Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Cowboy Altitude for Wyoming Fans!

Red Sox's Bench May Be Set For 2010

Yesterday's news of the Red Sox acquiring Bill Hall did a few different things for the Red Sox, including potentially setting the Red Sox's bench in stone.

As of right now, this is what the Red Sox's bench would look like:

While it may not be ideal, every position is covered with this setup. Varitek is the backup catcher and a switch-hitter off the bench. Lowell can back up at the corner infield positions and still carries a pretty big stick. Hermida can play the corner outfield spots and bring a decent bat to the table as well. Hall is the most versatile of all, playing everything but first base and catcher.

But this bench certainly isn't perfect.

Star-divide

What this bench lacks, though, is any good defense and any speed. It's certainly not the ideal situation to have.

The good news is that the bench above probably won't stick because the Red Sox will try and continue to move Lowell. Varitek, Hall and Hermida are pretty much locks, but if the Sox ship out Lowell, they have a few more options.

The most obvious is Jed Lowrie. Lowrie is a nice option because he can play second, short and third well defensively. The knack on Jed, of course, is the fact he can't stay healthy. The other issue is whether or not Lowrie needs more time in Triple-A Pawtucket. Lowrie doesn't necessarily to prove himself in AAA, but it may be a better route than sitting on the bench in the big leagues.

There are a handful of minor league options that could work -- Tug Hulett, Angel Sanchez, Darnell McDonald and Nate Spears come to mind. However, Sox fans shouldn't expect much out of them. They're like a Nick Green, except the odds are they're not going to provide anywhere close to the value Green did last season. They're fillers essentially -- guys to lean back on if you have to, but nothing more.

Unless Lowell is traded, it doesn't seem the problems of defense and speed off the bench will be fixed. Perhaps the Red Sox will deal with speed the way they've done it the last few seasons: acquire at the end of the year through the waiver wire. Remember Joey Gathright? All the Sox wanted was his speed. They got it and used it, but they spent nearly nothing for it.

Defense should be a priority for the bench, but maybe not as much in previous years considering how good the starting defense is already. The outfield won't need any late-inning replacements, nor should the infield (unless you count catcher). For once, defense off the bench is a backburner for the Red Sox (and no, Brian Anderson is not available).

It comes down to this: if the Sox need to start the season tomorrow, their bench is OK. But if they can improve it with more speed or defense, the bench should be in a good position for the 2010 season.

0 recs  |  Comment 33 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Defense probably won't be a priority for the bench

Our starting nine are mostly all studs at their positions, so our bench players will probably be seeing more of their action at the plate, when we need runs, rather than filling in on the field.

"Well let me just quote the late-great Colonel Sanders, who said...'I'm too drunk to taste this chicken.' "
-Ricky Bobby

by nepats108 on Jan 6, 2010 12:10 PM EST reply actions  

a lot of our roster are also offensive studs.

But if you pinch hit for someone, then someone also has to take their place in the field, so defense is always important.

by wolf9309 on Jan 6, 2010 12:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I expect pinch hitting to be rare

Go up and down the starting lineup, pick out which guys you can envision needing to be pinch hit for.

I can see Cameron being hit for, in late inning, close situation, man in scoring position, tough right hander on mound. And that’s the only situation I would pinch hit for him.

Who else? Most everybody else is strong enough against their weakside pitching that you wouldn’t pinch hit for them even in the above situation. Ells, Drew, Youk & Beltre are superior defenders on the corners – you would never want to take their gloves off the field in late innings of a close game – and all are above average hitters even against their weak side. Pedrooia? Nope.

Scutaro? Maybe, to get some pop – if we had some off the bench. But then you have to sub for SS. If you pinch Tek to hit for Scutaro to get some pop, you’ve lost your backup C.

VMart switches so you are almost never going to pinch for him.

Ortiz? Maybe against tough lefties in the above situation – but unless he goes into another death slump, probably not going to happen often.

by mmmmm on Jan 6, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions  

pinch running for Papi & VMart

that’s something we’ll probably need now and then. Those guys are sloooooowwwww.

by mmmmm on Jan 6, 2010 2:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Boring bench

Fellas, I gotta have more Cora.

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Jan 6, 2010 12:12 PM EST reply actions  

Turnover

Ton of turnover from Starting Roster 2009 – Starting Roster 2010, wonder if there has been a season lately like this?? I think it was necessary but WOW!

New Roster Players for 2010: Scutaro, Cameron, Hermida, Beltre, Hall, Lackey, V-Mart, Last bullpen arm (Ramirez, Bonser, etc.) – 8/25 = 32% turnover rate. Could potentially go to 9/25 – 36% if Lowell is shipped elsewhere.

by BobZupcic on Jan 6, 2010 12:25 PM EST reply actions  

we had a lot of new players in 07

Dice-K, Drew, Oki, Lugo, Pedroia, Hinske, Cash, guys we dumped (Donnelly, Pineiro), guys we added (Kielty, Ells, Buch, Gagne). Some were good, some were busts, but it all worked out.

by Buzzy on Jan 6, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions  

lowell will prob be gone

That will prob put lowrie on bench If they keep lowrie in AAA 4 AB’s I’d like Tatis he plays multi pos and hit pretty well last 2 yrs Bench still lacks speed though. need a pinch runner 4 ortiz

by Pl1166 on Jan 6, 2010 12:53 PM EST reply actions  

Speed off the bench would be nice

but I don’t think is a requirement as this years lineup is already looking pretty good speedwise- with Scutaro and Cameron are pretty good and Beltre’s a much better runner than Lowell.

I agree about Lowrie. The nice thing is the versatility of the lineup. If we had Lowrie instead of Lowell, we’d have Hall and Scutaro both able to play most any

by wolf9309 on Jan 6, 2010 12:58 PM EST up reply actions  

hm weird... continued

infield position plus outfield, Lowrie able to cover second, 3rd, or 4th, Youk’s versatility. Really just a ridiculous amount of ways the field can be covered.

by wolf9309 on Jan 6, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Hall is a good defender

I think Lowrie is more likely to be there most of the year than Lowell, and he provides solid defense where he plays. Really not too stressed about the defense. It’s really a pretty versatile, useful bench.

by wolf9309 on Jan 6, 2010 1:01 PM EST reply actions  

We DO have speed available to pinch run.

His name is Clay Buchholz. Isn’t he the second fastest player on the team? Except when he starts, he’s a viable option to run for Ortiz/Lowell in late innings.

by dsharp on Jan 6, 2010 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

he is fast but you never really want to pinch run a pitcher too much. There are too many ways he can get hurt on the basepath

by cnubsbl16 on Jan 6, 2010 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

I know pitchers are supposed to be athletes too

but do you really want one of your starters coming in to pinch run? All it takes is a tweaked hammy on a cool night to be on the shelf for a few weeks. Even worse he could tear a Lisfranc and have his career go down the tubes a la CMW.

Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.

by CasanovaWong on Jan 6, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Lowell

I dont see Lowell sticking around and being a bench player, he will go somewhere and be a starter

by cnubsbl16 on Jan 6, 2010 1:24 PM EST reply actions  

I'm not sure

about Mike being a backup, especially at first base. Even though I am sure that he can learn it in time to stay on the roster for that role, I don’t believe that his defense would be much improved at all (moving from third to first), and I think his offensive performance (due to age, injury and limited playing time) has no reason to do anything but degrade this season. If there is any truth to the Luis Castillo option, it should be pursued, if only to have more attractive trade bait.

by JoCro on Jan 6, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions  

I understand the whole debate about protecting pitchers and all but...

I honestly never could understand how pitchers in the National league could be any more durable than pitchers in the American League.

Injuries happen all the time and sometimes it’s stupid stuff like playing too much Guitar Hero (Ah-choo! Zumaya!). I just don’t think you count out anyone when a game is on the line. I’m not saying that Clay should be used as a normal baserunner, but I am saying that the option should be there. God forbid he ends up on a National League roster if you’re going to worry about him tearing out all the ligaments in his whole left side or anything! Seriously…

by Red Sox Raider on Jan 6, 2010 3:17 PM EST reply actions  

Very true,

but if he enters the season knowing that will be part of his potential role, he will spend some time doing the sprints and base running drills to be ready for it. He’s a gamer if they want to go there.

by dsharp on Jan 6, 2010 4:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Yea i understand what you mean but its not that the pitchers in the national league are more durable, its that they spread their time out doing different things. Their pitchers take more time to run sprints and to swing a bat, because they know they will have to do that in a game. AL pitchers know that they are not going to hit or have to sprint very often so they spend little time doing these things

by cnubsbl16 on Jan 6, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions  

So, assuming Lowell is traded, who finishes off the bench?

I’m guessing Hall is our new infield guy who can occasionally play the OF (although he hasn’t played SS since 2006). Hermida really should just play LF, but I guess he could play RF in a pinch. Do we look for another person to play the corners, or relegate Hall to that role and bring in a back-up MIF?

DFA Beckett

by South Coast Ghost on Jan 6, 2010 7:21 PM EST reply actions  

Can kind of think of Tek playing a "corner".

In that he would be letting VMart play 1st…but yes it would seem someone else would need to be picked up.

by upCHUCK on Jan 6, 2010 9:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Frank Catalanotto?

He can do LF/1B, and in a pinch RF (although not well).

DFA Beckett

by South Coast Ghost on Jan 7, 2010 1:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I would assume

That is Drew went down or needed a day off, Ellsbury would slide to RF and Hermida would play Left.

by TheLoneDavid on Jan 7, 2010 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Take Lowell out

Put Tug Hulett in. Hall can’t actually play SS (hasnt played there since 06). Lowell simply doesnt have a spot on this team. I seriously doubt he can live with a bench role. He would only be a pinch hitter and part time DH, too. He absolutely is incapable of playing 3B (as we saw plenty of last year) and Tito reacted very negatively when asked if he could see time at 1B – a position he’s never played. Lowell is road kill, and theyve made it eminently clear he has no place on the 2010 Red Sox. They went out and trade for Hulett to be the UTIL INF.

by alskor on Jan 7, 2010 2:25 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tardy_001_small
The negativity
Small
OTM Fantasy Football?
Tatersox_small
I Demand Blood

Recent FanPosts

Small
Killing Paps value
Small
Trade With Dodgers
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Minor League Rankings
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
It's Not Over Yet,  But....
Tatersox_small
A Yahoo Fantasy Reminder
Small
2011 Roster/Lineup Formation
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Portland SeaDogs Report

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Texas Rangers Michael Young, left, is held back by Texas Rangers third base coach Dave Anderson (obscured) after being called out at third by third base umpire Alfonso Marquez, front right, to end a baseball game against the Minnesota Twins, Sunday, Sept. 5, 2010, in Minneapolis.  Rangers manager Ron Washington (wearing sunglasses) looks on. The Twins won 6-5. (AP Photo/Paul Battaglia) +1 updates

Twins Top Rangers 6-5 Thanks To Controversial Ump Decision

LOS ANGELES CA - SEPTEMBER 04:  Jamey Carroll #14 of the Los Angeles Dodgers is pulled off the bag as Darren Ford #34 of the San Francisco Giants steals second base in the eighth inning at Dodger Stadium on September 4 2010 in Los Angeles California. The Giants defeated the Dodgers 5-4.  (Photo by Jeff Gross/Getty Images) +1 updates

Dodgers' Slide Continues With 3-0 Loss To Rival Giants

BOSTON - SEPTEMBER 05: Jonathan Papelbon #58 of the Boston Red Sox heads for the dugout after he is pulled in the ninth inning against the Chicago White Sox on September 5 2010 at Fenway Park in Boston Massachusetts.  (Photo by Elsa/Getty Images)

White Sox Score Four In 9th, Hand Jonathan Papelbon His Seventh Blown Save Of 2010

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Red-sox-yankees_small BerkshireFan

Photo_small wolf9309