74 to Go: All Star Break Thoughts
As the weekend finishes up and we prepare to go back to work, the Sox get ready for their only sustained mid-season break. It is well-needed and deserved; a team as wracked, besieged, and overwrought with injuries as the 2010 Sox needs a couple days (even a couple weeks) to recover. Boston ends the first half of the season 5 games behind New York, and 3 behind Tampa.
The Sox deserve credit for still being in contention, and we can hope for better play in the remaining months. The return of some injured players should help some. But there are also causes for concern. Looking ahead, there are a few things that we can expect to happen:
1. The implosion of Adrian Beltre.
Easy call here. Beltre is, quite simply, not as good a hitter as he's been thus far. A career .785 OPS guy is highly unlikely to keep up his .912 pace, the second highest of his career (after a steroid-induced 2004). Beltre is not Joe Mauer - a gifted batter who sees a lot of pitches, and he's not Vladi Guerrero - someone who can hit anything. Expect more swings and misses and more first-pitch outs.
2. Better pitching from John Lackey (or a trip to the DL).
Lackey is a better player than he's been so far. His walk rate is so far above career norms that it's not even funny to bitter Angel fans (or Sox fans who resent the signing). Maybe he's playing through injury, or maybe it's just a funk he'll work out of. It's certainly possible that he'll be mediocre all season, but I think it's far more likely he'll find some semblance of his old form, or he'll hit the DL harder than Adrian Beltre steamrolls a Sox outfielder. [Click Continue Reading for more]
3. Theo brings in some help from outside.
As per usual, the trade deadline will go right down to the wire, and at the end of the day on July 31 Boston will have some shiny new players (or a 38-year-old veteran) coming through the doors. The pen needs improvement, and while Beckett is coming back, the rotation may need some help (Oswalt?). I think it's time to get Wakefield back into the pen, with Lackey and Matsuzaka .
What Theo decides, standing pat is not an option, not after he doubled down on the season with a ton of costly free agent signings and extensions. You can't spend over $170 million on a bridge year (unless it's Bridge-to-Nowhere-Year).
4. Continued sightings of AAA players.
Even if our heavy hitters come back healthy, we're going to see guys who came up from Pawtucket. I would not be surprised if Darnell MacDonald or Daniel Nava end up providing us with better production than Ellsbury does, and if he ends up splitting time with one of them in the event of his return to the club.
5. Stiff competition from Tampa and New York.
The Yankees can be expected to stay at or near the top of the division going forward, seeing as how they're fielding $100 billion in payroll on any given night (actually . And unlike the Sox, they don't have a substantial part of their team on the disabled list (yet... Yanks All-Stars, beware the speeding Beltre, he strikes when you least expect). Barring a plague of Jed Lowrie-induced killer mononucleosis (think Outbreak or 28 Days Later) in the Bronx, the Yankees are too strong to fold this year.
I think the Rays are going to be in the race all year as well. Tampa GM Friedman should be on the prowl for bats to help his offense; the Rays already have great strength in the pen and rotation. About the only improvement his team could make would be to relocate to an area where people actually watch baseball. Could Honolulu or Juneau use a franchise?
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This surprised me a little.
Beltre’s H/A splits:
Home: .318/.359/.482 in 184 PA
Away: .344/.382/.597 in 165 PA
WELL NOW YOU'RE NUM NUMS
yes, he’s a good road player
Join the Lacrosse community at theprolaxblog.blogspot.com
Talk about Boston sports at http://www.bestbostonsports.com/
"That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
by bestbostonsports on Jul 12, 2010 10:20 AM EDT up reply actions
yes
Join the Lacrosse community at theprolaxblog.blogspot.com
Talk about Boston sports at http://www.bestbostonsports.com/
"That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
by bestbostonsports on Jul 12, 2010 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't like your "steroid-induced 2004" comment
saying it as if it was something factual when there is no evidence to that apart from it being a big outlier year.
I also think “implosion” is probably an exaggeration of what will happen- his BABIP is only a little higher than peripherals would indicate- a lot of line drives. He’s also just effectively brought back his swing that goes right up the middle, where balls tend to get through more. It’s not like he’s hitting 40 bloop singles and dozens of extra base hits that just happen to fall right in the outfield gaps.
by wolf9309 on Jul 12, 2010 11:43 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Completely agree.
I won’t say he wasn’t on steroids because I have no idea. If you think he was go on and think it, but if you wanna play psychic start a 900 number.
by SendEmHomeKim on Jul 12, 2010 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
totally agree
If you look at the actual details of his 2004 season, it was basically more luck than any sudden increase (and mysterious decrease) in power. His ratio of extra base hits to hits that year was not unusual for his career (in fact he had other years with much higher ratios) – its just that a lot of what would be normally doubles and fly ball outs at the warning track managed to drift over the wall that year. But he didn’t actually hit deep balls at any higher rate. And for his career, that ratio is fairly consistent – unlike some known steroid users.
I’m not saying this is proof that Beltre didn’t use PEDs, but his 2004 season is not really very compelling evidence that he did.
Further, regarding an ‘implosion’ – he’s not a “.785” career OPS guy, once you park-adjust. I do expect him to regress somewhat, but as long as he’s healthy he won’t likely “implode”.
While I don't think Beltre will implode I think he will come down to earth a little.
So far he has had a bad July: going, 5 for 32
July: .156 Avg, .229 OBP, .344 SLG, .572 OPS
However over his career Beltre has been a good Aug player:
From 2009 – 2002 in Aug he has averaged:
.304 Avg, .346 OBP, .533 SLG, .879 OPS
I can't believe anyone who has been paying attention to this club
could possibly believe Roy Oswalt has even the slightest possibility of coming here. You do realize he’s owed something in the range of the GDP of Zimbabwe over the next 2.5 years, right. I think he’s a great pitcher and have been a big fan since his Team USA days with Ben Sheets, but there is no room for him at all. The money Theo handed out to Beckett and Lackey makes an Oswalt sized investment an absolute impossibility. The mentioning of it makes me itch in places I can’t scratch in mixed company.
Don't worry,
If the Rays lose someone from their rotation or outfield, they don’t have any depth at AAA to step up and fill the hole.
/shit.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
Yeah, they could replace an injured Garza and Crawford right now,
so long as good looking prospects adjust seamlessly to major league competition in the toughest division in the game.
by SendEmHomeKim on Jul 12, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
I think you're refering to Hellickson and Jennings
The problem is that they are…2 injury prone prospects:
Jennings has back problems and Hellickson has to top 155 IPs he has in 2008!
Maybe Beltre will take out Swisher?
Not that I actually want that to happen, I wouldn’t wish injury on anyone. But maybe that knee of his can start helping this team.
Just a thought to help the Rays with their fan problems
Obviously it’s not a good move right now with the oil spill, but why not New Orleans. It’s a city, where 80% of the populus are NOT senior citizens. And they all ready have teams-Super Bowl Champion Saints and the decent Hornets. If Selig were smart, which he’s not, he’d consider that…
"We're not going to give up," It doesn't happen, so who cares? There's always next year. It's not like it's the end of the world."-Manny Ramirez
by revigik on Jul 12, 2010 7:00 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs

by 




























