Imperfection At Its Finest: Bud Selig Should Not Reverse The Un-Perfect Game
Detroit Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga pitched an amazing game on Wednesday night. He was masterful, really. He struck out only three Indians in nine innings, but he was efficient. He threw just 88 pitches on the night and walked none. He was around the zone and he dominated.
But he wasn't perfect. And he shouldn't be perfect.
As I'm sure you've heard, Galarraga was one out away from a perfect game when the Indians' Jason Donald hit a grounder to the hole between first and second base. First baseman Miguel Cabrera was able to snag the ball, turn and fire to first where Galarraga covered in just enough time to get the out.Except first base umpire Jim Joyce did not see it that way.
Joyce called Donald safe, although he appeared to be out by a half step at the least. Cabrera argued. Tigers' coach Jim Leyland argued. Galarraga just smiled in disbelief.
Joyce admitted his mistake after the game, saying, "it was the biggest call of my career, and I kicked the shit out of it. I just cost that kid a perfect game."
The right call is clear. Joyce messed it up, but he admitted his wrong doing. So perhaps MLB Commissioner Bud Selig should just overturn the call and declare it a perfect game. He would make Galarraga happy, Tigers fans happy and, most importantly, Joyce happy.
But he really shouldn't.
Jim Joyce was positioned behind first base to make the best possible call he could make. That is his job and that is what he did. He blew the call horribly, yes, but that was the best call he could make at the time. He knows he blew it and we know he blew it ... but that's baseball.
Baseball is not perfect and no one has ever claimed that it is. Joyce made a mistake, but that's what makes baseball great: players, coaches, fans and -- a lot of the time -- umpires just make the wrong moves. They might read a signal wrong and get thrown out trying to steal second. Or they might send in a left-handed pinch-hitter that is 0 for 37 lifetime against the pitcher. Or they might reach over the barrier and grab a ball they shouldn't have touched. Or they might just blow a perfect game.
But that is baseball. And it's not that we should "learn to live with it." It's that we have always been living with it and for such a long time. Baseball is not a new sport and making mistakes in baseball is not foreign. In every game it happens. This time it was just on a very big stage with many eyes peering down.
If Selig reverses the call and gives Galarraga the 21st perfect game in baseball history, it is like taking a giant eraser to baseball history. It's also like taking a lighter to the baseball rulebook.
It was not a perfect game. As much as it should have been a perfect game, it wasn't because Joyce called Donald safe. That's the history. History can not be changed. Selig, although he is the God of Major League Baseball, has no right to overturn the call.
Joyce failed in making the right call. Galarraga failed in accomplishing the perfect game. And Selig will fail if he reverses the call.
This is baseball and we must continue to live with it. Perfect or not.
63 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Disagree
Sorry, but the umpire admits that he blew it and the tape doesn’t lie. Also, it doesn’t change wether or not the game was won. At the very least it should instigate instant replay.
It's hard to say what's been most impressive. The seamless jump from AA? The ability to hit for average? The ability to hit for power? The 18 walks in 111 trips to the plate? The flair for the dramatic? When you're trying to isolate the most impressive aspect of Jason Heyward's game, there's a lot to choose from, and it's only been a month and a half.
I agree with you on the last sentence
It should make the MLB look into instant replay. It’s a gray area, but why not, right? I’m not exactly a replay fan, but I think that SOMETHING has to happen as a result of this and that will be the only thing.
Umpire blew it. Tapes don’t lie. But it happened. Why do we change that now?
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow this guy on Twitter: @RCBooth
To right a wrong
It is obvious that the call was wrong, the umpire admits it was wrong. Again, it had no true impact on the outcome of the game. It is a grey area, and if Bud has any guts he’ll reverse it. (Guess that mean’s he won’t) I just think the right thing to do would be to overturn it.
It's hard to say what's been most impressive. The seamless jump from AA? The ability to hit for average? The ability to hit for power? The 18 walks in 111 trips to the plate? The flair for the dramatic? When you're trying to isolate the most impressive aspect of Jason Heyward's game, there's a lot to choose from, and it's only been a month and a half.
by Richie Grogan on Jun 3, 2010 1:02 AM EDT up reply actions
If he overturns it
People are going to ask, “Why didn’t he overturn X play on X day?”
I think it should just left be.
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow this guy on Twitter: @RCBooth
A perfect game is a once-in-a-lifetime occurrence
Yes, it might open the floodgates of people asking why all bad calls aren’t overturned, and maybe it should. There’s absolutely no reason the sport shouldn’t endeavor to make every call right. If this provides the much-needed pressure to change the way it’s officiated, then I’m all for it.
Oh, if a man tried to take his time on earth, and prove before he died
What one man's life could be worth--oh, I wonder what would happen to this world.
by LegendaryTadpole on Jun 3, 2010 1:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Change the way things are done in the future...
But right now…I don’t know. Can’t you see a play in the 4th being protested, and then clearly wrong by replay, and then people will ask “So should we play the last 5 innings over again?” That’s just not gonna work.
USG
Actually
A perfect game is apparently a two-to-three-times-a-month occurrence…
But I get your point.
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow this guy on Twitter: @RCBooth
So Wrong. It HAS to be overturned. A call like that cannot be allowed to ruin HISTORY. The game has to go into the books as perfect, because it was no fault of the players. To not do so is to punish the player for the mistake of a non-player. It is wrong and must be fixed. It ain’t fair to the pitcher to tell him, sorry someone elses mistake has to keep you from making history.
by dguad on Jun 3, 2010 1:02 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I agree somewhat, except...
If it is indeed overturned, it’s still not the same. There will be no on-field celebration in front of a roaring crowd. There will be no real sense of accomplishment for the pitcher, or the team. it didn’t affect the outcome. The moment is lost forever in time. Changing it in the books does no one any services.
David Ortiz 2010: 120 RBIs, 35+ HRs. Jason who?
I agree
Something I failed to put in the post, but yes, it just wouldn’t be the same.
I don’t think Galarraga would want it that way anyway.
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow this guy on Twitter: @RCBooth
How can you say there would be no sense of accomplishment for the pitcher?
Have you talked to the guy? If I were in his position, I’d like the call reversed and my name forever enshrined in the record books. Maybe he feels that way, maybe he doesn’t—I’m not about to make a judgment call based on information I don’t have. If I had to go one way or the other, I certainly wouldn’t assume that Galarraga wouldn’t want the satisfaction of having officially pitched a perfect game.
Oh, if a man tried to take his time on earth, and prove before he died
What one man's life could be worth--oh, I wonder what would happen to this world.
by LegendaryTadpole on Jun 3, 2010 1:36 AM EDT up reply actions
The pitcher knows what he did
He knows he pitched a perfect game. We all do. Reversing the call does not change that, and nor does leaving it. It would be ludicrous to suggest that the pitcher would want it overturned, because then it becomes a personal vendetta, putting yourself before the team.
David Ortiz 2010: 120 RBIs, 35+ HRs. Jason who?
Even Galarraga said after the game
I can still tell my son that “I pitched a perfect game and show him the video”. You don’t overturn it. Like Randy said, why not over turn this or that or this. A slippery slope. Yeah it sucks for the kid pitching but oh well. And JJ is a good umpire. He went to Galarraga after the game and apologized “with his eyes all watery” You think Joe West would have done that? How about Angel? Not a chance.
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
WOOHOO
my 1st +1! I win! From a mod no less!
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
Slash creator slash head blogger slash manager.
He has to many titles. I’m just gonna start calling him “The Big Cheese”
USG
This
If NESN or ESPN can immediately deliver an instant replay to the viewing audience, then there is zero reason why it can’t be done on the field.
Are we really arguing this? I come to this site because most of the regular bloggers use things like Pitch F/X to support their assertions. Now we’re afraid of a Pandora’s Box being opened if replay is expanded that past games will be argued?
Right the wrong here, which really is the only option left now that the ump has publicly admitted he was incorrect. As has been mentioned here, the technology is to be used for games going forward with the exception of the catalyst event. There’s already precedent. If MLB is willing to review tape to hand out suspensions and fines days and weeks after games are concluded, then this should be no different.
Should a system be in place to ensure that every three minutes the umps aren’t disappearing to look at the tape? Yes, they need to implement replay efficiently.
But the longer this crap goes on, the more likely I and others like me will slowly write the game off as at worst rigged and at best grossly stubborn and archaic.
This is a separate issue, but since we’re on the topic of changing the game, interleague play should not be a new thing. Actually, with a 162 game schedule, each baseball team should play every other team in the league at least five times, with the remaining dozen games allotted to regional rivalries. Then and only then could I take Ubaldo Jimenez as the real deal, since he isn’t beating up on the Giants, D-Backs, etc.
by Christopher B on Jun 3, 2010 2:52 AM EDT up reply actions
record books
OK, put it in the record books without reversing the call. Why not? It would right the wrong without changing the whole fabric of the game.
Furthermore
Yes, this adds another chapter to the unfortunate story that is umpiring in 2010. But still… I don’t think I want it to be as highly reviewed as football. That’s one reason I think football is so damn BORING. I like replay for HR calls. I’d even be game to seeing it expanded to close plays at the plate. But that’s it.
David Ortiz 2010: 120 RBIs, 35+ HRs. Jason who?
Could be worse
The umps could be the 2010 NBA Playoff refs
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
NBA refs in general really
Their problem is far worse than MLB. I’ll watch the Celtics but man, it seems like they’re paid to make bullshit calls all the time.
David Ortiz 2010: 120 RBIs, 35+ HRs. Jason who?
The problem with the NBA
is that they have proven, convicted cheaters for refs and do absolutely nothing to combat that perception. It actually jst gets worse
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
Realistically
the man did throw a perfect game. Whether or not the ump called it right, it was still actually perfect. I don’t see why we should let an ump’s bad call get in the way – ESPECIALLY when he clearly understands that he blew it. If it were closer I could at least understand, but it was obvious. Ump was in a bad position, made a bad call – give the guy the game he deserves.
Umps really are trying over the last couple of years to make a case for instant replay, aren’t they? A simple NFL-like flag system would suffice. Unless you’re Joe West, in which case the extra few minutes it might cut into your nightly WoW time.
Or might not leave you enough tim e for that last bucket of KFC
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
Leave HIM enough time.
Sorry. Its the booze again. Bed time
I exercise strong self control. I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast
I disagree empahtically
The umpires are not players on the field. They are an extension of the rules that are there to make sure that everyone knows what happened. Yes, umpire mistakes are a part of baseball but they shouldn’t be. If they could have some system that was absolutely perfect are you seriously telling me you would rather have fallable refs? That’s patently ridiculous.
Selig shouldn’t get in the habit of changing games after they happen, but he damn sure should consider making at least 1 exception. And hopefully institute further rule changes to further minimize umps being wrong and destroying the sanctity of the game.
"We Believe" - Rudy Fernandez
by TheGreatMon on Jun 3, 2010 3:44 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
9 1/3 innings of perfection
I don’t agree with overturning the call, or amending scores or whatnot, but I would agree with the Selig announcing it as a perfect game. Then can be listed with the other perfect games.
If Selig reverses the call and gives Galarraga the 21st complete game in baseball history
Dont you mean perfect?
Oh, and I disagree completely. And I think reply should be implemented.
Screw the purists, we should have a consistent strike zone (electronically) and replay for questionable calls.
The “tradition” of bad calls should go the way of the dodo. A pure game of baseball would be the right calls and we have the technology to do it.
"I think about baseball when I wake up in the morning. I think about it all day. And I dream about it at night. The only time I don't think about it is when I'm playing it."
Carl "Yaz" Yastrzemski
We see bad calls almost every game.
In 2009, three umps got under my skin enough to write their name on a peice of paper and throw it in a box to look at in the off season:
Jim Joyce, Bill Miller, and then Bob Davidson.
In 2010 my three pieces of paper to date are:
Dale Scott, Joe West, and Angel Hernandez.
Bring on the electronic ump system.
I could add a name to the box every night for just plain missed calls.
Link to Jim Joyce Bio;
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/official_info/umpires/bio.jsp?id=2536
Come on Randy , you can't really believe this.
Awful mistakes that lead to injustice are not what make baseball great. If that was true then instant replay would be a negative for baseball, while it will actually make it so much better.
I agree wholeheartedly that the call should not be overturned.
However, Boy Howdy, do I ever disagree with this:
Jim Joyce was positioned behind first base to make the best possible call he could make. That is his job and that is what he did
That is his job, but that is most certainly NOT what he did. He @#$%ed that call. Absolutely @#$%ed it. It was absolutely brutal and that fact should not swept aside as “nobody’s perfect”.
His job was to make the best possible call he could make. That most certainly is not what he did. What he did was make the worst call he could make.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Or maybe a ball was called a strike that could have created a walk...
This is only become a big deal because it was the last play
Which is exactly why I think the call should NOT be overturned.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
This is the one case where you can safely reverse the call
Most of the time you can argue that you don’t know what would happened later in the game if the call were reversed. You would have pitched differently etc. In this case it was the 27th out, and the exception should specify that:
1) It was the 27th out
2) The outcome is unchanged
3) (actually part of 2) He got the next man as well
That case will come up once year it is a lot, more likely once a decade or less
Justice baseball style!
Who needs justice. A proven wrong is done, but because “it has always been that way” well we must not have justice. Hell how did we stop eating other people??
What bullcrap! Even if you do not wish to retroactively change a finalized game now, at least use the new technology of reply to prevent this crap from happening again. Justice is a good and fair AND NEEDED social concept.
I don't watch baseball for mistakes
I love the game because for whatever reason I like to watch nine guys hit a ball at nine other guys and run counter clockwise. Blown calls have nothing to do with it. Yes mistakes happen, balls are strikes, bases aren’t tagged and all sorts of other things, but I can’t say if umps could manage to get calls better with technology I’d love the game less.
I agree with Randy here
seriously….mistakes are made every game…should they go back and review tapes of every one hitter? The Tigers won the game, Galarraga pitched well….a meaningless hit does not change that
Whos asking for every hitter?
or every play to be reviewed? i think you are going into an extreme. easily a potential game changing play should be open for review. Like football after the 2 minute warning, it’s discrecianary by the booth. Does every play after the 2 minute warning get reviewed? NO.
If that play happened in the 3rd inning, it may have just disappeared into obscurity, but it was THE LAST OUT IN A PERFECT GAME. so I would argue it wasn’t a “meaningless hit”. It had historical ramifications for the pitcher and the team.
Hits and errors are changed after the fact in many cases, this one, even if it’s not the same in a celebratory sense (on field celebration with fans, etc in the moment), needs to be changed for the sake of the INTEGRITY OF THE GAME.
by toonman on Jun 3, 2010 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Amen to this!
Justice has to be had when it obviously counts. Good post!
For such a seemingly young crowd, many in this group around here sure seems terribly conservative. (keep things the old way no matter what!) That kind of thinking always worrys me!
by NG on Jun 3, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I meant in history
surelty this is not the first blown call in a no-hitter/perfect game scenario….You give Galarraga his perfect game what’s to say other’s aren’t in the same boat.
Different stripes on that animal
That would be a totally different discussion and scenario, as you would be dealing with what info and technology was available at the time. Going back to say 1963, and trying to reconstruct events would be way more difficult. Is it really necessary- I think no. I don’t believe that the can of worms you think would be opened up, would be appropriate. I am talking about in the present day, from here forward.
Now, on one hand, if someone has undeniable historical evidence that there was some history changing flaw represented in a past game, why not have the abilty to bring that up to the commisioner. If there’s something extremely conclusive with enough viable evidence, why not?
Read recently where the Department of Defense was honoring a Union soldier from the Civil war with the Congressional Medal of Honor, after convincing evidence of his heroic acts were brought to light. 167 years after the fact, i believe it was. Credit where credit is due, shouldn’t be a bad thing. I don’t advocate a mad rush to the film vaults, but I see no ill effects of making things right.
Reviews don’t need to be handled by on-field umps as football does. In the time the coach argued the play, an “official video Review umpire/ league rep, whoever” would’ve had that play cued and nailed and corrected with little effect to the flow of the game.
Therein lies the problem
because there probably have been other no-hitters blown by one call, but I bet you can’t name any of them. The fact is this kid did something historical and that bad call is the difference between being in the record books and no one remembering who he is in a month and a half. Just because something’s been done incorrectly to date doesn’t mean that things should continue to be done incorrectly.
Yes, the last out
I don’t believe this call should be reversed UNLESS MLB puts in a rule stating that video review is only available for the last out of a game. Take out the perfect game scenario and say this was a playoff game, home team down 2-1 in the bottom of the 9th; even if the umpire blows the first or second out, the team HAS another chance to keep the game going. It the umpire blows the 3rd out, the game is over, no chances left, so MLB could, at that instant, not the next day, review the call. This may happen once every 20 year or more anyway.
Bottom line
Don’t change it because then other people will want things in the past and future changed. Let’s just move on.
"man, this team they just suck so bad"- gizmosandy
Youkilis for MVP 2010
DFA Bogar
Twitter: @BoldandBrash
Limited View
so is your limited view of progress just for baseball, or all life in general? I guess you’ve never wanted a raise for fear others around you will want their pay changed. Don’t upgrade your computer system, because everyone in the company will want faster more efficient equipment to make their lives and work easier. Hope you’ll be happy with “pong” on your atari while everyone else is consumed in modern warfare2 on their 360…so, yeah… “Let’s just move on”,
after all it is 2010.
What in the blue hell are you talking about?
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
response
to BOTTOM LINE comment about people wanting things changed in the past and future, so dont change the call. Just move on. So my question was to him if that’s how he looks at all possible infractions of life. Sounded like he’s against change of any sort. sarcasm.
I realize who the response was to B&B
But he said he didn’t want people going back changing calls in games that were in the books. You ignorantly jump to some moronic conclusion about being stuck in the dark ages and made ridiculous allusions to raises and Atari.
Ergo…what in the blue hell are you talking about? You don’t make sense.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
thanks
it is possible i misread that to mean wanted nothing to change, as it reads past and future.
so i joyfully take the mantle of blue hell moron and will wear it for the rest of the day as an example to others who read to fast for their own good.
i did give you the opportunity to post the phrase “What in the Blue Hell” a solid twice, maybe a third time after this posts?
apologies for not making sense. it’s the job, or the kids or maybe lack of coffee. I still maintain the call should be changed, but that doesn’t mean everyone wanting an event changed should get it.
What I meant was that changing this will set a precedent.
Things in the future will always be up for questionable change until we get a instant replay. People would also complain about wanting other things in the past changed. If Selig takes action here, he will have to do so in the future. That is what I don’t want.
"man, this team they just suck so bad"- gizmosandy
Youkilis for MVP 2010
DFA Bogar
Twitter: @BoldandBrash
Internet handshake after coming to common ground:
Huzzah for an Internet conversation not spiraling into a pointless pissing contest!!
HUZZAH!
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
The Right Thing
We all want to have the “right thing” happen and award the perfect game. That being said, I don’t see how MLB can possibly reverse the call after the fact, obviously using video replay; it would set a huge precedent for the future. Perhaps MLB could put the perfect game in the record books anyway? A real cop out I realize, but it would be akin to the Maris asterik and altering the record does not alter the call or the game. Just a thought.
As to the possibility of changing the call, I don’t see MLB going down that path and I don’t believe they should. The only possibility is to change a rule to allow replay for the last out of a game.
Baseball is an imperfect game and every event on the field is subject to a call by the umpire; every out is called, every pitch is called, fair/foul, etc. This makes wide usage of in-game replay almost impossible as implemented in other sports. On the other hand, there is no clock in baseball and the imperferfections/human element is balanced by the fact that every batter gets 3 strikes, 3 outs, 9 innings… you all get it. When my 12 year old complains about a called third strike, I reply that he had 3+ other pitches to hit and another chance later in the game, assuming it was not the last out. That is why it could be possible to implement replay for the third out as last night.
If MLB reverses this call, without changing the rules or narrowingly defining the scope, they are opening a huge can of worms for the future. What happens when an umpire blows a call in a playoff game or World Series? If MLB does not inervene, could the affected team sue saying that MLB previously intervened? Wow, wouldn’t that be a black eye.
Whew! 'Missed a lotta great discussion last night.
Just a couple of comments:
Bheep wrote: “The umpire knew as soon as he made the call that he made a mistake.”
This is important. Contrary to what some may be thinking, the umpire’s initial call is NOT final. Umpires can and often do change their calls, usually within a second or two of an initial call. I have umpired a lot in the past and it is not uncommon to wave ‘safe’ or ‘out’ as the play happens and then immediately realize that is wrong (perhaps the fielder juggled a ball or a runner slid off the bag or whatever) and reverse the call. It happens all the time at all levels of baseball.
Joyce really blew it in the 5 seconds or so right after the call in which he easily could have simply overruled himself.
But he didn’t. If we believe he truly ‘knew he made a mistake immediately’ – then he failed to exercise his duty as an umpire in correcting the call ‘immediately’.
I’m not sure retro-fixing it now is the right thing. Stats like these (no hitters, four-HR games, perfect games, etc.) are meta-info. They exist independent of the actual game. Arguably Galaraga will be more famous if it is left as “The Imperfect Game” or the “28-out Perfect Game”.
But I wouldn’t be opposed if Selig did retro-fix it. That doesn’t require a rule change or anything drastic that opens up past events for rewrite. The judicial system often makes situational decisions and simply explicitly limits the scope of the ruling to the one event. ‘American Justice’ recognizes the concept of extenuating circumstances. So I disagree that it opens up any can of worms.
The most important thing is that maybe this will open up a real dialog towards using modern capabilities and understanding to improve the way baseball is officiated.
what Joyce said was
that he was CONVINCED the runner had beaten the ball until he watched the replay and then saw that he was wrong.
In that case, then he didn't fail to correct himself within a reasonable time.
He still probably should have asked for help from his fellow umps.
I don’t know WHY they resist doing that in MLB. At other levels umps do it all the time. I’ve umped a lot in the past and it was no big deal. If you feel any doubt about a call (which might happen two or three times in a season at most) you simply confer quickly and get your ‘mates to bale you out with the ’better view’ explanation. No biggy.
Oh well.

by 


























