Red Sox Bullpen: Expectations vs. Reality vs. Perception
The Red Sox offense is on pace to score 702 runs. The Red Sox rotation is 27th in the MLB with an ERA of 5.76. Defensively, this team that was supposed to prevent runs is actually allowing more than any other with a -9 Defensive Runs Saved.
And yet it's the bullpen with the 8th best ERA in the nation that many Red Sox fans would consider the weakest link. What's that all about? Let's find out after the jump.
To start with, it's about expectations. Coming into this year, most believed that we should be one of the best defensive teams with one of the best rotations in the majors, and a legitimate-if-not-outstanding offense. And if everyone on the team would start performing to the level that they are capable of, that's just about how this team WOULD play out in the long run.
After all, how long can Josh Beckett, John Lackey, and Jon Lester all maintain ERAs over 5.00? Three good pitchers simply don't disappear off the face of the Earth like that at once. The same can be said for our batters, many of whom are underperforming. I went into greater detail on the offense here, so I won't say too much more on that subject.
But what about the bullpen? All throughout Spring Training, the shakiness of the bullpen loomed. Papelbon was coming off his worst career year, Hideki Okajima was just getting older, MDC and Ramon Ramirez spent the last half of the 2009 season failing to get anyone out, and the last two spots were going to be taken up by minor league free agents picked from the scrap heap. So it's no surprise that, after a few early bullpen meltdowns, we had our opinion of these "Dirty's", as our own Gizmosandy likes to call them, locked in.
Is that opinion fair? Well, yes and no. As I mentioned earlier, we have the 8th best ERA at 3.06--certainly an acceptable number. And if you remove the pathetic numbers of Ramon Ramirez, things look even better. Replace him with, say, Wakefield, and it appears that we have a very full and well-structured bullpen. Okajima, Bard, and Papelbon are a strong 7th-8th-9th inning combo. Scott Schoeneweis has actually been quite good against lefties, striking out 6 of the 13 he has faced (only 1 walk). And Manny Delcarmen and Scott Atchison's ERAs are actually quite good, especially for mop-up duties.
But much like the struggles of the rotation, offense, and defense, it seems like this is not likely to last.
As good as some of these guy's ERAs are concerned, there are some very scary signs. Particularly with Okajima, Papelbon, and Delcarmen, all three of whom have walked more batters than they have struck out (a combined 15:7 BB:K--remarkably awful), a great deal of regression is likely. Looking at the Manny Delcarmen of last year compared to the Manny Delcarmen of this year, the only thing that stands out is that this one hasn't given up the big hit. The Red Sox' bullpen has the 4th highest strand rate, the 3rd worst FIP, and by far the lowest BABIP. None of this speaks to any level of sustainability.
There are some "real" results--if just a few. Daniel Bard is looking for all the world like exactly who we had hoped he would be, blowing away hitters alternatively with big heat and two styles of Slider with hard break. Scott Schoeneweis' results against lefties have been very impressive, too, and believe it or not, Ramon Ramirez has actually had three straight strong outings, totaling almost 6 innings.
But the dangers of the late innings still looms strong. Can Okajima, Papelbon, and Delcarmen avoid getting hurt by their bad tendencies long enough to correct them, or are the Sox in store for more meltdowns? With Daniel Bard currently being run out there just about every night, the team is going to need to rely on these guys more and more--hopefully, they can keep providing results regardless of the process.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Interesting
Here’s a few things worth noting:
Regarding the relief pitchers’ ERAs, the Sox’ bullpen has allowed 6 of 17 inherited runners to score (35%). While all of those runs weren’t charged to starting pitchers, I’m sure some were. Thos e 6 runs were allowed by three pitchers: Atchison (2/6 – 33%), Okajima (2/5 – 40%), and Bard (2/2 – 100%).
Regarding to bullpen management, which I think has been quite good, here’s how the relief pitchers stack up by innings pitched:
Bard – 10
Atchison – 8.2
Papelbon – 8.1
Ramirez – 7
Delcarmen – 6.2
Schoeneweis – 6.2
Okajima – 5.2
Based on innings, it seems as if Tito is riding Bard. However, when you look at total pitches thrown, this is not the case:
Bard – 137 pitches (3.70 P/PA)
Atchison – 134 pitches (3.94 P/PA)
Papelbon -131 pitches (3.97 PA)
Ramirez – 126 pitches (3.94 P/PA)
Delcarmen – 117 pitches (4.50 P/PA)
Okajima – 112 pitches (4.31 P/PA)
Schoeneweis – 99 pitches (3.67 P/PA)
First, Bard hasn’t thrown an abnormally large number of pitches compared to the other relievers. He has been the most efficient bullpen arm so far, so it makes sense that he’d throw the most innings at this point in the season. Secondly, Tito and Farrell are good at resting pitchers. They know what they’re doing.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
good scribe - excellent data
can’t argue when you have the numbers.
paps goes back & forth with pitches/batter. the other night i think he thru 12 pitches then walked a guy. then the first pitch got the next batter out. it may have been you, drugs, (2nd guess would be radiohix) that pointed out that paps only has one pitch that he can locate for strikes.
guess what that pitch is.
there is no point to this post.
Ben
I don’t understand how on the one hand you can complain about Bard (or any other pitcher out of the pen) being overused (a worry I voiced when I said that this team needs a long man and brough up Bard and you argued that he pitched a lot of 2 inning games in the minors) while also calling it a questionable decision to bring Beckett out for the 7th when the Sox had a 3 run lead, Beckett was at 94 pitches, and has just put up 4 straght 0s on the scoreboard (albeit with some help from Tek’s plate block)…
I don't really question bringing Beckett back out for the 7th
I question leaving him in after the walk.
But even if I did question bringing him out for the 7th, it wouldn’t be any contradiction. The fact is that Bard isn’t the only guy in the bullpen. As much as I have little faith in members 3-6, it’s better to risk a game now then it is to blow out a promising young closing arm.
And I don’t object to Bard throwing 2 innings in a game so long as he’s used less otherwise. In that post, I just said that Bard COULD throw 2, because he often WAS utilized for 2 (50 innings in 31 AA games, 16 in 11 AAA games). The number I’m looking at is projected IP on the season, and that’s what worries me.
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Apr 22, 2010 4:18 PM EDT up reply actions
why worry about innings for relievers
when individual starter appearences are based on pitches? I am not saying I like it, but the correct fix is to either get another arm that we can use or a dencent long guy (or perhaps both in the same person). This is an FO issue, not a pen management issue, at least in my mind.
Innings and appearances.
Both warm up just once before their appearance, with a few tosses between innings. Bard’s up-and-down warm ups are pitches too. Besides which, even on pitch count, Bard is on pace for 1479.6 pitches this year—3 more than the most used reliever last year despite being a guy pitching his first full major league season, and a guy who had disastrous results when his arm was overtaxed (as a starter) in the minors. It’s very worrisome to me to see him throwing so much right now.
Obviously, the idea is that starters will go longer so fewer relief innings will be needed, but how often are we expecting them to go into the 8th, which has been Bard’s territory. All I said in the article is that they’re going to need to use Bard less—and I don’t think anyone disagrees that being the reliever who throws 108 innings and the most pitches in MLB is desirable—and that some of that slack will have to be picked up by players who can’t keep living so dangerously as they have been without getting hurt.
The correct fix IS to get another reliever, but the stopgap should not be
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Apr 22, 2010 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Whoops, ending cut short:
But the stopgap should not be to exhaust Bard. They’ve got to distribute the workload evenly in the meantime.
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Apr 22, 2010 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions
The Sox from the top
on down to Francona know that the team needs to win games now or the Sox face a real morale risk. Francona knows the team, and you get that strong sense from Epstein and the players. He took the bet that Beckett is better than RamRam and Schoeneweis (I would have too-recall than even MDC had thrown nearly 2 innings the night before), that failed and then he went to Bard because the W is a bit more important to the team now. This kind of thing is not going to continue one way or another. The Sox have never overused their pen arms, and Francona is not Torre. Bard is 25 years old. He can take a little extra use as long as the pace relaxes.
Like anything
else based on very limited data, this will not continue so I would not worry about it. The starters will go longer, and or more arms will be added to the pen.
good ditty ben
generally, i still think it’s too early to fully tell if it’s Expectations vs. Reality vs. Perception.
but, there are some troubling trends that began last year and continue this year – paps not having a reliable 2nd pitch – even a change up.
bull pens pitchers have always reminded me of field goal kickers – a team will be disappointed if they rely too heavily on the pen or a field goal kicker to win.
two good things about being outscored 950 to 702. is it can’t get any worst, unless your team is named the pirates.
2nd, this bad, it has to be everyone’s fault.
Arod
just turned a triple play on Kurt Suzuki. Disgusting. However As are winning 4-2 top 7.

by 





























