Is Jon Lester a Slow Starter?
Apparently Jon Lester is a slow starter. At least this what Peter Abraham thinks (an most of the fan base actually): In his today piece for the Globe, PA wrote this:
Jon Lester finished last season as one of the best pitchers in the American League. But he was one of the shakiest early on, compiling a 6.07 ERA in his first 10 starts as opponents batted .307 against him.
You see the flaw in his analysis from the get go: ERA and BAA are not stats that reflects the true talent level of a pitcher because they incorporate aspects, mainly defense, that are out of the pitcher control. A better test would be using his xFIP, Batted Ball Data, BABIP and Pitch f/x and that's what we'll do after the jump:
You may have heard, David Appelman and his crew have added a cool new tool to Fangraphs and it's the Splits (and quit frankly, I'm addicted to them):
During the months of April and May, Jon Lester was sporting an xFIP of 3.36 and 3.34!! He was respectively striking out 9.90 and 10.44 per 9 innings and walking just 3 and 3.57 per 9. So nothing here lead us to consider that he's a "slow starter".
Let's see what the Batted Ball Data has to tell us:
|
April |
May |
|
|
LD% |
20.2 |
19.6 |
|
GB% |
44.0 |
45.1 |
|
FB% |
35.7 |
35.3 |
|
IFF% |
3.3 |
8.3 |
Again nothing alarming here, we see a jump in the Pop ups from April to May but every thing is the career norms of the lefty.
Let's return to the article to see what Lester has to say:
“It was my time to struggle. The more I look back on it, I didn’t do anything wrong,’’ he said yesterday. “I made some bad pitches when I didn’t need to, had some bad innings that just kind of crept up on me. My process was there, so that was the frustrating part
Even he agrees and he's right about that "I made some bad pitches" and his HR/FB ratio shows it:
April: 16.7% leading to a 4.16 FIP
May: 16.7% leading to a 4.26 FIP
But a low 4 FIP is a far cry from a 6 ERA, what led him to that? Well, it was his stratospheric BABIP:
April: .375 (Ugh!)
May: .374 (see how bad was the defense?)
What about his process? He claims he was there. A look at his Pitch f/x data (on this awesome blog) confirms that again:
when facing RHB, he was relying on his
- 4 seamer (6.6% whiff rate)
- Cutter (13.5% whiff rate)
- Curveball (11.1% Whiff rate)
And some changeups to keep them honest (13.1% Whiff rate)
When facing LHB, It was the
- 4 seamer (10.3% Whiff rate)
- Slider (13.3 % Whiff rate)
- Curveball (9.7% Whiff rate)
As you can see, the whiffs were there and so the Ks.
In sabermetrics, there are several generally accepted principals. Among them:
- Most pitchers will regress to a .290 BABIP over the course of their careers.
- HR/FB% will stabilize around 10% over long periods.
Looking at the numbers below and keeping those principals in mind, we could've predicted that a regression to the mean was due and a "rebound" was coming. To conclude, Jon Lester is no a slow starter, luck and bad defense are the ones to blame. He was doing nothing wrong or started to do things differently: Sorry Peter!
47 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Why isn't this on the Front page yet?
Great stuff Radiohix
I can’t wait to watch Beltre, Cameron, and Scooter in the field this year.
Thanks man
I wanted to add this to the post as a Pitch f/x component

But I’m a failure when it comes to HTML :(
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Feb 20, 2010 11:03 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
That changeup and Two-Seam mess is beautiful!
"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko
by sox-inda-south on Feb 21, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
Can we get Pedro's graph
from the 99 or the 2000 season. That must be one hell of a sight.
It would've been a hell of a sight indeed but...
Pitch f/x was introduced in 2006.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
rec'ed
someone should flip this green.
To sox-inda-south: Even better, there looks like a lot of orange buried underneath the 4-seamer as well.
For more on How Jon Lester works the strike zone
There’s this excellent piece by Massarotti (what?): Check it, definitely worth the read.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
overall a nice read - and i have to give Mas props for that.
He is much better in baseball than when he talks football or (gawd forbid) basketball.
But parts of the article regurgitate the same misconceptions that your own article above dispell. That there was somehow something wrong with Lester’s pitching during the early start of the year – when it is so clearly that horrific BABIP.
That's a sweet graph
But, what do the numbers on the y-axis mean? In other words, what does +10 inches of vertical movement mean?
Movement relative to spinless pitch.
So negative values sink more than predicted by simple action of gravity.
Nice post.
(One editorial suggestion, when citing the stat from Fangraphs or wherever, give a hyperlink)
I actually did the same thing after reading the Abraham article – went to Fangraphs to check the splits. While it’s true that he wasn’t nearly as bad in April/May as his ERA and W/L would suggest, he did pitch better beginning in June.
I can’t wait to see this defense in action.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
There were some games where he was the victim of some bad luck
There was the start against the Devil Rays where he had an error which led to five runs, and then there was a game where Lowell and Lugo allowed five or six straight ground balls to go into left field for hits.
Nice post!
It is good to see refutation of sports writer’s views, even decdent ones like Abraham. Last year with both Beckett and Lester we addressed part of this issue with regard to unsustainable HR/FB rates, BABIPs, etc. Another one-there has been recent work (see: http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2010/02/verducci_effect.php) refuting the “Verducci” effect. We at OTM are ahead of the pack on these things!
Indeed
On the Verducci effect, Troy Patterson has a post on that too.
Verducci effect uses more circumstantial evidence.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
Buzzy got there first
He posted on the same subject six months ago,
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Feb 22, 2010 10:17 AM EST up reply actions
just a counter observation
The new one I linked to above had a fair bit of data backing up what we all sort of thought-Verducci’s claim is not so well supported…
I wish minor league innings were included in that study
Isn’t the biggest jump in innings usually during the transition from the minors to the majors?
It is a good point
however usually innings in the minors are more ploiced than in the majors. You don’t have cases like Kerry Woods being called up during a pennant race. Either way, Verducci’s list includes minors innings, and in the counter examples people usually include them too. I think for all of the 09 cases they were pitchers whose jump in innings was all at the MLB level.
Lester is a horse
He is far and away my favorite player on this team.
Trade Beckett before the deadline
I'm taking suggestions from myself on the 2010 rally song.
Re-sign Victor Martinez, the future DH of the Boston Red Sox
Lester will benefit nicely from our improved defense....and...
I easily see him finishing as one of the best 10 starters in the AL.
He's ALREADY on that list!
I mean, I can’t name 10 pitchers better than him: There’s Greinke, Verlander, Felix, Halladay (in the NL now) Lee and then who? Sabbathia is pretty good and they’re neck to neck
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
Theo's on Lester last year
"You saw Jon Lester early in the year hurt by balls that got by the left side of the infield and by double plays that were not turned. It’s the same stuff that the numbers will tell you if you look at it.’’
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
I like Theo. Have I mentioned the lately?
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Feb 22, 2010 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
Me too
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Feb 22, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
Wait...What?
You’re telling me you’re not Theo?
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
No, he's just saying that he likes himself.
If I were Theo, I’d like myself too.
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea /
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown /
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
Is Jon Lester a slow starter?
Jon Lester, three days after reading the article: “… … … No.”
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea /
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown /
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
Great analyis, radio
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow this guy on Twitter: @RCBooth
Beckett had similar issues early last season.
Mar/Apr ERA: 7.22 FIP: 3.97 BABIP: .398
Although his 5.02 BB/9 didn’t help much.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
I'd forgotten about that.
Beckett is usually so good at suppressing the BBs, almost Schilling-like in that regard.
We have lingered in the chambers of the sea /
By sea-girls wreathed with seaweed red and brown /
Till human voices wake us, and we drown.
it is interesting that
his FIP was that low given his walk rate. I bet his xFIP was much higher…still like Lester we knew it would not last.
xFIP was 4.04
K/9 was 9.27, HR/FB% was 10%
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Feb 23, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions
Yep
Beckett didn’t have HR problems until late in the season.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Feb 23, 2010 2:23 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah
it just seems like with such a high BB rate he must of had an abnormal HR/FB % to keep his FIP down…but actually he did not. But on second thought those numbers are a lot like 08 Matsuzaka (high BB, high K, normalish HR/FB%) and Dice also has a 4 FIP (but a higher xFIP because he had a lower HR rate compared to normal) so I guess it makes sense.
Looking at the FIP equation:
The BB rate really did not hurt him. Using the FIP equation, a K/BB higher than 1.5 actually brings a FIP down. Beckett had a K/BB of 1.9 during that period, so his BB rate was fine when coupled with the great K rate. It was his HR rate that hurt (according to FIP). FIP uses total HR’s (and not a HR/FB ratio). So his 3 HR’s allowed in 28.2 innings led to an increase of about 1.4 in FIP (though no HR rate will lower a FIP, like a high K/BB can).
More than anything, this excercise made it clear how little small FIP samples ought to be relied on. If Beckett had not given up one of those HR’s his FIP would have been right aroun 3.5 (as opposed to 4.00). That is a big difference for one play.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by 

























