Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Isn't Up To Speed On Jeremy Lin, 'Linning'

To catch a catcher


Because right now, the state of the 2010 team is a little too depressing to think about, lets talk a bit more in depth about 2011, the season when the Red Sox are bound to remain entirely healthy throughout the year.

Catcher has got to be the hardest position on a team to effectively fill.  They, by definition, take the most physical abuse of any player on the field.  Despite the gear they're wearing, contantly having balls fouled off you, getting smacked in the head by player's backswings, and trying to block the plate from runners sliding in cleats-first takes a special kind of person.  When this is combined with the ridiculous amount of wear that comes from just having to crouch most of the time they're playing the game, catching is a rough position.

Partly because of this, it's nearly impossible to find a catcher who's actually good at what he does (calling, blocking, throwing, oh, and catching) and is more than an offensive black hole.

The Red Sox have been blessed currently with one of the best offensive catchers in the game- a hitter who, despite the abuse he takes at the plate, is a genuine middle-of-the-order switch hitter with a game-changing bat.  After this year, however, he can hit free agency and it's time for the Red Sox to be thinking about what they will do to fill the position, either by trade, free agency, of promoting one of their multitude of catchers in the minors.  So lets look at just a few of the options.  And please, feel free to add any other options that occur to you down below.

Star-divide

First of all, and most obvious is re-sign Victor Martinez.  He has said that he wants to stay with the Red Sox (and by all accounts just seems to be the type of guy that wants to continue on with what he's been doing and not have any giant life changes like going to a new city).  The Red Sox would certainly love to keep him around.  So then, the question lies with the contract he would require- he is, hands down, the best catcher on the market this year, and is probably looking for a multi-year contract for significant money.  This would be fine, if the Red Sox feel that he will actually be an effective catcher throughout the life of the contract, but if not, he shouldn't be paid like he is- while is bat is outstanding for a catcher, it is less impressive for a designated hitter.  Reasonably, he hasn't been a catcher incredibly long and I personally haven't seen signs of him wearing down (although I don't have all the inside information, so I can't make that decision).  It would be interesting to see if he would be amenable to a contract for a certain amount over a couple of years and then perhaps a varying salary for the next couple of years depending on amount of games caught (say for 2013, a low base pay with big escalators for games caught).  Of course, then the other thing to take into consideration is draft pick compensation- as a type A free agent, if the Red Sox let him walk, they can gain two draft picks and probably bring is someone for significantly less money.

I'll just briefly mention the minors.  The Red Sox have a plethora of catching prospects in the minors- Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Mark Wagner, Luis Exposito, Tim Federowicz, Ryan Lavarnaway, and recent international signing Adalberto Ibarra.  None of them, however, are ready for the majors.  Salty has struggled in his showings in the majors, and is a project in the minors for now, Wagner had his progress hampered by an injury for much of the year, Ibarra has yet to even be assigned to a team, so none of us know if he can even catch.  One or two of these guys may contribute in the future, although none of them are can't-miss prospects.  Saltalamacchia is the most likely to contribute next year, but the Sox would probably like to see quite a bit more of him before committing to him as the primary catcher for 2011.

As far as free agency, outside of Martinez, the class is weak.  I see the most promising on the list as John Buck of the Blue Jays.  He is a good defensive catcher- throwing out 37% of base-stealers this year, and provides some offensive ability.  He will barely ever get on base, and has walked only 3.3% of the time this year, but has quite a bit of power, providing a strong wOBA this year of .346 at the weak position with 14 home runs.  It is worth noting, also, that his increase in power and inability to take a walk line up perfectly with the Blue Jays team he is on- with a change in coaching, he may be able to flash a little more plate discipline, but he will never be a big on-base, low strikeout guy.  He is probably on course for an upgrade over his 2010 salary of $2 million, but could still be had for significantly less money and years than Victor Martinez.  Apart from him, there are really no free agents worth mentioning- all either have never been good or are way past their prime.

There might a a couple of trade possibilities.  The Pirates currently have both Ryan Doumit and Chris Snyder, both of whom are offensively unexceptional but not Cashian in their offensive abilities.  Doumit has made Red Sox catchers look like the best throwers in the business, but Snyder has had back issues.  Both are signed for similar amounts of money through 2011 with club options after that.  They're also both 29.  It's actually a little eerie to me how much of a wash it is between these two catchers.  Snyder, while not a great option, would at least cost pretty much nothing in prospects to acquire with the Pirates plethora of catchers too expensive for their team.  It might make a kind of sense to get one of them cheap if the Sox think that Saltalamacchia or one of the other guys in the minors would be able to step it up partway through the year.  Neither strikes me as a better idea than Buck or Martinez.

Another name that makes a lot of sense and has been bandied around is Chris Iannetta, who is both probably available in trade and is a native son, from Rhode Island.  He's a streaky hitter who won't hit for high average, but knows how to walk very well with a very good eye, and a good amount of power when he actually hits the ball.  Probably the best offensive option outside of Martinez.  He seems generally considered solid defensively, and seems able to throw out a good number of base-stealers when he is playing regularly.  Best of all, he is signed cheaply through 2012, with a club option for 2013.  Because he's a good option, he could well cost quite a bit in prospects.

Personally, I still see Martinez as by far the best option- he has a game changing bat and has looked just fine defensively of late.  Obviously, if something can't be worked out with him they'll have to look elsewhere.  After him, I see Iannetta as by far the best option- although he has a prospect cost, he looks to provide a lot of value for his price, and I feel that the prospect cost would be offset to a degree by the draft picks they'd receive from Martinez.  Buck is option 3 for me.  The others I think are last resorts who I hope to not see with the Sox.

Comment 40 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

VMart hands down

Is the best option for the immediate future. I like the escalation idea, but make it fair, if he doesn’t catch, give him batting incentives for that year instead since his bat still has a lot of value he could DH for us, maybe picking up after Ortiz leaves (assuming we keep him for a couple more years).

He wants to be here, he plays well here, there isn’t anyone obtainable that I’d rather have than him.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 5, 2010 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

well he could have batting incentives

my idea was more of, not a really low base, but a base of a decent DH that could work it’s way up to the salary of a very good catcher through escalators. I didn’t mean a really low base like a couple million.

by wolf9309 on Aug 6, 2010 12:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ah gotcha

I think that would be a breakthrough sort of contract. I’m not sure I’ve heard of one that depends on what position the player ends up at down the road.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 6, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I've never heard of anything quite like it either

But it seems like it would the solution with the best probably outcome.

by wolf9309 on Aug 6, 2010 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

Alex Rodriguez had a $6mil incentive to hit HR #600 and has 5 more $6mil incentives for passing certain players and eventually breaking the HR record.

Can’t we fashion something like that?

Say he hits his 200th HR, give him an incentive for that instead of an incentive for 25 HRs in a season.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 6, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hmmm

I guess you can put in milestone achievements. Or perhaps I’m wrong all together.

by brogshan on Aug 6, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe it is just milestones. Will wait for those contract experts to step in with the correction. I’m sure there are enough loopholes like the Arod contract to figure something out that would give VMart appropriate compensation whether he catches or not.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 6, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

The situation seems really simple to me. Next year’s catcher will either be Vic, Iannetta, or maybe, MAYBE Buck. I can’t see us putting anybody else put there.

"If I was being paid $30,000 dollars a year, the very least I could do was hit .400."- Ted Williams
I hate Hermida
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Aug 5, 2010 10:56 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

You want to talk about blessed. How about the TWELVE years of Tek

Going to be hard to find another guy who can hold down 2 for 5 years, let alone 10+

With the Salty trade, I doubt they go after Iannetta – unless the move Salty as part of the package to get him.

Victor I like as a batter, but when you move his bat out of 2, then it marginalizes by comparison. I would think if it’s a 4 yr deal, perhaps the next 2 he starts at catcher, with Salty backing him up, eventually with Salty, Wagner, or TBD stepping in full time and Victor going to DH.

I’m interesting in what it would cost to get Buck, who would certainly be cheaper and provide better D. Though if they go this way the need to replace Victor’s bat in LF.

by JonnyNYC on Aug 5, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

FYI-

Buck to the 15 day:
Link:

VMart by a landslide. With a side order of the Salty. Tek to skipper in Greenville or Gulf Coast Rookie League with his brother coming on board as a coach.

by went9 on Aug 5, 2010 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah Buck's on the 15 day

but it’s a ball fouled off his thumb. Shouldn’t be an issue for next year.

by wolf9309 on Aug 5, 2010 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

You definitely talk to Vic first

the Vic-Beltre-Ortiz trio aught to be interesting during the off-season

by BobZupcic on Aug 5, 2010 12:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Ibarra could take over as the full-time catcher sometime next year.

Brett Anderson is the Truth. Brett Anderson is divine presence. Brett Anderson is eternal life. Brett Anderson is within you. Brett Anderson is here. Brett Anderson is Now.

by Frederick0220 on Aug 5, 2010 1:08 PM EDT reply actions  

We really have no idea though

He hasn’t played a single inning of baseball here yet.

We really knew nothing about him coming from Cuba, they say he has a good bat, but don’t know anything about his catching ability. He’s going to need time learning the language and learning how to call a game most likely.

I wouldn’t count on him until 2012 at least.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 5, 2010 1:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah exactly

and we know “good bat” but we don’t even know what level of “good bat”. He’s a great unknown- obviously one they think can help us in the somewhat near future, based on the major league contract they gave him, but still an unknown.

by wolf9309 on Aug 5, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it a possibility Tek comes back for one more part-time year?

- not to be the primary guy, but to be a backup as kind of repeat of 2010 (without the broken foot).

Otherwise, it looks hands down to be V-Mart and Salty.

by dsharp on Aug 5, 2010 1:39 PM EDT reply actions  

I think it would make sense

but I also think being able to bring Salty up would make more sense for the long term. I’d be surprised if he called it quits, but I see him being a backup for another team.

by wolf9309 on Aug 5, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

backup for another team

That’s a sad, sad thought. I sort of wish he would just retire and make the whole damn thing easy. Like someone said, coach our GCL team or something.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 5, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey but if the guy likes to play

he still looks like he can. Who knows, his bat was seeming to wear down anyways. Maybe he’d sign on for a cheap one year thing with the Sox with an understanding that Salty would probably replace him at some point in the year. Doesn’t seem likely though.

by wolf9309 on Aug 5, 2010 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doumit makes no sense for the Sox

He’s always on the DL, seemingly being put there 3+ times per season.

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Aug 5, 2010 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

I figure VMart's negotiations shouldn't be TERRIBLY difficult.

He wants to play here, doesn’t like moving around in general, and is an option for multiple positions (C, 1B, DH). If you sign him for more years/less money, he seems like a guy who would go for it.

Catch until he can’t, at which point he goes 1B/DH/back-up C.

I say this deal gets done.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Aug 5, 2010 2:30 PM EDT reply actions  

Me too and I'd love to see it happen.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 5, 2010 2:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Doumit.......

and Salty are essentially the same player right now. Except that Doumit is four years older,and there have been occasional attitude questions. Actually,Doumit’s probably worse defensively than Salty…
The Red Sox are the big boys……..Re-sign V-Mart and be done with it.

by havildar on Aug 5, 2010 3:58 PM EDT reply actions  

the sox need a catcher not a hitter

The common denominator for the entire pitching staff’s era to go up by more than a point, is Martinez. When Elston Howard joined the red sox in 1967, he hit 180 but the era of the staff went DOWN by a point. A really weak team went to the world series and almost WON. Calling game for any team is more important than some 300 hitting bum who buries the pitching staff. I am astonished that I hear nothing of this.

by tomoc_99 on Aug 6, 2010 12:52 AM EDT reply actions  

it's because there is no truth behind it

and any decent pitcher, coach, or catcher will tell you that the pitcher is the one calling the game. The catcher just works with the pitcher to figure out what he will want. How do you explain the phenomenal performances this year of Buchholz, Lester, and Daisuke if Martinez is incapable of catching? In addition, Beckett has been great so far since coming back off the DL and Lackey has simply had problems locating certain pitches, not pitch selection issues. Back your statement up with some actual numbers or some justification of how the catcher can actually have that effect and I might give it a little credence.

by wolf9309 on Aug 6, 2010 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

V-Mart AND Varitek

I would be happy to bring back both catchers, including Varitek for another year. Signing V-Mart, even above Beltre, must be the Sox #1 priority in the offseason. There is something to be said for stability, especially with catching on a veteran team.
Nobody is going to like the cost of Ianetta, since he is a ML-ready prospect, the Rockies are going to want a top prospect (yes, Kelly, et. al.) in return, and they are justified in that.

by Scoop1981 on Aug 6, 2010 10:59 AM EDT reply actions  

I highly doubt they would and could ask for Kelly.

I’ve read different things from different sources that makes it sound like they are going to use Olivo over Iannetta. If this is true, then they have no leverage because Iannetta is either of no use or a backup. Gammons said that the Rockies turned down an Iannetta for Lowrie deal. He made it sound like the only reason they turned it down was because of injuries and depth problems at 1B this year. This is just what I gathered.

"If I was being paid $30,000 dollars a year, the very least I could do was hit .400."- Ted Williams
I hate Hermida
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Aug 6, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Olivo/Ianetta a good tandem

The Rockies would be idiots to trade Iannetta for anything less than another good young ML player (Lowrie doesn’t get it done) or top prospect. I don’t see why the Rockies have no leverage; Iannetta and Olivo will make $5mil. between them next season, certainly not a scary figure for any ML team not named the Marlins or Pirates.
Hey, if Theo can get this done for Lowrie, I’m all for it.

by Scoop1981 on Aug 6, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Iannetta, but he's nothing spectacular.

If we’re gonna trade a top 50 prospect, then I want to add to the package and get someone better. The problem is that there aren’t may people that would be available. Anyway, they can start talks with Kelly, but they won’t go anywhere. I’m pretty sure they want to stick with Olivo until Jordan Pacheco is ready. Hell, If we’re gonna trade Kelly, then maybe I would rather have Pacheco, but he can’t help us next year.

"If I was being paid $30,000 dollars a year, the very least I could do was hit .400."- Ted Williams
I hate Hermida
Twitter: @BoldandBrash

by BoldandBrash on Aug 6, 2010 4:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t know.

With Mauer in place presumably the Twins had even less leverage when they traded Ramos, a highly regarded catcher prospect. They still managed to haul the best reliever at the trade deadline.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Aug 6, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the twins made an awful decision

I think the lack of leverage is an oversight on their part. Sure, everyone knew they’d trade him, but almost every team would’ve wanted that prospect, so a decent amount of leverage comes from that.

by wolf9309 on Aug 6, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Kevin Cash

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 6, 2010 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

I'd be for re-signing Cash

So long as he legally changed his name to “Buhlow Mendozaline”.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Aug 6, 2010 3:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol

I hope you relize I was being sarcastic

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 6, 2010 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I do. ;)

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard

by Bloggy on Aug 6, 2010 7:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd be exstatic if the Sox got Ianetta

But there is no way he can be had for a reasonable price.

by brogshan on Aug 6, 2010 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jddrew_small
OTM Fantasy Baseball-post 2

Recent FanPosts

I_want_to_believe_small
Dwight Evans = Hall of Famer
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been continued: 2010-2011 offseason
Small
The Red Sox and the luxury tax
Silence_small
Alfredo Aceves and Red Sox agree at $1.2 million
Danny_and_shuttle_small
Matt Garza Is Fair Compensation For Theo Epstein
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been: A revisionist look to the 2009-2010 offseason.
School-of-adventure_print_small
Dustin Moseley
Old-patriots-logo_small
Free Agent SPs Not Named Oswalt, Jackson
Small
Attempt at objectivity - position players

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi

Retired Numbers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rollie_fingers_small SoxDevil

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Photo_small wolf9309