If You Haven’t Got Your Health: Part 1 Overview
In the wake of the largest pennant race collapse ever, Red Sox fans are looking for answers. What went wrong? Who is to blame for this epic failure? Manager Terry Francona is already gone. Speculation about GM Theo Epstein’s future abounds. Unlike so many of the Red Sox heartbreaking failures, this season’s tragedy offers up no singular villain to curse. There is no Bill Buckner or Grady Little this time around. Robert Andino will not live in
The 2010 team did not break too many hearts on their way to third place in the AL East. That team was undercut by an almost unimaginable string of injuries and never seemed poised to make a run toward October. The 2010 high water came on July 3, just a few days after losing star Dustin Pedroia. Injuries plagued every aspect of the team that year; pitchers Josh Beckett, Clay Buchholz lost significant time, both catchers, Victor Martinez and Jason Varitek, went down for extended periods. Finally, when Kevin Youkilis, arguably the team’s best overall player, went down for the year the team’s chances seemed slim.
As fans reflect on two disappointing seasons, questions about the Red Sox ability to evaluate injury risk and handle injury prevention cannot be ignored. Unfortunately, there are no easy answers here. The subject of injury risk and prevention is mired in variables, thickly fogged with randomness and variation. No two players or injuries are exactly the same. Accessing a team’s ability to identify injury risks or to prevent them is fraught with peril. As Dr. Spaceman says, "What can we do? Medicine is not a science."
To begin with, we should ask, "are the Red Sox falling victim to bad luck and freak occurrences or does the team struggle to identify at risk players and to address issues in mechanics and conditioning to prevent injuries?" First, answering that question means trying to indentify what is normal for a team with respect to injuries, which are abnormalities, in sense. Thankfully, Jeff Zimmerman at Beyond the Boxscore has done some incredible work in this area and provided some context for these questions.
From 2002-2009, teams averaged 710 player-days lost to the DL. Conclusions should be tempered with the knowledge that the variation in these numbers was fairly extreme, with a standard deviation of 314 days. Under Theo’s guidance, the Red Sox were slightly below average in lost player-days from 2003-2009, with an average of 652 per year in those years. Given the extreme variations, that is essentially average. The worst during that time period was actually 2004 when the Sox lost 1151 player-days to injury on route to the World Series. The 2008 team saw the fewest lost days with just 408 total.
In 2011, the Red Sox lost 806 player-days* to injury, hardly a shocking or significant number, less than one third of a standard deviation and less than half the colossal totals seen by the 2007 Royals (1644) or the 2004 Diamondback (1640). While injuries certainly help to derail the 2011 Red Sox, the sheer total of time lost to injuries was nothing out of the ordinary. Based simply on days lost, the Red Sox are not doing any better or any worse then the rest of baseball in the area of injury management.
That does not mean
*This my calculation based on the transaction records and does not include most minor league players like Ryan Kalish.
3 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As I've said before, I believe the whole 'conditioning' topic is a red herring.
While it is probable a couple of RS players were indeed not in great shape, I don’t really have any reason to believe that’s an endemic problem for the Red Sox.
I also believe that the vast majority of injuries have nothing to do with conditioning.
The wide variances in the numbers show that this is largely a luck-driven issue.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.
It's Certainly Luck
But if any athlete doesn’t put in proper conditioning work (e.g. said athlete is lazy about it), the the chances of injury go up significantly. Why do we need to stretch and/or warm up before doing any sort of exercise? This is the reason.
"Common sense is quite rare." - Voltaire
The Artist Formerly Known as PacoL250
Resident Psychologist and Tech Support at Over the Monster: SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Web Site
I didn't say the athletes shouldn't be in condition.
They are professionals, paid to be in shape.
But the hue and cry that there must be something wrong with the Red Sox strength and conditioning program and that that is the cause of all the injuries the last couple of years is silly talk..
Pro athletes at this level rarely if ever get injured because they were out of shape. They may not be able to throw 95mph after 30 pitches if they are not in shape. But very rarely do they get hurt due to lack of conditioning.
Aside – recent studies have suggested that excessive static stretching may be detrimental. Shorter stretching sessions were not found to be detrimental, but of questionable value. Stretching and warmups should be focused/tuned to the particulars of the activity to have any benefit.
NBA Officiating - Corrupt? Incompetent? Which is worse? Does it matter? It sucks.

by 


























