Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Will Outfield Uncertainty Force The Red Sox' Hand?

BOSTON - SEPTEMBER 08:  Ryan Kalish #55 of the Boston Red Sox makes the catch as teammate Josh Reddick #46 stands by against the Tampa Bay Rays on September 8 2010 at Fenway Park in Boston Massachusetts.  (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

Going into 2011, there appears to be a logjam in the Red Sox' outfield. With Ryan Kalish seemingly approaching Major League ready status, and both Jacoby Ellsbury and Mike Cameron on the way back from injury, there are four potential starters for three spots.

Now, this is all potentially solved by simply sticking Ryan Kalish in Triple-A until someone gets injured or doesn't perform. The Sox would have no problem with keeping his service clock low. But the real point of all this is to draw attention to the fact that the Red Sox have plenty of options for those three spot.

So why could there be one more added during the offseason? It all comes down to risk.

Star-divide

Two of the biggest free agents on the market this offseason are Jayson Werth and Carl Crawford. Both of them outfielders, and with each likely to be signed for big money into their mid-30s, both of them big risks. At first glance, it makes no sense for the Red Sox to be involved in the bidding for either. They already have the position filled. They already even have their backup. Why pay big for someone you don't have a space for?

The thing is that there's another risk for the Red Sox. Right now, their future outfield is relying on prospects-a dangerous game. Of immediate importance are the aforementioned Ryan Kalish, as well as big-time slugger Josh Reddick. A little further off there's the possibility that Che-Hsuan Lin, and then things get murky for the immediate future.

If prospects were sure things, all would be well and good. Kalish would take over for Cameron, and Reddick for Drew after 2011. Maybe we'd deal off Jacoby to make way for Che-Hsuan Lin at some point. Unfortunately, that's not even close to being a reality. And with Reddick still not really hitting Major League pitching, and Che-Hsuan Lin not showing even the slightest modicum of power, it's hard to factor either into the Sox' plans. Even if one of them does pan out, there's no guaranteeing that the surest one of the three, Ryan Kalish, manages anything.

So what could our outfield look like in 2012?

Ellsbury, Reddick, Kalish

or

Ellsbury

See what I mean?

Unfortunately for the Red Sox, the free agency stars have not aligned. Unless Jose Bautista repeats his huge year, the Sox could be heading into 2012 with a one man outfield, and a crop of free agents headed by...Hell, I don't know who would head this group once you take out the obvious team options. It's a pretty sad looking bunch, especially when you consider that Drew isn't necessarily looking to play past his current contract.

At this point, the Sox have to start considering how much they're willing to bet on their less-than-certain prospects. Is their faith in Josh Reddick and/or Che-Hsuan Lin enough to take that risk, or do they bite the bullet, and likely overpay one of the big name mercenaries?

This last offseason, the Sox showed that, by God, if they had money to spend they were going to spend it. John Lackey, a declining, older pitcher does not exactly fit into the typical big-signing free agent profile. But they had cash, and Lackey made them a better team. And in that situation, the Red Sox' chances to find a decent fifth starter in the coming years seemed a lot better than their likelihood of finding a decent outfielder does in the near future.

I have never been a big proponent of either Crawford or Werth, but as I look at the situation, I become more-and-more resigned to the idea of it happening. Kalish will start the year in Pawtucket, Cameron will platoon with Drew, and either Werth or, at least in my opinion, more likely Crawford (given the sudden price bump on Werth's contract) will be filling in the final full-time spot. When 2012 comes along, they can just write it off as being the replacement to Drew's contract.

In the meantime, it might be time to stop hoping they don't sign Crawford, and time to start hoping he can keep his production up when they inevitably do.

Poll
Will the Red Sox add a big name OF free agent?
Yes, Carl Crawford.
228 votes
Yes, Jayson Werth.
137 votes
No, they have faith in their prospects.
158 votes
No, you forgot the trades, Buchanan! The trades!
54 votes
Speaking of trades, trade Ellsbury! (The Sandy Option)
88 votes

665 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 187 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nah just don't see it happening

clearly they think Kalish is going to make it for sure, which isn’t necessarily the case, but does mean that he’ll be given every possible chance. I think after next year, if Reddick doesn’t look ridiculously good this year, they’ll deal with the issue then and trade for someone to fill the space if necessary. For now, it just doesn’t make sense to pay big money so that 5 players can fight over 3 spots.

by wolf9309 on Sep 24, 2010 9:28 AM EDT reply actions  

I totally agree.

First off, they don’t have to do anything for next year because they still have Drew and Cameron through next year.

Thus the only decision they HAVE to make for next year is whether to keep Kalish up or not.

And as you point out, if they believe that Kalish is ready to be given a chance, then they are almost certain to give him that chance. So that means at a minimum they are set with him as their 4th OF among Drew, Cam, Ells & Kalish.

Beyond that, they can take measured steps into their prospect depth. They get one more year to find out if Reddick can take the final step up.

The only argument I can see for going after Crawford is if you believe he presents a window of opportunity that will close. That if we don’t get him now, then we’ll be screwed a year later when we DO need someone and all of our prospects have flopped. But there are always trades that can be made.

We also have further OF prospects that Ben doesn’t mention besides just Kalish and Reddick. Nava has shown himself to be a legitimate MLB hitter. Lin’s ‘lack of power’ is a bit deceiving. He has an ultra conservative approach and swing that is robbing him of power, but it is also why he has a .386 OBP. He also actually has decent size and his frame could support quite a bit more muscle mass. But even without a lot of power, such a high OBP combined with stellar defense? I’ll take that anyday.

And lets don’t give up on Ryan Westmoreland yet. I have a lot of confidence that by the middle of next year, he’ll be racing back up our prospect rankings.

Are any of these guys guaranteed? Of course not. But all of them have legitimate high MLB upside and we only need a couple of them to pan out as the studs we think they could be. The more dice you get to roll, the more likely you’ll hit a couple of sixes.

So that helps mitigate the risk of our prospects flopping on us.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 2:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Daniel Nava will never be a top-3 outfielder for the Sox.

And Westy, even if he does come back full-force starting next year, will still be in the lower leagues, and 2-3 years away.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Sep 24, 2010 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

You may be right. But you are also guessing.

Nava looks to be at least 4th OF quality, though.

We will just have to wait and see with Westmoreland. From what little I know about this sort of surgery, its usually either a loooong recovery (because of neurological trauma affecting motor development) or it is actually very, very fast (because if it was a clean removal, there is very little trauma to anything else).

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

This is right

As far as Westmoreland goes, aren’t they already talking about him playing somewhere this coming year? That’s a very good sign. Kudos to the docs that did his surgery. If that’s the case the recovery is quick, considering it IS major surgery to the most vital organ in your body. He’ll be on his way back up through the ranks, minus the rust from just missing the season. If he can even play T-Ball that soon after said surgery then there most likely won’t be very many, if any lasting effects.

I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast

by DocOne on Sep 24, 2010 11:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't see it happening

First, lets worry about 2011 first. Mark Texiera aside, the Theo Sox have not been big players in the top tier of the free-agency market. Texiera is also a middle of the order switch-hitting power bat and a gold-glove caliber defender. Crawford is great player, although I put him a notch below Texiera for impact.
Crawford is only 29, so he will demand and likely get a 6-7 year deal at $17 – $20 mil. per. Remember, the Yankees are in this one, so anything can happen. If we assume the Yankees sign Cliff Lee for $20/year, will they also sign Crawford and add $40 mil to the annual payroll with Jeter and Riviera up for new contracts? I have learned not to underestimate the Yankees when it comes to spending, and this is great news for the Royals, Marlins and Pirates owners, as their tax reciepts will grow.

All that beign said, I would personally love to see the Sox sign Crawford. Unlike many posters here, I don’t stay up at night worrying about the finances of the Red Sox, I just want the best players. I just don’t see it happening. They still have Cameron on the books next year, can’t move him and will be looking at essentially eating his $7 mil. I guess they have experience (Lugo, Renteria) with eating contract money, but it is a bad business practice to say the least. If they do, the 2011 OF of Crawford/Ellsbury/Drew(Kalish) looks awesome. Dream on.
The Sox will monitor the health of Cameron and Ellsbury very carefully in the off-season and in the spring. If they feel they can bounce back, I see them possibly grabbing a veteran or another Hermedia-type to start the season with Kalish in Pawtucket. I can also envision Kalish coming north to be the 4th OF. I know, I know…he will “waste away” on the bench when he could get full-time play in AAA. But if he is deemed ready for the bigs, I see him getting plenty of time with Cameron and Drew at the corners.

by Scoop1981 on Sep 24, 2010 9:36 AM EDT reply actions  

I believe they want the kids to win out

If they bring back Beltre, extend Ortiz, and go thrpugh arbitration with Papelbon they will probably not want to pay for more outfielders. If the kids aren’t performing, there will probably be roentgen available at the trade deadline.

by The Herndon Kid on Sep 24, 2010 11:00 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Yankees aren’t in on outfielders this year.

With Granderson performing better lately they have 0 need to add another between him, Gardner and Swisher, they are set.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Sep 24, 2010 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Good point

I had forgotten about Gardner becoming an everyday player. If the Yankees are not involved, that may mean Crawford will probably come in at the lower end of the scale, but still cash in big time. As an OF, he will have many options.

by Scoop1981 on Sep 24, 2010 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I could see the Angels making a run at either Crawford or Werth, Hunter isn’t going to play forever, or at least I hope so, he has just killed us over his career. Crawford is still going to make a lot of money, despite no real intention of signing him, the Yankees will drive that price up with threats.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Sep 24, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree with the Angels on Crawford.

When life gives you questions, Google has answers.

by Bento Box on Sep 24, 2010 5:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would LOVE for them to give him a 20 contract

like Gammons was predicting

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

But didn't the Angels just move Hunter...

… out of CF to make room for their prospect? The name escapes me at the moment, but it looks to me like they’ve decided he’s their CF of the future, so they may not have a need for Crawford either.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

Abreu's contract ends after 2011 except for an option,

so it’s pretty much like the Red Sox situation with Kalish and Drew.

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which, in my opinion...

… is why we shouldn’t be in on Crawford either.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Eh

because we have Cameron too, so out of Cam, Kalish, Ells, Drew, and possibly Reddick we can find 3 good OFs.

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 10:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that's my opinion.

Personally, as I started below, I like the idea of Ellsbury, Cameron and Drew in that order (LF-CF-RF) to start the season, with Nava as the fourth OF… Kalish and Reddick start in AAA, with Kalish getting the first call up, and if Cameron can be traded at the deadline (or before), Reddick comes up to take over the fourth spot.

Of course, that means Nava is also tradeable, if he can show some ability playing in that fourth OF spot early in the year.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup.

And one more year for Kalish, Reddick, Lin, etc. to mature for the following years.

One thing occurs to me – given that Ells has lost this year to injury – he’s lost a lot of leverage. I know Boras is tough and normally plays for the big long-term contract, but there may be a chance we get him to do something similar to what he did with Beltre. Ells could renew with a short contract hoping to play for a bigger one.

I’ve been vocal about not wanting to overpay with a long contract to Ellsbury, but renewing Ellsbury for 1 year would not be a bad thing.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

we have him under team control for 3 more years

not up to him. Next year will be his first arbitration year. We can go year to year if we don’t have faith in him, and with Boras as his agent, that’s probably all he’d do anyways.

by wolf9309 on Sep 24, 2010 10:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ah - perfect. Thanks for the clarification.

That’s good. Year to year works perfect for me.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just remember...

… the Yanks acquiring Nick Swisher and everyone assuming that since Swisher had to play somewhere, the Yanks wouldn’t sign Tex. The availability of Nick Swisher never kept nobody from doing nothing…

…except voting for Youk on an All-Star ballot.

So, I guess, the take home lesson is f@#k Nick Swisher and f@#k the Yanks.

Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."

by nuthinboutnuthin on Sep 24, 2010 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

You needed a lesson for that?

If I was your math homework I'd be really hard and you'd be doing me on your desk.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.

by TheLoneDavid on Sep 24, 2010 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

2012 outfield

I see it being from left to right Kalish, Ellsbury, and Werth. I would like to trade Ellsbury, but I don’t see him really being worth much for the next couple years due to arbitration, so I think we will have to hold him till free agency. Which would not be a bad thing. By that time he could become a type A or B Free agent (B is more likely, but either way) I’d rather hold him until his value kicks up. That said if we could trade Ellsbury for a decent prospect, I’d be all for it. I would love an outfield of Reddick, Kalish, and Werth, although thoughts of grandeur lead to me wanting Crawford, Kalish and Werth. That would be one hell of an outfield. Unless they get injured.

Which leads me to believe that we would need a strong fourth outfielder. Enter Reddick in situation A, Nava in situation B, and Reddick again in Situation C. Where is JD Drew? Far gone, I love the guy, but I wouldn’t mind losing him for a Jayson Werth or Carl Crawford

Every Red Sox loss, I like to blame on the Yankees. Every Yankees win, I like to blame the Rays.

by outofleftfield on Sep 24, 2010 11:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Werth is going to get a Holliday-esque contract and produce Bay-esque results.

If they do go for one of the two free agents, it had better be Crawford, outside of the warehouse in St Petersburg, running on actual grass would be a lot easier on his knees than if he were still playing half his games on concrete with carpet over it. He’s going to have more longevity than Werth will have, seeing as Werth is 32 or going to be 32 and is a mostly exceptional player in a small ballpark. I would like nothing more than to have an 8-9-1-2 of Lowrie, Ells, Crawford, Pedroia. Barring a play for Crawford, we should stick to our young guns and maybe make a trade if it doesn’t work out. Keep in mind there’s always a chance Westy is ready by 2013/14.

If I was your math homework I'd be really hard and you'd be doing me on your desk.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.

by TheLoneDavid on Sep 24, 2010 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

There is a chance of Westy being back by then

but I won’t hold my breath, the dude had major brain surgery. I would love to see him come back, but I understand 100% if he has to retire from baseball because of his inability to play or produce decent results.

I agree Crawford would be better, but I think realistically we are going to end up chasing Werth. I would prefer Crawford (an outfield featuring both Ellsbury and Crawford? If Ells gets back to form and keeps the speed, then we will have a stolen base threat at the top and bottom of the order) but I understand if we get Werth. I’d rather play Werth than JD Drew though. Even though JD has been very healthy this year.

Every Red Sox loss, I like to blame on the Yankees. Every Yankees win, I like to blame the Rays.

by outofleftfield on Sep 24, 2010 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Drew was not only healthy, but strong...

… his number’s defensively and offensively were very good.

Werth would be an improvement over him? Considering we’d have to committ more than just 2011 to him? I’m not so sure.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, folks have focused a lot on Drew's numbers against Lefties this year

and they have definitely been sub-par for Drew.

But he’s been fine against RH hitters and very quietly put up a stellar year defensively. His UZR numbers are very, very good this year. His UZR150 is 11.4 so far – 3rd behind only Jay Bruce of Cinncinati (a wicked 15.0!) and Ichiro (12.0).

Justin Upton of AZ is 4th at 10 and no other RF in baseball has an UZR150 over 8.

So those 4 guys really set themselves apart defensively this year.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah - the vs LHP thing really killed him.

His OPS v RHP was a solid .872. Yes that’s a drop from his career v RHP of .922 – but its still very very good.

But his v LHP OPS dropped all the way from .780 career to just .602. That was just killer to his overall numbers, even with only 167 PAs v LHP.

I can’t help but wonder, though, if part of the problem WAS the lack of consistent ABs vs LHP. I think the platooning backfired, if anything.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

He has put up solid numbers

This is true, definitely a good player by all means. I just think Werth would be an improvement. While Drew also has had a steller defensive year, I am concerned about his health issues in the past. Yes, this season he has been healthy in a year where seemingly everybody got injured, but that only makes me think he’s due for an injury soon or next season.

As far as I can tell, Werth has been consistent and healthy, which is the main reason I prefer him to Drew. Altough I would prefer Crawford to both.

Every Red Sox loss, I like to blame on the Yankees. Every Yankees win, I like to blame the Rays.

by outofleftfield on Sep 25, 2010 1:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well, next year is Drew's last year.

I don’t want worrying about him getting injured in his last year of a contract to drive me to go overspend on either Werth OR Crawford for a long term contract.

Drew has only been injured and missed significant time twice in the last 7 years. In the other 5 he has played at least 137 games. In the two injured years he played 109 (2008) and 72 (2005). That 2005 season was the only one in 12 years in which he played less than 100 games.

Werth has managed to play 134+ the last 3 years, but prior to that in 5 seasons never played more than 102 games and above 100 only once.

I like Werth, but he’s no J.D. Drew.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2010 2:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you!

Great point.

I’d respond to your comment below to the Yankees fan trolling our page, but I’d hate to give him the satisfaction. Though, he is right on many levels. We failed to take care of the teams we should have.

 But on this topic, I have buried my demons with Drew. I am happy to have his defense, and his patience at the plate, in 2011, with the realization that any injury he suffers next year results in a Kalish/Reddick appearance on our team, which is fine with me.

In 2012, either one of them…okay, Reddick… will have taken over RF, or we go after a free agent. Neither Crawford or Werth seem to me to be the long-term solution, worth committing to instead of the potential Kalish/Reddick offer to replace Drew. Ellsbury/Kalish/Reddick (with Lin as the fourth OF) seems like a perfectly acceptable 2012 at the moment. (Talk to me if we miss the playoffs again in 2011, and my tune might change.)

And let’s just say Reddick isn’t ready for the OF in 2012. Do you really think talking Drew into one more year, pending his health/performance in 2011 would actually be that hard? Having seen how he’s handled his career, if Reddick wasn’t ready and he thought he could go one more, I suspect he’d be willing to give it a go.

by AlohaSox on Sep 25, 2010 5:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah it's worth mentioning

that Drew has specifically said that if he doesn’t retire after this contract, it will only be to sign with the Red Sox. Which makes it sound like there’s a decent chance he’d be amenable to that IF it were necessary. Obviously there’s more that goes in the decision than that, but it is an option.

by wolf9309 on Sep 25, 2010 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like the idea of a home grown outfield

I’m just worried about some things with Ells, Reddick, and Lin.

Ells needs to prove next year that it was just an injury year and that the injury bug won’t hunt him, nothing is more important right now than having a healthy outfield.

Reddick has been inconsistent at the major league level. Given, I love his stuff, I think he will be a fine player once he finally brings his game to the level he needs it at. But for now, how do we handle him? He is obviously too good for AAA, but he still needs to adjust to the MLB level. I think by 2012 he should be ready (If he isn’t I am giving him the AAAA tag), but at the same time will he be good enough to warrant letting him patrol the outfield?

I don’t see Drew coming back for one more year, just because JD says he won’t. I have never known JD to go back on his decisions, except for that one time with the Cardinals/Braves or something like that. He wants to spend more time with his family, and I rally don’t think the Red Sox are going to give him an offer he can’t refuse.

My final concern is Lin. This year was not a good year for him, and I don’t see him making his MLB debut until 2012, and even then only as a September callup. I could be wrong, but I don’t think his game is advanced enough to talk about him playing in the majors just yet. Although he does have good potential, I would love to see him in our outfield every now and then.

The only reason I want a Werth/Crawford is because they are estabilished ballplayers. True, nothing is guaranteed, and injuries can happen, I just like our chances with an estabilished vet over that of a primarily rookie outfield.

Every Red Sox loss, I like to blame on the Yankees. Every Yankees win, I like to blame the Rays.

by outofleftfield on Sep 25, 2010 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

On a homegrown OF

Ells – Replace Ells with Kalish. Done.

Drew – see Wolfie’s comment above.

Lin – I don’t think we are talking about 2011 here. A .386 OBP and stellar defense were ‘not a good year for him’? I agree though, he’s not completely ready. I’d like to see him put on about 20 more lbs in the weight room (he’s currently 180 on a 6 ft frame). That would pop his SLG up without needing to tweak his conservative swing. And yet, his swing is where he’s losing power, not because its a bad swing, but he basically uses an Ichiro approach – he hits the ball to get hits, not to kill the ball – and it works, but for singles. There is more power available if they can get him to sit back more, though that might cut into his avg a bit. He’s still wicked young, just 22.

If you sign Werth or Crawford it will be for multiple years.

Werth is a good player, but he’s not of the class of player, like Drew has been, that I want to give an expensive mult-year contract too. After 5 years of so-so results, he finally has had 3 years of decent, not great production in the Vet.

Crawford is also good. He’s like Ellsbury except a fair step better in most categories. But again, I just don’t want to pay the price that he’ll command for multiple years of him.

What it comes down to is that Werth or Crawford would almost certainly be more reliably productive immediately than any of our prospects, but you’ll have to commit to them for 3-5 years and I don’t see them being all THAT much more productive than at least a couple of our guys will be during the bulk of that time.

For dirt cheap.

by mmmmm on Sep 25, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yup... My thoughts too.

I’m not saying Werth/Crawford might not give us more production than Kalish/Reddick in 2011… I just don’t want to committ to them for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015.

I do, however, see Ben’s concern at the end of the article, which is that if we don’t do this, and Reddick/Kalish/Lin don’t pan out for 2012 there isn’t a great solution on the radar as a free agent… I’m just not sure it’s a big enough concern to warrant the 2013/2014/2015 commitment to either Werth or Crawford.

In 2011, we have Ellsbury/Cameron/Drew and either Nava/McDonald at the fourth, with Kalish hopefully back up by the All-Star Break (and Cameron playing well enough to have trade value at the deadline).

In 2012, we hopefully have Ellsbury/Kalish/Reddick, with the potential to convince Drew to stick around on more year if Reddick hasn’t panned out yet (and I agree, he has another year or two before he’s AAAA), and either Nava/McDonald or possibly even Lin at the 4th outfielder.

By 2013, none of us really know what our OF will look like… but I know I wouldn’t really want a 35 year old Jason Werth out there at that point.

I think we can get through 2011 & 2012 with our home grown guys, and then see where we’re at for 2013. Nothing says we cannot work a trade for an OF at the deadline in 2012 or 2013 if the home grown guys haven’t made it to the major league level. I really like the way 2011 is shaping up.

by AlohaSox on Sep 25, 2010 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

werth won't get a holliday-esque contract

that’s just what Boras is aiming for. Really, he’s 2 years older than holliday was, so any team signing him long term is going to realize that they’ll be paying for his decline.

by wolf9309 on Sep 24, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t mind losing him (Drew) for a Jayson Werth or Carl Crawford

Moot because Drew has indicated he will probably retire after his contract is up (after next year).

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Whatever they do, I just hope they don't go for Crawford

He’s what Ellsbury will be in a couple years if he doesn’t get mugged by any more third basemen. Why overpay for something you already have?

I think the solution is pretty simple for next year: Kalish’s production shows he needs more time in AAA, so let him at least start the year there; Ellsbury should be more like 2009 than a guy whose ribcage was caved in; and Cameron and Drew should both be good to go for the year. The starting outfield has to be Ellsbury, Cameron, and Drew, with the only real question being whether Reddick gets the #4 outfielder job (and then what do you do with Nava?) or if he’s kept in AAA so he can play every day and Nava gets the #4 job (which I think would be optimal). Best case scenario, Reddick and Kalish are ready to replace Cameron and Drew after next year, and Westmoreland is back and ready to replace Ellsbury when Boras demands $15M/year for him.

In any case, we have multiple decent options for the outfield for next year and I’d much rather see the Sox spend money to retain Beltre and Martinez for a couple years and — most desperately — to upgrade the bullpen.

by RSNexile on Sep 24, 2010 11:40 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with your scenarios.

The optimal one is Ells & Cam back healthy and starting with Drew to playout their contracts. I like Nava’s ability to continue to develop as a 4th OF better than I do Reddick or Kalish – not because I think they have less potential, but rather because I think they need more steady PAs. Nava has a more developed plate approach that probably would not regress if he only got 200 ABs in a season.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually think they have more potential than Nava

But I’m not seeing much reason to believe Nava would develop any more with more time in the minors, while Kalish and Reddick both still might. We won’t find out for certain, though, unless they’re playing every day, and based on their production in the majors, neither is ready to play every day in Boston just yet. We still have Cameron and Drew for another year, so we might as well let Kalish and Reddick continue to develop in AAA, call them up only when needed or in September, and see where we are this time next year for 2012.

In any case, Nava fits a sort of prototype for a fourth outfielder — he’s a solid hitter but not great with the glove, and that’s not likely to change. He’d be fine as the #4 outfielder, especially if we still have McDonald for when we need a solid defensive backup.

by RSNexile on Sep 24, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly. 'Pretty much concur completely.

Which means, of course that reality will go some other direction! :-D

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I agree with this assessment as well

Spend the money on VMart and/or Beltre, and let the OF sort itself out. Cameron and Ells should both bounce back to their career norms, and with Nava as a 4th OF, we can rest Cam and Drew as needed… Worst case scenario is that we need to either A) trade for an OF midseason, or B) call up the kids earlier than intended (which is more likely, given the odds of someone getting hurt).

Having said all that, if we sign Crawford, I’m not going to complain. Love that guy.

by travben85 on Sep 24, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

First off, our 4th best OF presently is D-Mac. But as for next year...

Ells returns to LF b/c he’s not tradeable given his injury year.

Cameron returns to CF b/c he’s still under contract. At his age, contract, and coming off an injury, he, too, isn’t tradeable.

Drew is in RF. With his contract and a lackluster year, particualry against LHPs, he is also untradeable.

Kalish is the future, but will stick with the team as the main fill-in OF.

D-mac should also return as the 5th OF. If, however, we don’t keep D-Mac, that opens the door for a free agent, or either Nava or Reddick (I think Nava).

I don’t see us burning our wallet on Crawford/Werth this off-season after last year’s Lackey debacle even though Papi resigns for less and Lowell is gone. We have bigger need to re-sign V-Mart and Beltre.

Reddick or Nava returns to AAA.

Our best trade possibility is Scutaro given Lowrie’s performance – provided we re-sign Beltre.

by dsharp on Sep 24, 2010 11:50 AM EDT reply actions  

If Kalish can’t get regular at bats he should be in Pawtucket with DMac being OF #4, the guy has shown to be a positive value player this year and doesn’t need anymore AAA seasoning.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Sep 24, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Agree, but for different reasons

The Sox are not going for Crawford because they already have an OF for 2011 – Cameron (in left, please!), Ellsbury and Drew, with Kalish and Reddick almost ready for prime time. They tend to shun most big-time free agents anyway, because you always “overpay”, it is just the nature of the market. If the signed Crawford, they would be paying over $39 million for Crawford($@18), Cameron($7) and Drew ($14).
On the other hand, the reason the Sox would want Crawford has nothing to do with already having Ellsbury. Crawford is a much more proven commodity than Ellsbury, and is more versitile in the lineup as he can hit from 1-6 if needed. I am not in the camp that is ready to give up on Ellsbury; he still has all the potential and tools to be a big contributor to the Sox for many years.

by Scoop1981 on Sep 24, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Ellsbury can be productive - I actually like him as a player. BUT ...

My only problem with him is that I just think that several of our prospects all look like they have higher ceilings than Ellsbury. We have 5 guys developing that all, imho, have a chance to be much more valuable than Ellsbury. None of them steal bases like he does, but all of them look like they will either hit better or for more power or both and several of them play better defense.

Thus the risk of signing Ellsbury long term is that it could be a Boras contract that is overpriced and difficult to trade and so you end up with Ellbury blocking much better talent.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are a better talent evauator than me....

I think Kalish, Reddick and Nava look OK, but I don’t see any huge ceilings. I hope they all turn into all-stars, but righ now they just look like good, athletic prospects. Remember when Ellsbury burst on the scene in the 2007 post-season? Now that was ceiling!
Nobody is going to be blocked. I’m sure right now the Sox are planning to field the same OF as they planned for this year. I jus hope Cameron is in left.
I predict the Sox will bring in some veteran OF help for insurance in the spring. Reddick/Kalish/Nava will get long looks, and a chance to win a job, but they will likely start in AAA after extended spring training. If one of the starters gets hurt, a real possibility with older players like Cameron/Drew, then one of the youngters may get a shot. I would expect to see one of them up fairly soon and possibly even stick around.

by Scoop1981 on Sep 24, 2010 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

the "blocking" I refer to would indeed happen if Ells is signed to a long multi-year.

The reason I see more upside is in the combination of the hitting factors and age.

All these guys generally hit either for better OBP or SLG or both than Ells did at this stage. The only major plus skill he has over the norm is stolen bases – which while exciting is of marginal value for winning games.

And the general trend for players is to get stronger and hit better as they go from their early 20s to their mid-late 20s. Thus these guys are likely to improve and end up notably better hitters than Ells is (unless Ells makes an abnormal jump up in his next couple of years).

And defensively, while Nava is a question mark (though his arm is good), Lin, Reddick, Kalish (and hopefully Westmoreland if he recovers fully) are all easily as good or better defensively.

There are no guarantees, of course. And I should caveate all this with that I would not view Ellsbury in the outfield as a bad thing. He’s a good player. I just think at least a couple of these other guys are going to be better in the long run and I don’t want them blocked by a long, overpriced contract to Ells.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 9:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

yankees will go after cliff lee and trade for king felix.

by 5689 on Sep 24, 2010 3:51 PM EDT reply actions  

You forgot pujols

Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."

by nuthinboutnuthin on Sep 24, 2010 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ben, Ben, Ben...

… you’re undervaluing the inherent value in ingratiating themselves to the Yankees and all that is good and pure in baseball. Commie.

Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."

by nuthinboutnuthin on Sep 24, 2010 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cliff Lee

First of all, Cliff Lee is a sore spot for me because he is sucking wind the last few weeks in my fantasy team. That being said, has there ever been a more sure thing FA deal than Lee signing with the Yankees?

by Scoop1981 on Sep 24, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just this...

… that Montero will be better with a bat than Justin Smoak – thanks, Mariners.

Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."

by nuthinboutnuthin on Sep 24, 2010 4:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

no they got tex

by 5689 on Sep 24, 2010 4:26 PM EDT reply actions  

I think what we have here...

… is a failure to communicate.

Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."

by nuthinboutnuthin on Sep 24, 2010 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ellsbury must go

we will be fine without him

The certified ambassador of all things good and great, here at OTM.
DO NOT OVERPAY FOR BELTRE !!!
TRADE ELLSBURY THIS WINTER !!!
One of the many, proud OTM'ers that cannot stand Josh Beckett.

by gizmosandy on Sep 24, 2010 7:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Some blah, blah, blah about next year

The math hasn’t ended this year! Go Sox!!!

by 415SoxFan on Sep 24, 2010 8:14 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

thank you andy !

the thing that $ucks is tampon bay will make out on this game :-(

by RED SOX are #1 in my heart on Sep 24, 2010 8:15 PM EDT reply actions  

Jed Lowrie is PFG

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 8:34 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

on a tear

The certified ambassador of all things good and great, here at OTM.
DO NOT OVERPAY FOR BELTRE !!!
TRADE ELLSBURY THIS WINTER !!!
One of the many, proud OTM'ers that cannot stand Josh Beckett.

by gizmosandy on Sep 24, 2010 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

MIKE LOWELL

you are the MAN ! we can never thank you enough for what you have done for your team !

by RED SOX are #1 in my heart on Sep 24, 2010 8:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Felipe Lopez has signed with the sox

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:33 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I suppose he could be a bench player

but he’s only here for the rest of the year. Maybe it’s to see if he likes Boston. Then maybe it gives us the option of trading Lowrie or Scutaro.

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:40 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Wait... what??

Doesn’t Lowrie give us the option of trading Scutaro?

Wait… now I’m forgetting who would be our utility infielder. Navarro? Is this why we need Lopez?

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 9:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lowrie does give us the option of trading Scutaro or vice versa. Hall is certainly not versatile and he’s really not a bench player, so we’d need a middle IF backup, either Navarro, Lopez, or somebody else.

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

So we get a pick

Nice

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:49 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Assuming we offer him arb.

He’s cheap enough, though, that we should. If he accepts, then eh, we get a relatively low-cost backup IF (probably send Scoot off somewhere). If not, then we get a sandwich.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Sep 24, 2010 9:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

It’s like overcompensation

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 10:02 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

We need to shut Bard down.

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I know - but at this point what's Francona to do?

After Beckett and Atchison coughed up those 4 runs?

There is no way he wants to lose after being up 10-1. That MAKES this a ‘must win’.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 9:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

This isn’t a must win. The only way I can justify Bard pitching is if it’s a one or two run game, but even then. I don’t care if Bard wants to pitch, Francona should be protecting him. If he got a serious injury, he could be done for almost all of next year. THAT is what I don’t want to happen

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 9:57 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I hear what you are saying. And that's completely valid.

I’d say I agree with it – to a point.

My preference would be that you draw a deliberate line and say – “He’s done.” At that point you put him on the DL and he no longer is an option.

But because the Sox kept hanging just around within shouting distance of the race, they kept having to keep him here. And now its the Yankees and the fact is, rational or not, the series with the Yankees has more meaning than other games, beyond the pennant and playoff races.

Given that it was the 8th inning of a Yankees game where the MFY had just cut the lead from 9 runs down to just 3, I just don’t see how Francona could NOT bring Bard in.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

The only thing that would have been better

is if he had taken out the rib cages of a few Yankee fans …

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 9:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Crap - how did Granderson hit that pitch?

That was a nice pitch by Bard, but Granderson got good wood on it.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 9:54 PM EDT reply actions  

I can't even watch this...

My internet connection sucks today. I think they’re doing work on something, so the wired is down.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Sep 24, 2010 9:55 PM EDT reply actions  

WHEW! I'm not sure we got Gardner on that play!

That was damn close.

He’s got to be one of the fastest down the line – up their with Ichiro.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 9:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Ha ha ha!

That’s what I have here too… I’m home from the office, the game is on MLB TV, but my girlfriend was watching Ghost Whisperer…

The good news is, she wouldn’t switch to the game. She grew up in New York, and claims that she’s not a Yankees fan, yet does quite a few things that suggest she is… so if she won’t swap to the game, that’s good news to me. Not a true fan.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, while I was writing the message above...

… her show ended, and I got to swap to the game.

I rarely get games on TV out here (though, more so than Orioles fans, I suppose), so I don’t care where we are in the season… seeing a 10-3 score, I wanted to swap right away.

I’m okay watching it from here, though. At least I can see the Sox.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Damn...

Just realized, I have the Yankees broadcast on MLB Network. Crap.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Ivan Nova is their young pitcher. He's scheduled later this weekend.

Daniel Nava is our young outfielder.

LOL – Nova could be pitching to Nava!

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was making fun because the Yankees announcers went through...

… who was available on both benches.

At the end of the Sox bench, they said Daniel Nova was available… Salty, and a few others, but Daniel Nova.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I love that Paps got Jeter out.

No matter what happens – I hate when Jeter beats us.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Great Topic, Ben...

Once the game ends, I’m going to read through the thread and then put my two cents in.

Shorthand, though… is that I want Ellsbury in LF, Cameron in CF, Drew in RF, with Kalish called up by the All-Star Break and Nava as the one riding the pine until then …

… are you kidding me??? PAPELBON!!!

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:14 PM EDT reply actions  

First hit against Papelbon??

Tex was 0 for 9 against Papelbon before that home run? F>>>!!!

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

crapelbon

"Every night I go to bed thinking about when I’m going to play again. I dream about playing at Fenway."-Ryan Westmoreland
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Sep 24, 2010 10:15 PM EDT reply actions  

On rewind, it looked like that was outside for ball three...

… but it is a travesty that AFraud reached… it should have been ball two, not three and he already struck out before that pitch.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

go look at the pitch chart on game-day

pitches 1, 2, 4 & 5 were all strikes. But 4 & 5 were called balls.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I went back and watched it... Game Day spotted it wrong.

That pitch was actually outside (as was the one called as a strike on Cano in the next at bat).

I was thinking pitch 3 was a strike (making the count 2-1 when it was called a ball, but it should have been 1-2). He struck out swinging (in my count) on the next pitch, so pitch 4.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Great pitch!!

About time he got the call… Yankees announcers didn’t like that call.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:20 PM EDT reply actions  

Woo hoo!!!

Struck out the side… ignoring AFraud’s trip to first base on his strike out.

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, it did.

What is up for Beckett and the 6th/7th? No stamina??

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 10:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

concentration.

The walk was questionable – hell the strike zone was totally unpredictable all day – but the HR was a mistake pitch. You miss over the plate – BOOM. You pay.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks, I hadn't gotten here yet...

Somewhat distracted by work, and suddenly I realized we were up 10-3 in the game, that there was a game, and by the time I got GameDay up and running, it was 10-7.

But, my point is, when you go back and look at box scores on Beckett (not just his game logs), I think all of the ERs are coming in the 6th & 7th. Maybe not truly all, but he’ll have pitched well to the sixth, and then the wheels just come off in either the 6th or the 7th or both.

So, not just specifically concentration in this game…

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 11:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lowrie pulls his avg up to .282 with that nice 4-4 performance.

He’s put together a very solid stint since coming back from being sick.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Well, if we can pull out a series win this weekend,

that will help salvage some love for this otherwise frustrating season.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 10:29 PM EDT reply actions  

why have the yankees party at fenway

by 5689 on Sep 24, 2010 11:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, all caught up.

Like I said earlier, great topic. Not sure anyone will see, or care, about my final thoughts on the 2011 outfield, but I agree with what seems to be the majority opinion on here (and that means, as has been said already, the Sox will do something different).

First, 2011 should start with Ellsbury, Cameron and Drew, although I will step back from my earlier assertion of LF/CF/RF… personally, all the UZR stats aside, I like Ellsbury in CF, but I think the Sox have decided (whether for negotiating reasons with Boras, adherence to UZR rating, or random stubborness) to go with Cameron in CF. My eyes tell me Ellsbury’s speed makes up for his bad reads, but I’m smart enough to know the math matters.

For my money, I’d rather see Nava or McDonald at the fourth OF position than Kalish/Reddick, simply because I want them to spend the first half of next year at AAA getting more ABs. I think Nava doesn’t necessarily have the upside offered by the other two, and can afford to be platooned (and likely get some time with the elder statesmen of Cameron/Drew).

That said, I’d be happy to have McDonald back. With all he’s done for the Sox this year, though, I’d also be happy to see him get a chance on another team where maybe he’d actually get to start? Either way, Nava or McDonald stays as the fourth OF in my ideal world, and the other gets traded for a bullpen piece.

I have no use for the commitments to Crawford or Werth that would be required, because in 2012, I would really like to see an OF of Ellsbury/Kalish/Reddick, assuming all three manage to hit, and by the time Ellsbury is a true free agent, and Boras can hold us over a barrel (assuming Ellsbury hasn’t fired him somewhere along the way), we let him go and bring up one of the prospects that are further out (Lin, Westmoreland, or someone I haven’t even heard of yet).

For me, Drew has been solid enough (and I’ve certainly been one of those people screaming at the TV when he takes a called strike three in a key situation, like bases loaded with two outs in the 9th) offensively, and very underrated defensively, that I’m happy to have him in RF for 2011.

Then again, maybe I still need to make it up to him after telling friends I’d buy a JD Drew jersey if he got a hit with the bases loaded in the Cleveland series in 2007 (you know, the one where he hit that monster grand slam). Never bought the jersey, but I have gradually come to respect what he brings to the plate, figuratively and literally, for the Red Sox.

My two cents (or two dollars… brevity is not my strong point).

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 11:20 PM EDT reply actions  

all the lgames lost to the O,s and other bad team killed the sox.

by 5689 on Sep 24, 2010 11:23 PM EDT reply actions  

that's a fair view

Its hard to look at the standings and not think about the losses to the Orioles – as well as a couple of other crappy teams along the way.

by mmmmm on Sep 24, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

True... but it'll still be fun to watch the first round exit for the Yankees...

What with CC wearing out for the playoffs like he has so many times before… tough break for you guys. I’m really going to feel bad…

by AlohaSox on Sep 24, 2010 11:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

he won the ws last year

by 5689 on Sep 25, 2010 5:44 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm guessing

That you don’t know how to use the reply button? It’s right there under the text.

Every Red Sox loss, I like to blame on the Yankees. Every Yankees win, I like to blame the Rays.

by outofleftfield on Sep 25, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Free Agent Signings

If i am going to gamble on Unproven farm hands, i would gamble with a catcher that can call a game so let Victor and Jason go and Big Pappy too, sign the best hitters you can, ala Crawford and Werth too if you can afford it, fill in a first and third as you can and sign some low risk relievers and hope to get lucky on a couple. I think you get hitters while they are available, after 2011 you lose OF’s too. I wouldn’t be too surprised that Lowrie could be an everyday 1B as well (yes i expect lots of comments on the post:)

by SoxBrainTrust on Oct 10, 2010 2:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Skinner_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi