Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Gift Of The 2003 Tigers

Winning Percentage Correlations


This is a follow up FanPost to the previous one on HR and World Series Champions. I wanted a direct statistical analysis for Team HR and "Winning". Since winning the World Series is a qualitative statistic I could not do a direct correlation against stats like Team HR Rank so I used Winning Percentage. I chose to analyze team rank for the following categories: Team HR, Team Run Scored (RS), Team Runs Allowed (RA) and Team Run Differential (RD) against Winning Percentage (WP). I only did the AL to remove league inequities and I only ran the numbers for the 2000's (2000 - 2009). This gave me 140 data sets. Listed in the table you will find the correlation coefficients for each year and then the coefficients for the entire set of data (10 years).

The negative on the correlation means nothing, just that low numbers (such as being ranked 1st - correlate to high numbers such as a larger winning percentage). So you would expect negative values. The goal would be -1 and the closer to that -1 the closer the correlation. Data after the jump  

Star-divide

YEAR HR COR RS COR RA COR RD COR
2009 -0.663 -0.683 -0.642 -0.897
2008 -0.254 -0.297 -0.661 -0.844
2007 -0.060 -0.706 -0.678 -0.932
2006 -0.390 -0.577 -0.814 -0.815
2005 -0.543 -0.583 -0.630 -0.893
2004 -0.709 -0.732 -0.709 -0.951
2003 -0.404 -0.725 -0.668 -0.917
2002 -0.474 -0.732 -0.901 -0.950
2001 -0.519 -0.813 -0.814 -0.951
2000 -0.686 -0.820 -0.685 -0.961
         
TOT -0.464 -0.660 -0.715 -0.895

So what we see is that Team HR is the worst correlator to WP out of the chosen statistics. Of course you could interview any Texas Rangers fan and find that out (Rangers were in the top 5 in HR 8 out of the 10 years including 4 Top 1 finishes) but nonetheless there does seem to be this interesting love affair with the Homerun.

Runs Scored and Runs Allowed are about equally correllative and by far better than HR but neither is great when held apart. I will say this however, teams that ranked very low in RS or RA tended toward the lower end of the WP scale where the data was skewed was toward the middle and even the upper scoring teams.

As most could have determined Run Differential is the most correlative statistic out of the chosen with an almost consistent 0.9 average.

Moral: If you score more runs than your opponent you are likely to win more games (Duh), however it really does not matter how those runs are scored, nor even how you come by a good run differential.

BTW, I tried to find a team fielding stat to include but could not come up with one that I trusted.

BZ

Comment 4 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice job Bob.
BTW, I tried to find a team fielding stat to include but could not come up with one that I trusted.

How about the BABIP of the team pitching staff?

"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur

by radiohix on Mar 4, 2010 3:01 PM EST reply actions  

great job, Bob

This makes a lot of sense.

HR leading teams tend to get have a lot of their run differential dependent on just one or two big boppers. That statistically seems extremely vulnerable to slumps during the 8-19 games of the playoffs.

Using defense and a deep hitting lineup with no real automatic outs seems statistically far less vulnerable to slumps for creating run differential.

I have this theory that big sluggers are a better financial match for teams that know they aren’t going to win. The reason is that you can bring in fans in two ways: by Winning or by Freak Show.

Winning is better accomplished by spreading the money around to purchase run differential evenly distributed across your roster. A Freak Show can be accomplished by dumping money into one player on a roster.

So long as you have a player that is doing something interesting, fans will come even if you aren’t winning.

by mmmmm on Mar 5, 2010 5:51 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jddrew_small
OTM Fantasy Baseball-post 2

Recent FanPosts

School-of-adventure_print_small
Carl Crawford's offensive woes.
Small
Pedroia vs Cano
I_want_to_believe_small
Dwight Evans = Hall of Famer
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been continued: 2010-2011 offseason
Small
The Red Sox and the luxury tax
Silence_small
Alfredo Aceves and Red Sox agree at $1.2 million
Danny_and_shuttle_small
Matt Garza Is Fair Compensation For Theo Epstein
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been: A revisionist look to the 2009-2010 offseason.
School-of-adventure_print_small
Dustin Moseley
Old-patriots-logo_small
Free Agent SPs Not Named Oswalt, Jackson

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi