Interview with ESPN Boston's Amy K. Nelson
I recently sent a set of questions to Amy K. Nelson, the new Red Sox beat writer for the brand-spankin' new ESPN Boston. She was kind enough to answer those questions for all of the great readers here at Over The Monster. Here's the Q&A:
1) First of all, how is it covering the Sox for the new ESPN Boston? What is the experience like for you? Has there been any challenges so far?
It's been very challenging but has also renewed my belief that a baseball beat is by far the most difficult to cover. Period. Not only is the travel brutal, but you have to arrive each day and try and come up with something different and creative to write (if you so choose). That is extremely difficult, and I have nothing but respect for my colleagues who do it every year. The biggest challenge is coming onto a beat when the season is almost over. I have not been following the team as closely as a beat guy would, and therefore don't have as much context and certainly not as many relationships established - an absolute must if you're going to be competitive on a beat. Luckily, I used to be based in Boston so that has helped me in some ways, but it's still a challenge.
2) Speaking of ESPN Boston, many people already think ESPN has an "east coast bias." This obviously isn't going to erase those thoughts. But what kind of things are we going to see from ESPN Boston that we wouldn't normally see from ESPN itself?
I think this is probably a better question for the bosses, but generally speaking, I believe the goal is to provide excellent local coverage on all the New England teams, just as any local outlet would (and obviously the goal would be to do it better.)
3) Are sportswriters starting to come around to the "SABR" way of using stats? If not, why do you think that is?
I saw my colleague Jerry Crasnick answer a question like this in a chat recently, and I think he nailed it: he peruses many of the SABR-friendly sites on a regular basis, but that doesn't mean that narrative and story telling should go by the wayside. If you've read my work before, I tend to be much more interested in the human element of the game than on the stats. It's just a personal preference; I'd rather write a story about the struggles of people like Rod Beck or Fred Lewis, or how everyone collided at that intersection the night Nick Adenhart died, than analyze them statistically. And that's not a knock on the SABR community at all. There's a reason why the BP guys are enormously successful at what they do and why colleague Keith Law has a crazy, intense and smart following - and not just because he's a foodie who's well-read (though I still say Cook's Illustrated is great; he's not a fan).
4) Now to the Red Sox: the Sox have obviously benefited from acquiring Alex Gonzalez. Although historically his bat has been nothing special and his defense has declined over the years, what's the feedback from the front office, Tito and his teammates regarding what he's brought to the team?
Look for more on that from me in the near future, but I will tell you that it seems this guy has always had a quiet efficiency; he's not one of the top shortstops who come to mind when you think of the position defensively, but current and past teammates have effusive praise for him. His acquisition could wind up being a very key one if they Red Sox go deep into the playoffs (and it's already paid big dividends).
5) Billy Wagner has been very good for the Sox. His time on the mound is limited, but do you expect the Sox to use him more in the postseason, if need be? Do you think the Sox would be hesitant to use him in a one-run setup situation?
I know Wagner wants to pitch on back-to-back days if he could, but they simply will not allow him. As of right now, I think they are going to keep it pretty conservative with him, and unless there are bullpens issues that blow up over the next two weeks, they will stick with their plan. I know Wagner wants to push it, but that is just his personality; you can certainly understand, it's a natural thing for him to want to ramp it up.
6) What do you expect the catching/first base/third base situation to look like next year?
The catching situation should be Victor Martinez as a mostly full-time catcher; you can see how quickly they have integrated him into the staff, and there's even a possibility he will catch Beckett before the year is out, though not a guarantee.
7) Clay Buchholz looks like he's finally -- well, Clay Buchholz. He's been great for a couple of months now. Do you think he'll be able to continue this success through the postseason?
Angels manager Mike Scioscia said the biggest difference he's seen in Buchholz is his confidence. Orioles manager Dave Trembley said it was his ability to command the zone, especially with the fastball. If Buchholz is able to continue with this consistency and obviously command the zone, he will be effective. But you never know how a young player will react once he reaches the postseason. Working with Victor Martinez has been huge for him. I spoke to him at Yankee stadium over a month ago, when Martinez had only caught him twice, and he was already raving then about the battery and his comfort level with Martinez.
8) If the Sox make the playoffs (I still have to throw that "if" in there), are there any players that could be on the fringe for making the 25-man roster for the ALDS? Where does a guy like Casey Kotchman or Nick Green fit in?
Look for me to address this soon, but as we know, Nick Green's status is questionable. I'm not sure if this couldn't be something more serious...
9) Who will be the left fielder for the Red Sox next season? Will Jason Bay be back, or is a player like Matt Holliday due for Boston?
I think most everyone in that clubhouse thinks the Red Sox are crazy if they don't bring back Bay. He is universally liked and respected, with many players calling him their MVP.
10) What are your predictions for this year's AL Cy Young and AL MVP?
Greinke and Mauer.
Be sure to check out Amy's ESPN blog and make sure to follow Amy on Twitter @amyknelson. (I follow her -- her tweets are top-notch, if I say so myself. Oh, and she's a "Mad Men" fan -- that makes her No. 1 in my book.)
0 recs |
19 comments
|
Comments
In a related note
I don’t know if this has been discussed here but one of the best Yankee beat writers; Pete Abraham is defecting and joining the ranks of the Globe. You’ve all probably been to his blog yankees.lhblogs.com at least once or twice. He’s from Mass and a sox/pats fan at heart so you’ll probably enjoy his stuff. He has one of the most visited Yankee sites on the internets right now, we’ll surely miss him.
Strikeouts are boring- Besides that, they're fascist. Throw some ground balls - it's more democratic.
by CasanovaWong on Sep 24, 2009 10:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Another passenger on the Gonzo Bandwagon!!
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllll aboard!!
Glad you threw in the question about the “east coast bias”.
(I follow her — her tweets are top-notch, if I say so myself. Oh, and she’s a “Mad Men” fan — that makes her No. 1 in my book.)
♥ Randy’s in looo-oove! Randy’s in looo-ooove!! ♥ (You have to admit, “her tweets are top notch” does sound kinda dirty)
Man I love that tuna casserole.
by Bloggy on Sep 24, 2009 12:09 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anything with the word "tweet" in it
Is inherently dirty.
by Randy Booth on Sep 24, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Quiet Man
As great a pickup as Victor Martinez was the for the Sox, I think Theo’s best move was getting Gonzales back at shortstop. Immediately, the Sox settled down and seem to look a better ballclub. No longer were balls hit to short suspenseful; Gonzo has gobbled them up and made them look easy, as he did when he was with us before. He does it all quietly, also hit .300 and has great respect from teammates, if not from some web managers who still don’t believe in him. This guy is a real pro and I hope the Sox keep him next year while we see what happens with Jed Lowrie.
Glad to hear Amy thinks V-Mart will be our regular catcher next year. Hope that’s true. Seen enough of ’Tek.
by ccthemovieman on Sep 24, 2009 12:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is a very interesting view that I would like to understand more.
My question to you is-why do you believe in Gonzalez? It sounds like a really dumb question, since he has been an upgrade for us and played well for the Sox. And don’t get me wrong-I am damn happy that he has played well for the Sox and I hope it continues. However, he has played a lot more SS over his whole career than he has for us this year, and over his career he is a terrible offensive player (let’s leave defense out of this because it is beside my main point and furthermore it is harder to quantify). Thus, the question is “why would you put faith in someones very limited good stretch when his much longer (and thus more reliable) body of work says that he stinks”?
by Buzzy on Sep 24, 2009 1:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My take
Firstly, look at who else is there to take his place. Green, who has shown this year that despite a hot streak is not a great offense addition to the line-up (let’s assume he’s healthy for the sake of this argument), and Jed Lowrie who is coming off injury and who, in the past (if memory serves), has been a very slow starter coming off injury and as such not necessarily an offensive plus.
But now you have Gonzo who is playing well offensively right now. “Should” he be? Probably not, but he is. Taking the name and stats off him, does it make sense to take a player who is playing well out of the line-up?
Has he not earned that spot?
Man I love that tuna casserole.
by Bloggy on Sep 24, 2009 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No doubt
Gonzo should be the starter for the reasons you mention. He is healthier and (perhaps) better than Green. He is healthier than Lowrie. He is playing well. These are the reasons. What makes me uncomfortable is statements to the effect that he should be the defacto starter next year (note that CC did not explicitly state this), that he is a good SS, etc. I wonder if people actually think his hitting will continue? Even for the Sox his wOBA (.341) is very solid for a SS but not spectacular. But it is 46 points above his career average of .295. And for us in 2006 his wOBA was .300. Those are horrible, horrible numbers. Would anyone be surprised if he reverted to this form in the playoffs? He should-because that is what he is. That is not to say that he should not be the regular SS in the playoffs, it is only to say that the “web managers who still don’t believe in him” are still correct despite his success. You cannot predict how something will turn out before it happens, you can only look at the large body of data to say what will happen, and that is the logical thing to do. If you win the lottery it does not mean that it was logical for you to play the lottery each week, or that you will win it again.
As for next year, indeed we will have to see about Jed’s health. But there is no logical reason to say that a healthy Jed Lowrie should not start because all that we know about these two players tells us that Lowrie is a better hitter and probably a better fielder too.
by Buzzy on Sep 24, 2009 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
I’m all about Gonzo right now. RIGHT NOW. After that, I think that if Jed is healthy he is definitely the way to go next year. I wouldn’t be adverse to keeping Gonzo in the Alex Cora role, though.
Man I love that tuna casserole.
by Bloggy on Sep 24, 2009 2:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I agree, too
Gonzo has done fantastic job this year but, for the future, Lowrie’s the man – at least I hope so. I just stated how impressed I was with the job Gonzo has done for us this year and how he has been a good influence. I still have high hopes for Jed and hope he stays healthy from now on.
by ccthemovieman on Sep 24, 2009 4:29 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not liking the answer to #3
It’s not an either/or scenario. Sports writers aren’t limited to either stats or storytelling. Stats help establish narratives, without them stories become exceptionally vague.
Let’s take an example of a player who nobody ever talks about, ever: Alex Gonzalez. You could write a story about how his return to the Red Sox has been a great success, he seems to get a hit every night. However, wouldn’t that story be more detailed and convincing if you included his batting average with the team and its improvement . Most writers have no problem using BA. It’s not much of a stretch to use OBP and slugging. In the case of Alex Gonzalez, you’d realize that he is not walking for the Sox at all, thus his OBP is only slightly higher than his BA. You’d also note that his power numbers are quite impressive in the short span that’s he playing. Does this preclude interviewing Tito or teammates, or discussing his clubhouse impact? Absolutely not.
There are people who can both write good narratives and understand / incorporate statistics in them. I’d like to see more use of SABR stats in sports journalism, since they help interpret the sport and provide insight into it.
My impression is the reluctance of the profession to embrace newfangled stats is due to lingering old school “runs ’n ribbies” traditionalism and sheer laziness / discomfort on the part of younger writers, who could learn some sabermetric stats but don’t. Nothing can be done for traditionalists, except maybe to fire them (see collected works of FJM), but younger writers are the hope for the future. Unfortunately, my guess is that most young / aspiring sports journalists are Humanities people with phobias for math and stats. Given the issues of finding new and creative stories over a 162 game season, sports writers probably need all the subjects they can get, and Sabermetric stats provides plenty of new subjects to write about (see THT, BP, Fangraphs).
"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.
by 0157H7 on Sep 24, 2009 4:01 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of FJM
This is why I really miss them.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 24, 2009 4:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let's put it this way:
What makes for a better story?
“Alex Gonzalez has been a bright spot at what has usually been a dark area for the Red Sox, filling in at shortstop with solid defense and a surprisingly quality bat”
or
“While Alex Gonzalez’ contributions to the Sox have been plentiful so far, there’s no ****ing way he keeps it up.”
by USG on Sep 24, 2009 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The second one.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 24, 2009 5:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Rec'd.
The preferred way would be to use anecdotal evidence to set up your point, and then slam it home with stats, but that’s not the most effective way, unfortunately. The most effective way is to do the opposite, and to explain, in laymen’s terms, the more advanced stats.
@bs_uf15bosox9be The Original Gameday; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Sep 24, 2009 6:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Rec'd.
I don’t want to see the stories that she described disappear – I just want baseball stories to stop evaluating players based on stats that were rendered ineffective before I started following baseball.
Although, I would have loved for her to cite FanGraphs as a SABR community – BP has fallen behind, in my opinion.
@bs_uf15bosox9be The Original Gameday; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Sep 24, 2009 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not understanding her response to #8....
“something bigger”..?
"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko
by sox-inda-south on Sep 24, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 



















