Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

Internal Development: The Evolution of the Red Sox's Farm System

Once named Minor League News' Farm System of the Year (2005), the Red Sox organization has developed one of the most impactful systems in all of baseball; a trend likely to continue.

Once named Minor League News' Farm System of the Year (2005), the Red Sox organization has developed one of the most impactful systems in all of baseball; a trend likely to continue.

The Red Sox held their annual Rookie Program this past Monday. The event has garnered increased exposure and attention the last few seasons in light of recent developmental successes.

Boston's front office has always had a decisive approach in the way that they manage the still-developing talent via their minor league affiliates. However, it is only recently that this approach has been altered -- albeit dramatically. There once was a time when you'd be hard-pressed to find a key contributor on the roster who was developed internally; something that likely had a direct influence on Boston's long-suffered title drought prior to 2004.

However, Boston's developmental approach and major league-level success have simultaneously improved during the "Theo Epstein Era;" a less than coincidental occurrence. With more emphasis being placed on the stockpiling of young talent for future use rather than trade-bait, the Red Sox have built one of the most impressive and impactful core of prospects in Major League Baseball. The current roster offers an accurate reflection of that, as well as a little insight into the future.

Star-divide

The Red Sox's organization had drafted its share of gems prior to Theo Epstein's arrival, only with less frequency. However, it was a common occurrence to see those high-ceiling prospects traded for an already established player in an attempt to upgrade the major league team, even at the expense of depleting the system. While some instances stemmed positive results, there are a number of current MLB-notables that were once property of the Red Sox; their current success being absorbed retrospectively with a certain level of repressed animosity by the Fenway-faithful.

Nowadays, home-grown talent at Fenway Park is a refreshing normalcy relative to other big-market teams. Though Red Sox fans are not far removed from the days when trade rumors would spark speculation as to what big-name acquisition their club could potentially land, with little to no consideration for the price.

However, today is a different story.

Now, every prospect involved in trade discussions is subsequently involved in discussions amongst fans regarding everything from their current market value to their projected ceiling. A fact that is not lost on the instigator of this so-called 'youth movement,' Theo Epstein:

"Five or six years ago, the fan on the street wanted to go tell you what superstar you should go trade for using all your prospects," Epstein said. "Then a couple years ago, they started telling you what superstars you should promote from Double A to Triple A to the big leagues. Now they want to tell you who to draft."

Epstein has only himself to blame, or thank for that matter, regarding fans' evolved expectations.

While this more economically-friendly angle began in direct correspondence with Epstein's inception as the general manager of the Boston Red Sox in 2002, the culmination of his efforts are best represented by the resulting success of the 2005 draft -- namely those players selected in the first round. All five of Boston's first round choices have already contributed on the major league level; those picks include Jacoby Ellsbury (23rd), Craig Hansen (26th), Clay Buchholz (42nd), Jed Lowrie (45th) and Michael Bowden (47th). Each of the aforementioned individuals have encountered different successes in the years since, perhaps making this draft class one of Epstein's most prideful accomplishments during his tenure as GM.

As the 2005 draft offers a specific citation of success in relation to management's overall theme-change pertaining to internal development, the same can be said for the current youth-laden roster -- though, in a more generalized sense.

Kevin Youkilis, Dustin Pedroia, Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, Daniel Bard, Jed Lowrie, Jon Lester, Manny Delcarmen, Jonathan Papelbon

The players that form the above list have accrued an impressive list of accolades during their short-lived careers. Not surprisingly, given the context of this article, that same list is comprised solely of players developed internally within the Red Sox organization (on the current active roster). 

Such success stories have aided in the promotion of an 'eye on the future' mentality among the Red Sox fan base. That farsighted approach towards the construction of the organization has been the cause of much deliberation this off season.

While most fans awaited Theo Epstein's first big acquisition this off season in response to the rival Yankees' World Series Championship, the calm and collected general manager instead offered intentions of retooling amidst a self-proclaimed 'bridge period;' a period primarily focused on the potential of the farm system. Epstein spent ample time gauging the cost that accompanied trading for players such as Roy Halladay and Adrian Gonzalez at the onset of the Winter Meetings -- ultimately scoffing at the idea of packaging multiple promising prospects.

His reluctancy is not only a sign of the times, it's a warranted unwillingness upon reviewing the future prospects that currently inhabit the farm system.

Players such as Casey Kelly, Ryan Westmoreland, Josh Reddick, Ryan Kalish, Reymond Fuentes and Jose Iglesias are just a small sampling of prospects currently offering a glimpse into the future of the Red Sox from within the system -- a glimpse that is still a few years from fruition, hence the term 'bridge period.'

This oft-described 'bridge period' is conceptualized on Epstein's philosophy that the free agent market should only be used as a resource when building around a primarily cost-efficient core of internally developed players, and not vice-versa. With so much promising young talent with E.T.A.'s ranging from 2-4 years, Boston's hesitancy is seemingly justifiable.

No less than a decade ago, under similar cirumstances, the Red Sox would likely have pulled the trigger on a deal involving Clay Buchholz, Casey Kelly or Ryan Westmoreland for a quick fix. Around the same time the Red Sox were still searching for their first title in 80+ years. Again, the correlation between the two is palpable, to say the least.

Named Minor League News' Farm System of the Year in 2005, the Red Sox's scouting and development departments have undergone vast improvements under the guidance of Epstein and company. Coupled with a supremely-talented international scouting department, the newly-emphasized importance on draft preparation and execution conjures up little validity to the potential that this progressive trend suddenly cease to continue -- something that incites more enthusiasm nowadays within 'Red Sox Nation' than it would have pre-Epstein, and with good reason.

0 recs  |  Comment 20 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Since Theo started running things, the Sox have failed to sign 3 top-10 picks

Two of them #10s

That’s quite the track record. Sure, it helps to have a ton of money, but the Sox had plenty of money when they passed up on a certain #9 pick.

The money they’re committing to IFA of late is pretty ridiculous, too. It remains to be seen if the big money picks are a good idea in that market (Iglesias, Vinicio, to say nothing of the Alcantra brothers who were sporting high-80s fastballs at age 16) compared to, say, mass smaller signings.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 14, 2010 8:38 AM EST reply actions  

mhmm

I agree with your point regarding ‘big money picks’…

by Logan Lietz on Jan 14, 2010 8:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Of course, there's only so much space in the DSL

And a lot of Iglesias’ worth comes from being only a year or two away.

Guys like Vinicio and the Alcantras—$1 million on a 16 year old—are the real questions.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 14, 2010 9:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I'd throw Almanzar's name in there....

…if it weren’t for the fact that I like him so much (regardless of how raw he may still be).

If I remember correctly we gave him like $1.5 million to sign, although he wasn’t quite as young as 16, he’s not nearly as polished as some of the other younger “bonus babies” that we’ve acquired.

by Logan Lietz on Jan 14, 2010 9:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Indeed. There's plenty of others.

Engel Beltre, Oscar Perez, and Oscar Tejeda all saw half-a-million-or-more.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 14, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Hm...

Now I’m thinking this warrants a story. And I’m on one of my writing kicks.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 15, 2010 7:29 AM EST up reply actions  

"That’s quite the track record. Sure, it helps to have a ton of money"

good post.

i don’t think the draft pick signings count against the cap. if true, i’m thinking that these picks become a good business decision – as they get the minimum for 3 full seasons in the bigs.

so, ultimately, the signings, as compared to the cap, could be a very good value.

but, you have to make the right picks.

by Mick Lowe on Jan 14, 2010 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

right they don't count against the cap

that’s just about how much money they actually have to spend

by wolf9309 on Jan 14, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Just to clarify

Epstein was not the GM when Teixeira was drafted and not signed by the Sox – good ole Duquette was.

by AGuinness on Jan 14, 2010 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

No but he did see

Matt LaPorta, Pedro Alvarez and Steven Pearce all go unsigned.

Of course, Im not throwing blame around here, as they were super long shots to begin with…

by alskor on Jan 14, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Indeed

Teixeira was more willing to sign than those guys. The Red Sox just wouldn’t meet his demands back then, and Boras told him to walk.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Jan 14, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

It may have even been worse than that

I was under the impression they spread word to other teams he was unsignable.

by alskor on Jan 14, 2010 4:03 PM EST up reply actions  

…getting him to drop, and then they lowballed him…

by alskor on Jan 14, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Not only that...

… but other teams don’t sign some good players that we ended up with: Ellsbury could be roaming the outfield in Tampa Bay, Daniel Bard could be throwing bullets for the Evil Empire, Alex Wilson could making his way through the Cubs’ system and so on and so forth.

by AGuinness on Jan 14, 2010 3:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm excited for this year

but I am even more excited for the next couple of seasons. I’ hoping the next wave of prospects (Manifest, Kelly, Iglesias, Kalish, etc.) rival the success of the Pedroia/Lester/Ellsbury wave that came a couple of years ago.

by MikeAtBU on Jan 14, 2010 12:30 PM EST reply actions  

Drafts - By Year

Drafts By Year including only players who have made appearances in the big leagues

Skipping 2009 – 2007 since no players from those drafts have made it

2006 (Epstein) – Bard (1), Masterson (2), Bates (3), Richardson (5), LaPorta (14, did not sign), Reddick (17)

Notable Prospects: Anderson (18), Kalish (9)

2005 (Epstein) – Ellsbury (1), Hansen (1), Buchholz (1s), Lowrie (1s), Bowden (1s), H. Jones (UDFA)

Notable Prospects: Wagner (9), Exposito (31)

2004 (Epstein) – Pedroia (2), Meredith (6), Steven Pearce (10, did not sign)

2003 (Epstein) – Murphy (1), Murton (1s), A. Alvarez (2), Papelbon (4)

2002 (Port) – Lester(2), Chris Smith (4), Moss (8), Ricky Romero (37, did not sign), Brian Bannister (45, did not sign), Charlie Zink (UDFA)

2001 (Duquette) – Shoppach (2), Matt Chico (2s, did not sign), Youkilis (8)

2000 (Duquette) – Dumatrait (1), Delcarmen (2), F. Sanchez (11), Gabbard (29), D. Brown (35),

by BobZupcic on Jan 14, 2010 12:39 PM EST reply actions  

Duquette

Duquette’s drafts in the late 90’s are just heinous…..

Bob Zupcic was drafted in the first round in 1987

by BobZupcic on Jan 14, 2010 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

The Sox have been drafting extremely well in the Epstein years: Baseball America have them ranked 2nd in all baseball in the 2005-2008 span:
Team 08 07 06 05 GPA
Giants A A A C 3.50
Red Sox A C+ B+ A 3.50
Rays B A A C+ 3.38
Dbacks C B A A 3.25
They were very aggressive when they liked a player ceiling, never hesitating to go way over the slot for some of them (Kelly, RWML, Younginer, Renfroe, Lars…). That willingness made up for the lack of high draft picks.
In the last years, we saw the organization going from drafting polished College kids to drafting HS kids with high ceiling: I noticed that most of those kids are very athletic, some of them are 2 sports stars (Renfroe and Kelly have scholarship to UT and Ole Miss, Westy is a terrific basketball player, Fuentes is track champion…), some of them are polished (Westmoreland, Hissey and Kelly) and others need a lot of work (Fuentes Middlesbrook) and they think that they can develop them
For the IFA signings, I’m not delighted: Tejada and Almanzar are not showing the potential nor the tools that made them big bonus babies and are a year away from being called “Busts”. Ironically, the ones that has been signed for small signing bonuses are the ones who are showing the best potential: Navarro and Pimentel had 25 K bonus each.

"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur

by radiohix on Jan 14, 2010 7:42 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tardy_001_small
The negativity
Tatersox_small
I Demand Blood

Recent FanPosts

Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Minor League Rankings
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
It's Not Over Yet,  But....
Small
OTM Fantasy Football?
Tatersox_small
A Yahoo Fantasy Reminder
Small
2011 Roster/Lineup Formation
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Portland SeaDogs Report
Small
TB vs. BOS series (Aug. 27-29)
T
Welcome to the 2010 Red Sox Playoffs! Starting early (August)? This may be as good as it gets.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

ATLANTA - APRIL 22:  Omar Infante #4 of the Atlanta Braves celebrates after scoring against the Philiadelphia Phillies at Turner Field on April 22, 2010 in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Albert Pujols, Joey Votto, And The Triple Crown Villains Who Plot Their Ruin

Washington Nationals' Nyjer Morgan, center, is led off the field after a brawl during the sixth inning of a baseball game against the Florida Marlins, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010, in Miami. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee) +4 updates

Nats, Marlins Brawl After Nyjer Morgan Charges Mound

Photo

Aroldis Chapman Touches 104, Earns First Win As Reds Rally Past Brewers

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Red-sox-yankees_small BerkshireFan

Photo_small wolf9309