Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Gamestory: Bay's Resurgence, Lowell Takes A Stand Against Violence, Beckett Gets The Arbitrary W

Everyone's smiling after a win - except NG, 75bandwagon, etc.

More photos » by Elise Amendola - AP

Everyone's smiling after a win - except NG, 75bandwagon, etc.


Final - 8.12.2009 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 R H E
Detroit Tigers 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0
Boston Red Sox 0 1 2 0 5 0 0 0 X 8 11 0
WP: Josh Beckett (14 - 4)
LP: Zach Miner (5 - 3)

Complete Coverage >



290812102_tigers_redsox_138323345_lbig_medium

via www.fangraphs.com - More after the jump

Star-divide

SCOREBOARD WATCHING

The winning streak is now up to 3 games, with help from the Detroit Tigers. Unfortunately, the MFY won today,
so we don't pull any closer in the AL East. The Rays lost though, so there's that. Now if only the Rangers had lost, we'd be more than 1.5 games ahead in the Wild Card.

OFFENSIVE HIGHLIGHTS

Jason Bay and Mike Lowell continued their offensive shows, going 3/3 + 2 BB with a 2 run home run (and 2 doubles) and 3/4 with a solo home run, respectively. Other Sox reaching base were: Dustin Pedroia (1/5), David Ortiz (1/4 + BB), JD Drew (1/3 + BB), Casey Kotchman (1/4), and Nick Green (1/4 - garbage time double).

PITCHING HIGHLIGHTS

Josh Beckett went 7.0 innings on 97 pitches, giving up 3 hits, 1 walk, and only 2 runs on two solo home runs. He wasn't striking out a lot of guys tonight, tallying only 6 K's. Hideki Okajima and Ramon Ramirez worked a perfect and hitless inning, respectively, with 2 strikeouts each.

 

0 recs  |  Comment 69 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I don't care how many K's he gets

If he can go out every time and get 7 innings giving up only 2 runs? That will always be fine with me, because it means the Sox have a good chance to win.

Besides, it’s hard to get lots of K’s without running up some pitch counts.

by lone1c on Aug 12, 2009 11:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

True.

Just saying he wasn’t trying to run guys over like normal.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But high K numbers are generally correlated with low ERA’s.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd rather have the actual stats

Rather than the stats that are correlated.

by lone1c on Aug 13, 2009 8:14 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point of looking at K and BB numbers is:

that they are more predictive of future performance than ERA. Early in the season, Lester and Beckett were both giving up runs. However, many of us noticed their high K rates and low BB rates so we were fairly confident of their future success. At the same time, we looked at Dice-K’s peripherals and could tell he was in trouble. And guess what happened…

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dice-K never pitched well this season.

That was evident to anyone watching him, peripherals or not.

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Aug 13, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

he was

King people actually. He was giving up a lot of bombs and hits.

by Buzzy on Aug 13, 2009 11:56 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The point is that Dice, Beckett and Lester were all giving up runs, but using peripherals, it was clear that Beckett and Lester were unlucky while Dice was actually sucking.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

yes

I understand the point. However, DiceK had very funny peripherals more than just sucky ones. His K/BB numbers were actually better than last year. He had a severly high BAPIP, a high LD%age (almost 10 points up from his first 2 years), gave up a lot of HRs and had a bad LOB%. If you didn’t know about the LD% and did not watch him pitch, you could say he was having a fit of the fluctuations. His HR/FB% was high but not like Lester’s, his LD% was very high, and when you watched it was clear he was leaving all kinds of stuff right over the plate. So it is a case where watching +closer inspection of the peripherals tells a clearer story.

by Buzzy on Aug 13, 2009 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Exactly.

He over-regressed from last season.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true

watching the games is the point.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 3:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unluckiness is no guarantee the player will snap out of it.

Beckett was unlucky all of last season. That didn’t make his performance better.

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Aug 13, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

True

of course. BT’s point (which I know you understand) is that standard stats and peripherals are for different things. ERA and the like tell you how much success you had, while peripherals are used to try as best as possible to predict how much success you will have. You could also say that peripherals tell you how well you really pitched (eg Verlander has really been much better than Jackson this year even though his ERA is nearly a point higher) but that is something most tradionally minded fans would debate. Either way one type of statistic is not the replacement for the other.

by Buzzy on Aug 13, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

true.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 3:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bay heating up a little?

Couldn’t have happened at a better time

by South Coast Ghost on Aug 12, 2009 11:51 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Don't care what anyone else thinks, but

They need to sit Papi as much as possible once Youk comes back. As a DH, he’s just killing this team. Or at the very least, he needs to be shifted back to 6th in the order. With V-mart, kotchman, youk, lowell and Tek in the c/1b/3b rotation, there is no space for a lumbering DH with no defensive value. I’ve given this enough time and I am now convinced that he’s a spent force. Lowell and Bay seem to be getting warm again and v-mart will just do his thing. Papi is the odd(underperforming) man out.

by sydneysox on Aug 13, 2009 12:00 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No

I want a DH who can hit. But since we don’t have that, I’d rather have a player who has some value. Papi has very little value right now because he can neither hit nor field. The DH spot is great because you can give a guy like Lowell a chance to just swing a hot bat as he’s not providing much value in the field right now. With Papi, you have no option.

by sydneysox on Aug 13, 2009 12:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So long as you don't have to put the DH into the field

As soon as the DH becomes a defensive replacement, you’re hosed, because you lose the DH for the rest of the game.

Having Papi on the bench is taking a risk. That said, I’d be all in favor of moving Papi back down in the order.

by lone1c on Aug 13, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Couldn't they do a double switch?

Move Papi to DH, move Lowell to 3B? Or does that only work with the pitcher being substituted?

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If you put the DH in the field

You lose the spot for the game.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hmm.

I really need to study up on these rules.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 1:25 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

tampa bay

lost their DH earlier this year for that reason. their pitcher had to hit

I'm scared

by revived0103 on Aug 13, 2009 3:46 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

USG's right.

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Aug 13, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maddon listed 2 third basement and lost his DH.

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Aug 13, 2009 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And it happened to the Twins in that game with the ejections

Mauer had to catch, and they lost the DH

Fear the Rebel Polar Bears (trust me, this sig makes sense)

by crabchowdah on Aug 13, 2009 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

but why

do you bring up his defense? If he’s DHing, that’s irrelevant.

Lowell’s defensive value as a DH is no better than Papi’s.

by RickD on Aug 13, 2009 12:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

the point is

that his OVERALL value is much lower because he has no defensive value. At least Lowell could play some 3rd and 1st. Also, right now with the players we have who can now DH, his value is below both Lowell and V-mart

by sydneysox on Aug 13, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

VMart hasn't been much of an offensive force

In Cleveland, he hit .211 AVG/.303 OBP/.378 SLG (.681 OPS) after June 1st. He has been a bit better for Boston, but still hasn’t been very good: .261 AVG/.320 OBP/.435 SLG (.755 OPS).

Mike Lowell has been the Sox’ best hitter since the ASB (1.123 OPS).

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

SSS is affecting VMart

He’s had quite a few line outs.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And a lot of ground ball singles

And a double in Baltimore that should have been scored an error.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ramirez did not pitch a perfect ninth

An HBP normally excludes use of the word “perfect” to describe an outing. But he didn’t give up any hits.

by lone1c on Aug 13, 2009 12:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

with the proviso

if he’d hit ARod, that would’ve been perfect

by RickD on Aug 13, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, whoops.

Forgot about that. Going to edit it.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 12:28 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

BS, good to have you as an author.

and who is soxstats and why is he an author?

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 1:28 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Soxstats is the most brilliant sports writer of all time.

Accordingly, he’s far too busy to contribute to the site. He’s listed here because Randy decided we need more writers who never write anything.

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Aug 13, 2009 9:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

ZING!

:-(

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Aug 13, 2009 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hey, I include myself here

I haven’t written anything in a while. Stupid having a real job…

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Aug 13, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, none of that for me.

Though I’ll have a fake job and school in a couple weeks.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Eventually you will realize that “having to read books” is not the worst thing in the world. But probably not unil you’re out of college.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nah, I like reading.

I just like reading about the Sox better.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks.

I’m not sure why he hasn’t posted anything yet. Hopefully my use of advanced statistics in place of normal stats will convince him to post some stuff.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Big and slow

Ortiz was big and quick, now he’s big and slow. I hit well for one month, but I believe he’s paid to hit for more than one month a season. Having a DH with the teams lowest BA with RISP kills the offense. Drew is almost as bad.

by Old Fan on Aug 13, 2009 8:07 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Drew is NOT almost as bad.

He’s a plus defensive fielder with a .375 OBP.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 9:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Correct me if Im wrong but I think he meant Drew’s BA with RISP is almost as bad as Papis…. I could be reading it wrong though

Fehr is fair, but I like Laich

by amkcaps on Aug 13, 2009 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And ...

Nick Green has a .296 BA w/ runners in scoring position.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

And we wonder why everybody hates him so much…..

Fehr is fair, but I like Laich

by amkcaps on Aug 13, 2009 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because he is a bad hitter

His defense is underrated, though. No doubt, Green has been valuable for the Sox. But there’s a reason why he is a journeyman bench player.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, OK, that would be fair.

Though his OBP is STILL high. And quite frankly the idea that hitting with RISP is a skill is kind of screwy.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree

To me, it’s an arbitrary stat that really is there mostly so the media can use it as a highlight point. Has no real value with respect to the game.

There are two theories on hitting the Knuckleball. Unfortunately, neither of them work. ~Charlie Lau

by BHeebs on Aug 13, 2009 10:27 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It’s plausible to say that it is one way to reflect on how a hitter does in higher pressure situations.

by upCHUCK on Aug 13, 2009 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think a player can do particularly poorly in pressure situations.

I don’t think it’s possible for them to somehow lock in above and beyond their usual abilities just ‘cause there’s a man on second.

by USG on Aug 13, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So...

I guess a more valuable stat would be difference between batting and batting w RISP. To me, that’s the most interesting part, because a .300 hitter hitting .310 with RISP could be just statistical variance but a .250 hitter with a .310 RISP could actually be saying something. And obviously would still be interesting with numbers changing in the other direction.

by BigRedDog42 on Aug 13, 2009 12:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Unless, of course, a player's RISP stats fluctuate year-to-year

While his overall year-to-year stats are more consistent.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That seems to be the common view by most statistic minded fans.

The whole “they can’t give more than 100%” thing. But, I think the concept of clutch is being able to deal with the extra pressure – they’re still giving 100% conscience effort, but they are able to clear their mind and focus better when needed. A better subconscious effort, I guess it could be called.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Aug 13, 2009 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

risp

Ortiz and Drew are both hitting in the .120’s RISP … OBP without clutch hitting is worth nothing. You can’t win without scoring.

by Old Fan on Aug 13, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But Ortiz was one of the best in the league in "clutch" stats only a few years ago.

Did Papi lose the ability to up his game in pressure situations? Why did he lose that abilitty, considering it is “in his blood” as many commentators like to say?

What we are saying is that most likely “clutch” is just random variation caused by small sample size. Yes, it is important to hit in the clutch, but it is unclear if it is actually a skill.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Aug 13, 2009 3:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Last year

Drew hit .289 AVG/.457 OBP/.522 SLG (.979 OPS) with RISP. Drew has a career OPS of .893 with RISP.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Aug 13, 2009 6:02 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over The Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything regarding the Boston Red Sox organization. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rorscach_small
The Adventures of Statman: Attack of the Scioscier
Rorscach_small
RED SOX VS. YANKEES (TEAM OF TEH TWO CENTURIES = 1900 TO 2100) - JUST THE FACTS

Recent FanPosts

Military-explosion-20799_small
Bay to the Yankees? Holliday to the Red Sox?
Small
Jason Bay rejects Sox offer
Small
Damon may not sign with yanks....scary
Small
Baseball Prospectus' Top 11 Red Sox Prospects
Small
Wagner could accept Arbitration
Redsoxlogo_small
Free Agents
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Life_is_brighter_after_guinness_small
Sox, Wakefield Agree to 2-year/$5 Million Contract
Chewbacca_pitch_red_sox_small
Who is your daddy and what does he do?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

N32606527_32219358_6072_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Helmet_icon_small bs.uf15bosox9bears23

Pedroia_small ltrain2

Red_seat_small USG

Small soxstats