Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Jed Lowrie: The Origins Of A Legend

For many, the legend of Jed Lowrie started on April 16, 2011 when he ostensibly took over the Red Sox' starting shortstop position from Marco Scutaro, singling in his first at bat and then homering in his second. These people are rather late to the party.

As it so happens, the Legend of Jed Lowrie is, like any good story, something of a roller coaster. It has not always been this easy, this fun, or this exciting--there are lows to this tale too. But for years now, the Legend of Lowrie has been building--a slowly growing wave that, if you looked hard enough, you could see coming years away.

Of course, there are any number of places you could start this legend. In Salem, Oregon where Lowrie was born, or at any number of other formative moments that must have occurred that led him to baseball. But for Red Sox fans, it makes sense to start at the 2005 MLB Draft.

Star-divide

The 2005 MLB draft produced one of the strongest crops of players in recent memory. Led by a group of All-Stars in Troy Tulowitzki, Ryan Braun, Ryan Zimmerman, Clay Buchholz, and Justin Upton, the pool of players features still more who are just now reaching their potential: Andrew McCutchen, Ricky Romero, Colby Rasmus, Jay Bruce, the list goes on and on and on.

The Red Sox, having lost Orlando Cabrera, Derek Lowe, and Pedro Martinez, entered into the draft with five picks before the second round. They left with Clay Buchholz, Jacoby Ellsbury, Craig Hansen, Michael Bowden, and Jed Lowrie.

Since that point, Clay Buchholz has flirted with the Cy Young award, Jacoby Ellsbury has divided a fanbase while holding down the starting center field position, Craig Hansen disappeared into the black hole that is the Pittsburgh Pirates' farm system, and Michael Bowden has bounced back and forth between Triple-A and Boston, unable to really translate his minor league numbers.

And then there's Jed Lowrie, the 45th overall pick in the draft. A shortstop out of Stanford, Lowrie earned his first round placement with breakout years at Stanford in 2004 and 2005, hitting .399/.505/.734 and .317/.416/.594 respectively, collecting 31 homers along the way. 

He hit the ground running in Lowell. While his home run power didn't carry over to wood bats and professional pitching, he actually improved on his OBP from his last year at Stanford, walking more than he struck out. The organization deemed him worthy of a promotion to Double-A to start 2007 despite a down year in High-A Wilmington.Lowrie took full advantage, establishing himself with a season that earned him both a late-season promotion to Triple-A and Portland's MVP award. Before the year was up, Lowrie had belted 13 homers, put up a .896 OPS (the best in the minors), and was ranked fifth amongst Red Sox minor leaguers on SoxProspects.com, and 73rd amongst all prospects by Baseball America.

Lowrie's peak was short-lived, however, as 2008 saw the double-edged sword that was his Major League debut. 

The Red Sox entered 2008 as World Series Champions, but with one obvious flaw: starting shortstop Julio Lugo. After hitting .237/.294/.349 in his first season with the team and providing little defensively, Lugo had used up all his good will with the local fan base. Jed Lowrie, stashed away in Pawtucket, was the heir apparent.

Lowrie's opportunity came just halfway through April when Mike Lowell sprained his thumb. Though he only received 42 at bats in his first trip to the Majors, he made the best of his opportunity, hitting a solid .310/.340/.476 before returning to the minor leagues. All was going well, but then, on May 16, Jed Lowrie fractured his left wrist in a collision at second base while playing for Pawtucket. When he returned to the majors, his numbers against right-handed pitchers just weren't the same. By the time the playoffs came around, he just wasn't the same from the left side of the plate.

Still, with a supposedly healed wrist, Lowrie looked poised to take over the starting shortstop job in 2009. It was not to be. Just eight games into the season, the team determined that Lowrie's wrist was far from well, and sent him to have surgery. He would spend the rest of the season watching his stock drop dramatically as he went on and off the disabled list. With the arrival of spring training in 2010, Lowrie was no longer a sure thing to factor into the team's plans. His opportunity to change that went up in a flash, though, when he was diagnosed with mono early in March. 

At this point, more than a fair share of fans were ready to write Lowrie off. He had come in strong, yes, but hadn't showed anything at the plate since August 2008. Besides which, he was always injured. Jed Lowrie was, for all intents and purposes, a bust.

But others were not so willing to give up. There were signs that Lowrie still had plenty to give. He hadn't produced at the plate from the left side because his wrist was broken. From the right side he maintained a .934 OPS over the course of the 2008 season. Always injured? Hardly. It was just one wrist injury that was grossly mishandled. The mono was just a crazy fluke--hardly indicative of anything. There was no reason Lowrie shouldn't still be expected to be the Red Sox' shortstop of the future.

And then came the most recent part of the story. We all know by now how Jed Lowrie returned to action in late 2010, taking out all the frustrations of the past two years on opposing pitchers and the balls they threw, putting up numbers that rivaled the best shortstops in the league over the last few months of the season. And now, after a brief period backing up Marco Scutaro, Jed Lowrie seems to have finally made it. The starting shortstop on the Boston Red Sox, owner of a 1.319 OPS that could survive an 0-for-25 streak before dipping below a reasonable .750. 

Will Jed Lowrie end the season batting like Barry Bonds at his best? No, obviously not. But at this point the .900 OPS from 2010 that seemed destined to be an aberration--even if .800 wouldn't be--seems entirely attainable these days. Great for any team in the league, but the perfect fit for the Red Sox, long seeking a permanent fix at shortstop, and even better providing the lefty-killer that the Sox have been worrying about since the loss of Victor Martinez.

But was this a miracle? Lightning in a bottle? Or was it just the fulfillment of the promise Lowrie showed in college, as a first round draft pick, and as a top prospect in years past? The Legend of Jed Lowrie has reached new heights, but by no means is it just beginning.

Comment 87 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

He's not just rivaling the best shortstops right now

He’s rivaling the best hitters in MLB, period. There are only five AL players with OPS’s higher than his since the All-Star Break last year: Konerko, Cabrera, Thome, Hamilton, and Bautista.

Right now, we have absolutely no idea where Lowrie’s ceiling is—and that’s probably the most exciting part of all.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Apr 19, 2011 8:16 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm a big Lowrie fan

But you can’t say we have no idea what his ceiling is. You can get a fairly good idea by looking at his minor league numbers. If he could top out as a mid-.800s OPS hitter with even average defense at SS, he’d be extremely valuable. My best guess, Lowrie should be around a 4-5 WAR player as a regular SS.

There’s no way Lowrie continues like this all year. Lowrie kills left-handed pitching. So far this year, his lefty-righty split in terms of PA are even (meaning Tito is playing him in optimal situations). If Lowrie plays everyday, that won’t continue. You’d expect at least two-thirds of his PA to come against righties.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Apr 19, 2011 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions  

your comment made me look at his splits

and his OPS vs. lefties of 1.647 made me giggle a little involuntarily. Honestly, if he can hit literally half of that over the year, I’ll be thrilled.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe ceiling is the wrong word

It seems like that he’s hitting another level in his development this year, since he was able to focus on becoming a better player this offseason, rather than getting healthy.

What’s not clear is if, offensively, he’s going to be another Pedroia, or another Youkilis, or something in between. It will be a lot of fun to watch, though.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Apr 19, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

or something below both

My guess is that a full-time Lowrie facing RHP 60+% of the time is not as good offensively as Pedroia. Still should be a top-tier hitting SS.

by Buzzy on Apr 19, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think his splits aren't as big as they appear to be

Quite a bit of the skew comes from the end of 2008 where he hit a wall against righties as a LHB. If he can get just a little better against righties, he moves ahead Pedroia rather easily.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Apr 19, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

specifically, a wrist-shaped wall

according to him, he’s always hit for higher average, but not as much power, as a lefty.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Possibly

however I never understood the claims that the wrist injury should hurt his hitting as a LHB more; it was the left wrist which is just the guide hand.
Does anyone have a breakdown of his L-R splits in the minors? If indeed they are solid then I might also be inclined to thk he certainly could surpass Pedroia.

by Buzzy on Apr 19, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

unfortunately, minorleaguesplits.com doesn't exist anymore

which is sad because it was an awesome resource. Without it, I don’t know where to find the info. But Soxprospects’ profile on him says:

Hits for average very well, and equally from both sides of the plate.

more of the power comes from the left hand as a LHB- hence why lefties bat that way.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here

Lowrie’s minor league splits.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Apr 19, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question- What do we do with Iglesias if this keeps up?

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 9:30 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

+1

I was literally just going to ask that. I know it’s unreasonable for him to keep a +.500BA but if he ends up around .300 w/ 15-20 HR’s, what with Iglesias?

Winning

by return2greatness on Apr 19, 2011 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Where's his bat these days?

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Apr 19, 2011 9:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

his .250/.314/.250 line is none too pretty

but it is early in the year, and he’s just seeing AAA pitching for the first time (after not even seeing too much AA pitching), so I’m not going to judge it too much until later in the year- like July-August. If his bat does come around, I still say that on the Sox, Youk would be best suited to DH/back up a couple positions, with Lowrie at third and Iglesias at short. If his bat doesn’t come around, then Iglesias stays in Pawtucket.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 9:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

That's what I thought.

There is absolutely NO NEED to rush Iglesias. His situation is a “cross-that-bridge-when-we-get-to-it” scenario, as far as I’m concerned.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Apr 19, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

I really don't like Lowrie at third though.

A ton of his value comes from playing at SS. If he hits like this, he’ll probably be a decent bat at third, but he can play SS, and he’s a huge asset there. I’m not sure how to handle Iglesias, but Lowrie should stay at SS.

by ThePanda on Apr 19, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't know about that

good patience with some power and good defense if harder to find than you would think at third. If he could manage an .850 OPS, he would’ve ranked 7th among all third basemen last year (including Bautista, who really was a RF.

In addition, it IS a very important defensive position, and the consensus seems to be that while he has average defense at shortstop, he has very good defense at third. Value-wise, we’re talking about guys in the league of David Wright and A-Rod.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

you take it a year at a time

in 2012 the options are

1. Iglesias stays at Pawtucket one more year, Jed at SS
2. Iglesias, if ready, moves to SS, Lowrie slides to 3B, Youk to 1B/DH

by BobZupcic on Apr 19, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

or

3. If Iglesias starts to hit and Lowrie is entrenched at SS, you’ve got a nice trading chip either way

by BobZupcic on Apr 19, 2011 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Uh

YES. We may as well get Hendry in that deal too, since he wouldn’t be long for chicago.

by Sean O on Apr 19, 2011 12:26 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

would we have to take him?

like Rivera in the Wells deal? Or could we pass on that part?

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

Iglesias for Soto?

Absolutely. I’m sure you would have to add a minor league pitcher but I would still do it with most pitchers in our Minor league system, save for a couple.

by The Name is Dalton on Apr 19, 2011 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then again

I don’t see why Chicago would even consider it. They have their SS of the future in Castro who is hitting well at this point. No reason to trade for a SS with a good glove that might learn to hit.

by The Name is Dalton on Apr 19, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

or Lowrie for Soto?

Right now I’m more inclined to keep Lowrie even given Iglesias’ wayyy better glove.

by dsharp on Apr 19, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Surprised Nobody Actually Came Out and Asked

So a +1 to you. :-)

Like it’s been said, but I gather, Iglesias will be given all the time in the world to take the job from the Jedi (the apprentice will become the master, see what I did there? ROFL), or he’ll become our SS, Jed the 3B, and Youk our new DH/1B/3B (which I gather he may eventually once his body can’t stand the rigors of fielding).

"Common sense is quite rare." - Voltaire

The Artist Formerly Known as PacoL250
Resident Psychologist and Tech Support at Over the Monster: SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Web Site

by Raj Ghetia on Apr 19, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im thinking the same thing

but was not sure about it. What is the future of Navarro?

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

Navarro is hard to say

Between our options, i don’t see a place for him on the team unless they think he maxes out as a utility infielder. Unless he can keep mashing like he has been this year, I doubt they’d move Youk to DH for him if Iglesias can’t hit, but I could be wrong.

Maybe trade bait? Maybe a utility role? Probably he lingers in Pawtucket for now. Anyways, these are good problems to have- too many good players on the cheap.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lavarnway or Expo may be catcher if the future too.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:44 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Tek is good but can’t play everyday…. call up Expo? His defense is superb

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:50 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Tek isn't good

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Apr 19, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

We need a catcher of both.

Montero or Soto please.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on Apr 19, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why would Arizona trade Montero?

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 12:15 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

if they decide they won't compete this year or next

which it seems relatively likely they might decide. More likely than the Cubs having any inclination to trade Soto.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

He's Arb 3

and due a pay raise (making 3.2 million right now), plus Byrnes knows our system very well

by BobZupcic on Apr 19, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Towers, however

doesn’t know our system as well :)

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Towers is a trade guy, not a draft guy

He’ll want our prospects.

I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation

by TheLoneDavid on Apr 19, 2011 2:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Would you give up

a package of Reddick, Workman and Balcom-Miller for Montero?

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, yeah.

But that’s not a deal they would ever make.

Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG

by Ben Buchanan on Apr 19, 2011 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

ok

Kalish?

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Absolutely not.

As much as I want a catcher, I want Kalish in our OF.

by AlohaSox on Apr 19, 2011 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 4:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kalish won't have the same value to them as he does to us

Remember, they have Chris Young and Justin Upton firmly entrenched in CF and RF.

I could see Tejada/Britton/Balcom-Miller getting Montero.

I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation

by TheLoneDavid on Apr 19, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but nobody here ever wants to give up anything of value

I’d definitely do that trade, especially if we could extend Montero.

I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation

by TheLoneDavid on Apr 19, 2011 5:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tejada/Navarro

Clearly we have some growing depth at middle infield, so those guys might be attractive to a team like Arizona.

by AlohaSox on Apr 19, 2011 5:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Probably

but that’s not enough to get a good, young catcher

I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
Official Baker of Red Sox Nation

by TheLoneDavid on Apr 19, 2011 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Offtop- what is the perception of Alex Hassan? No one is talking about him but he’s been mashing.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:42 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

DH

Wolf …. do you think we might see DH by committee? If things pan out, it seems like we might end up having a number of good hitters who are also bona fide position players. Not a bad problem to have … maybe it makes the expense of a DH only roster spot not worth the cost?

by 111SoxFan111 on Apr 19, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd guess more likely that

we’d see one guy as the everyday DH but with the other guys rotating in the DH spot for rest a bit more often, as it’s probably better to keep guys in the field most days. Personally, I’ve always loved the idea of a versatile player in the DH spot because of the massive flexibility taht provides, and Youk seems perfect for that.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

"Youk seems perfect for that"

Except for the fact that he detests changing positions all the time.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Apr 19, 2011 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah I'm not suggesting that he rotates in regularly

just if there’s an injury or something and they need the position covered. In my world, he’d DH almost all the time, just would provide some flexibility in case of injury. We’ve got another great defender at first who’s here until 2018 and Youk’s defense just doesn’t look very good at third to me, so on this team I’d say that’s the position he’s most suited to.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 1:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Gotcha.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Apr 19, 2011 3:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

In Youk's Defense

He’s always been a 3B, it’s just that he made the transition to 1B so damn well that anything less than that, we all have fits.

"Common sense is quite rare." - Voltaire

The Artist Formerly Known as PacoL250
Resident Psychologist and Tech Support at Over the Monster: SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Web Site

by Raj Ghetia on Apr 19, 2011 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Navarro

Depends. IMO, if he keeps on hitting he might end up on a short track to MLB either with the Sox (2012 UIF) or as trade bait. FWIW, I don’t think it’s a given that Iglesias starts 2012 in the majors. If he struggles with the bat, I don’t think the team would hesitate to give him a full year plus in AAA … bringing him to the majors in his age 22 season isn’t exactly putting him on the slow track.

So I don’ think it is at all unlikely he gets the call before Iglesias and fills the UIF role until JI is ready … then he’s trade bait.

by 111SoxFan111 on Apr 19, 2011 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

What about Middlebrooks? I really like him.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:41 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Marisa, I might be one of the biggest Middlebrooks haters around.....

…but have you ever seen him play? I did multiple times last year and the defense was poor and I thought that there were holes in his swing. He’s way too far off and I don’t think he has the “All-Star” potential that Iglesias, Lowrie are being hailed at.

Middlebrooks is a 3B too. Way too immobile for SS.

"Hating the (New York) Yankees is as American as pizza pie, unwed mothers, and cheating on your income tax"

I'm back, that's all, formerly known as Sox-Inda-South!

by GameSox on Apr 19, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ive seen him play once

and he went 3-for-5 that day too, so I may be scewed. Iglesias is far better, but Middlebrooks is still a a prospect.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought the scutaro signing was stupid

The guy has a career year on a team that sucked and the Sox pay him for it? There were several SS they could have picked up cheaper. I always liked Lowrie and was disappointed when they picked up Scutaro because I knew what that meant for Jed. I was praying Jed would be healthy this year and take the job from Marco. Let’s hope this continues.

by iLikeStuff on Apr 19, 2011 10:02 AM EDT reply actions  

In retrospect it looks like a great signing

For 3/4 of last year Lowrie had mono…can you imagine how bad it could have been last year without knowing that Scutaro was going to come out and give you solid and consistent play at SS?

His contract doesn’t become an albatross on this team and the Sox have a great super UT guy coming off the bench now. Everyone wins.

by ritz on Apr 19, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

+1

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Apr 19, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

The Scutaro signing

was not stupid becase it was a short term contract and decently cheap. That by definition is what makes it not stupid. Scutaro was average last year (he was a 2+ WAR player worth his contract) and given Scutaro’s history of utility playing, his attitude obeing ok off the bench and Lowrie’s inability to stay healthy up until that point-the move was just fine.

by Buzzy on Apr 19, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

What?

Theo did what he needed to do- get a serviceable SS on a short contract. He had no assurance Jed would be ready, and he was the ONLY SS MLB ready.
Any guy you get on a 1 year deal would have been pretty horrid. 2 years with an option was a wise move by Theo which bought him time.
It would be stupid if Theo had pulled a Lugo or Rent-a-Wreck II, big money for 4 or more years. He may have learned his lesson. Sadly it took him a 2nd disaster, but I thought Lugo would do better after watching him kill us while in Tampa.
At worst, as Ritz noted, he returns to being the super utility guy. But if Jed suffers a horrid Regression to Mean, he remains a steady starter. His current BA is a slump, just like Youk, A-Gon, Crawford etc. It is not indicative of his career, or an instant decline in skills. The guy hit reasonably well last year with a bad neck and arm. He probably has to work out some bad habits he developed.

simul justus et peccator

by cavman on Apr 19, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lowrie had not proven to be healthy

they needed some sort of a reliable option and Scoot was coming off a career year.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on Apr 19, 2011 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

Play Both Ways

If he sees any pine time in the next two weeks, Francona should be fired. Scutaro can play late inning stuff right now. The Sox have 2 lefties coming up in Oakland. They have to find ways to hit lefties and Lowrie is currently #1 in that department.

by serf_tide on Apr 19, 2011 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

Lefties

so, generally speaking – lefties run about 30% of all starters

Here are the starters faced by Boston including the 2 game stint with OAK
Wilson (TEX) L
Lewis (TEX) R
Harrison (TEX) L
Tomlin (CLE) R
Talbot (CLE) R
Carmona (CLE) R
Hughes (NYY) R
Nova (NYY) R
Sabathia (NYY) L
Hellickson (TBR) R
Price (TBR) L
Cecil (TOR) L
Reyes (TOR) L
Litsch (TOR) R
Romero (TOR) L
Anderson (OAK) L
Gonzalez (OAK) L

So 9 of 17 starts so far by lefties or 53% (6 of the last 7)

by BobZupcic on Apr 19, 2011 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Fortunately,

Ortiz and Drew, our two lefties who looked like platoon players last year, have wOBAs of .472 and .384 respectively against lefties this year. Probably can’t keep those numbers up, but they are positive indications to start the year.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

All the more reason Jed is so valuable.

As pointed out above, his OPS against LHP is ridiculous this season: 1.647.

While it makes sense that he’ll see some regression as an everyday player facing more RHPs (well, and frankly, some regression due to the ridiculous #s he’s put up so far), I also think our lefty heavy line up may be a piece of why we’ve seen 9/17 starts against LHPs. So Jed is a huge weapon against teams that attempt that strategy.

Or does everyone think it’s just a coincidence that we continue to face the LHPs early in the season?

by AlohaSox on Apr 19, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I think it's mostly coincidence

I can’t imagine these teams are all lining up their rotations specifically for a series or two against the Sox. I don’t see many of them making drastic changes right before/after the Sox series’, and starters generally work best when they can stay on a set schedule.

by wolf9309 on Apr 19, 2011 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know, but still... 9 out of 17?

Then I guess we can expect that to even out as the season goes on.

Interesting to note that 4 or the last 5 were LHPs, and yet we won three of those games.

by AlohaSox on Apr 19, 2011 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is probably true

We hit 4 straight right-handers in La La Land. Toronto/Oakland are lefty heavy

by BobZupcic on Apr 19, 2011 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wrong

His legend began when he won the freakin’ ALDS in 2008 for us. Which everyone seems to forget.

by Sean O on Apr 19, 2011 12:24 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

It began even earlier than that

judging by this Surviving Grady feature.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Apr 19, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

It began even earlier ...

Sweet jesus!!! How’d you dig that one up? Nice work.

by 111SoxFan111 on Apr 19, 2011 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

The inspired lunacy is unforgettable

And I remembered roughly when it appeared, so not so hard to find. . . .

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Apr 19, 2011 3:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

+1

Nice find man, completely forgot about that one.

"Common sense is quite rare." - Voltaire

The Artist Formerly Known as PacoL250
Resident Psychologist and Tech Support at Over the Monster: SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Web Site

by Raj Ghetia on Apr 19, 2011 3:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

WOW!

This was awesome. Of course, it also reflects a time when we included Jacoby as a valued contributor to the team. (Hopefully, we’ll see him recover the fan love this season.)

by AlohaSox on Apr 19, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Skinner_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi