ellsbury is healthy and his numbers are decent, he’ll get his money.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 23, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

They are trying to dump those contracts..

 
Some of the teams that would bid for Els, like the Mets are in serious financial trouble. The Phillies, no matter if they leading in attendance or close to it, probably can’t keep up their payroll in the years to come. Other teams have seen a quarter or more drop in attendance.

 I can see maybe the Giants be interested in Els, but they pretty much need a stronger hitter, and Torres their current CF is much like Els, (just a bit older) and they still have Rowland, which was a bad move by Sabean.

I think Els is a good player, but he isn’t going to get much interest from other teams or get teams get into a major bidding war for his services. If he was a better CF, I think there would interest.

  One team that may interested in him, just to screw the Sox, and they could afford him, are the MFYs, but they already have Gardener who is almost a Els clone to start with, and he still would be cheaper.

If Els had some power, maybe his value would go up. One can packaged him like Ichiro, but Els doesn’t have a nation following every step he takes, like Ichiro, besides he isn’t Ichiro in the outfield.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Attendance is down

But ratings are up, and more teams are managing to make that of serious benefit to themselves instead of just to FOX and Comcast and all that.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 23, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

So?

Most teams get set annual income from the TV networks, no matter if the ratings are high or if they dropped. Attendance, besides parking, besides food and drink at the ballpark is where they can make a bunch of money or lose a bunch.

The only teams that benefit from increase ratings are those who own their sport channel like YES, NESN, SNY, while Comcast and Fox Sports keep the increase ad revenue.

 Two of the main flagships for MLB are in serious financial trouble, the Dodgers and the Mets. They probably need to be sold, and like the Astros, they will have more debt connected to them after the new owners buy them. It just means they will be out of contention to drive up Free Agent prices, or try to increase payroll, while other teams like the Phillies, Twins will have to slowly lose some payroll..

Baseball should be fine in the long run, but there are some economic problems caused by some serious mismanagement some of the franchises.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 2:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

and more teams are managing to make that of serious benefit to themselves instead of just to FOX and Comcast and all that.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 23, 2011 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

like Texas..

 who signed a huge contract with Fox, or the Astros with Comcast..

Most teams don’t have the money or the investment banks to raise the capital for a regional sports network.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know about being on of the better CFs.

I think he’s middle of the pack.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 22, 2011 6:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Second-third tier, I'd say.

But above average so far this year, definitely.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 23, 2011 2:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the Sox really need to wait and see where Reddick is at the end of this year.

The entire outfield situation basically revolves around if he’s learned patience or not. If he hasn’t, then Kalish starts the year in right field. If he has, then he starts in right and Kalish is the backup in Pawtucket until Ellsbury leaves.

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 22, 2011 6:10 PM EDT reply actions  

With Reddick and Kalish

and to a lesser extent guys like Lin, Hazelbaker, Brentz, and Jacobs in the farm system, the Sox really don’t have to worry about Ellsbury until the situation comes to a head. He’s a nice piece but I’d take Reddick or Kalish’ (projected) bats over his.

by ritz on May 22, 2011 6:47 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd certainly take either of their bat's ceilings over his

but I’m not sure either of them are necessarily expected to be a whole lot better than him. Reddick definitely has a floor of much worse than Ells.

by wolf9309 on May 22, 2011 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know how you're projecting Reddick

But when Ellsbury was Reddick’s age, he was already a major league starter. Reddick has shown little to warrant your confidence in his bat, except for 181 PA this year as a 24-year old in Triple-A. As good as he has been in this small sample, most of the damage he has done has been against right-handed pitching. If he can’t hit minor league lefties, he certainly won’t hit them in the majors.

I’m not an Ellsbury fan. But I’d be shocked if Reddick was as good in the majors.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 22, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Reddick has never traditionally had trouble with lefties.

And this year (SSS) his only issue is a low-.200’s BABIP. He’s seeing them just fine (8 BB:10 K) and can put a charge into the ball regardless of where it comes from.

We know for damn sure that Reddick can hit the ball very, very far even as thin as he is. The problem has always been hacking. And it’s looking like he’s decided to cut that out and make pitchers either throw him something he can hit, walk him, or hit the corners pretty consistently.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 23, 2011 2:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

We'll see

The stats for this season are a small sample, and he getting close to being too old for Triple-A.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 23, 2011 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, thats the thing

We have time to wait. If this was Ells’ last year of arb then it’d be a different story.

by ritz on May 23, 2011 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

He'll be 24 for the rest of the season, which is a perfectly acceptable age.

And small sample though it may be, he’s already matched last year’s walk total.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 23, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

One of Reddick/Ells/Kalish has to go.

Choice number one is Ells, IMO. Reddick would be my second choice. Kalish shouldn’t be touched. Ells is my first choice because I think teams will overvalue him and his speed. Kalish should start in RF next year, and between Reddick, Lin, Hazelbaker, Hassan, and Brentz (all top-25 prospects in our system according to SP), we should find one guy who sticks. If we keep Ells, that means all of those guys (or all of those guys minus 1 but plus Kalish) are completely blocked. Do you really want to have all of those a and b level prospects blocked, when you can ravage another team’s farm system by giving them Ells.

Another guy we’re forgetting about is Westmoreland. Nothing is guaranteed, but he was once our top overall prospect.

An extension leaves a lot of guys blocked, which is not good in this case. It’s fine when its one of your top 25 (Lars Anderson) because of a longterm deal, but when it’s your entire outfield, which is arguably the deepest position in our farm system, not so much. A guy’s trade value is limited when he can show only minimal PT.

Theo-trade John Lackey for a used condom and a punch in the nose. Remember, it's all about value.

by LesterJohn on May 22, 2011 8:23 PM EDT reply actions  

honestly, there's a lot here I disagree with

but the main thing I want to mention is that a reasonable extension (no one is talking about a giant 7-8 year extension) doesn’t block anyone because it wouldn’t be a large enough contract o be prohibitive. If, for example, Pedroia hadn’t performed as expected after his extension, they would have no problem either trading him or just dropping the contract. Blocking only becomes a real issue when we’re talking about giant Gonzalez or Carwford-esque contracts.

by wolf9309 on May 22, 2011 11:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I adgree we a surplus of young outfielders

Other then Brentz and Kalish I don’t believe any of the sox prospects are of the caliber of Jacoby Ellsbury. I really believe Ellsbury is a top center fielder. He makes the Sox lineup more dynamic. With his presence on 1st base he shakes up a ton of pitchers and makes the lineup more potent.

I believe that if someone is proven they should be the priority rather then an unproven prospect. The game speed is very different between triple-A and the majors. Ask Dominic Brown of the Phillies. I don’t know if anyone is aware of the kind of monster numbers Brandon Wood put up in the minors before he was a Major League Failure. Tons of prospects look great, no one should assume that all of those prospects the sox have playing in the farm system will necessarily be as productive as Ellsbury.

by Slap Baseball on May 22, 2011 9:37 PM EDT reply actions  

I’d stay away from a long term investment for as long as possible with Ellsbury. He may be proven, but not well proven. He has very very few plate appearances with this new plate approach. If he sticks to it he may approach the value you list but he still needs defense work, which is why I don’t think he’ll ever exceed that value.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on May 22, 2011 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he learned to play to his strengths then I'd agree with you

but his tendency to not be patient and hit flyballs is discouragning

by BobZupcic on May 22, 2011 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

That may be true

But 70 SB’s doesn’t stick out to you? Ellsbury’s talent is far behind the awful Brett Gardner. I wouldn’t complain if Ellsbury continues to bat .300, score 90 runs, and steal 70 bases, numbers close to what he did the last time he played a full season. He gets on base far more often then a guy like Brett Gardner and I really believe he has potential to knock out a solid number of homeruns (maybe 12-15). If this is the case Ellsbury starts to appear more like an il-equipt defensive version of Carl Crawford. The key thing is that Ellsbury fits well in Boston so why fix something that isn’t broke? If we continue to win with Ellsbury up top I would prefer to keep it that way.

by Slap Baseball on May 23, 2011 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

And he's very good defensively

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 24, 2011 9:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

but doesn't play CF

For all we know, Ells could be like a Carl Crawford and thrive in LF.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 24, 2011 3:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

He does play CF

He moved to LF when the MFY acquired Granderson. Gardner’s defense in CF was very good by most metrics. And in LF last year, Gardner was a 6.2 WAR player.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 24, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

If he's so good, then why doesn't Granderson play LF.

And I’m not sure I buy WAR anymore. It values UZR a lot and there’s some fishy stuff with that. Soriano had a 5.1 FLD that went into his WAR and he was one of the worst defensive corner OFs in the game.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 24, 2011 4:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Isn't UZR the metric that says Ellsbury is bad in CF?

Just playing devil’s advocate here… I’ve certainly seen a lot of his Skylab routes out there, but if we’re questioning WAR since UZR plays a big role, and UZR is what downgrades Ellsbury’s defense… do we question that at all?

by AlohaSox on May 24, 2011 6:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

UZR has Ellsbury for his career as about an average center fielder

just a tiny tick below. He takes bad routes and frequently makes up for them by being very fast. Mostly the people who always going on about how he’s a terrible center fielder are overreacting to the opinion that he’s a great center fielder based on web gems and diving catches.

by wolf9309 on May 24, 2011 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think he's merely average.

I don’t base that on the numbers, I use the good ole eye test. My favorite phrase to describe it boils down to this, how many times do you see JD Drew having to dive? Now how many times does Ellsbury have to dive? Now consider the difference in speed between them. That’s my issue with Ellsbury, with his speed he should never have a webgem unless it’s him robbing a HR at the wall. Otherwise if he had the instincts he would catch much more instride.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on May 24, 2011 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't care about it downgrading or upgrading Ells.

I know what his value is and I’m sure the FO does too. They originally put Cameron in CF last year and he was about 37 or 38 years old. I question WAR in general, not just for certain players.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 25, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

to be clear

he would be essentially 2003-2007 Juan Pierre, who was a useful player. So yes, I would gladly extend a 28-year-old version of Juan Pierre’s useful period for a few years. No one will recommend giving him Crawford-esque money or years, and people saying they would extend him doesn’t make Boras agreeing to an extension that isn’t Crawford-esque more likely.

by wolf9309 on May 22, 2011 11:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's Crawford lite and plays a "premium positon" albeit not well,

so we should see some sort of contract based off of Crawford’s contract.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 23, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hopefully not with the RS

Let some other team overpay for a speed guy who doesn’t use his speed very well

by BobZupcic on May 23, 2011 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Red Sox won't pay him.

They know his defense is sub-par in a defensive first position.

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 23, 2011 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Karma for Damon

was Crisp breaking his finger in 2006, and he was never the same hitter at the plate since. If Crisp could hit, and he was coming into his prime when the Sox got him, he probably be still in a Sox uniform. If anyone who should had gotten a gold glove in 2007, it was Crisp.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I recently watched some archived games from 07 via MLB.tv

Crisp was unbelievable in CF. Huge contributor to the team

Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on May 23, 2011 1:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

+2

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on May 23, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

And doing reasonably well again this season too.

It is a shame we didn’t see the best Coco Crisp, much like a certain Mike Cameron has failed to deliver on his potential here in Boston too.

Okay, that’s not fair… Crisp did a lot more for the team than Cameron has done.

by AlohaSox on May 24, 2011 3:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Game 5 of the 2008 ALCS...

  He should get something from Boston or some tribute for his clutch performance…

by superferret on May 25, 2011 9:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, but......

Either they make the call/offer now, or Ellsbury/Boras will likely test FA at the end of 2012. These value deals usually buy out more than one year of arb, offering the player huge security and a lifetime of riches in most cases. If the Sox wait until after the 2012 season, assumng Ellsbury continues to put up solid numbers, the Sox will not be getting any “discount” since he will be so close to FA.
I would be very pleased to see the Sox lock up Ellsbury for a few years; a good leadoff hitter is difficult to find, as we know after the departure of Damon and the Coco Crisp experiment in 2006-2007.

by Scoop1981 on May 23, 2011 9:55 AM EDT reply actions  

Disagree here

I’m not sure that Ells is such a “good” leadoff hitter. He’s o.k. but not ideal. He’s not really the type of player that you want to tie up a lot of money in and as has been stated – the team has younger/cheaper options that could well produce at Ellsbury’s level in 2012. I’d go one more year on him and then see what happens.

by BobZupcic on May 23, 2011 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, that is a valid option

but many thought Damon would be easily replaced also, and it took Ellsbury coming along to replace him two years later. Sure, Ellsbury may not be “ideal”, but what ideal leadoff hitter will replace him in 2013? This is the “bird in the hand” argument. Ellsbury’s lost 2010 season messed up the equation in some ways; if he had healthy, solid year the Sox may have offered a mutully beneficial multi-year deal when they were getting close to the arb deadline.
In reality, we all know that Ellsbury will test FA at this point in all likelyhood and when that happens, there is less than a 50/50 chance he comes back to the Sox.

by Scoop1981 on May 23, 2011 10:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Looking at the data that we have on him

He’s an average defensive CF at best (and likely below average due to poor reads)
He gets on base at about a 0.340 clip – hardly a top-notch “leadoff” value

so basically the 2 things that you want out of the position, he’s at average. Could he improve? sure he could, but we are talking about a 28 year old at seasons end – so we are pretty much in his peak. If he improves in various areas during this season – then great – look at an extension possiblity. If he does not – then you can get average replacement on the cheap and its time to let Kalish/Reddick give CF a try

by BobZupcic on May 23, 2011 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

I dont know if they should

I tend to say yes, he is valuable. However, there is no doubt in my mind the Red Sox will extend Jacoby. I would go to Vegas and bet it, thats how confident Theo will extend him.

by SoxAcumen on May 23, 2011 11:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Nooooooo... Let him play out the string, try to earn his next contract...

and let him walk.

There is no more upside, this is as good as it gets. .300/.340 ….and no power. Or, .215/.250 with power. He can’t do both.

8 HR’s this year, as the over/under. He’s got 4 already. I don’t think he’ll get 4 more. He’s not Grady Sizemore, he’s Fukodome.

Put Kalish in RF for two years then let him take over.

by cds7c on May 23, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Put KalishReddick in RF for two years then let him take over.

Fixed

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 23, 2011 11:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ideally

Kalish – CF, Reddick – RF……we can dream right?

by BobZupcic on May 23, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well ideally

but if I had to choose one or the other right now I’d go Reddick.

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 23, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would be cautious about Kemp..

  He is kind of a hothead, and has clashed in the Dodger clubhouse. I don’t know if he do well in another pressure cooker environment like Boston.

by superferret on May 23, 2011 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe it would calm him down

To know that his next paycheck would be in the mail instead of relying on Frank McCourt and his money management skills.

by The Name is Dalton on May 23, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

UBR

is out

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/ultimate-base-running-ubr/

Ellsbury, known for his speed, does not score all that well in base running

by BobZupcic on May 24, 2011 9:44 AM EDT reply actions  

He gets a positive number, though.

And SB/CS are not part of the equation.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on May 24, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is is SB/CS rate this year? Seems like he's been caught a lot this season...

Now, I realize this is a SSS, but still… if I did my math right:

15 SB, 6 CS in 2011 for 21 total attempts, and a CS rate of 29%. Not good.
Career, including 2011 is 151/30 in 181 attempts for a CS rate of 17%.
(Remove this year, and it’s 136/24 in 160 attempts for a CS rate of 15%.)

What is up with all kinds of guys (Pedroia/Youk with abnormal K rates) performing outside of their career numbers, and what happens when they all put it together?

(And, wow… as slow as he is, Gonzalez is leading the team in RUNS and RBIs… interesting.)

by AlohaSox on May 24, 2011 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's because

unless this has changed, he’s also leading the league in hits. Get on base a lot, you’ll score a lot!

by wolf9309 on May 24, 2011 3:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

For a second, I thought you meant Ellsbury.

Yes, I realize Adrian is scoring despite his speed due to being on base (especially in front of Youk and Big Papi…)

by AlohaSox on May 24, 2011 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ellsbury somewhat of an enigma

As we can see by the range of feeling here, it is very difficult to make a call on Ellsbury at this time, largely due to the lost 2010 season. He appears to be a good CF, but many say he is average or below average. He hits around .300 for his career, pretty good, but we want higher OBP for a leadoff hitter. Ellsbury has some pop in his bat, but does he have too “big” of swing and is he selective enough for a leadoff hitter?

For me, I see a solid big league ballplayer, with proven ability to play and perform on the biggest stage in the game. I’ll take this bird in the hand over the hope that Reddick/Kalish will be better. Sure, they will be cheaper, but this is Boston, not Pittsburgh.

Extend or not? I say extend, but I don’t think that will happen. Ellsbury, while a nice player, is not a “game changer” type of player. He is not the type of player the Sox management, or most fans will look at as a must keep, so the Sox are likely to play the value game here. I feel the Sox will be content to let Ellbury play and contribute in 2011 and 2012 and let him test FA.

The Sox will know a lot more in 2012. They will know if Kalish, Reddick or both are ML ready talent or not. They will know what players, perhaps a nice right-handed hitting OF are available in FA. In a perfect scenario, Kalish/Reddick take over and do well in RF in 2012, one of them moves over to CF in 2012 and the Sox sign a right-handed hitter for RF. Of course that leaves open the question of who hits leadoff, which brings us back to exending Ellsbury. See the enigma here?

by Scoop1981 on May 26, 2011 9:14 AM EDT reply actions  

I just don't think its going to be easy to extend Ells

Boras will do a good job selling him as an elite centerfielder (which he’s not).

by BobZupcic on May 26, 2011 9:26 AM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, cannot underestimate Boras’ ability to brainwash GMs.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on May 26, 2011 9:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Correct

Boras is great at his job and there will be a nice market for a player like Ellsbury. At this stage, I don’t see a scenario that has Ellsbury signing with the Sox before he tests FA.

by Scoop1981 on May 26, 2011 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah the combination of Boras not liking to extend

and the fact that the Sox appear to have so many potential CF prospects that may be ready relatively soon means that they’ll almost certainly finish arbitration with Ells, and then see what the outfield situation is and pursue him as a free agent if necessary. Frankly, I have trouble imagining that someone else won’t overpay for him.

by wolf9309 on May 26, 2011 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

Els is still the best athlete on the field.

Though Crawford is right up there with him.
LF is locked up for the foreseeable future. We have to strongly consider that CF and RF will need to be filled over the next couple of years and right now the Sox have one possibly ML ready player in Reddick, Kalish is still rehabbing his shoulder which could be a significant obstacle and Westmoreland might return to form, though experience should warn that brain trauma, and surgery is controlled trauma always leaves some deficit, maybe minimal, but some. How good was Ryan? How god will he be at 98%? 80%? Which leaves guys who are a few years off.
So , ride Reddick in RF right now, and see where it leads the team, he has had a decent bat since coming up which makes him the hot bat in right. However there is the Loyalty thing for Francona.

by NJ Native on Jun 2, 2011 9:00 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Skinner_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi