Red Sox Look To Make Big Splash In Free Agency
As the clock struck midnight on November 7th, this marked the beginning period of the 2011 free agency period for several Red Sox players, including Adrian Beltre and Victor Martinez. Both have at least a good chance of returning next season, however it is still unknown as to whether or not they will be back.
The offseason needs for the Sox remain: bullpen, third base (if Beltre departs), part-time catcher, and outfield help. The free agent pool this offseason is headlined by Cliff Lee, Carl Crawford, and Jayson Werth, along with Adam Dunn, Rafael Soriano and Carlos Pena.
With the Red Sox likely set in their starting pitching department, I believe they need to either re-sign Beltre, pursue one of the outfielders, and sign an effective left handed reliever or re-sign Martinez, pursue a big first baseman, and sign an effective left handed reliever (more emphasis on choice one).
Here is how I see Theo Epstein and the Red Sox management prioritizing the offseason with their top-5 targets:
- Adrian Beltre - Ok I have to admit that the Beltre signing was the best deal from last offseason in terms of timing for him. Beltre, as expected, declined his 10 million dollar player option and has decided to enter free agency. In his one season in Boston, Beltre hit over .300, leading the team, and was voted to the American League All-Star team. Even though he made a lot of errors at third base, Beltre is a clear defensive upgrade to any other option on the market and no one needs him more than the Red Sox. It is a clear-cut choice that Beltre needs to return.
- Jayson Werth - The big news came out Monday that Red Sox management has contacted Werth and agent Scott Boras to begin possible contract negotiation. I see it that Werth is, right now the Red Sox number one target on the outfield market. Werth can give the Red Soxaround .293 with 25 HR and 80-90 RBIs a season with above average defense. Some see Werth as a good target because of his ability to play the whole outfield. Werth could play left field next season and switch to right field if and when J.D. Drew departs.
- Scott Downs - When you read that Scott Downs is higher than say Adam Dunn or Carlos Pena, you probably ask "say what?" However, here is why Scott Downs is on my list: Last season for the Blue Jays, Downs established himself as one of the elite left-handed relievers in the game, going 5-5 with a 2.64 ERA in 67 appearances for the Jays. The Red Sox have needed a pitcher like this since we dumped Alan Embree and bought into the Hideki Okajima hype in 2007. Downs could be number one on many other lists, but the fact of the matter is that the Red Sox lost many close games due to bullpen struggles (except with Papelbon and the Yankees, that was just his fault). A combination of Downs-Bard-Papelbon (in a contract year) could become baseball's best back end of the rotation.
- Carl Crawford - Crawford by far is the biggest hitter on the open market this offseason. He could potentially become the first hitter to land a 100 million dollar plus contract with no 20 homer season. The reason I rank Crawford lower is because Crawford already has known suitors in the Angels and Tigers who have a lot of money to spend this offseason and a bigger hole in the outfield than the Red Sox do. Crawford could provide the glove the Sox have been looking for in left field, but I just don't know if the Red Sox will be able to afford Crawford and Beltre.
- Victor Martinez - Even though he is faced with the same bad comments about how he can't throw base runners out or he can't handle the Red Sox pitching staff, V-Mart proved to be a very valuable middle of the order offensive option for the Red Sox. Although his horrid caught stealing percentage would be rid of if the Red Sox chose to let Martinez walk, they would miss his .302 batting average, 20 home runs, and 80 RBIs he contributed to a short-handed Red Sox team last season. Also, the Red Sox could simply re-sign Martinez to play first base if Adrian Beltre signs elsewhere and the team just switches Kevin Youkilis to third base. You won't find a better switch hitting catcher in the game today than Martinez.
*Note that targets one and five and targets two and four are unlikely to co-exist.
Other possible targets: John Buck of the Blue Jays (if Martinez signs elsewhere), Arthur Rhodes of the Reds, Carlos Pena (if Beltre signs elsewhere), Adam Dunn (if Beltre signs elsewhere).
Let us know what you think the Red Sox should do this offseason!
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think trading for Adrian Gonzales is still #1
With the possibility of YouK at 3B and A-Gon at 1st, I think that move tops everything else on the Red Sox radar. The price will be high, of course, but the impact can’t be understated. I think that the only real hold up is the fact that the market gets smaller then longer the Padres hold out, with Gonzales approaching free agency. I prefer that to signing Adrian Beltre and one of Crawford/Werth.
- Matt Sullivan
A good friend of mine used to say, "This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains." Think about that for a while. - Nuke LaLoosh
Yes, but...
I don’t believe A-Gon is on the table right now unless the Padres get absolutely blown away by the trade offer. He is under a very reasonable contract and I’m pretty sure the Padres want to sell some tickets on the heels of a good, although ultimately dissapointing season. A-Gon and his agent coming out and stating the obvious that he will be testing free agency after 2011, may make it easiser for the Padres to explain an offseason trade to their fans, when they can clearly be contenders in the wide open NL West in 2011. You are correct that the market for trade partners is larger in the offseason when many teams believe they are a player or two away from contending. Look at Seattle with Cliff Lee last year.
Gonzales is not worth the trade picks
Unless he’s immediately signed to a long-term deal. No long-term deal, and it amounts to a king’s ransom for a one-year rental, which does not help the Sox.
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
Why trade for Gonzalez when you can wait a year?
Gonzalez is going to cost a few top prospects and a lot of money. It makes no sense to gut the system to get a player who will be available for just money in one year.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 9, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions
Exactly
They are looking for Ellsbury, Rizzo, Kelly, and one of Bard and Buchholz. No way.
Watch The Internet Sport Show
Help get Lacrosse on SBN. Join the lacrosse community at The Lacrosse Blog
by Marisa Ingemi on Nov 9, 2010 12:17 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Especially considering that we’re going to loosen up about $ 44MM in salary after this year, I think, with Papi, Paps, J.D and Cameron’s contracts/obligations all expiring. We could sign A-Gon and still potentially drop salary if you figure that Youk moves to DH (shakes head) when A-Gon takes over first, Bard becomes the closer, Kalish takes over the outfield slot and Reddick takes over the back-up outfield slot.
Maybe that’s the “bridge” we were building?
Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."
by nuthinboutnuthin on Nov 9, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions
Well, crap...
… how can I be expected to work now, with all this premium rosterbation material.
Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."
by nuthinboutnuthin on Nov 9, 2010 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
Beltre is going to get
overpaid. Again. Buck makes sense.
Please God, not Pena….
Peña had his time with the Sox
The Sox should only pick up Peña if he is a bargain basement.. It sounds like he will end up with the gNats.. He may also re-sign with the Rays. Peña didn’t have a very good walk year.
Pena
is awful. I am a Rays STH – watching him try to hit was painfull this year. His average has declined in four straight years. He was beched on two seperate occasions this year.
He may wind up back with the Rays – since I am not sure who else wants him.
I think some teams have gotten value
Sabathia comes to mind, Soriano in Tmapa. The Manny deal worked out pretty well in Boston….
What I mean, of course, is the Beltre has been unusually overpaid. The last time he got a contract based on one year he didn’t come close to matching. The same thing is going to happen this time.
Thats actually not true
During his time with the Mariners he provided them with roughly 68M worth in WAR while getting payed 64M, so he actually outperformed his contract. Nobody really believed he would repeat his 04 as is nobody expecting now he will repeat 2010
by German Red Sox Fan on Nov 10, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions
yeah he was still a very good third baseman in Seattle
the unhappiness with him just came because they thought they’d have the guy who hit 48 homers
Agree that A-Gonz is priority #1, but more likely...
Beltre – Very good, but not great player who will likely be a bit overpaid by someone.
Crawford – Very good 5-tool player who will be drastically overpaid by someone. I don’t think he’s a 20M or, as he wants, a 20+(!)M/yr guy.
Werth – Smartest OF value available as a 14-15M/yr guy.
Downs – Yes, we need him or someone like him.
V-Mart – Yes at 3 years max, but otherwise would be overpaid due to declining production at C and lessened value as a 1B/DH.
I think we’ll get Werth, Downs, and maybe, Beltre out of those. The big contracts for Beckett and Lackey keep us out of the Lee talks unless we trade Dice-K. Even with that trade the problem would be that a Lee signing will take out at least one of the other signings. We do still have a budget after all.
Victor Martinez
I’m not sure what Theo’s priority list is and I’m not sure they even have a priotity list. More likely is they will be in all these players and several others over the next few weeks.
For me, I would put V-Mart near the top of the list, although I’m getting the feeling the Sox are giving him the Jason Bay treatment. That one worked out, but many here were commenting the Bay departure would be largely offset by a full season of V-mart in 2010. For my money, I may take the chance that V-Mart can produce for 4 years and pay him the money becasuse of his versatility. Also, this thinking that there is no way he can catch in 3 years has taken on a life of its own. His bat an versatility alone warrant a 4 year deal from some team.
Martinez in four years will probably have some value
A front-loaded contract for Martinez makes more sense. Give him a bigger pile of cash up front, when his production is most valuable, then slightly lower bases with plenty of incentive cash so that he can come out ahead if he has a monster year.
Besides, if we get Beltre and don’t keep Martinez, who will lead the head-rubbing brigade?
Fenway: "An alternate and better universe, disguised as a ballpark." --Thomas Boswell
I think they are giving Victor the Jason Bay treatment..
Ironically, if Theo signed Bay to a multi year deal, and Bay had stats as he had with the Mets this year, Theo would be tarred and feathered. I actually feel kind of bad for Bay, he had a really tough year, excluding the wheel barrel of loot he made.
The Sox has always been really stingy on contract length, and they appeared to make conclusions on whether to pursue a player before he hits free agency like Victor.
I prefer it that way
Even if I disagree with Theo & Co sometimes, I like knowing that they have a plan and stick to it. They know what they want to pay, and if the player is unwilling, they let him walk. Granted, this strategy does not make the Sox FO immune to mistakes cough Lugo cough but it does give me a measure of solace as a fan to know that we will not be “Boras-ed” into overpaying in any given off season.
I want Victor and Werth
And maybe someone like Pena to play 1B for one season.
Watch The Internet Sport Show
Help get Lacrosse on SBN. Join the lacrosse community at The Lacrosse Blog
Re-signing VMart/or another a legit catcher and bullpen help should be the priority
Werth and Crawford are very good players. And while they’re better than what the Sox have—Drew, Cameron, Ellsbury, Kalish, etc.—the Sox can still field a decent OF. Beltre is also very good. But the Sox have options at 3B: Lowrie, Youk.
If VMart walks, the Sox have don’t have a legitimate catching option. The pen also stinks and there are in in-house solutions.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
I agree with you
All things being equal I would rather sign VMART and get Bullpen help. The Sox have options in the outfield as you correctly point out.
Agree.
This to me is where you start your priorities.
The marginal value that the other free agents bring over cheap alternatives is just not worth how much they’d cost.
V-Mart, on the other hand is clearly a major leap in value over our Catcher alternatives.
If we don’t do any of the other position player FA signings, we still will have adequate to well above adequate bodies filling those spots in the batting order.
If we don’t sign V-Mart, we are probably looking at an automatic out in the lineup …
Personally, my vote is for V-Mart, Beltre and a reliever. And if I could talk them into really opening the wallets, Cliff Lee …
:-D
Werth or Crawford? I think the question on Crawford is if he's still developing.
In other words, is he going to get better, play at the level he’s reached at present, or decline through the length of his contract?
His 20+M /yr demand only makes sense if you think he’s still going to improve further – i.e. a 25-30HR guy as opposed to a 19HR guy he’s established himself as. He’s a risk to be the #3 or #4 guy he’s signing to be. Still, he’d be great to bat with Youk in those spots. Under no circumstances should anyone bat him 1st or 2nd!
With Werth, you have the second coming of JD Drew – not a #3 or #4 hitter, but a solid #5 or #6 guy. Signing him is safe, but it leaves us still looking for the solid “Papi/Manny” duo for 3 and 4. Youk gets one spot. I’m still scratching my head for the other.
You don't need a duo at 3-4 hitting 35 homers a year
When you can have 2-3-4-5-6-possibly 7 hitting 25 homers a year.
If I was your math homework I'd be really hard and you'd be doing me on your desk.
I'm a 7 WAR player in bed.
dont really get the argument
Werth has a bigger bat than Crawford. 2010 wOBA: .397 (Werth) vs .378 (Crawford) and basically every year of their careers. So Werth would be a better #3 or #4 than Crawford. If we end up with Crawford i’d much prefer him to bat leadoff.
by German Red Sox Fan on Nov 10, 2010 12:22 AM EST up reply actions
Crawford has been at the same level
for about 5 years. His 2010 Season is pretty close to his 2006 Season. He hit 18 HR in 2006, and 19 in 2010. The main difference in the power numbers is a slight decline in the number of triples he hits, though he does seem to be trying to work the count more than he did a few years ago.
I don’t believe he hits 25 HR in Fenway, since his power is in the ally in left and not down the line. If the Red Soz resigned VMart I couldn’t see him hittting higher than 5th.
His war has never been over 5, though his owar did go up this year. I find this hard to believe, but his war isn’t much different from BJ Upton.
Neither.
Werth and Crawford are fine players.
But neither are THAT much better than our current replacements that they are worth paying huge money to.
Of the two, I like Werth better because he is a better hitter with more power. But let’s be clear: Werth is NOT the ‘second coming of J.D. Drew’. He’s good, but not that good.
Making a spash
I do believe the Sox upper management will want to make a splash in the offseason. Remember, they are selling a product and the interest in the Sox took a bit of a hit in 2010. The lack of “buzz” around town for the was palpable and the NESN ratings were way down.
Crawford is the only one of the group under 30 yrs old.
Arthur Rhodes just turned 41 and still had a WHIP of 1.02 in 55 IN in ’10 aided by a .244 BABIP. Bill James predicts his BB/9 to jump .61 and his WHIP to increase to 1.21.
If the Sox go for one older less expensive option in the new bullpen, I would prefer it to be Takashi Saito over Rhodes. Saito’s 11.50 K/9, 1.14 WHIP, and .304 BABIP in 2010 do more for me than Rhodes does and Saito was not bad in his one year in the AL East.
Both these old guys are still getting it done though.
Welcome Jared. I believe this is your 1st post as a writer at OTM. Great start.
+1
On the welcome to Jared, and on the analysis. Rhodes looks like a bad contract waiting to happen, and Saito is another year removed from that injury (forget what exact injury it was).
There are so many RP out there this winter, that I’d love to see us get a top option or two (Downs, Putz, Benoit) and then go scrape the bargain bin for a few invitees to spring training.
My Big Splash
Beltre, Werth, and Downs.
And possibly either Buck or Olivo at catcher.
And nice work Jared!
Raj Ghetia
"Common sense is quite rare." - Voltaire
Resident Psychologist and Tech Support at Over the Monster: SB Nation's Resident Red Sox Web Site
Reasons why I think Werth is a much better fit than Crawford!
Yes Carl Crawford is a better overall player and he is 2 years younger than Werth, still I believe Werth is a better fit for the Sox for various reasons.
1. Contract: I believe the contract for Crawford will be massive, I think it will be in the Holliday range and might possibly end up in the 7/140M range. Everbody who thinks he is not gonna make 100M is nuts. Werth on the other hand could end up with a 4/60 prolly 5/80 on the max side. I much prefer 4 years over 5, but Werth will be significantly cheaper i believe.
2. Crawfords Defense! The Red Sox might be the team who get the least value out of CC, because his defense is such a major part of his value and some of it will be lost in the 81 games in the small LF in Boston. So the 2 player are closer in their value to the Sox than they are for other teams.
3. Werth is RH! Thats huge in my book. With the Yankees prolly ending up with Cliff Lee. Their 2 Aces will be southpaws and thus we need players who crush southpaws. Werth career wOBA vs LHP: .401, Crawford: .307. Huge difference between the 2.
by German Red Sox Fan on Nov 10, 2010 12:43 AM EST reply actions
And Scott Boras won't be happy
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 10, 2010 11:36 AM EST up reply actions
Would make it even better.
I’d be willing to chip in 50 bucks to make Boras unhappy.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Boras says...
That he wants $500 to be unhappy. He says that statistics establish the he’s a premium moper, historically comparable to Pagliacci and Eeyore. He also wants you to pay up in a hurry, because he has a mystery poster, who may or may not be gizmosandy, interested. Also, he’d like to call Brian Cashman before he signs anything…
Wait 'til next/this year?
"Laser show. So relax."
by nuthinboutnuthin on Nov 10, 2010 9:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
Clearly not enough people have read this comment
to rec it yet.
Allow me to be the first.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
@#$%ing Twit: @blogtard
Gonzalez & Werth
Thats what I want to see. Sox cant wait for Agon to hit FA because whoever trades for him will lock him up
this is what I don't get
why would Gonzalez agree to necessarily sign with whatever team trades for him when he’ll be able to up his value significantly by going to the market? It sometimes makes sense for a player to sign an extension rather than hit free agency if they’ve been on a team a long time and don’t want to uproot their families and such, but for a young guy hitting free agency for the first time, I just don’t see any legitimate reason he would sign an extension with a new team.
Only to protect against the possibility of
of a bad injury happening in 2011 before he hits free agency. It the Sox traded a list of prospects and asked for a window the talk with Gonzalez agent and offered 5yr/$120m plus a $7mil signing bonus to add to his ‘10 salary and it’s all guaranteed even if he falls getting out of the shower the next day, wouldn’t you think he may take the security of the deal right then and there? Maybe he would counter by asking for a 6th or 7th year.
But there is a number that he would talk and sign to protect his family against an injury in 2011.
It’s the only reason for him to even offer a window to talk.
I dunno, he's pretty young in good shape,
gambling against a major injury is pretty safe as far as gambles go. In the open market,I think he can almost certainly leverage himself a 7 year deal, in fact there’s no real reason for him to approach free agency looking for anything less than a Teixeira deal.
I'm not saying Gonzalez will give a window to negotiate an extension
or that he should give a window. But this is the only reason that I can think of that he might give a window to a team that trades for him this off season. And if he does give a team that time to talk out an extension, then he would need to take a very slight discount for the insurance of knowing he and his family get all their money no matter if he even plays for one day in 2011.
I think we have an Agon type here already in Rizzo but that has not been proven yet on the big stage. To give up a huge value in prospects and then have to pay free agent $$ for a long contract when we already have Youk at 1st and Rizzo in the wings does not sit well with me. I believe his contract will be in between Ryan Howard and Teixeira in years and dollars.
Not to mention that he would have to want to play for that new team for 6-7 more years
Which isn’t always guaranteed. Some players just like playing for certain teams, and if AGonz gets traded to a team that he doesn’t want to spend the “rest” of his career with, then he’ll go to free agency.
Saying that we should trade for him now because another team could scoop him up and sign him long term is the type of fear-induced decision making that almost always leads to mistakes.

by 




























