Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

My Book Report: The Extra 2% by Jonah Keri

The Extra 2

The Extra 2% by Wall Street Journal and ESPN.com contributor Jonah Keri is the story of how one smart small-market team used strategies born on the trading floors of Wall Street to challenge their big budget competitors for October glory. That plot may sound familiar. On the surface, The Extra 2% is very similar to Michael Lewis’ game-changing write-up of the Oakland A’s and their iconoclastic GM Billy Beane.

Written more than seven years after Moneyball changed many people’s opinions of baseball strategies and management, The Extra 2% might tell a similar rag-to-riches story, but it is unlikely to have the same impact or to become short-hand for a contentious philosophy. Keri is writing in a world that has largely accepted statistical analysis and where young Wall Street-trained front office personnel are commonplace. As a result, the story of how the Tampa Bay Rays managed to pass baseball’s two richest teams in the standings and become a regular contender in the game’s toughest division, offers little in the way of revelation for the reader. In Keri’s telling, the Rays’ top management takes a poorly run team and uses intelligent PR, marketing, and negotiation tactics to turn the franchise around. The team’s turn-around in the standings is enough to make this book compelling, but the lack of a consistent narrative thread holds this book back and leaves the reader lacking a real understanding of how the Rays are different from any other intelligently run organization.

Star-divide

 

The early chapters of the book deal with Tampa Bay’s struggle to land a baseball team and the ensuing disaster that resulted from Vincent Naimoli finally bringing the Devil Rays to life. Keri’s account of how Naimoli and company alienated fans and made the Devil Rays into the laughingstock of the Major Leagues provides some of the best writing and the most entertaining moments in the book. Particularly hilarious is the story of Naimoli’s refusal to adopt the new "fad" known as email, causing his staff limitless headaches. Red Sox fans who remember the early days of the Devil Rays might not be surprised to learn the team was poorly run, but the extent of incompetence is truly impressive.

 

However incompetent the previous regime might have been, Keri is begrudgingly forced to acknowledge the fact that the division-winning Tampa Bay Rays teams of 2008 and 2010 were built in large part to the draft picks accumulated in those losing seasons. This is where the book struggles the most. Under the management of Stuart Sternberg, Matt Silverman and Andrew Freidman, Tampa Bay selected some very important key players like Evan Longoria and David Price, however the Naimoli era saw GM Chuck Lamar landing many important pieces as well, such as Carl Crawford, Reid Brignac, Wade Davis, Jeremy Hellickson, and BJ Upton and the infamous theft of Scott Kasmir from the guileless Mets. Keri may have good reason to exalt the new management team and chastise the previous one, but his assault on Chuck LaMar reads scattered and, at points, even slightly disingenuous.

 

He spends nearly three pages recounting the tale of a Ray’s scout taking a shine to a dumpy looking kid with a powerful right-handed swing and no real position, only to watch as the team ignores the kid and lets Albert Pujols pass them by. Of course, Keri later acknowledges that 31 other teams ignored their area scouts as well and Pujols was a 16th round pick when the Cardinals finally took a flyer on him. Is that really a failure worth pinning on LaMar? Was Josh Hamilton really a bad pick simply because he never materialized as a star with the Rays? Was Rocco Baldelli, losing his career to a literally one-in-a-million illness, a sign of incompetent scouting? Keri wants to give his heroes, Sternberg, Silverman and Freidman the loin’s share of the credit for building the 2008 Rays pennant-winning team, and in service to that, he downplays the contributions of Chuck LaMar and others and exaggerates fairly typical draft misses into systematic flaws.

 

With the arrival of Sternberg and Co, The Extra 2% once again parallels Moneyball, recounting the pedigrees of the new men in charge and illustrating how their backgrounds shaped them into the prefect figures to effect such miraculous change. The Wall Street vets of places like Goldman Sachs and Bears Stern learn to spot the undervalued and put a favorable price on what they need, be it the stock of fortune 500 companies or middle relievers. Their story is well-told, but it is not a new one. Sox fans have only to look at their own ownership to see obvious examples and the baseball world has many others these days.

 

The story of the Rays’ charismatic field captain Joe Madden is one of the book’s highlights. Madden is an impressive baseball mind and a fascinating figure and Keri is at his best when he recounts the forces that shaped the eccentric manager into a man capable of garnering the respect of his players and while at same time going against the grain in his strategies and his personality. Keri makes it clear throughout this book that Sternberg sought to change the entire culture of the team and in hiring Joe Madden, he seems to have found his most important instrument of change. Madden embraces the quantitative as much as any manager in the game, but most importantly, he gets his entire team to buy into the plan.

 

The Extra 2% will also hold particular interest for those in the statistical analysis community, as Keri details the Rays hiring of Pitch F/X experts and their forays into advanced defensive strategies. Keri is on strong footing when writing about such topics and it shows. As a regular contributor to such esteemed sites as Fangraphs and Baseball Prospectus, he is fluent in advanced metrics and the tenants of sabermetrics. He is careful to write to the larger audience though and readers without knowledge or love for these concepts will not be left out when reading about the way the Rays have used Pitch F/X to prevent injuries or looked into splits to find better ways to align their defense.

 

Red Sox fans should be warned: this book vilifies the Red Sox as much, if not more than the Yankees. This is not surprising given the intensity of the rivalry between the two teams, but it does detract from the enjoyment of the book at times. Whether you love or hate the Rays, the story of how one of baseball’s poorest teams became one of the best should interest you. However, if you are a Red Sox fan, this book will likely get under your skin in places. The two teams are certainly worlds apart in revenue and market-share, but they are both run by young, business-first GM’s, both owned by ex-Wall Street tycoons and both are looking up at a competitor with nearly limitless resources. Yet, The Extra 2% tries continually to shake off the comparisons and writes off the Red Sox as just another big market team. This seems most ironic as Keri outlines the Rays attempts to become a regional force, in the very image of the Boston Red Sox.

 

The Extra 2% has a lot to offer fans of the Rays and aspiring business leaders. Jonah Keri’s writing is solid and the book is well-researched. It suffers in part because it is so directly comparable to Lewis’ Moneyball. Lewis presented the Oakland A’s as a team winning through the exploitation of market inefficiencies born of the irrational biases of the baseball world. He intertwined the stories of castaway players like Scott Hatteberg and Chad Bradford with the new ideas Beane embraced, giving a personal feeling to his tale of business success. Keri also touches on some of the Rays player’s back stories but these tales rarely connect strongly to what the Rays are building or their core philosophy. In fact, any core philosophy the Rays might have is left unclear. Keri portrays the Rays’ management success as a result of doing everything better than other teams and as a fundamentally different approach.

The story of the Rays turnaround is interesting, but it doesn’t offer all that much revelation for the serious fan. The Rays had lousy owners and better ones bought the team. They stopped chasing name-brand free agents and invested in player development. They hired experts in statistical analysis and then actually listened to them. They did all these things and they went on to win the toughest division in the league two out of three years. It is a good story, but it doesn’t offer much that is really new. It is quick to overlook the impact of luck and to assign credit and blame where it fits best into the narrative. For those with a keen interest in baseball management and business, this book has some great things to offer. The more casual reader, however, can skip this one, especially if said reader happens to be a rather sensitive Red Sox fan.

You can buy a copy of The Extra 2% here. 

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If we start making Extra 2% jokes I'm finding a new site to hang out at

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 21, 2011 1:57 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm a big Keri fan

Looking forward to reading the book once I get a chance. While I agree that tarring the Sox as “just another big market team” may be oversimplifying things, even as Sox fans, I think we should acknowledge that the Rays FO has achieved some incredible accomplishments over the past few years.

There’s no doubt that Theo and Friedman have more in common than, say, Billy Beane and Joe Morgan, but it’s also undeniable that Theo has a ton more resources at his disposal. He can afford NOT to always follow an “extra 2%” strategy because his monetary resources give him the flexibility to take bigger risks. Doesn’t mean he’s better or worse of a GM than his Rays counterpart – Friedman would do exactly the same if his budget were the size of the Sox’s.

An aside – also, my understanding based on interviews I’ve read is that Keri does differ strongly from Lewis on one point: he views amateur scouting as a crucial part of good baseball operations, and apparently spends a significant chunk of the book showing how the Rays minor league system is strong more because of their stellar scouting and development than their draft positions.

by Tarrsk on May 21, 2011 4:28 PM EDT reply actions  

The 10 years in a row of draft picks in the top 10 and multiple years of back to back number 1 picks may have helped things a bit.

I wouldn’t pronounce the Rays a major success just yet until,

A: They win a World Series

and

B: Develop of fan base.

Given a few more years who knows both of those things may happen. However, for now their stands are empty and they don’t have a ring.

The “small market” team I’m always impressed with is the Marlins.

by ruktuim on May 21, 2011 6:15 PM EDT reply actions  

totally disagree.

There are several teams that have had years of high draft picks-KC, Pittsburgh to name 2. The Rays success is not built on high draft picks nearly as much as you think. Note that they continually make smart moves to pick up under the radar guys like Zobrist, Joyce, Pena, etc, or the way the always completely revamp their pen. The make smart trades (getting Kazmir then flipping him at the right time-both fleece trade, flipping Young for Garza/Bartlett then flipping Garza when the time is right, etc). Some of thier biggest contributors were not singularly high picks (Shields, Crawford…). Sure there are the Longorias, Hamiltons, Prices and Uptons, but this is a team that repeatedly makes quality moves for undervalued guys, drafts well (where are the legions of Pirates and Royals superstars?), flips guys for picks and players at the right time to maintain one of the best farm systems in the league and has won the toughest division in baseball for 2 of the last 3 years despite its payroll. I also don’t see what the fanbase has to do with the way the team is run.

by Buzzy on May 21, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

The legion of Royals superstars are in the high minors.

Be prepared for the coming storm.

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 22, 2011 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

They have an excellent farm system right now

but not good enough to have the kind of success that the Rays have had. As I mentioned so many of those players during their successful stretch were not high picks (Pena, Crawford, Joyce, Zobrist, Shields, Garza, Bartlett, Wheeler, Balfour, Howell…).

by Buzzy on May 22, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are the Rays a success

and the Marlins a failure.?

On the field the Rays have won 2 of three Division titles, and still have one of the top two minor league organizations in baseball.

They clearly know something. They hit paydirt with the first picks in ‘05 and ’06 (Longoria and Price) and some of the trades looked great for a while (Delmon Young for Edwin jackson and Jason Bartlett). Some of the other trades, though, don’t look so good now. One example was Kazimir-Rodriguez trade, and it is worth thinking about that the trade for a second. At the time of the trade the Rays were 3 games behind in the wild card race, and Kazmir was pitching well. The smart baseball guys said it was a great deal: Rodriguez hit with power in AAA, and Kazmir was being dealth at the peak of his trade value.

But it pissed the fan base off. It was pretty transparently a salary dump, and Rodriguez hasn’t lived up to his billing.

In the end it was a stupid trade. It broke faith with the fanbase. the Rays won some of this back in
2010 (signing Soriono, eg) but have lost it again over last recent winter. The Rays payroll went from 70 million to 35, and I would argue that both the attendance and the TV ratings have taken a big hit in large part because of the transparent salary dumps.

It is true they lead the Division: but unlike in past years I don’t think it will last this time. If it doesn’t I think people will compare the roster moves over the winter of 2010 with the dismanteling of the Marlins after the ’97 World Series. The Marlins never won the fans they lost in ’98, even after winning the WS in 2003. If the Rays fade this summer, I think the Rays will be in the same place they were in 2006.

I could make other observations: for example the specter of a Goldman Sachs partner always crying poverty (I know people who should know claim that the poverty part isn’t really true) and the example of the Marlins, who made 60 million a year, but hid the earnings in order to hoodwink Miami into a new stadium.

With respect to Maddon – he can be a genious with respect to the lineup, but I have seen him make serious mistakes with his bullpen.

Written by a Rays STH.

by flasoxfan on May 21, 2011 8:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Funny you should mention the Marlins and their stadium con-job

because the latter chapters of the book read like a plea for a new stadium and it is infuriating. Tampa Bay has a number of serious challenges in building a fan base (including their stadium) and I don’t think the Kasmir trade was all that harmful. The payroll reduction may be, though They will need to keep winning to attract a solid base, but they will also need to show their fans that they can do so without simply dumping salary or selling off top players when they get expensive. Roster turn-over can hurt teams almost as much as losing (just ask the NHL).

- Matt Sullivan
"I would change policy, bring back natural grass and nickel beer. Baseball is the belly-button of our society. Straighten out baseball, and you straighten out the rest of the world." Bill "Spaceman" Lee
www.overthemonster.com
www.spacemanspancakes.wordpress.com

by Mattsullivan on May 21, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

The stadium issues

do not explain why TV ratings are down over 30% this year.

Bottom line is they dismantled the team this winter. I know STH who did not re-up because of it. The owner of the Rays wants a new stadium because it will make the Rays more valuable. I wouldn’t trust him as far as I could throw him.

I will be surprised if the Rays get a new stadium. BTW – ST Pete hire bankrupcy counsel because of rumors the Rays would file for bankrupcy in order to get out of their lease at the Trop.

by flasoxfan on May 22, 2011 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Please get your facts straight

1)Young was traded for Garza and Bartlett, not Jackson and Bartlett. Jackson was picked up off the scrap heap and traded for Matt Joyce. Both were great trades for the Rays.
2)The Kazmir trade was a great trade regardless of the success or failure of Rodriguez. To dump his salary for nothing would have been a good trade. They freed themselves from a compleltey physically broken pitcher who was their most costly player for prospects. That is an awesome move. If a “fan” takes that as a reason to not root-they are dumb since Kaz was washed up.

The rays are totally different than the Marlins (who have had their success)-the Rays try to stay competitive always with smart market-gaming moves. Fla has picked their spots with large scale by ins and fire sales…

by Buzzy on May 22, 2011 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

Your right

about Garza. The Young doesn’t look as good now as it did a year ago, though.

Your wrong about Kazmir. Dead wrong. You don’t dump salary in the middle of a pennant race. It raises suspicions among fans. From a business perspective the Rays have a brand problem. That trade hurt their brand.

The Marlins got their stadium. The Rays are not going to get theirs. People in the area don’t trust them.

Until they restore their brand, they are going to be stuck right where they are.

Salary dumps like in 2010 and the Kazmir trade are part of the reason why.

by flasoxfan on May 22, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please explain to me

how a guy with a 5.92 ERA at the time he was dealt and has been worse since was going to be a big help during a pennant race? At that time the Rays were 10+ games back of the Yankees and 5 games behind the Sox, who had bolstered their lineup with VMart. You are telling me that the completely busted Kazmir should not have been dealt because he was going to help them make up these leads? Only the completely baseball-clueless press felt this as the time and the Rays have been proven correct. Kazmir has been an albatross to the Angels, and was not going to do anything but hurt the Rays dim chances at the time. Totally correct move.

As for your other points-
a)I have no idea what you mean about Young-but that continues to look like the right move for the Rays.
b)I have no idea what you mean about the fans. Getting rid of Kazmir had nothing to do with their fanbase size which is still bad but is as good or better than it was then.

by Buzzy on May 22, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

At the time Kazmir was traded

he had won 4 of his last 6 starts. Kazmir missed a month because of arm troubles, but it became clear when he was traded that he was pretty good.

He went on to post 1.73 with the Angels in six starts in September. Something that every in Tampa was well aware of. So you really don’t know all of the facts here, and you ignore that Rodriguez has been a bust himself.

The idea that he was “completely busted” wasn’t borne out by how he pitched down the stretch. In fact the truth is the exact opposite.

The trade cost the Rays with the fanbase – as it would with any other team that would make a similar trade at that time. Except I can’t think of another team doing anything close to this.

You last point begins with “I have no idea”. You don’t. Attendence in 2009 was BETTER than in 2010. Attendence in 2011 is worse than it was in 2010. If you know something about business, you know about branding, and the move absolutely hurt them.

Again – name me another team that dumps a starter down the stretch in a pennant race as a salary move.

The Yound trade looks less like a slam dunk because Bartlett regressed in 2010 and Delmon Young hit very well. Moreover, the Rays dumped Garza – in part to get Sam Fuld – a 29 year old with 150 AB’s in the major leagues before this year. There are other players the Rays got for Garza – we will see what happens with them.

The Rays were absolutely in the race when he was traded.

by flasoxfan on May 22, 2011 7:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

They dumped a starter who S-U-C-K-E-D

You are ignorant of the basic facts of baseball. Here is what you should try to learn and understand:
a)Scott Kazmir was an awful pitcher in 2009 and he was on a major downward trend. He had a 5.92 ERA with the Rays in 2009. He had a 4.70 FIP. He had a 4.84 xFIP. Those numbers are so poor that by WAR he would have been worth about 1/3 of a win going forward. 1/3 of a win is not going to make up 5 games for you.
b)For the Angels Kazmir’s “success” in 2009 was totally deceptive. He pitched only 36 innings. His low ERA was good fortune that anyone would know could not be sustained. He had a 82.5 LOB %, a . 257 bapip and a 4.71 xFIP. He was the same shitty pitcher who got lucky as is totally possible for anyone over such a small sample-but the pitching was the same crappy level of pitching as his perpherials show.
c)Thus what has happened since is no surprise, and the Rays knew it. They got rid of a broken, overpriced pitcher who was not helping them win anything. I wonder if the Angels wish they could not have made that deal and saved the $$-I am sure the answer is yes.
d)You quote wins-showing you have little understanding of baseball. A pitcher hardly controls his team’s offense which is half of what determines a game-Kazmir’s W-L record before the trade means nothing (especially in light of the numbers quoted above).
e)The Rays attendence in 2010 was GREATER than it was in 2008-Kazmir’s last decent year and the Rays WS year. Last year, they ranked higher (9/14) in attendence than they EVER have. These things are all listed on baseball-reference.com you know. Stop making shit up. There is no evidence that the Kazmir trade had any influence on attendence. They have shitty attendence regardless.
f)If you think they traded Garza for Fuld you are nuts. Please read what the trade was. Fuld was basically a toss-in.
g)Young is a bad baseball player-even in his ISO-inflated 2010 year he was worth all of 2 wins.

by Buzzy on May 22, 2011 7:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Listen

I have no problem arguing with people. But you can stick your all knowing attitude straight up your ass. I know plenty about baseball. More to the point, I live here. I know and remember what the fan reaction was.

And my point was first and foremost a BUSINESS POINT, and not a baseball one. Read what I wrote again.

In short, with respect to the business side of this trade and fan reaction, you haven’t a clue. YOU DON"T KNOW you are talking about. The fans were pissed. Kazmir was better than what we had, and he was winning in the time between he came back and when he was traded. As I noted, his season numbers with the Rays were meaningless since these numbers included the time when everyone knew he was hurt. He pitched into the 6th the majority of his outings when he returned from the DL. He wasn’t Lincecum, but he was better than anything else we had, and more to the point he was good against both the Red Sox and the Yankees.

 And he pitched well down the stretch for the Angels.

I suspect you have never run a business. It is pretty obvious you know nothing about it. In business, your reputation is everything. If people lose trust in you, your business suffers. And that is preciesly what happened here. The Rays were in the race, and traded one of their starters for nothing. Now it is obvoius you are too stupid to understand that the fan based was pissed. When they traded Kazmir everyone knew they had waved the surrender flag.

There is no way that what they got in baseball terms made up for what they lost with the fans.
Give me another example. just one, of a team something like the Rays did with this trade.

With respect to the attendance, you plain flat cherry pick numbers. You also attribute to me arguments I did not make. I did not say that the Kazmir trade lead to a dramatic decline in attendance. I said that it raised trust issues. In point of fact we both know that you are obfuscating. 2009 attendance was 1,874,962. 2010 attendance went down from 2009 despite the fact that they had the best record in baseball (it was 1,864,999). You deliberately lie about this since it doesn’t support your view. You cite some meanlingless start about them ranking 9th of 14 (for a team that was better in 2010 than in 2009). But you never cited the 2009 numbers – and now everyone knows why.

Then you accuse me of making shit up!!! After your own obvious prevarication this is really ironic.

I deal with people like you who cherry pick numbers, and misrepresent them every day. I never said the Rays traded Garza for Fuld, for example, so I have no idea what your point f was about. I never said the attendance problems were solely the result of the Kazmir trade.

Now as I originally wrote, they rebuilt some trust when they expanded the payroll with the Soriano signing. I never said that the Kazmir trade was responsible for all of the attendance problems What I DID say was that it created a trust issue with the fan base – an issue has grown significantly with the salary dump this winter. You can defend the Garza trade – who knows how it will work out – but that trade was about the money and not to make the ball club better. Nobody with any understanding of the Rays thinks it was anything but a salary dump.

by flasoxfan on May 22, 2011 11:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please

the fact that you know nothing about numbers means that you also know nothing about business. The “decline” in attendence from 2009 to 2010 is a random fraction of a percent. It is in the noise. To prove it I quote the ranking of atttendence. In 2010 they ranked higher in attendence than in 2009! This means that attendence was down in baseball across the board but relatively the Rays did beter in ’10 than ’09. Thus this had NOTHING to do with Kazmir. Please show me one legit shread of evidence that there was a “trust issue” with the fans other than some dumb sportswriter or randome fan spouting off.

by Buzzy on May 23, 2011 6:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bad Area For Baseball

Florida, in general, should not have a team, but particularly Tampa Bay. There is very little interest for Baseball, winning or not. IMO,any place south of the so called Mason Dixon Line is Football country. Incredibly so in Tampa. I live 1 1/2 hours from Tampa. Pick up a sportspage down here , and it’s all about football, from the high school level on up. If the Rays play, you will see a little blurb about it. Miami, with a new stadium, and a WS contending team, might have potential. You have a more diverse population there that like Baseball. Baseball and Spring Training are a nice marriage. Anything beyond that does not work. It has been proven now for years. All and all, Baseball could improve the sport by contracting both of these teams. Put all of the players in a dispersal draft with the worse teams picking first . You would improve the overall talent base in the game. You might see Evan Longoria with the Pirates, and Hanley Ramarez with the Birds. David Price with the Royals, and Josh Johnson with the Padres. You get the idea. Better competitive balance and revved up fan bases for all teams would be a benifit to the game.

by Robert57 on May 22, 2011 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd be interested in seeing the team move to Richmond, VA or Charleston, SC.

I definitely think those cities could support big league ballclub, and they’ve been without a big league team since the MLB started.

DFA Rev Halofan
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation
Fear the Roar.

by TheLoneDavid on May 22, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only teams without attendance problems in Florida

are the COLLEGE football teams. Attendance in Miami, Tampa and Jax isn’t good for the NFL.

But Florida is growing, and these markets are going get bigger all of the time.

by flasoxfan on May 22, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Skinner_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi