SB Nation Boston Editor's Pick
Red Sox: Friday Quick Hits
Like an elephant walking onto a glass-covered disco floor wearing tap dance shoes during a moment of silence, the red-hot Red Sox aren't in the business of sneaking up on anyone these days.
Here are some quick stats, streaks and other notable tidbits following Friday's 11-0 win in Baltimore to jumpstart your weekend right.
Boston Red Sox: Team
- The Red Sox are now a league-best 21-10 since May 3rd
- Boston has won or split their last six series (opponents average record during that span: 30-24)
- Since May 3rd, Boston has outscored their opponents 189-134 (6.1 - 4.3 per game average)
- Only the Rays (36) and the Yankees (34) have more wins than the Red Sox's 32
- Boston's "feeble" offense now ranks 2nd in the MLB in runs (305, 5.5/game), 1st in hits (540, 9.6/game), 2nd in doubles (132, 2.4/game), 2nd in home runs (77, 1.4/game), 1st in RBI (293, 5.2/game), 1st in total bases (913, 16.3/game), 3rd in walks (223, 4/game), T-2nd in OBP (.350), 2nd in SLG (.466) and 4th in team batting average (.275) -- all for the most part sans Mike Cameron and the team's biggest stolen base threat, Jacoby Ellsbury.
Boston Red Sox: Individual
- Clay Buchholz- After Friday night's win in Baltimore, Buchholz is now 8-3 with a 2.39 ERA. His 8 wins are second in all of baseball only to Ubaldo Jimenez's 10, and tied for first in the American League with David Price. In his last 5 starts, Clay is 5-0 with a 0.99 ERA (36 1/3 innings pitched, 23 hits, 25 strikeouts, 12 walks, 4 earned runs). Buchholz has not allowed a run in 18 1/3 straight innings following his most recent shutout against Baltimore (the third shutout of his career, the last also coming against the Orioles when he no-hit them in 2007). Buchholz's next start will likely be on the road in Cleveland, which is encouraging considering the fact that Clay has won nine consecutive starts away from Fenway dating back to last August.
- Jon Lester- After earning a win in his May 30th start against Kansas City, in which he threw seven innings of one-run baseball, Lester is now 6-2 with a 2.97 ERA in 2010 after a turbulent start to the season. In his previous eight starts dating back to April 23rd, Lester is 6-0 with a 1.42 ERA (56 2/3 innings, 9 earned runs, 31 hits, 19 walks, 63 strikeouts). His WHIP is 1.13, opponents are hitting just .195 against him and his 77 total strikeouts is tied for sixth in all of Major League Baseball.
- David Ortiz- Big Papi, the American League's player of the month in May, is back in a big way. After hitting just .143 in April, Oritz followed that up by hitting .363 in May, to accompany 10 home runs, 24 runs batted in and an OPS of 1.211. The last time David had a month-long OPS that high was back in September, 2007 -- which was also the last time he finished a season with a .300+ batting average, 35+ home runs and 100+ RBI.
- Daniel Bard- Bard has emerged as one of baseball's most dominant relief pitchers in 2010. To date (27 appearances), he is 1-1 with a 1.91 ERA and a WHIP of 0.85. Through 28 1/3 innings, Bard has allowed 6 earned runs on 15 hits, while striking out 31 and walking just 9 batters. Opponents are hitting .156 off the righty.
- Victor Martinez- After a slow start, Martinez has come on strong as of late. The last ten games, V-Mart is hitting .543 (19-35) with a pair of home runs, eight RBI, nine runs scored and has drawn four walks while striking out just once. Even more impressive is his 2010 success while facing left-handed pitching -- on the year, Martinez is hitting .482 (27-56) and slugging .857 with a .508 OBP.
- Adrian Beltre- Despite seemingly hitting off of one knee half the time, "Yo, Adrian" has been one of the hottest hitters in arguably baseball's hottest lineup. On the season, Beltre leads the Red Sox in batting average (.333), has 70 hits, 7 home runs and 40 RBI -- all to compliment his stellar play at third base despite having to constantly dodge incoming left fielders.
- Kevin Youkilis- Recently referred to as the poster boy for a solid at-bat by Rays manager, Joe Maddon, Youkilis has been incredible all season long. Youk' is hitting .312 (59-189) with 11 home runs, 35 RBI and 48 runs scored. Aside from sporting a .448 on-base percentage and a .587 slugging percentage, Youkilis has even flashed an element of speed not normally seen in his game to counter the absence of Jacoby Ellsbury, recording 3 triples and has still yet to be thrown out attempting a steal (a perfect 1-1).
Other News, Notes
- Originally reported Wednesday, the Chicago White Sox have been in contact with Boston regarding third baseman, Mike Lowell. After Chicago's everyday third baseman Mark Teahan was placed on the disabled list Tuesday with a fractured finger, general manager Ken Williams placed a call to the Red Sox inquiring about Boston's second-string corner infielder. The Angels are also rumored to have shown interest in Lowell as a replacement for injured first baseman, Kendry Morales.
- The schedule forecasts as more than fair for the Red Sox in the upcoming weeks. After finishing the current road stretch with six games against the last place Orioles and Indians, who have a combined record of 35-77, Boston returns to Fenway to begin a nine-game interleague homestand -- inluding three against the Phillies, who were beaten in two of three games by the Red Sox earlier this year in Philadelphia, three against the 21-34 Diamondbacks and the final three versus the Dodgers (which also marks the return of Manny Ramirez to Boston).
- The 2010 MLB First-Year Player Draft is just days away (June 7-9). Boston has the 20th pick overall, awarded to them after Atlanta signed Billy Wagner this offseason. Rumors have the Red Sox selecting LSU pitching standout, Anthony Ranaudo, who is expected to command more than any team above Boston is willing to offer. Theo Epstein has always been high on college players with his early-round picks, so there could be a solid level of validity to the rumors. Ranaudo is a big 20-year-old righty, standing at 6'7" and weighing in at 227 lbs. According to reports, his fastball typically sits around 91-93 and can touch 95 on occasion; his changeup is average and sits around the 79-81 mph range. Ranaudo's third pitch is a sharp-biting curveball that, while still considered inconsistent, has been said to show plus potential as a put-away pitch. The one prominent negative in reports is the pitcher's tendency to leave his pitches, namely his fastball, up in the zone too often. Despite that, Ranaudo remains one of the draft's highest regarded hurlers.
- Lastly, to address the elephant in the room -- that same tap dancing one from the first paragraph -- Dustin Pedroia's hit-streak now stands at four games in his pursuit of Joe DiMaggio's once considered untouchable record of 56 consecutive games with a hit. Godspeed, Pedey; just 53 more to go.
48 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Individual
I am also really impressed with what I see from Manny Delcarmen of late. He has really turned a corner and no longer brings a feeling of dread with him when he trots to the mound.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Except for the other night where he gave up back to back HRs…
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Yeah. I didn't like THAT much.
But now it’s an “off night” as opposed to “why do we bring this @#$%ing hump out of the bullpen at all”.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Quick Wakefiled stats and questions?
Wakefield is now 1win and 4 losses with a horrendous record of being easily hit for almost one or two innings for sure in each game. I personally feel he is far to old and far to easy to hit to be a major league player (especially a starter) anymore.
The question: If he starts again and is blown out by the 5th to go 1 and 5, do we finally stop this ignorance-insanity. If this does happen again and we don’t stop starting him, is it ignorance or insanity?
Its a tough situation. They cnat just release him, and i think he still has some in the tank. Id say move him back to the pen, but how will that work out?
Join the NLL community at http://www.nationallacrosseleagueblog.blogspot.com/
Talk about Boston sports at http://www.bestbostonsports.com/
by bestbostonsports on Jun 5, 2010 9:42 AM EDT up reply actions
If this does happen again and we don’t stop starting him, is it ignorance or insanity?
The exact same question you’ve been asking for a year, despite Wake having proved you wrong repeatedly and ending with a respectable 4.58 ERA in ’09.
So, tell me, what’s your excuse: ignorance or insanity?
Oh, you might be right this time. Maybe Wake finally is done. But I’d hardly call it correct analysis if I stood here declaring the end of Albert Pujols for the next 10 years until it finally worked out.
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jun 5, 2010 10:18 AM EDT up reply actions
How many other pitchers
have their own pet meltdown phrase which is used extensively around here with great anticipatory fear? Do you think this fear phrase, which everyone here understands well, can be so applied routinely to all or most of our pitchers. NO! It is an exclusive for Wakefield to indicate that he is on average not a major league caliber pitcher, and has not been for a while. I did not make up this “meltdown” acknowledgement/fear, so there must be more to this than just a recent Wakefield slip.
I absolutely fail to see why Wakefield has such a following around here despite being absolutely destructive to team morale and momentum 90% of the time. Is it because he works cheap?? Well he has other costs that hurt the team which make up for that far more often than any good he has been doing for a while!
by NG on Jun 5, 2010 10:28 AM EDT up reply actions
No one enjoys the blow up innings of Wake or Matsuzaka.
With Wakefield, it isn’t his age. It’s been pitch location up in the zone and lack of movement on the knuckle. His leash as a starter is getting short.
NG- quick question.
Do you remember what Wakefield did in the 2004 ALCS to help the Sox to the Championship that year?
Wakefield is destructive to team morale 90% of the time?
That’s an interesting assertion. Can you back that up with any evidence?
Per Ben’s comment – repeating the same assertions about Wake being ‘done’ due to age smacks of both insanity and brilliance.
Insanity in that repeating it again and again during period in which the statistical evidence has been that he is NOT ‘done’ (posting better-than average ERA over a large slog of innings over the last year and a half) is tantamount to doing the same thing again and again and expecting a different outcome.
Brilliance in that, since it is a age-related assertion, eventually, if you keep repeating it, it will become true. Just keep on, keepin’ on …
One thing thing I do agree with in your post: You “absolutely fail to see”.
I don't get that "90%" comment at all...
but count me in those who think Wake should work out the pen and let Boof get a couple of starts for now if he comes up Monday. If it doesn’t work out, flip him with Boof and move Wake back to the #5 or #6 spot starter.
That occasional 3-inning man relieving Dice-K or Boof (or, sigh, Lackey) in the 4th inning is a good spot for Wake, as is someone to finish off the game starting with the 11th inning. That way, he’s well-rested while providing longer, though not starting, numbers of innings. You know, the Justin Masterson role. I think we should give it a shot, but I don’t think Francona will. Why won’t he take my calls?
Wow
You don’t understand why he has such a following around here? I thought you’ve been a Sox fan for a while. He’s been on this team for the vast majority of my 21 years on this planet. Not only that, he loves Boston so much he agreed to a perpetual team option at WAY below market value, essentially to say, I don’t care how long you want to keep me here, I’ll do it. Maybe it’s because he’s always been humble and a great veteran club house presence on the team. Maybe that’s why he has such a following, the fans that love him do so because he loves the team as much as we do.
To call him destructive is ignorant AND insane. Last year he made an All Star game, so much for your “argument”. Maybe he is done this year, but he wasn’t done last year, or the year before that or the year before that. Wake has never been the best pitcher, he hasn’t won a ton of awards and been a front of the rotation starter but he has been solidly one of the best mid-back end of the rotation starters in baseball, every year posting an ERA in the respectable mid 4s. Sometimes he’s hittable but when he’s on, he’s on. And it’s a gamble, but winning nearly 200 games isn’t a product of being a fringe talent. Please use the filter in your head before you speak again. Or at least acknowledge that there is a very solid argument for the other side that easily over comes your thoughts.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Furthermore
I don’t recall you every responding to one of my requests on another topic, the Varitek one. About what YOU would have done differently to construct this team since clearly Theo is ignorant. Please, answer that if you want.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
He would have to take his foot out of his mouth to do that!
and he is not wearing his pepermint sneakers :-)
by RED SOX are #1 in my heart on Jun 5, 2010 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions
53 % winning effort career-long.
Do you consider that good, especially with the way he bombs out when he loses. By the time he can be replaced when he bombs out, that game is out of reach. Playing him is like playing Russian Roulette, and I find that unacceptable on the major league level. Too nerve-wracking a pitcher for me, and now it is getting even worse, but still he starts.
by NG on Jun 5, 2010 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Check my reply to my post as well kindly. Thanks.
53% over a 20 year career? He wins more than he loses, better than a lot of pitchers. Besides the fact that it isn’t about wins to measure a pitcher’s worth since it depends on way more than him, he’s averaged a 4.36 ERA throughout year after year. You need to stop analyzing him as a top of the rotation starter, for a back end guy like he is, he’s usually one of the better ones in baseball. We’ve been lucky these last few years to have someone like him instead of the scrubs in the 5th spot a lot of teams have.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
I mean, look at the Yankees #5, Vazquez, he’s over 6 ERA too. Rays have Davis sitting at over 5. Blanton on the Phils is close to 6. Those are some of the best teams or highest paid teams in the league with a 5th starter who has been comparably as bad as Wake this year.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
He's been saying this for a long time.
Its better not to even engage him.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
It’s hard to just let someone bad mouth Wake.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
I have nothing against Wakefield as a person,or
how he conducted himself personally on the field. In fact, that must be why so many like him despite his enormous shortcomings as a major league pitcher. I tend to see the weak spots on a team quickly, and reliability for high performance has got to be a requirement of a championship caliber major league player. Wakefield is too unreliable and too easily massacred at the plate to be a major league pitcher that can help lead his team to championships. He is a filler-in and an object of curiosity for his style and now age, but that does not make him a championship caliber pitcher.
Tell me you really get excited about a win when you see Wakefield posted as the starting pitcher.
by NG on Jun 6, 2010 9:56 AM EDT up reply actions
I get really excited when I see a win.
The fact is Wake HAS pitched as a major-leauge caliber pitcher for many, many years.
USG
Yeah, because championship teams can never use long-men or starters with
low-4 ERAs.
You talk about Wake’s blowups, but then ignore his ERAs. So what if he single-handedly loses you 5 games on a season if he also single-handedly wins you 10 or 15!
But the best part is you’re not even accurate! Guys have bad nights! All of them! But Wakefield is pretty damned consistent
In 2006, Wakefield had 5 starts with 0-2 earned runs
12 with 3-4
6 with 5+
In 2007, Wakefield had 11 starts with 0-2 earned runs
11 with 3-4
9 with 5+
In 2008, Wakefield had 14 starts with 0-2 earned runs
10 starts with 3-4
6 with 5+
In 2009, Wakefield had 8 starts with 0-2 earned runs.
7 with 3-4
6 with 5+
38 with 0-2
40 with 3-4
27 with 5+
Generally speaking, he gravitates towards the middle, but with more exceptionally good starts than exceptionally bad. Nobody is “reliably good” in the 4th or 5th spot on almost any championship team because—surprise—they’re back end for a reason! They’d have ERAs in the 3s if they were reliably good.
2001 Diamondbacks: Brian Anderson and Robert Ellis, 48 starts @ >5 ERA
2002 Angels: Aaron Sele and Scott Schoeneweiss (!), 41 starts @ 4.88 ERA
2003 Marlins: Carl Pavano, 32 starts @ 4.30 ERA
2004 Red Sox: Derek Lowe, 33 starts @ 5.42 ERA (Obviously, Wake could slot in here too @ around 4.8)
2005 White Sox: Orlando Hernandez, 22 starts @ 5.12 ERA
2006 Cardinals: I swear to GOD, 95 starts made by guys with a >5 ERA.
2007 Red Sox: Freddy Krueger, 23 starts @ 5.15 ERA
2008 Phillies: Kyle Kendrick & Adam Eaton, 49 starts @ 5.49 & 5.80 ERA
2009 Yankees: Joba Chamberlain, Chien-Ming Wang, and Sergio Mitre, 49 starts @ a combined 6.01 ERA
I have empirically shown that EVERY TEAM HAS BACK-END STARTERS THAT PERFORM AT LEVELS OFTEN MUCH WORSE THAN WAKEFIELD HAS FOR MANY STARTS, OFTEN FOR MUCH MORE MONEY
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jun 7, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Look at the 96, 98-00 Yankees, they were championship caliber teams, mostly because well, they were champions, every year (with the exception of 98 which is widely considered to have been one of the most efficient teams ever with 114 wins) they had a starter that was very comparable, or WORSE than Wakefield, and they won. Hell, we won with Wake, TWICE!
You are expecting wayyy to much from a 5th starter, look at my Phillies, Rays and Yankees comparison above, these are teams that are expecting to win, or are paying to win and their 5th starters are comparably unpredictable. Yes Wake is having a bad year, but let’s not forget, he isn’t even supposed to be starting, this wasn’t the plan and there isn’t much out there that would be any better or cost effective, since presumably Beckett will be back sooner or later and bump who ever we got, out. We have Wake and historically he has been a very good back of the rotation starter.
If you’re looking for a sub-4 ERA with good peripherals, you aren’t going to get it at #5, pretty much anywhere in the league.
Also, stop ignoring me up above, you’ve yet to answer my question, you’re real quick to argue some points but like to ignore the ones you’re going to lose.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
The unknown is better than a known poor or mediocre talent.
I would be for going with minor league experiments or trade for hungry players that might blossom rather than stay with a known poor or mediocre talent. Staying with such a mediocre or has been talent only assures an average or poor year. Starting Varitek last year or playing Wakefield at all now is such a mediocre move that can only delay better times. Get on with the experiments that may lead to better times and out with the has-been!
by NG on Jun 7, 2010 2:07 PM EDT up reply actions
Minor League experiments ruin Minor Leaguers
Hungry players? Like who? Give me one that won’t perform worse than Wake? And I mean Wake in 2009, because the argument isn’t that he’s still good—this might be the year he disappears. But you’ve been on his case much longer.
USG
But you are simply wrong.
Wake is not a ‘known poor or mediocre talent’.
He is a known quantity that is well above average for a 5th starter.
The numbers are absolutely compelling on this point. You are simply wrong.
Great article, Logan!
This morning has been much more pleasant than yesterday’s (following both the RS & Celt losses Thursday night).
Awesome article.
Really enjoyed reading it. My highlight of the year so far has been Beltre’s reemergence as a dominant figure in the league…and Buchholz’ maturation into a superb MLB pitcher.
Oh…and Papi raking and shutting people up hasnt hurt either :-)
thanks, and I def enjoyed venting all of my excitment into this
And I am right there with you regarding Buchholz. Upon reflection, I can say with absolute certainty that Clay has been my favorite story of the Red Sox’s 2010. I’ve always wanted him to do well, he’s always been one of my favorite young Sox players, and it’s such a different feeling that I have before the beginning of one of his starts nowadays. In the past I would go in hoping he’d put it all together for 7-8 innings, instead he’d go 5 and give up 3-4 runs on like 115 pitches — which I can’t say was disappointing, because it was almost expected. Nowadays, I watch his starts like a proud dad…which I don’t deserve, because I have been guilty of claiming that he should be traded in the past — I can’t imagine how great it is to watch for guys like Epstein who have stuck with Clay through so much and refused to dump him for guys like Halladay; he must REALLY feel like a proud dad.
On a darker note, my biggest disappointment this year has definetly been Beckett. I’m sure that’s the case for most people, but I’m reeeeallly disappointed. With how well our staff has been without his presence, it’s frustrating to think where we’d be with him producing like he should the last few weeks.
Buchholz makes up for Beckett though — I think his success has a lot to do with the new hairstyle….the flowing curly locks and pretty badass.
Hi, I'm here for the laser show...?
Thanks Logan.
Also like our offense from the catching position compared to all other teams:
Jason Varitek and Victor Martinez combined offensive rankings, AL and NL stats:
Ranking:
1st, wOBA .402
1st, OPS%, .936
1st, SLG%, .570
1st , RBI, 39
1st, Runs, 39
1st, HR, 14
1st, Total Hits, 70
I’m enjoying this offensive production from our platoon catching team.
Impressive! Makes up a bit for the fact....
that we are dead last in catching opposing basestealers
By Position using wOBA:
C – 1st
1B – 3rd
2B – 10th
3B – 7th
SS – 12th
OF – 19th
DH – 6th
I cannot wait for Ells and Cam to come back so we can bench/DFA the Hall/DMac/Hermida trio
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
WAR
BTW – The Offense/Defense is second in overall WAR with 13.0 behind the MFY 13.4 and well ahead of the 3rd place Reds with 11.6
Team Defense UZR – +9.3 (9th best in the majors)….Yanks are -1.1. The Dodgers are an unsightly -27.5!
On the catching basestealer issue:
Improvements have been made. We have played 56 games to date and have given up 60 SB total.
The first 28 games= 39 SB.
The last 28 games= 21 SB.
.75 SB/game is much improved over 1.39 SB/game.
Bottomline: Keep improving.
my pleasure
And great stats on the catchers…the V-Tek and Martinez combo has worked out incredible for the Sox this season, and I think it’s one of the most overlooked small-scale successes on the season so far for Boston.
Hi, I'm here for the laser show...?
With 56 games played,
the Sox offense is now on pace to score more runs than last year.
303 runs/ 56 games = 876 runs/162 games. And it’s still warming up.
Where are all the naysayers now?
Oh that’s right they only reside on Brownie Points, WEEI, The Globe, etc.
Gotta love OTM!
If the Chisox and Angels are interested in Lowell....
PLEASE GET US A SOLID PIECE FOR THE BULLPEN!!!!
Whoever said it doesn't matter whether you win or lose, probably lost.

by 





























