Red Sox Close To Signing Lenny DiNardo
If that was a name you never thought you'd hear again, you are not alone.
According to Chad Bradford, the Red Sox are close to signing former Red Sox Rule 5 pick Lenny DiNardo, pending an MRI.
DiNardo, acquired by the Sox in 2004's Rule 5 draft, has 257 unimpressive big league innings under his belt. While he was a promising prospect coming through the minors, and had 42 productive innings for the Red Sox between 2004 and 2005, the 31-year-old southpaw's career has been plagued by injury, leading to significant control issues. Over his last four seasons (he missed 2010), DiNardo has walked more batters than he's struck out.
Consider this the Red Sox' response to the Mark Prior acquisition by the Yankees. A depth move, and nothing more.
21 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Headlines I'd rather see:
“Sox sign Jenks”
“Sox sign Buchholz”
“Sox sign Miller”
“Sox trade for Soto” (You’re welcome)
“Sox trade for Napoli”
“Sox sign insertnameofanyotherrelieverwhowalkslessthanhekos”
Why are you waisting your time on this Theo? Sign someone worth a damn before they’re all gone.
"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.
Think this is our big #9 starter plan.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Dec 15, 2010 9:46 PM EST up reply actions
It's incest
How many times has DeNardo been of the Sox?
Does he think he’s Lou Merloni?
I'm getting a little worried that after all this 3 year deals for FA reliever out there
we try the same plan as last year again. Stack up arms and hope some overachieve.
by German Red Sox Fan on Dec 15, 2010 9:12 PM EST reply actions
Rays have an open Closer's spot
This offseason seems to have come down to two things for relievers: either make them a closer or give them 3 years.
Crazy.
by South Coast Ghost on Dec 15, 2010 9:34 PM EST up reply actions
This.
Twitter | "Almost every organization has a guy like Papelbon or Lester" - Dave Cameron 12/29/2005
It's tough to blame them when these contracts are outlandish
But at the same time, they do need to bring in a quality reliever! So, do you stand by your “moral code” and refuse to offer 3 years, even if it means getting not one quality reliever from FA? That is the question.
I’m really starting to think that we’ll bypass the FA reliever market altogether and just trade for someone. Three years is just too much, even if it’s the going rate.
Welcome back?
I’m fine with all these bullpen signings as long as the other shoe drops and we’ve really been lining up somebody good…
They are disappearing
their refusal to sign guys for 3 years seems to be killing them.
simul justus et peccator
he's been pretty bad against lefties
admittedly not as bad as against righties, but still pretty bad. I’d guess Rich Hill has a better shot.
At this point, I'm getting to hoping we don't start Doubront in Triple-A.
Over the Monster -- SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Site
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Dec 16, 2010 1:02 PM EST up reply actions
I think Doubront could be interesting in the pen
I don’t see him as a good LOOGY type though, him splits from Pawtucket look significantly worse against lefties than righties.
Was Chad Bradford really the guy to report this?
I didn’t know that knucklescraper was a journalist as well :)

by 


























