Rescue Squad 2010: The new Red Sox bench
Last year, the Red Sox bench ended up seeing a whole lot more time on the field than anyone had expected or hoped for over the season. In fact, of the Red Sox starting 9, only 4 members appeared in 150 or more games. By the end of the year, we realized that the Sox backup backup shortstop (Nick Green, backup to Lugo, backup to Lowrie) had ended up playing in more than half the games, starting for about half the season.
In short, anyone that hadn't already learned it, saw firsthand how injuries can rip apart a team expected to do well and succeed, and a lot of the credit for the team managing to get so far despite the majority of its starters missing significant time has to be chalked up to having a deep bench.
So let's take a quick break from discussing the merits of pitching and defense and from discussing whether Papelbon is worth someone else's money to talk about the Sox depth on the bench for 2010
- First of all is, of course, Jason Varitek. Love him or hate him (or like most of us these days, love what he's done and hate seeing him on the field), the Sox are stuck with paying him through 2010, so unless he looks almost useless out there as backup catcher, expect to see him performing backup duties next season. Now some people have speculated that he will probably end up catching Beckett, because Beckett has said in the past that he prefers having Tek as his catcher. Earlier this offseason, however, Francona said to expect a "more typical" rotation of catchers, which I took to mean that there will not be a one-pitcher to one-catcher relationship going on- rather, Martinez will be the main catcher for all of the pitchers and Varitek will be there as a backup for all the pitchers. This is one role Varitek fits very nicely into, as he is already very familiar with most of the Sox staff, so he can not only pick up how to catch to them quickly, he can help Martinez if he is struggling to learn how they work best.Now, how does Varitek work best in my mind? Easy. He can start against lefty pitchers. In his horrible 2009, he still managed to mash an OPS of .807 from the right side of the plate, so he is still a valuable hitter against lefty pitchers. This also provides the team flexibility to sit Ortiz against lefties (where he has not looked good) and slide Martinez into the DH slot, which really maximizes everyone's potential (in fact, in 2009, Varitek's OPS against lefties was a solid 90 points above Ortiz's! Putting in Varitek could actually improve the team's offense). Because of this use, Varitek can still be a useful player in 2010, even in a reduced role on the bench.
- The second player who looks like a lock for the bench at the moment is Bill Hall, who brings good backup defense to almost every position. In his career, he has played at 2b, 3b, SS, LF, CF, and RF, playing at least average defense in all of them and very good defense at a few positions. Despite this, however, he brings a threat of a bad attitude (he's been unhappy about being used as a utility player or off the bench in the past) and a bat which can best be described as horrific (a .596 OPS in 2009, striking out 35.9% of the time). The Red Sox probably see him as a temporary patch at the most- if someone is day to day for a few days or needs to come out of a game early, he can be there to fill in there position for a couple of innings or even a couple of games, but he almost certainly won't be seeing significant at bats in 2010 unless he proves himself very impressively in ST.
The depth he brings, however, must be acknowledged. Again, he can potentially fill almost any position defensively, should he need to. With the addition of Scutaro being able to move around if necessary and Youk's ability to flip-flop, this provides a plethora of options should injury strike. The Sox can only hope that Hall is anxious to prove that his bat is not dead (he had a couple of decent years, with an impressive .899 OPS and 35 homers in 2006) and he may provide at least a little bit of offensive juice instead of just being a hole in the lineup whenever he comes to bat. It is worth noting that at least his career batting stats rate well above those of Nick Green's (who he is, in essence, replacing) and there's always a slim chance he could show a glimmer of the player he could have been. As is, however, he is an effective defensive replacement.
- which brings us to the Red Sox one remaining arbitration case they have not yet resolved with, Jeremy Hermida. Hermida was a top prospect with a lot of hope who, as a starting OF for the Marlins, began to show that potential in 2007 before slumping into 2008 and 2009. Theo brought him in in the hopes that a change to Boston would revitalize him and they might be able to bring back the potential he was known for.
He is, by all accounts, excited to be in Boston, even though it will be his first time playing off the bench instead of being an everyday regular. Boston is, really, probably not a bad place for it as, between Cameron and Drew, he is bound to get a decent amount of playing time at the corners (though they both have played quite regularly, i expect as they age a few more days off). If he can prove himself revitalized, there could easily be a starting position in Boston available for him as soon as 2012, or he could pump up his value enough to get moved somewhere else for 2011. He is an interesting case- I'm very interested to see him in Boston, but don't want him to get too much playing time as it will mean that someone in the Sox very solid outfield is injured. He should be able to be a productive player for what is required of him.
- Both of these players bring a decent amount of versatility to the roster. Although I don't expect him to be on the roster once opening day rolls around, at the moment, the fourth spot is filled with someone who brings no versatility to the field at the moment, Mike Lowell. It's possible that Lowell will be able to play 3rd base by April. It's even possible that he can learn to play first base effectively by then, but the Sox don't seem inclined to keep him around- which seems to work for both parties as he doesn't not seem inclined to want to work off of the bench. In any case, he is still an effective hitter, and if he does stick around, has potential to be a backup 1b- something the Sox lack right now, unless the plan is having Tek start everyday and moving Martinez to 1st in case of injury. Depth at 3rd is also important, seeing Beltre's performance last year, however, between Hall, Scutaro, Lowrie when healthy, and Hulett, there are a lot of other, cheaper players ready to man the hot corner, probably more effectively than Mikey can at this point in his career (or hip). I still expect him to be moved, but if he stayed he could provide some reserve hitting abilities against lefty batters for days when they wanted to keep Martinez catching but didn't want Ortiz hitting. Really, his role would be limited enough with the team that I can't imagine him being there opening day.
So then, if we assume he probably won't be there, there are some other options. Most obvious, and probably most likely, is bring Lowrie back in- he should be able to provide at least as good defense in the infield as Hall, but (assuming he's healed), better offense. Tug Hulett is also a recent pickup who could provide depth as a middle infielder (though has also played inning in the OF corners) from Pawtucket- it could be that the idea is to move Hulett to Boston as a backup IF, keeping Lowrie in Pawtucket so he can get consistent PAs instead of sitting on the bench. Another possible option is a backup 1B- there's still quite a market out there of first basemen who are unimpressive, but certainly good enough to serve as a backup- although since they probably wouldn't sign anyone until Lowell is dealt, it will be hard to say what kind of market will remain. Still, they don't seem to have an obvious backup solution at 1b apart from moving Varitek to everyday catcher, so this seems like possibly the most likely move.
As it stands now however, while this bench may not be overpowering, it is extremely versatile and very deep- there's players it would hurt to lose but there is no position that couldn't be covered by either the regular bench players or the players in the high minors such as Lowrie, Hulett, and Reddick. Hopefully we won't see too much of any of them, but as we know, injuries almost always will pop up.
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I think Lowell will be gone & we need a BU 1B
If Lowell is moved that should free up a couple of mil to sign a bu 1b. I like Tatis. He hit well the last 2 yrs and plays both corner OF & Inf. also played a couple @ 2b & ss. I dont know how his Def is though
yeah agreed about the backup 1b
Tatis doesn’t seem like a bad option, really. Versatile and not a bad hitter. My absolute favorite would be Branyan- perfect bench 1b, with decent defense and a very solid bat- but I’m sure after his 2009, he’s going to finagle a starting job somewhere, even though he almost certainly won’t be able to play every day. I still would be happy to see Aaron Bates get a shot as the backup, I like what I’ve seen of him and what I’ve heard about him.
Branyan would be nice
But I think he’s looking to start too. Would be nice to have if Ortiz cont to go south
Third option
In between “great” and “not enough” is the “decent at the moment, let’s see how things shake out when June comes around” option. That’s where I think we’re at.
I think it was Beane who put forth the three-part season, each phase lasting about two months: see what you’ve got, get what you need and let ‘em play. I’ve always like that, and I think we can see what we’ve got at this point, with the caveat that Lowell will be traded eventually.
well it's "to be ready for the 2010 season"
so your answer would be yes. Doesn’t mean you don’t think it’ll change over the year.
Okay, I'll say it
I don’t really understand Hermida’s role on this team. He’s left-handed so he’s not exactly the right choice to spell Drew/Ellsbury against tough LHP, is below average defensively at the corners as he hasn’t had a positive UZR season in RF or LF since 2005 so forget CF, and his numbers against right-handers isn’t that much better than Cameron’s (although that’s definitely a better role for him anyway).
I understand that he has lots of potential with the bat, and maybe they can teach him some 1B to compensate, but I guess I would just prefer a more…traditional OF bench bat.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Jan 21, 2010 2:47 PM EST reply actions
I think their hopes for him are not for 2010
in 2010, he’ll play off the bench, yes, meaning that Drew will probably be sitting more against righties and less against lefties. I think the hope is just that he ressurects and proves that he can provide a lot of value for his cost in the future. It does seem like a slightly odd gamble, but I’m very curious to see how he pans out.
How will he get enough playing time to prove any value?
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
I don't think it's guaranteed that he does
but I also think that part of the thinking is that with a right fielder with an injury history and a 37 year old CF, it’s probably best to have a backup OF who you wouldn’t mind seeing out there every day, should something happen.
Problem is, I don't really want to see him in RF
Only in LF. Which is fine since Cameron can probably cover all 3 OF positions and Ellsbury can cover CF. But still, defensively Hermida is limited. But maybe they teach him some 1B in ST and it won’t be so bad.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Jan 22, 2010 2:25 PM EST up reply actions
But do we want Hermida out there every day? And do we think we should be paying $3M for an outfielder who cannot field and might not be able to hit? I just do not buy the “reclamation project” angle and its hard to believe he is an ideal 4th OF’er. My guess is that we flip him before the season.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
Drew/Cameron(age) will need days off
Ellsbury will shift to CF when Cams out. Hermida also hit RHP pretty well and could ph for Cam/Beltre late in the gm. Plus he has some upside
Drew
Is actually a decent hitter against lefties (0.863 OPS last year and a 0.926 OPS in 2008). More than likely against some tough Righties, Cameron might get rested Ellsbury shifts over to CF and Hermida plays Left where he can’t be any worse defensively than JBay was.
Cameron should see every lefty that they throw at us – 0.954 OPS in 2009, 0.951 in 2008
So on most occasions/against lefties: Ellsbury/Cameron/Drew
On some occasions against righties and to rest the 37 yr old Cameron: Hermida/Ellsbury/Drew
On some occasions to rest Drew: Ellsbury/Cameron/Hermida
Long term injury?? Who knows
Hall
Hall also hits lefties significantly (0.893 OPS in 2008, Lifetime 0.810 OPS) better than righties and can play the OF to spell Drew on occasion
Mauer
I want to see Joe Mauer in a sox uniform some time soon. Im still upset we didnt get Matt Holliday. Sox are a aging batting team with decent pitching but not enough to fend off the yanks any more
Only the season will tell if their pitching and defense can fend off the yanks
I’m guessing it’ll do a pretty good job, so i guess my crystal ball reads differently than yours. You’re right that steps haven’t been made to make the team younger this year (except at 3b), but all the batters have been signed to very short term contracts so that it won’t be long until the next crop of prospects is able to hit the majors.
I think you’re wrong in saying that Holliday would have been an answer to that problem, as he will be getting paid huge money until he is 36.
Mauer I see no reason to discuss until the Twins actually fail to re-sign him (unlikely), other than to say, yes, every team in the majors would like to see him in their uniform.
you know, only 3 bona fide aces
and two other potential aces. It’s no guaranteed 5 ace rotation. Decent.
clearly Theo *failed* by not getting Lee, Halladay and Hernandez !
I guess we’ll just have to limp by with the scrubs that we’ve got.
To be sure.
It’s a weak man who makes due with anything less than 5 of the 3 best pitchers in the league!
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jan 22, 2010 2:10 PM EST up reply actions
and people think he's a good GM
just because there aren’t any better rotations out there. Silly silly silly.
Adding to 2010 Bench
We’re dreaming to think Lowell will accept a bench role permanently, so expect him to be traded by mid-season. Hermida could be a sleeper, I saw him with the Marlins and he brings a power bat (though admitedly inconsistent) and a gun for an arm, suited for LF. What he nor anyone else currently in consideration for the bench brings is speed. I’d love to see the Sox pursue Endy Chavez—a superb defender, speedy runner/decent basestealer and good contact hitter. Granted, carries a question mark reg. his knees, but with clean bill of health would make an excellent bench addition.
well lowell would accept a bench role
what else would he do, void his contract? The FO would love that. That said, he would be unhappy, and I don’t think management wants him to be on the bench so I’m sure he’ll be traded.

by 

























