why so down on the Red Sox?
People are outrageously down on the Red Sox. People are saying that we have a 0% chance at winning the division, that we'll be a .500 team. I personally think we are much better than the Rays.
Take this into consideration. It is almost impossible for the Red Sox to get worse. Clay Buchholz was injured for a ton of time, that would've seriously helped the team. Also this, nobody will be as bad as John Lackey was last year, his performance was the single reason why we did not make the playoffs last year. My personal WAR stat has him at -1.5. That means if we replaced him with some random minor leaguer, not a good minor leaguer like Felix Doubront or Junichi Tazawa, or Alex Wilson, but if we replaced himi with someone like Brandon Duckworth, we would win a and a half more games. That would put us in the playoffs. Third Carl Crawford is almost guaranteed to rebound, according to fangraphs, his WAR dropped 7.4. Let's just use a simple marcel projection of his last 4 years of WAR, it's 3.9. Improving 4 wins. Also Bard has a chance of being an ace, he could bust, but as I showed earlier, busting would not be nearly as bad as John Lackey last year. We also had Kyle Weiland and Tim Wakefield perform awfully along with Lackey, both of them are likely to be gone. I think Lavarnway will get called up mid season, and be much better than Tek was last year. Shoppach will also be better than tek. Also the right field situation, while the Sox did just trade Reddick, the Right fielders will still be much better than last year Kalish and Sweeny will easily top the horrible line the Red Sox right fielders put up in 2011 because of JD Drew's awful performance. And last but not least, luck. I did a test on excel using a random number generator, it was very complicated, but all you need to know, is that on average, one true talent 98 win team becomes a 90 win team per season, I believe we were the 98 win team because in Clay Davenport's advanced standings, the Red Sox have a schedule and pythag adjusted record of 98 and 64, the 2nd best adjusted record in the league, ahead of the Yankees. Also, coolstandings.com had the Red Sox at 99.9% playoff odds at one time. For that to happen is so unlikely, I know it was extremely frustrating for that to happen, but it was probably luck. it will definitely not happen again. I think the Red Sox have a very good shot at winning the division, and an even better shot at wild card with 2 wild cards in 2012.
112 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I agree with most of what you're saying...
…But I’m pretty intrigued by your “personal WAR stat”. What’s that all about?
I made my own version of WAR
it includes RA9 for pitching, I like to average it with fangraphs pitching WAR.
In my opinion
If they get Kuroda or Oswalt, they’re the best team in baseball.
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
well i havent seen or heard anyone say or write that
the sox have no chance at division or that they will be a .500 team is just ridiculous. what i do sense and myself included is after last offseason expectations were so high and predictions so lofty then the bad first month followed by thge best 4 months in baseball and finished off with the biggest collapse in major league history. i am going into this season with a more even keeled look onto 2012. but i will say this i love the malancon and bailey aquisitions i understand the bard expirement for the rotation stretch him out and see if he can do it and if not he can go back to the bullpen. now i think if they could get kuroda or oswalt on a 1 or 2 year deal and keep aceves for the bullpen i would be very excited about the red sox chances !! a starting rotation of becket lester bucholz oswalt /kuroda and bard with a bullpen led by aceves melanson and bailey is a pretty good staff on paper.
Z3rogs said
“So what’s YOUR plan?
Tell us how you would improve the rotation given the current state of things”
Sean O said “Dumpster dive and accept that we’re finishing around .500
If our dumpster acquisitions do something, maybe we somehow win the wildcard.”
Sean O said at a different time “Would it really be time to panic?
I can’t be alone in realizing we have right around a 0% chance of winning the division. If we’re lucky, and the Rays backslide, we may have a slight chance at the WC. Then in the playoffs, anything can happen.”
Then he said
“In any other division, sure
In the Beast, I think we’d be lucky to finish third.”
So really
When you say:
People are outrageously down on the Red Sox.
You are really just referring to Sean O apparently?
by The Name is Dalton on Dec 29, 2011 3:31 PM EST up reply actions
no,
lots of other people are too, this is a high 90s wins talent team. I’ve heard a lot of people say they’ll be worse than last year, this makes no sense to me.
Well last year we were supposed to be a high 90s low 100s win team
And for a while we were on that pace and then suddenly we weren’t, THAT makes no sense to me.
Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"
Yup, I stick by this being a mediocre team
That will finish .500 to slightly above .500. Effectively no chance at the division.
I don't agree with that at all.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven
After acquiring Bailey
They potentially have 4 solid starting pitchers plus one of the group of Doubront, Bowden, Aceves, or WIlson. Pitching is their only problem and they currently have a fairly solid bullpen. They are a low 90’s win team who will be one of the 2 wild card positions along with the Rays or Angels/Rangers.
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
by Conor Duffy on Dec 29, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions
They also potentially
have one starting pitcher, which makes us an 81 win team. Buchholz is often either glass or ineffective, even year Beckett, and the Great Bard Experiment.
You're not right on Buchholz.
He hasn’t thrown 200 innings yet, but he’s definitely usually an effective pitcher.
by revived0103 on Dec 29, 2011 11:01 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting
because outside of injury he’s very consistent. His 2011 was almost identical to 2010 pure numbers wise, except he didn’t get as lucky, and still put up good results. He’s definitely a good young pitcher.
by revived0103 on Dec 29, 2011 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
His 2011 involved him being out for almost the entire season
That would make him inconsistent to me.
He's had a major league career since what, 07?
He’s only gone over 100 IP once, last year.
Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"
To be fair he has spent a lot of time in the minors
Since 07, and he threw just under 200 innings total in 09. He’s clearly not one of the best pitchers in the league, but he’s also clearly good, outside of breaking his back.
by revived0103 on Dec 30, 2011 12:13 AM EST up reply actions
So shuttled back and forth from Boston to Pawtucket for the 07, 08, 09 seasons
Was good in 10 and then hurt for most of 11?
And this is “consistent” to you?
Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"
Look at his numbers.
He’s changed a little bit, but he’s looked like the same guy numbers wise since 2008. His strikeouts have gone down along with his walks and ERA, but he’s been above average since the end of 07.
I can't look at a guy who only has 1 full season under his belt
Out of 5 potential ones and say he is consistent. Consistent is more about just how he plays, its about how often he plays too. Nick Johnson is an excellent offensive player, however he is not consistent because you don’t know how much you can count on him in any given season.
Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"
But last year is the first time he's really hurt himself.
The other years are incomplete because he spent time in the minors.
But I think stuff wise
and potential wise, he’s not one of the problems with the rotation. Our first three pitchers really are all above average for the league.
I agree with you
I think that if we can sign a starter we should be a 94ish win team next season. I fully expect Ellsbury to regress a bit and I don’t think Ortiz will put up quite the numbers he did in 2011, but I feel that a full offseason for Gonzo not having to rehab his shoulder and rebounding for Crawford to make up that difference. And with the offense we should put up we only really need a solid pitching staff, not an ace 1-5, as long as it isn’t as atrocious as what the production was at the end of last season we should be fine.
Fuck coolstandings
I gave them about a 25% to miss the playoffs 22 games out…and that was being nice.
Given that its almost impossible not to improve in RF-LF and the 4-5 pitching spots, I generally agree with you. I’d say 93 wins. I still think the Rays win the division.
BUT they could also have Beckett, Bard, Buchholz, and Youk be on the DL at the same time with degradation from SS,2B,CF and DH.
Every team, every year, has injuries that spoil the best laid plans.
including the rays and mfy. With the emphasis on conditioning through offseason and ST, with Youk, Gonzo, PD, Buchholz, Beckett, Bailey rehabbed and recovered from injuries, their likelihood of staying healthy increases, barring a freak occurence. So the Sox are no more likely to experience such degredation than any other team. And if they do Lavarnway, Middlebrooks, Iglesias, Anderson, Kalish, Lin, Linares, Doubront, Tazawa, Wilson, Matsuzaka, Hill and others are knocking at the door, and inuries wont hurt as much as in 2011.
lol
Middlebrook, Iglesias, Lars…Lin..Kalish…i cant go on..
Laugh away
but these kids were not ready last season, but were able to contribute. Just because they arent top $$ 30 year old FA’s doesnt mean they are lol. Middlebrooks is a good bet to replace Youk soon. Lavarnway is expected to be up this year. Iglesias is the best defensive SS we have playing wayyy above his age and experience levels at AAA. He hit well at age level, and if he hits well in AAA maybe you will swallow your laughs. Lin is our best defensive OF for whom Fenway’s CF and RF are no more than an interesting challenge. Unless you demand 25 more HR from him for a team that doesnt rely need it, you wouldnt laugh at his defense. You would laugh at the potential of Doubront, Tazawa, Wilson to help this team? Get used to laughing then because unless traded you will see alot of yhem this year, and be glad for tbeir contribution. I knew if I included Lars or Miller in that list someone would zero in on them to negate the entire list. Bottom line, though, they have their strenghts and have made it to the Show (like you?) and could yet become reliable players and have the ability to contribute if needed … Certainly as well or better than backups on most teams. I dont drink koolaid but I do respect, admire, and have hopes for young players waiting for their chance. Laugh away.
I will
Middlebrook has proven nothing in AAA, Iglesias went backwards from what I hear…Lars is a bust..Kalish, well we just got the new news on him today…
You say you’re not drinking the kool-aid, but that you might as well have busted through my screen

Oh...
…and assure you when the Sox are at .500 on May 1st, there will be panic in the streets.
And Sean, Aloha, Rogue, and I will be sitting somewhere, sharing some beers and watching it all burn.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 29, 2011 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
I was thinking about buying a six-pack of each of New Holland Brewing Co. high gravity series.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 29, 2011 5:07 PM EST up reply actions
What's a Rays fans?
Joe, the reason we shout "WE ARE" and the reason the answer will always be "PENN STATE"
by Rogue Nine on Dec 29, 2011 5:44 PM EST up reply actions 4 recs
I think that would require transforming into a plastic chair.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 29, 2011 6:43 PM EST up reply actions
Turned it green
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Dec 29, 2011 7:47 PM EST up reply actions
It will be bard to top their run
through May, June, July, August but it will be very easy to reverse last April and Sept. With a healthy Gonzo, PD, Youk, CC, Buchholz, Jenks, Hill; a platoon of Salty/Shop stopping the running game; and an upgraded Rotation and Pen, this should be a better team. More importantly, after September and subsequent changes, it will be more motivated and consistent. A true force in the division.
I will believe this team is more motivated when i see it
..I haven’t heard any lip service to back that up except from the new guys.
so?
why do they need to give you lip service? What does that affect?
I don’t care if you believe they’re motivated. I’d imagine they don’t either.
heh
“They arn’t motivated to care if you think they are motivated.”
Funny because it is true
But let’s be honest though, does it really matter? When it comes to this, players are not stupid and they know what the public is like. They will give the same, canned comments that all players give and know that the media and fans will make their decisions based on the W-L column. Which is what will decide when this motivation/clubhouse stuff will die.
- If they win, the fans won’t give a #$@#.
- If they lose, the media will look for some headline-grabbing reason to try and explain it and the fans (many of them) will latch onto it due to the “need” for people to have a scapegoat.
by The Name is Dalton on Dec 29, 2011 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
actually a quiet off-season is very encouraging
seeing as how the more noisy ones have come up smelly
And Pedey
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
Because the image is too large or you think Im being sarcastic?
I’m not being sarcastic. I wish there was a thumbs up button so you could see someone basically saying “I disagreed with you upthread, but agree with you here and shit lets all just be friends, at least until my ritalin wears off.”
I could see how that could come off as being sarcastic.
But since it’s not: a hearty, “Good reference!” to you, sir.
by abbreviatedman on Dec 29, 2011 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
Well said.
(If a little Wall-O’-Text-y.)
The only counterpoint I’d give is that Boston’s terrible luck last year was the twin of the terrible luck the year before, which tells you that the mean, health-wise, may be lower than we thought. We probably can’t regress our team’s health projection back to the average health of your average major league team.
That said, it really just has to be “bad health” and not “catastrophic health” for us to make the playoffs. What’s more, with the extra wild card, our chances at making the playoffs are improved.
Anyone telling you that 2012’s team is going to be 10 wins worse than 2011’s team is not providing level-headed analysis. There is no reasonable projection of this team’s individual performances that doesn’t add up to at least a 90-win team.
I'm not quite clear on that myself.
But I believe they’re trying to get it instituted for 2012.
by abbreviatedman on Dec 29, 2011 7:00 PM EST up reply actions
Do we actually get to field a Best Case Scenario Red Sox
vs everyone else’s Reality Team? Because that would be awesome. Anything but our Reality Team, which isn’t really any good.
Y'know, I think a lot of people who have a problem with us
are fielding the Best Case team, while you and I are looking at Worst Case Scenarios.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 29, 2011 7:30 PM EST up reply actions
Best Case Scenario Team:
This offseason, they go out and get Cody Ross to platoon with Sweeney in right field. That would secure up the only weak spot in the lineup and give us the best offense in baseball. Also, they get Kuroda or Oswalt to fill up the remaining spot of the rotation. Buchholz and Bailey stay healthy and Beckett is odd-year. This team is one of the wild cards along with the Rays or Angels/Rangers.
Reality Team:
They have a very good offense with one weaker spot in right field which could potentially be platooned by Sweeney and McDonald. The pitching rotation is very weak with one guy we can really count on and two guys who are sort of wild cards: Buchholz with his health and Beckett with his even/odd years. Bard may work out or be a bust which is another wild card. The bullpen is very good, particularly the back end of Aceves, Melancon, and Bailey. If this team misses the playoffs, it won’t be by much.
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
You know, I'm not really on board with what's going on with the Sox these days
And I’m not too pleased with the corner we have painted, and are currently painting, ourselves into.
But it is really premature to write off this team as not a playoff contender. The Yankees themselves aren’t looking all that shit-hot to me right now. A-Rod is in Germany getting Euroblasted or something, Jeter is a continually declining black hole at short, AJ is the MFY version of John Lackey (or vice-versa), except he’s healthy enough to actually pitch. Tex? Whatever. There’s a whole pile of regression about to happen on the Yankees. Add Mariano to that list. That old bastard can’t last forever.
MFY have one reliable starter, we have one. I still like our #2/#3 better than theirs, regardless of their issues.
All of which is to say that if the Sox have the problems…it isn’t enough to write off the team. I can easily see the Yankees dropping more than the Sox do.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven
I think it's just absurd to assume the Sox aren't going to sign at least one SP.
And also, I think it’s dumb to assume the Bard experiment will absolutely 100% be a failure. We can at least wait till after Spring Training to see, you know, how he actually pitches as a starter.
As it is, we have an improved, stabilized bullpen, even after the loss of Papelbon and Bard, which is a pretty significant accomplishment.
if Bard fails he goes back to the pen
and we have potentially super-dominant pen and can pick up a cheap filler to throw in the 5th slot. If he pitches well then our pen is a bit more suspect but we’ve now got another solid starter.
The real crux here is signing a guy to man the #4 slot, if that happens then this has been a solid off-season
...If Bard's arm doesn't explode
As for the Yankees, they don’t have to look good on paper, they’ll somehow win 96-100 like they always do.
Voodoo magic, man
That or game fixing.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 29, 2011 10:17 PM EST up reply actions
You act like starting pitching
is one of the most dangerous activities known to man.
by revived0103 on Dec 29, 2011 11:04 PM EST up reply actions
Indeed.
Most evidence suggests that the pitching pattern of relievers is FAR harder on the arm than that of starters.
by abbreviatedman on Dec 29, 2011 11:15 PM EST up reply actions
I think that's possible.
Where is this evidence?
by revived0103 on Dec 29, 2011 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
I have no empirical evidence
But I recall that when they were talking about moving Papelbon to the rotation, one of the primary reasons was that his doctor’s thought that the set schedule of pitching every five days would be easier on his arm/shoulder
Not known to man
Known to the human elbow? Kinda.
He fell apart after 60 innings this year, so in return we’re deciding to up his workload. This is a separate argument from thinking he can actually pitch well.
We use Bard a lot out of the bullpen.
As in quite often, That could have just as negative effect as more innings spread out over time.
by revived0103 on Dec 30, 2011 12:08 AM EST up reply actions
He can't possibly be worse than Lackey
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
Reasonable optimism
We won 90 games last year with a -1.2 WAR from Lackey, -0.2 from Miller, and another -1.2 from Wake. So theoretically if we just run average pitchers out there for 3-5 we’re up to 92 games just from that (and when healthy Buch is definitely north of average).
That's actually...
…close to my usual rejoinder every year when the Yankees are ‘supposed’ to implode.
1) They have actual prospects and chips.
2) That GD ‘pinstriped effect’. (See Colon) call it Yankee Pride or Frankenstein doctors….whatever…Sox seem to have the opposite. Sox Sloveness.
So you dont think a lineup that
produced some of baseball’s most potent offense, even with Youk, Gonzo, CC, JD struggling can’t repeat, even tho they come back healthy and with a chip on their shoulders?
And you dont think that Beckett and Lester, whk had good years in 2011 will repeat. And a healthy Buchholz wont have a good year. And whoever is signed as #4 wont do well, and any of Acevas/Bard/Doubront/Tazawa who might be the #5 will also fail.
And a pen of Bailey, Melancon, Jenks, Morales, Acevas/Bard, maybe Doubront, Albers, Bowden, Miller, Atchison, Tazawa, Hill, Carlson is also a fail
And the defense of Gonzo, PD, Scoot, Youk, CC, Ells will.be porous, and Salty/Shop/Lavarnway wont shut down the running game either. Oh yeah, and the bench and depth are also pitiful.
Is your life that bad? I am truly sorry. If you are correct, I’m switching to soccer. But the evidence is very much against your incredible negativity, so I hope you dont mind my being a fan of the 2012 Red Sox.
You should be a fan whether they win 90 or 19 games
Doesn’t make blind optimism any more logical than pessimism.
You can still be a fan and not want to watch the games.
I’ve been a Lions fan since before I moved to New England, but I didn’t watch any of the 0-16 season in 2008.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 30, 2011 1:59 AM EST up reply actions
Ad hominems and victim mentality aside….My biggest hope is the recent realization that RF production can only go up. Way up. LF also has to. Add that to the 4-5 starters having nowhere to go but up. I still think the Rays will take the division though. They still have a plethora of SPs to trade.
Gonzo didn’t struggle, I expect his production to be near identical to what it was last year. All this ’He’ll hit 50 HRS!!! in Fenway!!’ was just so much felgercarb. Scoots D will be porous, his range is nothing special.
…and there’s nothing stopping you from watching soccer now…aside from it being a corrupt, ridiculous sport that turns on the whimsey of whether or not a ref bought into a dive. Or decides to kick out a GK defending himself from a pitch invader….and this is coming from someone who played for years,…soccer that is…
I think we can realistically expect 30-35 home runs from Adrian in 2012
I feel his lack of power came from his shoulder injury still nagging at him.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 30, 2011 2:01 AM EST up reply actions
He admitted it was at the end of the season.
by aubatron2011 on Dec 30, 2011 10:42 AM EST up reply actions
Imagine what he'll do when he's totally healthy
too bad we don’t have any pitching to back him up.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 30, 2011 6:26 PM EST up reply actions
I'd say were are a bit short but
Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Bailey, Melancon, Aceves is a nice start
Fine.
“Too bad we won’t have any pitching behind him two out of every five days until one of our three starters get hurt, which they will because lets face it, Baseball God hates us.”
Better?
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 30, 2011 6:55 PM EST up reply actions
Better
Check out my blog at http://conor-soxrox.blogspot.com
by Conor Duffy on Dec 30, 2011 10:47 PM EST up reply actions
I would also add to this
“Ehhhhhhhhhhh” Arthur Fonzarelli to Richie son of Howard
by The Name is Dalton on Jan 1, 2012 8:19 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Well met.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven
Positivism? Positivity?
Positivism??
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven
Which is one of the reasons why I think this team will be better next year.
Adrian’s going to be a full year out from surgery, meaning he’s going to have the ability to strength train for the entire off-season. The average might dip a little but his power numbers should go up. If he and some who had a “down” season offensively can pick up the regression of Ellsbury, the pitchers will have more leads to work with. I believe that was one of the downfalls of this team, while they did lead the Majors in runs scored, there were periods where they struggled mightly, which led to more stressful outings for the pitchers.
by aubatron2011 on Dec 30, 2011 6:32 PM EST up reply actions
Yet even they have missed out on the prize
so often: 1 world series title in the last 11 years for so much money
I honestly believe after what we saw last year
that winning the WS takes more luck than skill.
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 31, 2011 10:41 AM EST up reply actions
Looking at 2011 projections
Sean O undershot on almost every player on the Red Sox except Crawford. He is obviously way too pessimistic.
by Bososx13 on Dec 31, 2011 7:58 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
You my friend
are a bit late to the party
by BobZupcic on Dec 31, 2011 9:29 AM EST up reply actions 3 recs
rec'd
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
OTM | Silver Seven
And... Green'd
You build on failure. You use it as a stepping stone. Close the door on the past. You don't try to forget the mistakes, but you don't dwell on it. You don't let it have any of your energy, or any of your time, or any of your space.
-Johnny Cash
by TheLoneDavid on Dec 31, 2011 11:12 AM EST up reply actions

by 




























