No Question: Pedro Martinez Was The Red Sox's Best Starter Of The Decade
You really shouldn't have to think about this one for long. Long? How about, "not at all"? When the words "great pitcher" are uttered, Pedro Martinez's name is right there with the rest of the MLB's greats. Now that we're talking about the Red Sox's best pitchers in the last decade, it's easy to know who's first in line.
First we went with hitters. Then we continued with relievers. Now we finish with the 10 best starting pitching seasons of the decade for the Red Sox.
The top 10 are after the jump, in descending order (and, once again, we are using FIP as our judge o' talent):
10. Curt Schilling - 2006 (3.59 FIP)
204 ip, 3.97 era, 1.21 whip, 6.54 so/bb
In one of the Red Sox's worst years of the decade, Curt Schilling put together his second-best performance in Beantown. Schilling was solid, but not great like he was in 2004. He was the ace of the staff in 2006 because Josh Beckett, in his second year with the Sox, struggled mightily. Schill showed pinpoint control like his entire career, as he issued just 28 walks in 2006.
9. Pedro Martinez - 2004 (3.58 FIP)
217 ip, 3.90 era, 1.17 whip, 3.72 so/bb
Even in Pedro's last season with the Red Sox -- and one which most fans saw Pedro's skills fall down a slippery slope -- he cracks the top 10 list. That's just how good Pedro was. Pedro's numbers certainly weren't Pedro-esque, but they were good compared to the rest of the league. His WHIP was a pretty little 1.17 and he struck out 9.4 batters per nine innings. Pedro would have one more good year in his tank (2005), but after that we haven't seen a resurgence.
8. Derek Lowe - 2002 (3.34 FIP)
219.2 ip, 2.58 era, 0.97 whip, 2.65 so/bb
In his first full season as a starter, Lowe was magnificent, winning 21 games and finishing third in the Cy Young voting. Not too bad for a closer, huh? The durable Lowe hasn't looked back, as he is still a starter with the Atlanta Braves. Lowe in 2002, however, was the best Lowe has ever been. As a starter, he's never duplicated his numbers from 2002; not even close, actually. It was fun to watch him and Pedro in '02. Two of the best starters in the league were teammates.
7. Josh Beckett - 2008 (3.24 FIP)
174.1 ip, 4.03 era, 1.18 whip, 5.06 so/bb
People look at Josh Beckett's 2008 season as a disappointment from the outside. But really, if you look deeper, he was one of the best in 2008. Despite the 4.03 ERA, he ranks 7th on this list. All his numbers really check out except his ERA which, most of us know, is not the best indicator of talent. However, to see his 4+ ERA combined with all these 2+'s and 3+'s is quite interesting. Beckett was quite good in both 2008 and 2007, only having "down" seasons in 2006, his first season with the Sox.
6. Jon Lester - 2009 (3.15 FIP)
203.1 ip, 3.41 era, 1.23 whip, 3.52 so/bb
When we do this again in 2019 (holy crap), Jon Lester might litter this list. But for now, this is his only spot in the top 10 -- and I'll take it. Lester really came into his own in 2009 and made a case for him to be the "ace" in 2010. While some would like to give the title to him and others have reservations, Lester is, at the least, a great pitcher. One that is only getting better, too. Lester could be the "Pedro" down the line. (Note: I am not saying he could be as good as Pedro, as nice as that would be. However, he could stand out in the next decade as the Sox's best.)
5. Curt Schilling - 2004 (3.11 FIP)
226.2 ip, 3.26 era, 1.06 whip, 5.80 so/bb
The 2004 season was certainly Big Schill's best year as a Red Sox. He did everything well, including leading the Red Sox to a World Series title. That part was nice. In terms of his performance though, he was a workhorse and he kept runners off the bases. Schilling did exactly what the Red Sox wanted him to do when they brought him in: win and bring the Sox to a World Series. Check and check.
4. Josh Beckett - 2007 (3.08 FIP)
200.2 ip, 3.27 era, 1.14 whip, 4.85 so/bb
What Schilling did in 2004 was what Josh Beckett did in 2007: win and lead the Red Sox to a World Series title. Beckett, who finished second in the Cy Young race to C.C. Sabathia, really should have been the American League Cy Young -- especially if his playoff performance could have been factored in. This is the season in which Beckett stood out and said "I'm the ace." In my opinion, he's still there, but 2010 will be a big season for him as its the last year on his contract.
Now it's time to just get ridiculous...
3. Pedro Martinez - 2002 (2.24 FIP)
199.1 ip, 2.26 era, 0.92 whip, 5.98 so/bb
2. Pedro Martinez - 2003 (2.21 FIP)
186.2 ip, 2.22 era, 1.03 whip, 4.38 so/bb
1. Pedro Martinez - 2000 (2.17 FIP)
217 ip, 1.74 era, 0.73 whip, 8.88 so/bb
Yes, those numbers are real and are in no way fabricated. Pedro Martinez was just that dirty.
Let's just look at his 2000 for the sake of dominance. Did you know that Pedro had the best ERA in the American League that season with a 1.74? If you had guessed, it was probably a safe guess. But take a gander at what the second best ERA was in the American League was. I'll wait for your answer...
Whatever you said, you were wrong because it was Roger Clemens with a 3.70 as a Yankee. Three point seven freaking oh. That's almost two full runs worse than Pedro! Pedro Martinez was just that dirty.
Pedro led the American League in every stat imaginable that season except BB/9, which he lost out to David Wells by zero point freakin' one. Hands down, Pedro's 2000 season will go down as one of the best ever.
(I also realized Tuesday night that I actually saw Pedro in person that season. It was a July 23 day game against the White Sox. Pedro pitched a complete-game shutout and the Red Sox won, 1-0. He struck out 15 White Sox in that game. It's a game I'll remember forever.)
One more thing about Pedro's 2000 season: HOW DID HE NOT WIN THE MVP?! Jason Giambi won, if you were curious. I'm sure if voters could look back, they'd change their vote in hindsight because we may never see another pitching season like that again. Pedro Martinez was just that dirty.
Pedro Martinez was great. He may be the best Red Sox pitcher we ever see. We may not see a pitcher in Major League Baseball like him again. We may not see anything close to him.
But at the very least, we got to see him. We got to see greatness.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
2000
Pedro in 2000 was arguably the best performance ever by a starting pitcher in MLB history. He put up those incredible numbers in a small park, in a tough division, when PEDs were at their peak.
Absolutely.
Pedro’s 2000 was absolutely ridiculous. I wish I could have a DVD of that year.
Pedro doesn’t have the longevity of, say, Greg Maddux, but it’s 2000 that makes me think he’s the best pitcher of all time.
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jan 15, 2010 7:27 AM EST up reply actions
+ many
I would also pay an outrageous amount for a 30 DVD set.
Building Fenway from the ground up - Virtual Fenway
It's those 3 years
that are going to make him a HOFer too.
Agreed.
I also wish I could have a DVD of that season.
I love Petey
He’ll always be one of my favorite players. I’m so glad I got to see him live (in his prime)a number of times. He’s by far the best pitcher I ever saw.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
Pedro's 2000
I posted this in another thread but digging into that 2000 Season
12-1 on the road with 5 CG and 3 Shutouts and a ridiculous 0.681 WHIP
Held Lefties to an overall OPS of .406 including a 0.190 OBP. Basically Lefties stepped into the batters box 420 times and reached base 80 times.
In August he walked 2 batters the entire month and struck out 51! a 25.5 SO/BB ratio
He held righties to a .544 OPS
He also had a 3.28 ERA in his losses and no decisions. The Sox were a bad offensive team in 2000, and the rest of the pitching staff pretty much sucked. The only reason to watch that team was to see Pedro and Nomar.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Jan 15, 2010 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
the mound was lowered in the late 60's
the bob gibson rule or something.
i think this changed the dynamics of pitching and started decreasing complete games while increasing the need for relieve pitching. pitching staffs increased to 10.
lower mound favored hitters but that obviously didn’t hinder pedro
Of course that must have not affected the 1980's Oakland A's
Their Starting 5 pitched every game with the exception of 3 and they completed 93 games between them with Rick Langford closing out 28 of his 33 starts….amazing
what about the orioles?
i think in 1970, they had 4 20 game winners – palmer, mcnally, cuevar and some other flash in the pan dotty dobson.
i just got off my butt and looked it up – 1971 (Cuellar, Jim Palmer, Pat Dobson, and Dave McNally). the amazing thing was this is prior to the “coincidental superstar, everyone is a fifty homer hitter, sending taters further than nasa” era.
not bad, i almost nailed it, unlike kurt warner.
the a’s were one of the teams that successfully implemented a bullpen. they kind of started an era.
wasnt this before the 5 man rotation?
Didnt they use the 4 man rotation back then?
I remember
going to a game in 1999 seeing pedro pitch against Seattle. Nomar went off and went 4 for 5 driving in 3 (he is my favorite player). Got to see Ken Griffey Jr play. Well anyways Pedro went off and stuck out 15 Mariners in 8 innings!!!!!!!!!!
Well in the 2nd inning we went to get a couple of beers and saw a Yankee fan in line. So we busted his chops a little for being at Fenway wearing a Yankees cap and the Yankees werent even there. We didnt get rough or anything like that, even shook his hand after he got a beer LOL. Well we got shut off, when I asked why they said cuz we gave him a hard time. I said he was a Yankee fan at Fenway when the Mariners were in town, we should bust his balls a little, its not like we were beating him up, he even understood it.
So we got a couple of beers from another line. As my friend was walking up to the seats, security grabs him and kicks him out in the bottom of the 2nd. He missed the whole game and a chance to see Pedro get 15 K’s in 8 Innings. I couldnt believe it!!!!!! Just glad it wasnt me that got kicked out LOL
oh yeah
He pretty much just walked around Fenway for the next 2 hours until the rest of us came out.
I was at that 7/23/00 game too
The infamous Izzy Alcantara scores the only run of the game. I think that Magglio leadoff double in the ninth was a ground ball that took a ridiculous hop over Nomar’s head. The next 3 go strikeout, pop out, strikeout. Game over.
izzy
Do you remember how badly Izzy was booed in his early PAs? Then he scores the run and he was like Elvvis back from the dead.
SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow Randy on Twitter: @RCBooth
by Randy Booth on Jan 15, 2010 3:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
WOW!!
Pedro’s 2000 season was almost a full run better than Beckett’s 2007 when he arguably should have won the Cy Young. RIDONKULOUS
It was actually well over a full run better.
1.74 ERA
USG
by Ben Buchanan on Jan 15, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions
Pedro's 2000...
Is a prime example of why the BBWAA should not be allowed to vote on anything by themselves.
That’s why BBWAA is the first syllable of the Evil laugh: BBWAAHAHAHA!!!
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
COMMENT SCORE.
Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.
I have a five-tool player in my pants.
I remember for those summers, when Pedro pitched, there was no question what my buddies and I were doing; we were watching Pedro. We were only 15 years old and we all knew that he was special. I don’t think I will ever see a Boston athlete that dominant again (although 2007 Tom Brady was pretty close).
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by 




























