Boston's Best: Buchholz Exceeding Elevated Expecations
With the Red Sox entering the season with six viable options to fill a starting rotation with just five spots, the question surrounding starter Clay Buchholz wasn’t where, but rather if, he fit amongst Boston‘s overstocked staff.
Despite the presence of one of baseball’s best pairings at the front end of the rotation -- Josh Beckett and Jon Lester -- the most notable acquisition of the off-season for the Red Sox was the top available free agent starting pitcher on the market, John Lackey. With Daisuke Matsuzaka slotted in the fourth spot by default, just one starting spot remained vacant heading into spring training.
There was plenty of backing for Buchholz after a strong finish to the season prior; he even received a public endorsement via manager Terry Francona during the spring. "I think we all want him to take this and go with it. And he looks so strong," said Francona.
Others, however, favored veteran Tim Wakefield as the fifth and final starting pitcher. At the time, it wasn’t difficult to comprehend the ideology behind those opposing Buchholz. After all, you knew what you were going to get with Wakefield, whereas Clay’s name had almost been synonymous with the word inconsistent throughout the early portion of his career.
And yet, as the Red Sox and the rest of Major League Baseball approach the midway point of the season, it’s the previously mentioned Buchholz-backers that are saying, "I told you so." Not only has the 25-year-old matured into an All Star considerable in 2010, he also presents a strong case as the Red Sox’s most valuable player for the season’s first half.
The starting rotation, thought to be as good, if not better, than any other in baseball, struggled in the early goings of 2010. Jon Lester again lived up to his reputation as a slow starter, sporting an inflated ERA and losing both his first two decisions. Josh Beckett struggled as well, before ultimately leaving on an extended disabled list stint. Daisuke Matsuzaka, similarly to Beckett, has spent half the time struggling on the field and the other half plagued by injuries off of it. While the offense -- originally thought to be the team’s off-season-induced area of concern -- has been better than expected, the result of the problematic pitching was a month-long inability to maintain, or even reach, a .500 record. However, since starting the year 4-9, the Red Sox have won more games than any other team in baseball and currently find themselves within reaching distance of the top spot in the American League East standings. Lester has regained his dominant form as one of the most imposing left-handers in the game as of late, John Lackey has continued to produce positively out of the middle of the order and, aside from the still-rehabbing Josh Beckett, the rotation as a whole has rounded into one of baseball’s best, statistically speaking. Clay Buchholz has been an integral aspect in the emergence of what is now considered one of baseball’s most feared teams, the Boston Red Sox. From 2007-2009, Buchholz started thirty-four games for Boston -- of those, Clay won just twelve and lost fourteen. In that time, he accrued an ERA just under 5.00 and surrendered an average of nearly 1.3 home runs per nine innings. After repeating baseball’s all-too-common phrase "wait till next year" in regards to Buchholz’s developmental completion, it seems as though Red Sox Nation was finally on to something when they reverted back to the old saying following an encouraging finish for Clay in 2009. Buchholz’s ten wins this season leads the rotation that he once had to fight just to be a part of, and it nearly matches his career win total [12] entering the season. His ERA of 2.47 also leads all starting pitchers, besting the man second on that list, Jon Lester [3.03], by over half a run. Clay is second only to Lester in strikeouts, and surprisingly, is the only member of the rotation to throw a complete game shutout. Deciding a team’s most valuable player more often than not extends beyond the statistical realm -- Buchholz’s case is no different. One of the most overlooked aspects of the Red Sox’s resurgence is the absence of Josh Beckett in the starting rotation. Beckett has made just eight starts this season and none since mid-May when he surrendered five runs in less than five innings at Yankee Stadium. In his four starts prior to his disabled list departure, the normally reliable Beckett went 0-1 with a 9.90 ERA, giving up nine walks, twenty-nine hits, and twenty-two earned runs in just twenty innings pitched. Buchholz has had an enormous impact on the way Josh Beckett’s season has played out thus far and subsequently how successful it ends up being following his eventual return to the rotation. For instance, early in the season while Beckett and the rest of the staff struggled in one way or another, Buchholz helped hold the rotation in tact. In the month of April, when Boston went 11-12 overall, it was Clay that provided dependable outings while the front end of the rotation struggled.
April Starts GS Record ERA IP H ER HR BB SO WHIP SO/BB Josh Beckett: 5 (1-0) 7.22 28.6 37 23 4 13 20 1.74 1.54 Jon Lester: 5 (1-2) 4.71 28.6 26 15 2 15 32 1.43 2.13 John Lackey: 5 (2-1) 4.50 30 35 15 2 12 17 1.57 1.42 Tim Wakefield: 4 (0-1) 5.40 25 30 15 2 8 16 1.52 2.00 Clay Buchholz: 4 (2-2) 2.19 24.6 23 6 1 9 22 1.29 2.44 *Daisuke Matsuzaka did not pitch in April.
Even as Lester and the rest of the starters began to turn it around in the months of May and June, Buchholz continued to pitch exceptionally. Fueling Boston’s elevation towards the top of the divisional standings, the team’s tenatively titled 5th starter [Buchholz] has gone 8-2 with a 2.57 ERA in his last ten starts. The rotation’s turnaround, coupled with Buchholz’s consistent success, has dramatically altered the way that Boston has handled Beckett’s lower back problems. With the team winning at such a feverish pace despite Beckett’s absence, management has been afforded the luxury of applying a high level of patience regarding his return. Last season, Beckett threw 121 innings before the All Star break -- his highest first half total as a Red Sox. The second half of last year saw a dramatic increase in Beckett’s ERA, HR per nine innings pitched, and opponent’s BA, SLG, OPS. Instead of rushing the right-hander back to the mound, Beckett will enter the second half of the season, and hopefully the postseason, fresh and healthy -- having thrown less than fifty innings in his eight starts so far in 2010. There’s no doubt that the stability of the rotation, namely anchored by Buchholz, is the reason that Beckett has been allotted such a generous time table for his rehabbing. A strong second half in 2010 for Josh can be indirectly attributed to Buchholz’s influence on the mound. Clay’s emergence as arguably the Red Sox’s best pitcher in 2010 has directly coincided with a visible mental maturation on the field. The curveball that he so heavily depended on early and often in past games is no longer his crutch when in a jam. "I don’t think anything has changed with my stuff. It just feels better, getting out of jams than not," Buchholz said following his last start -- echoing the sentiment that it’s not necessarily his stuff that has improved, it’s the way he is utilizing it. A newfound confidence in the ability to locate his fastball -- something that had always been noticeably absent -- has had a profound impact on Buchholz’s plan of attack. Instead of leaning on the curveball the first time through the opposing lineup, giving the hitters a look at his out-pitch early and often, Buchholz now takes a Beckett-like approach by establishing the fastball in the early innings -- effectively managing his pinch count and saving his put-away pitches for later on in games. In a season where finding consistent production and health from the starting rotation has been a toilsome task, Clay Buchholz is having the type of season that Boston had always envisioned him having. This is the type of evolution in Buchholz’s game that has kept him in a Red Sox uniform throughout an inordinate amount of trade rumors early in his career.
In fact, at least year’s trade deadline, the Red Sox supposedly turned down a ‘Cliff Lee for Clay Buchholz, straight up' trade proposal.
Thanks to Buchholz’s performance to this point, Theo Epstein and company, like the Buchholz-backers of 2010 spring training, can now look back and collectively say, "I told you so."
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Article Logan!
I’d have to say that Clay has been my favorite story line this year. The potential was always there, I saw him pitch in Portland a couple times and was just blown away by how good he was. It just took some time for him to mature into the great pitcher we all knew he could be.
My only question is, what happened the the strike outs? I remember him striking out more than a batter an inning throughout his entire minor league career, even though he’s second on the team his SO/9 is at 6.1. I mean, what he’s doing now is working, and working well and I don’t want him to change that but did he change his mechanics back in 2008 or 2009 and I just never heard anything about it? And could that be related to his resurgence in the organization?
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
What he's said when asked about it
is that before, a lot of his problems have come from nibbling. In the minor leagues, minor league hitters would swing at pitches outside the zone and that inflated his K numbers- in the majors they weren’t swinging the same way.
So he’s been consciously pitching more to contact. With a groundball rate like he has, contact is the way to go.
I couldn't be happier about Clay's performance
All along, I was one of the guys who said “don’t trade Clay, don’t trade Clay”. I don’t mention that because I’m bragging or saying I Told You So, because it was largely out of complete sentimentality, not out of objective data or anything of the like. I saw a lot of potential in him and I just wanted him to be able to put it all together and do well, and I wanted him to do it in a Sox uniform.
I’m so glad to see that coming to pass.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Clay's probably my favorite player on the Red Sox.
And I love that he’s doing well.
Totally agree that Clay has been our best pitcher so far.
I’m not yet ready to call him our ‘ace’.
There was a stretch early last year where Wake was our best pitcher, followed by a stretch where Beckett was.
After the rough start, Lester has shown some amazing brilliance in some of his games as well.
But Buch sure has been overall our best from start of season up through now. He has a legitimate chance at a 20 win season.
Lester and Buchholz – pretty awesome combo to have in any rotation.
I can’t wait for Kelley to join them. Talk about a Power Trio!
Agreed on all counts.
He’s a little above where I would have put his ceiling, but not quite an ace yet.
Buchholz has done his job well: 2.2 WAR
with $8.7 mil in value to the team.
A quality start vs the Giants on Friday and he’s on his first All Star Team. Now with the off day on Monday, do the Sox keep him on regular rest and pitch him vs the Ray’s on Wednesday the 30th? I hope so.
John Lackey: we’re looking for you to give us a chance to win tonight. You of 1.0 WAR and $3.9 in value to the team thus far. Bring it John. Bring it.
We need the bats to have one of those
“we made the struggling pitcher look like Cy Young yesterday- so now let’s pound the crap out of the best pitcher in baseball today …”
games.
Yes on our bats but Chacin was not struggling last night.
He had movement and for the move part good control.
With lefties hitting Jimenez better than righties, do you think Ortiz is in tonight?
Oh, for sure. He pitched great.
But he had struggled in several of his prior starts. Its all relative (in this case, to Jimenez).
And he did struggle early last night with walks until he gave up on his change-up (damn those intelligent mid-game adjustments!). After that, he was wicked.
That's a tough one.
You can’t sit Beltre, the way he’s been swinging.
Do you sit Youk in order to get Ortiz in?
NL rules suck.
Francona said each of the three is getting two starts in this series
so either Beltre or Youk will be out tonight and the other tomorrow
The quote is from the Francona phone interview with
WEEI today.
How are you going to handle things with Ortiz, Kevin Youkilis and Adrian Beltre in this three-game set?
It’s actually kind of frustrating. We’re going to play David at first base tonight and play Beltre at third. Either way we go, we’re going to have one of our 3, 4, 5 hitters not playing, our most productive hitters. I understand the concept. I know the fans love it, but we have one of our main guys that we’re paying a lot of money for how many games we play on the road in interleague, nine maybe, that can’t play. That’s tough. It puts us at a disadvantage. So far we’ve handled it pretty well, but it’s a tough way to play
that's kinda what I figured with Jimenez
since Youk is kind of slumping a smidge and because against Jimenez, we’ll need to try our hardest to keep THEM from scoring runs, and an Ortiz-Beltre defensive combo is better than an Ortiz-Youk defensive combo.
Agree and also agree with batting lefties vs Jimenez.
Do you think McDonald (a Colorado born and raised boy) is in CF between Nava and Reddick or does Cameron go two nights in a row?
Sox line up is in:
RED SOX
Marco Scutaro-SS
Dustin Pedroia-2B
Victor Martinez-C
David Ortiz-1B
Adrian Beltre-3B
Daniel Nava-LF
Josh Reddick-RF
Darnell McDonald-CF
John Lackey-P
McLovin gets the call.
Don't worry.
You’re facing the hottest pitcher in baseball and my Yanks are facing a guy who last last good in 2005. I’m fully expecting to undo any distance that was created by yesterday’s Yankee win/ Sox loss.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
by CasanovaWong on Jun 23, 2010 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions

by 




























