The Paranoid's Guide to the Boston Red Sox, Part I: Riverdancing with Wolves
As the season fast approaches, many baseball fans glance longingly at their calendars, imploring the days to pass more quickly, for April 4th and its glorious Opening Day to arrive in all their splendor. But there is another class of sports aficionados, a cohort whose excitement and joy is mixed with ever-present fear and a despairing pessimism. For a long time, this group was collectively known as Red Sox Fans, the noble, hearty, and long-suffering fanbase whose paragons could do no right. The men in uniform changed, but whether Williams, Boggs, or Nomar, the result was the same.
This ideal, we are told, is no more. Two World Series victories crushed the team's Sisyphyean legacy, allowing fans to marvel at something other than portents of doom (specifically shiny trophies). Success brought new fans, some previously too afraid of defeat to lavish their emotions on the team; others all too willing to attach themselves to a team and sport they only vaguely understood. And success brought with it envy: the tone of the media and other fanbases turned against Boston very quickly, as the underdogs became the uberdogs and the "Idiots" became the Enemy. The end of this Era was supposed to be a sad affair, one in which the Red Sox became a boring, normal team, and some writers mourned its passing. The future of Boston looked brighter than ever, and surely the melancholy, desultory, choleric Red Sox fan was a thing of the past.
And yet they linger. The bright new paradise of Red Sox Nation was supposed to cast out its pariahs, the doomsayers and woebringers. Dan Shaughnessy was supposed to be forced out of this utopia, and yet he remains coiled around the Boston Globe Sports section like some enormous python, tempting readers to eat fruit from the Tree of Ignorance. Even some members of this community, by far the brightest, happiest place in the Nation, have been known to forecast failure, to bring up the specter of 2006, and even to criticize upstanding players like Julio Lugo and Jason Varitek.
Fear, worry, and paranoia boil in the blood of every Red Sox fan, no matter how much we fight them. So why fight at all? Let's embrace the Dark Side, and take a good hard look at the people and reasons why 2010 will be the Worst Year Ever. [Click Continue Reading for the #1 Reason]
First up is this guy:
via dinosaursneverexisted.files.wordpress.com
Jonathan Papelbon is easily the most accomplished reliever in Red Sox history. He has an astounding 1.84 career ERA, a 1.00 postseason ERA, and the team lead in career saves (151). But is he leading the team... to OBLIVION??!!!
Last year, Papelbon not only destroyed the team's chances of winning the critical ALDS game three, he also took a major step backward in the regular season. To the untrained eye, his stats seem good - 38 saves, his second highest total, and a 1.85 ERA - but we know to look harder for the cloud in his silver lining.
More advanced stats tell a different story. 2009 for Papelbon was the year of the Walk: his walk rate tripled from 1.04 BBs / 9 innings to 3.04 BB/9. All these walks led to a higher FIP (Fielding Independent Percentage, interpreted like ERA, but more predictive): at 3.05 full point higher than 2009's 2.01.
Part of the problem was pitch quality, as 81% of Paps' pitches were fastballs, but his heater was less effective. Fangraphs.com gives the run value of his fastball at 13.7, which is quite a step down from his awesome 23.3 in 2007. The obvious fix would be to throw more offspeed pitches to vary things up, but neither of Papelbon's secondary pitches (slider, splitter) are much better than average. Knowing that the fastball is coming and the offspeed stuff isn't very good, hitters can sit fastball when Paps is in. And when Paps' control is off, as it was often last year, opposing batters can ignore anything that isn't right down the middle and take their walks, filling the bases and creating even more pressure on the embattled closer.
Optimists might point out that our closer was still one of the best relievers in baseball last year, and expect another good run in 2010, but we know better. When you've got a 1-pitch pitcher with a lot of wear on his arm, and a big free agent contract on the horizon, the last thing you expect is a big season. In 2010, the only thing Jonathan Papelbon will be saving is himself... for the Yankees.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
That second option is horrifying...
HORRIFYING I TELLS YA!!!!!!
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
PS
There’s no way in hell the Yankees sign Pap. Not when they have a plethora of hard throwing youngsters who could fill the role capably for one tenth of the price. Not to mention Mo seems immune to the effects of time. Keep dreaming dude. We’re letting a menage a trois of Randy Winn, Brett Gardner and Marcus Freaking Thames man left field when we could have easily scooped up Holliday or Jason Bay. They’re not going to sign Papelbon. I’d bet money on that.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
I could see Joba closing for the Yanks.
But I think snapping up Papelbon is a more likely scenario. It takes him away from the Sox, for one thing, and it gives them a legit closer to finally replace Mariano Rivera, who is not going to pitching into his Wakefield years, let’s face it. Putting Hughes in the pen is probably a waste for New York, as he can be a solid starter (unlike Chamberlain), and I can’t think of any other young Yankee fireballers, though admittedly I don’t know their farm too well. What other players were you thinking of?
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea /
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown /
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
"a menage a trois of Randy Winn, Brett Gardner and Marcus Freaking Thames"
Rabramar Wingardames?
So now we have to deal with Franken-Yankee (Frankee?) along with Zombie-Swish? Frickin’ Yankees! It’s not enough to spend infinite dollars to sign the best living free agents, now they have to sign all the best undead free agents too?
Rock me, sexy Jesus...
by nuthinboutnuthin on Mar 24, 2010 11:06 PM EDT up reply actions
It'll be tough for Yankees fans to stomach an inconsistent closer after Mo
After almost 2 decades of the best, it’s quite a drop off to go to an inconsistent youngin’.
I think reason # 1 is actually...
That J.J. Abrams and “Johnny” Damon Lindelhof are secretly planning on erasing the 2004 ALDS in the Lost series finale.
Rock me, sexy Jesus...
by nuthinboutnuthin on Mar 24, 2010 11:09 PM EDT reply actions
Shaughnessy sucks
… did I miss the point of the article?
Building Fenway from the ground up - Virtual Fenway
Slowly...
come back from the edge. Really slowly. We can talk this out, okay?
Anyways, I’ve already mentally readied myself for the fact that Papelbon will leave via FA and the possibility that he’ll sign with the Yankees if their closer situation is very fluid; however, if Joba Chamberlain is the Yankees closer by the time Papelbon hits FA, then perhaps he’ll go elsewhere or maybe even stay in Boston depending on the market for closers then.
Think about it this way: if Chamberlain proves himself to be “closer material,” then the Yankees may not make a serious run at Papelbon and probably just get involved to raise the price for everybody else. Then again who knows, they may actually get involved and have Chamberlain be their 8th inning guy.
Think about it: with Chamberlain really being a bullpen pitcher (I think the Yankees have been denial about this for a while now) and Papelbon, just imagine the near impossibility of getting past the 8th and 9th…
However, this may not happen if Chamberlain cements his role as the Yankees closer of the future. So in this case, if you don’t want Papelbon in a Yankee uniform, root for Chamberlain to succeed Mo’.

by 



























