Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Season of the Living Dead: the Resurrection of Jason Varitek

I think I remember when it happened.

It was his first home appearance of the year, against the Rays. Jason Varitek stepped into the batters box to his entrance music (which is, for the record, "Kryptonite" by Three Doors Down), and I made some sort of sarcastic comment to my friend, you know something along the lines of "you're long past anyone calling you Superman, Tek" (I hate that song).  Somehow about 200 feet away, our beloved Captain must have heard me and taken exception to my sarcasm, because a few seconds later, that ball was planted squarely out of the park.

At first it seemed freakish. We all knew that there was a quick hot streak, but before we knew it, that slugger with the "C" on his uniform would revert to the zombie we all knew far too well from 2009.  Then time went by, and the home runs have kept coming.  Gradually, even the most cynical start to think deep down: "with all the rest he's getting, what if he actually can keep this up through the year?"  He'd be hands down the best backup catcher in baseball.  Is it possible?

Now that we're two months into the season, does it look like it might actually happen?  

Star-divide

Now before I delve into this anymore, let me just admit here openly that before the season started, I was already scheming how we could gracefully cut ties with our Captain to bring up Mark Wagner or Dusty Brown to get some work in the big leagues.

This season started off oddly for all of these veterans. It's well-documented how Mike Lowell has been fighting to get someone anywhere to let him play baseball, Tim Wakefield has been unhappy with the fact that he wasn't chosen as one of the five, David Ortiz spent the first month trying to get reporters to shut up and let him play baseball. The only one who never made headlines about his playing situation was Varitek.

Maybe it's because he just doesn't care about the spotlight, maybe because he's that great leader that earned his "C", and maybe it's just because he knew when he picked up his player option that he was not going to be the go-to guy. But the fact remains that Varitek has appeared to relish his role as a backup catcher, even vehemently defending Victor Martinez when reporters were criticizing his throwing ability and defense.

That grace, combined with his absolutely out-of-this-world start, has made Varitek's 2010 one of the most impressive of the team so far.  Now he's started out well before; he's actually had some level of history with starting out the season very well.  If you remember last year, he was actually looking better than anyone expected, batting around .240 but with 10 homers at the end of May.  

Of course, that was in 138 at bats.  This year, he's only gotten 7 of them, but hitting .269, and those 7 homers came in just 67 official at bats.

That's one homer every 9 at bats.

One every nine.

For comparisons sake, this year's surprise Home Run hitting phenom is the Blue Jay's Jose Bautista. His 16 homers have come at a rate of one every 11.625 at bats.  Obviously, that's a more fair sample size, but still, our Captain is off to an absolutely torrid start, especially from the right side of the plate, but that's to be expected from him.

So what has brought this about?  There's all kinds of things I've seen credited with this. Obviously the one that makes the most sense is just that he isn't squatting for two hours every day.  He's also gained more time for lifting and batting practice, not having to spend every day studying batters' hot and cold zones and work with the pitchers.  Maybe he just got some of whatever Cito Gaston has been doing to his team this year.

So the question is whether these couple of months are a fluke, or can he genuinely keep up this level of production for the year?  Usually veterans hate losing playing time. It is very rare to see someone as established as Tek flourish and embrace suddenly finding himself in a backup role, but here we are two months into the season and not a word of complaint from him.  If he genuinely can keep this up, he just might find the Red Sox would love to have him back for a few years to come playing backup and helping to tutor the pitching staff and whoever is catching for the Sox.

So what do you think? Can he do it?  When October rolls around, will we still call him "Superman"?

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If they play him only occasionally,

he has a chance to do better, but I still see signs of the old zombie lately. Play him more often, and zombie hitter will be back for sure. So don’t try to ignore what you know, and let us hope the Sox can find the right balance to keep him as an acceptable backup only at least until something younger and better can be found.

This constant ignorance of the effects of age on player’s skills and stamina levels by this Sox management is astonishing to me!

by NG on Jun 3, 2010 8:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Why?

For the umpteen-thousandth time, NG, you can’t just assume that the younger player is always better.

Particularly at catcher: right now, there’s a huge, league-wide shortage of really good catchers out there. Getting one in trade is a challenge—to get Martinez required giving up a decent reliever and a very good prospect, and that is probably a bargain compared to what the Sox could have been fleeced for. And free agency is not necessarily the best route either, especially now that there won’t be a Mauer sweepstakes this offseason.

Now, when pressed to name an alternative, you nearly always decline, saying “It’s not my job to figure it out.” But the fact that you’re not coming up with alternatives indicates that you’re probably not considering the problem past your reflex instinct of saying “younger is better.” If you looked at the catcher issue in any significant depth, you’d see that there aren’t a lot of better options around right now, and there isn’t any good way to get them without the Sox giving up what could be even more valuable full-time players in exchange for—what, a backup catcher?

(And all of that is without addressing the issue that you need to have veterans on a staff to work with the younger players. The Sox could stop signing free agents and making trades, and no longer extend contracts as of tomorrow, and only promote to the team from their farm system. But that’s not really viable, either, because pretty soon you’ll be out of experienced players, and you end up with a directionless ball club that doesn’t have leadership from within, unless you happen to find that rare player with Pedroia-like qualities that can assume leadership while still being quite young.

(If a young team had slumped the way these Sox did in April, there wouldn’t be a bounceback; they wouldn’t probably even have any idea how to break through.)

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Jun 3, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Experience has its limited place, but

age ruins all skills eventually. Look at the Florida Marlins for what youth can do. I don’t know what is out there in high school and in College and in the minor leagues, but I am sure there are great young catching prospects that the Sox should have had in the pipeline ages ago. Instead they stick with Varitek until he is so old that he is basically a zombie. Now on short notice you say there is nobody else. I call that mismanagement.

I saw what age did to Varitek over the last few years, and that effect is permanent. If they can squeeze a YEAR OR MORE OUT OF HIS OLD CARCASS BY PLAYING HIM ONCE OR TWICE A WEEK, SO BE IT, BUT LET’S STOP FANTASIZING ABOUT GOING BACK TO THE YOUNG VERSION OF VARITEK BY SOME MIRACLE HAPPENSTANCE!

by NG on Jun 3, 2010 9:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nobody is saying that Veritek is the answer

But he’s a back up right now, so replacing is a waste of resources. It’s not like VMart will walk and the Sox will make Tek the starter again. And the Sox have had young catchers in the system, they’ve just not panned out. And how many of these great young catchers could the Sox have picked up? It’s an extremely hard position to evaluate and it’s not like they’re getting a first rounder in the draft.

by brogshan on Jun 3, 2010 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nice strawman you built there.

Nobody is hoping for Varitek to be the starting catcher again—not even Varitek! However, since the normal offensive output from a backup catcher is expected to be somewhere between that of a shortstop and an NL pitcher, the fact that Varitek is excelling in the reduced role of backup catcher IS encouraging.

Also, NG, something to think about: a top-caliber catching prospect—say, with anything like the potential of Varitek circa 2002-2004—is considered a very, very valuable commodity. So valuable, in fact, that the odds of the Sox being able to draft them is essential zero, because they would have already been snapped up by another team higher in the draft. (Don’t forget that the Sox typically have to wait for two dozen players to go off the board before they get their first selection!)

And stop shouting—you come across as Abe Simpson shouting at clouds.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Jun 3, 2010 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think the issue is that there has been a league-wide movement of locking up younger players earlier and earlier so the free-agency classes haven’t been as good. And also the shortage of catchers, there just aren’t any around that are very good in a complete game sense. There are a few catchers who are really good at throwing out runners, there are a few who call great games and there are a few who can really hit but there are way fewer who can actually put it all together. Tek hung around because his bat wasn’t awful and called a good game, and is a leader on the team and, there just haven’t been any better options that have shown themselves. We do have some some promising talent that should be up soon but I think the lack of good catchers in the league proves the point that even if we had been drafting earlier for catcher, there wasn’t much talent or we’d have seen it at this point and the teams that do have depth are usually dealing with an injury at catcher that is tying up their prospects like Montero or Teagarden or Salty.

Further more, I think that the team has dealt with aging players rather well. They aren’t ignorant of the affect of age on people, they know what happens and what to expect. That’s why we have people like Beltre and Cameron on short term deals. Maybe signing Lowell to his extension wasn’t the best idea, but Theo sort of had to do it, it’s the way things are done and he did take a discount. The change in Lackey and Beckett’s ability this year was absolutely unpredictable, this isn’t football where players hit 32 and drop off the planet, baseball players decline but it’s usually a bit more graceful than jumping from a 4 ERA to a 7 ERA.

A GM can’t be better than what the system allows him. Right now, if you want to fill a hole in free-agency than you have a few options. The first is to sign the star free agent to a long term deal he can never hope to live up to (Tex, A Rod, CC, Lackey, Beckett, Soriano etc) or sign a cheaper, older player who still has talent and hope that they won’t decline too much like Smoltz, Beltre, Cameron. Or you can sign a middle of the road player like Penny or Kelly Johnson who doesn’t necessarily have talent on their side but they do have age and potential. And then there is building from within. There still isn’t a good way to evaluate amateur talent and have a perfect draft in which every selection goes on to have brilliant major league careers. It’s a crap shoot. Theo does better than most with scouting and drafting and our farm has been really good at producing starting caliber players that are very good like Youk, Pedey, Bard, Lester, Buch, Paps and Ells but it just isn’t possible to fill a team with prospects. They develop differently, they wash out, they take years. And then if you want to trade for a younger player on another team it’s going to cost an arm and a leg to do so, hindering your growth at other positions and making you go out and dealing with free agency.

Theo has done a good job of maintaining a competitive team in one of the most difficult divisions of baseball to play in. We have our homegrown talent (see above), our over priced stars in Ortiz, Lackey, Beckett, Lowell, Tek and our mercenaries in Beltre and Cameron. Drew is the example of the perfect contract that we were lucky to get now that he moneyball secret is out.

What do you want the front office to do? What is your plan? You’re always complaining about the way things are, not they should be! Make a damn suggestion once in a while about an actual, viable, move that Theo could do instead of what he actually has done and how it would be beneficial and cost effective.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Jun 3, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Thinking is hard work, Rogue Nine!

Thus spake NG:

“I don’t know what is out there in high school and in College and in the minor leagues, but I am sure there are great young catching prospects that the Sox should have had in the pipeline ages ago.”

Translation: “I have no idea what’s actually available, but surely there must be someone that the Sox overlooked. Therefore the Sox have screwed up, and I am correct.”

As for his claim that the Marlins do wonders with youth, I’d argue that the Marlins are never a good example of sound baseball management practices to emulate.

Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell

by lone1c on Jun 3, 2010 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well the Marlins do well with what they have. They’ve been doing it for a while, build up a good team, make a run. They realize when their run is over and trade away the pieces, the Miguel Cabreras, Mike Lowells, Josh Becketts, Dontrelle Williss and rebuild for the next run.

However with their resources they cannot maintain a team, even with young talent and eventually they implode again.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Jun 3, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the entire youth baseball world worldwide,

you do not think there are many comparable developing talent to Mauer playing right now? Maybe the scouting part of the Sox system cannot find them, but that does not mean they are not there. The lure of GIANT money surely must be an incentive for talented young players to become catchers in a supply and demand world. I know they are there, and must assume Sox management has been neglegent in finding and pursuing them from just a common sense basis with this kind of potential money at stake.

by NG on Jun 3, 2010 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

They may be, in the future, given the shortage and the demand.

But they are not there right now and not in the near future. They don’t just magically appear.

It takes years to train a MLB-caliber catcher. And there are a lot of disincentives to playing the position because of how hard it is on the body. Yes the pay may be good. But the careers are short. Have you ever tried to squat like that for any extended time? It is very simply NOT a natural and common ability. Most players would be crying for momma after 2 innings and their knees would explode after 4. Just the sheer knee endurance to be able to play the position is a harsh selector that reduces the number of potential candidate players. Then, among them, they have to have the other skills to play the position. So even fewer players. Now, from that small pool, try to find some who can hit MLB pitching at a decent clip. Tiny number. Tiny.

Right now, and for the next few years, there will continue to be a very tight supply of decent hitting catchers. That’s the reality. No matter what you might think ‘should’ be or ‘might’ be. That is the reality.

by mmmmm on Jun 3, 2010 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Mauer

Isn’t going to be a career catcher either, neither is Jesus Montero in New York. So a lot of the best catchers, aren’t even going to be catchers. Like mmmmm says above me, it’s a very demanding position and there are less people willing to fill in. When the salaries start getting REALLY ridiculous than there will start being a bigger supply of catchers.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Jun 3, 2010 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

concur completely with lone1c

Especially for the backup catcher role, age is not a concern and in fact a potential benefit.

The scarcity of catcher talent in MLB can NOT be over stated. It is a huge problem.

This is why, despite some arguable flaws, Victor will be a very hot commodity as a free agent catcher if the Red Sox do not sign him.

We have no comparable prospect coming up that comes close to providing the offense that V-Mart does. We do have some that seem to provide better defense. The tricky thing is it is not clear that catcher defense provides enough marginal value to outweigh their lesser offensive value.

Further, there are very, very few catchers in all of baseball, period, who hit nearly as well as V-Mart and our rested Captain are hitting right now. Only a small handful of teams get production out of the C position that is worth hitting any higher than #8 in the lineup. And that’s #8 on much crappier teams.

Red Sox fans have been spoiled. For years, Varitek was way above average offensively for a catcher and then after a few years of obvious decline we replaced him with V-Mart, arguably the 2nd best offensive catcher in baseball in the last few years. Most teams just don’t expect anywhere near that sort of production from the Catcher spot.

by mmmmm on Jun 3, 2010 1:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

I feel like

he knows that even as a backup, he will get his share of playing time. No catcher can realistically catch every single game, and he’s certainly getting a good amount of time behind the plate as a backup. I see no reason why he’d be unhappy in the first place :-) And he’s the captain. He’s there to lead his team, and he’s doing that.

One quick thing about the spotlight: Papi didn’t want the spotlight in April, it was forced on him by the media. Hence his reaction.

David Ortiz 2010: 120 RBIs, 35+ HRs. Jason who?

by BHeebs on Jun 3, 2010 9:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I like that song!

Varitek = Superman ….for now….

"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko

by sox-inda-south on Jun 3, 2010 10:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Skinner_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi