Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Trades: Oh, the possibilities! (Jack Cust, anyone?)

Is Jack Cust the Red Sox's answer at DH?

More photos » by Marcio Jose Sanchez - AP

Is Jack Cust the Red Sox's answer at DH?

The Globe's Tony Massaroti took a good look at the Red Sox today and dissected it to see where the areas of improvement are. A couple areas are obvious: when it comes to trades, the pitching staff really doesn't need anything.

Although the Red Sox starting pitchers have been absolutely abysmal at times, the depth is there: John Smoltz, Clay Buchholz and Michael Bowden are all waiting in the wings for a shot at the big time. Meanwhile, there are also pitchers like Justin Masterson who could start in a pinch and other AAA'ers that would like a shot.

And we don't even need to talk about the bullpen. That thing is nasty. I just hope it stays that way the entire season (which, if I want to be honest with myself, won't happen).

The Mazz does find some problem areas though, namely the offense:

How the Red Sox can improve: From Matt Holliday and Adrian Gonzalez to Victor Martinez and Mark DeRosa, the Sox will have options here. It really is up to them to determine how much they want to sacrifice in the way of young talent. The pronounced disparity between home and road production is worrisome, particularly one when considers that Ortiz is hitting .161 away from Fenway Park. That suggests DH is the best place to make an impact, and the absolute best-case scenario would involve the Sox acquiring a younger and/or offensive-minded catcher (Martinez, Jarrod Saltalamacchia) who could help them address needs in the both the short term (offensively) and the long (behind the plate).

Thus far, the Red Sox have had below average production from three spots on the diamond based on OPS: designated hitter, shortstop, and center field. Given Jacoby Ellsbury's youth and game-changing speed, the first two seem like areas of priority. Addressing either would require the club to eat quite a bit in salary because both Ortiz ($13 million this year and next) and Julio Lugo ($9 million this year and next) are signed through 2010, but the Sox have shown a willingness to do that in the past (Edgar Renteria). Some of what the Sox choose here may well depend on how the rest of their roster comes together.

As we've talked about before, Victor Martinez really isn't a long term solution at catcher. How long can he stay behind the dish? (He's already played almost half his games at first base this year). And the Sox, at this point, really don't need another first baseman. Could Martinez be a DH for the rest of this year and of the future? That might be doable, but consider the production that Martinez could give us at that spot -- career high 25 home runs with a .316 batting average.

NOTE: Any production that is not David Ortiz in the DH spot is BETTER production. While it may look like I am knocking Martinez's numbers -- or anyone else's, really -- be aware that I am taking in consideration what the DH of yesteryear did. i am used to the 40 home run, 130 RBI caliber player in that spot. Aren't you?

The bottom line is this: something needs to be done about the designated hitter spot. Either bring in a new hitter all together or have a platoon with Ortiz, because the Sox can't keep carrying a .185 hitter as their DH. That will not win this team a World Series. Why not a right-handed power bat to compliment Ortiz's left-handed power bat umm, swing?

OK, this guy is not a righty, but how about Jack Cust? Is that too crazy of an idea? Sure, the guy strikes out a ton, but he can also hit the cover off the ball. He's Adam Dunn -- the lite version. He walks a ton, too. He hit 33 home runs last year. Wouldn't we like that out of our DH, huh?

The A's are also dead-last in the AL West. And, no matter how well they do, it seems like they are always sellers. I imagine Billy Beane wouldn't want a whole lot for Cust. He does have value, but I'm sure there's a prospect or two that could make this deal work. Beane would want a Michael Bowden in the deal, but would a Ryan Kalish/Bryan Price deal work out? Maybe even that is too much.

The name Mark DeRosa has also been thrown around. The thing I love about DeRosa is his versatility. He can literally play anywhere. I'm pretty sure if Tito told him to grab a mask, he'd go out and catch Tim Wakefield.

While I love his versatility, he's a bench player. He's a bench player and an effective one at that. He'd be an amazing bench player, too, but the question comes: what do the Indians want for him? I'm going to guess they're going to try and steal as much as possible for him. So why should the Red Sox give up (half ... maybe a quarter) of the farm for a bench player? Doesn't make much sense to me.

The last area of big concern, in my mind, is shortstop. Everyone says: "Jed Lowrie is coming back soon," but to be honest, I'm not sold on him just yet. I know he had a good season last year with a busted wrist, but I still have my overall concerns. And the biggest concern is just that: health. Sure, Jed could come back, but then a week later, his third wrist is broken again? (That sounds dirty. Excuse me.) He's a liability just for the fact he's never really been healthy. So if July 31 comes and goes and we still have Lowrie, Julio Lugo and Nick Green -- will that be good enough?

Personally, I love what Green brings to the table. He's a gamer, he can hit and he seems just solid all around -- except for that pesky defense thing. But, hey, ya' know, who needs defense? The Sox need defense, especially at that position.

Green, at least to me right now, seems like the better option than Lugo. Lugo is probably public enemy No. 1 here at OTM, but I really think it's time to cut our losses. Try to work Lugo up before the deadline and trade him. Eat some of the contract; I really don't care how it gets done. But with Green in the mix and Lowrie back, the Sox might be able to make a move for a shortstop that can actually play defense.

Mazz throws out the name Omar Vizquel. I'm not 100 percent opposed to that idea, to be honest with you. Keep all three on the roster if you can -- have Lowrie be the starter, the Defensive-SS-To-Be-Named on the bench and same with Green. Green is versatile -- he can play 2B, 3B and I'm sure he's not too shabby at the corner outfield positions (although I'd like to see him practice that before anything -- oh, looky here: three career games in right field. Thank you, B-R.com).

Now it's your turn to sound off. Vote in the poll listed below and throw out some names in the comments.

Poll
From the names mentioned above, who should the Sox trade for?
Victor Martinez
293 votes
Jack Cust
230 votes
Mark DeRosa
118 votes
Omar Vizquel
82 votes
Another name (I'll tell ya' in the comments) that was not touched upon
274 votes

997 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs  |  Comment 119 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Here is why I hate Mazz

he does not even check his facts. It is one thing to say things for the sake of speculation that may or may not be true, but to just be plain wrong on one of your main points is reason to just not read further.

The Sox have 2 crappy back-up level SS-that we can all agree upon. However, the Sox OPS from the SS position (717 in 84 PAs for Lugo; 783 in 114 PAs for Green) ranks 4th in the AL. Yes, it is also 4th in the AL East, but outside of the AL East not a single team has a SS with a 754 OPS. Texas is real close. All the rest are not even close. If you want to make a point about our SS’s-talk about their defense, not production.

The rest is typical Mazz, from his man-crush on the exposed Holiday to guys that we would not get to guys we have discussed to stupid ideas…

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 12:20 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Oh

not too much. But I do feel like slapping him sometimes. Does that mean I should seek help?

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No, it's perfectly natural

If the Sox want Holliday (and I’m not sure they do), all they have to do is wait until the off-season and pay him. Does anyone think Billy Beane will let Holliday (or Cust, for that matter) go cheaply? Beane’s track record suggests that he will get the maximum number of decent prospects he can get.

Mazz is idiotic.

From Matt Holliday and Adrian Gonzalez to Victor Martinez and Mark DeRosa, the Sox will have options here.
Anyone can throw out players’ names. Hmm, “from Albert Pujols and Evan Longoria to Justin Morneau and Joe Mauer, the Sox will have options here.” See, it’s easy.

The questions is: are these players available? I can’t imagine the Padres would trade Gonzalez. As stated above, Beane will want too much for Holliday, an impending free agent and Scott Boras client. That makes Holliday a definite pass, even if he was having a good season. I don’t see how DeRosa, with his .775 OPS, improves the team. Texas is curently in 1st place. Why would they trade Salty, their starting catcher, despite his .255 AVG/.309 OBP/.416 SLG line? And, if they did. would he help the Sox? That leaves Victor Martinez, of the names Mazz cited. We already discussed him at length on this site.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 1, 2009 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

what I dont understand

is why the Red Sox need Matt Holliday when we have Jason Bay (understanding we need to resign him). Bay has better numbers, can obviously deal with the pressure and seems to fit in wonderfully with the team. What does Matt Holliday offer that makes him so coveted over Bay?

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Its not really one or the other.

The Sox need another bat in the lineup now. We would not be trading Bay for Holliday. We would be giving up something else for Holliday so we could have them both (and DH one of them). For the record, I am not necessarily in favor of this plan, but just showing you the idea behind it.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 5:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

You misunderstand

IF the Red Sox trade for Holliday, they will only resign one of the two for the future.

I just think that Bay is proven, he is here now, no need to waste time on Holliday.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

We are thinking about this season.

If the Sox get Holliday, it does nothing to impact the signing of Bay. They would not be “wasting time on Holliday”, they would be getting a player that could help them win this year.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

But ...

The Sox would be potentially wasting prospects for a half-year of Holliday. With Boras as his agent, he will take lots of $$$ to sign. The Sox will pay a premium to get Holliday (see Beane, Billy), then Boras will have a ton of leverage in the contract negotiations. The Sox would be paying twice for Holliday. They’d be better off waiting until the off-season if they want Holliday.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 2, 2009 7:24 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

All true.

But this would be the case with many trade targets. My point was that attaining Holliday for the playoff push this year, and keeping Bay beyond this year are unrelated.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Victor Martinez is not a feasible option.

He is still under contractual control for 2010 (very cheap, too). Unless the Red Sox bowled them over with an offer (not likely), the Indians aren’t really interested in trading Victor/Lee until next season.

A DeRosa deal would be similar to what the Indians recieved for Casey Blake last year. A top 5 prospect from High A and a bullpen arm from the upper levels.

by Toxicadam on Jun 1, 2009 12:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I still like the idea of Dunn

And think he’s attainable for less than we think. I figure we ship Penny to some team that wants him, they send a prospect Washington’s way, we send Delcarmen and maybe a Reddick/Kalish and a Doubront his their way for Dunn. That’s a closer and 3 good prospects for them, Penny for a Prospect for the other team, and we get Dunn.

by USG on Jun 1, 2009 1:45 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Washington won't take anything less than a package that includes Bowden

If they asked for Bowden for Nick Johnson, they’ll definitely ask for Bowden + other players for Dunn.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 1, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Actually they asked for MDC for Nick Jonhson.

The only Red Sox fan in a country where nobody cares about basball!

by radiohix on Jun 1, 2009 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That was the rumor that we debated here, but it turned out to be false. They would not take MDC. They wanted Bowden.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

actually it is not clear

2 deals were reported. The Sox gave a cover about not wanting to trade MDC. But the other proposal involved Bowden. To mee, from reading both reports, it sounded like the Sox actually offered MDC, and the Nats turned around and said Bowden. The Sox then denied wanting to trade MDC…

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'd trade Bowden for Dunn.

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Jun 1, 2009 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

USG

if he is attainable for less than we think, why did the Nats sign him for 20 million? I mean, they didn’t think they would contend did they? Sure, if that is all it would take, I would be for it, but seems really strange a team that has never contended yet always tried to hold up deals for too much would ever, ever go for that.

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

So they are basically paying Dunn in order to trade him...

I guess that’s probably right. Its also a pretty solid plan. But what other teams are going to be looking for a guy like Dunn? If we are bidding against ourselves, I do not see Theo giving in to their demands.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sox

are using the same plan with Penny. Sign him, use him and trade him.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm pretty against Omar Vizquel.

are we sure the guy is still a great defensive player? I am fine with Jed Lowrie, when’s he coming back anyway?

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 1:55 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+2

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 1, 2009 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes, he is still a great defensive player

but I dout the Rangers would trade him anyway.

Go Rangers...don't suck...

by Kinslerhomer on Jun 1, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

doubt*

Go Rangers...don't suck...

by Kinslerhomer on Jun 1, 2009 2:05 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

pointless and illogical trade proposal

(aka, “if the Sox only had any 2B prospects ready to go but hopelessly blocked by Pedroia.”)

The Brewers need a second baseman for the rest of 2009. What they have, in bulk quantities, are various sorts of shortstops who are either blocked by J.J. Hardy or being utility infielders.

Craig Counsell has lost a bit on his defense, but he’s still pretty l33t out there. He’s also getting on base a lot this year (well, more than he usually does.) But, unfortunately, there are no 2B out there who could adequately replace Counsell. His problem is that he shouldn’t be starting all the time.

by morineko on Jun 1, 2009 2:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I'd support a deal centered around Escobar and Bowden.

Sox get a SS for the Future and Brewers get a starter for the future. I don’t think it could be done straight up. There would have to be other players involved. This is just a thought, and I don’t know where that would put Lowrie.

Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.

by sox-inda-south on Jun 1, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

So

We don’t have anyone with power in the farm system? I know that prospects are not as valuable as proven players, yet I don’t think its worth it to give up the entire farm. We should have just paid Adam Dunn some money this off-season and not wasted all our time on Texiera.

by jcorye1 on Jun 1, 2009 3:41 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Huh?

why in hell would we have done that? It is not like we could have known Papi would be completely crappy.

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Did you just question whether we don't have any prospect with power in our system?

Lars Anderson? I mean really, if you haven’t heard of him, you’ve been in a hole the last three months.

Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.

by sox-inda-south on Jun 1, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Please, no DeRosa or Vizquel

And since pretty much all the other names in the list are not available or would take too much to get, we don’t have that many options. One guy that I would make a deal is Salty, but Texas won’t trade him and even if they did it would take a lot.

"Hey we got a lot in common here... I'm gonna rape you"

by MerryGoByeBye on Jun 1, 2009 3:59 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

+1

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 1, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I like Mark Derosa

he plays every position and seems to be a solid hitter. He wont cost much.

Salty = Buchholz, so its just a matter of who you want more. Texas will not give up Salty for anything less.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Derosa is a solid and versatile player, but not really an answer for our DH problem. Why is Salty=Buch? Do you think Salty is a catcher in the future or a 1b?

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 4:53 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Texas

is winning they dont need to trade him, they dont seem to be interested unless Buchholz is the deal. Just the impression i get. If we could of gotten him for less, I think Theo would of already made the move.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Trade

I believe they should trade for Adrian Gonzalez, move Youk to third, Lowell to DH, and jettison Ortiz..

San Diego would want a bunch in return but for the long term it would be worth it to have gold glove type corner infielders for the next 5-6 years.

by 70's Steelers still the best on Jun 1, 2009 4:10 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ok

I’ll play.
a)What do you think SD would want?
b)What would you be willing to part with?

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would give up just about everything for Gonzalez. Lars, Buch and Bard? Would that work?

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 4:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

They'd want some of our young Latin players too.

They have great potential and high ceilings: Pimentel, Tejeda, Navarro, Exposito

Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.

by sox-inda-south on Jun 1, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think

Lars, Buch and Bowden would be the starting point. You could then argue about it, but that is not something Theo is likely to do, since he tends to really cling to pitching prospects, especially starters. I don’t think SD would do Lars, Buch and Bard, since Lars is still in (and struggling in) AA, and Bard relief pitcher.

I always sort of look at the Marlins deal (that Theo was not involved in): FL knew they had to deal Beckett and wanted out of Lowell’s contract. The took HanRam, who was a more highly regarded prospect than Lars and Sanchez, who was around the Bowden level (or better). In this case SD’s hand is less forced, since Gonzalez is cheap and signed for a while, so that makes it even more expensive.

In my view, I could understand wanting to trade Gonzalez for the 3 I menitoned (plus more) but I wouldn’t do it-it would really deplete our front line young pitching at the expense of a 1b. We have a good 1b now, and Lars is in the pipeline. I know that Youk playes a pretty good 3b, but still, I am always afraid of many-for-one deals.

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lars Anderson, Clay Buchholz, another arm prospect and another bat prospect…exactly what Texas got for Teixeira.

I would be more than willing to give up Lars, one of Buchholz or Bowden, Daniel Bard and another top everyday prospect. Sold American.

AG in Fenway would change the Red Sox not just this year but make them the team to beat for the next 4-5 years and probably give 2 more WS shots. Ells, Pedroia, Youk, AG, Bay, Drew, Lowell(DH), C, Lowrie is an insane lineup and unlike the Yankees, most are under 30.

He is that good.

I know I am the only one that still thinks he is available, but he is. Nobody has given the Padres enough to save face and their first priority is getting rid of Peavy.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Tex

was different, he was close to his walk year, was known to be after the big bucks, was a bora$$ client, and had to be delt. That totally changes the equation. Right now, the Sox have one young starter (Lester), one in his prime who may or may not be with the team long term (Beckett), one who will be gone sooner than you think (Dice-K), an old geezer and spare parts #5 (fill in your favorite). I am not sure you are contemplating this properly. If you keep your rotation young, good and cheap, you can build strength in your lineup in an economical and flexible way-it is easier to fill with quality for less. Going the FA route with starting pitching is nearly always a long term failure. Just consider these points.

by Buzzy on Jun 1, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No i hear ya

but there is no guarantee that Buchholz will do well in the bigs, he might and he might not. AG is a proven stud and will most likely do better in Fenway.

Each decisions has possible pit falls, but there are still guys available if you keep Buchholz and look for FA bats or you trade him lock up Bay and AG and go after arms…

Santana was available, Lackey will be available as will Yu Darvish, so will other top arms when their teams refuse to pay big money that Burnett and CC got.

I don’t expect the Red Sox to trade Buchholz to be completely honest, for the exact reason you stated above. He is their insurance policy.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

AG would be expensive

considering that he has 2-3 years left on his contract and is being paid close to what would be nothing for the Red Sox. The Padres have a 1st baseman prosect, but I bet they would want some deal that would invole Lars Anderson. This is a wild guess on what a deal for AG would look like.
 Adrian Gonzalez for Lars Anderson(1st Base), Jed Lowrie(Shortstop), Jonathan Van Every(Centerfield), Mark Wagner(Catcher), Jose Alverez(Pitcher). This might be a little much though for AG. And remember, this is a wild guess of prospects names for AG

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 5:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

If we could do it with your package I would in a second, but I think it will take some of our elite, young starting pitching.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would too

But the deal would be more costful than that.

PS great signature

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Any AG deal

 would have to involve Buchholz or Bowden, San Diego has stated they are making young pitching a priority.

And, I would do your deal in a second if thats what SD wanted.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 5:49 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It was a general idea.

The Padres system is lagging worhwhile prospects, but AG would be an expensive pickup for any team.

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 8:17 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bay

That being said they must re-sign Jason Bay!

by 70's Steelers still the best on Jun 1, 2009 4:12 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Only thing I can say about Jack Cust

Is that he is a professional hitter. The guy is a legend. All he does is hit, practice hitting, think about hitting, dream of hitting…he is a freak in that respect.

Many people in MLB talk about his devotion to the religion of hitting and how the guy never does anything else but hang out in batting cages. He probably would be a good fit for the DH spot.

by SoxAcumen on Jun 1, 2009 5:02 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Ya

Is there anyway we could unload ortiz and get a good guy in return in the same trade?

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Nope.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 5:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I say we should try to get a deal from the Pirates.

A deal for Adam LaRoche, Jack Wilson/Freddy Sanchez for 3-4 guys. Good deal.

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 5:05 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I would take Wilson or Laroche in a salary-dump deal, but I would not be willing to give up anything of too much value for either of them. Freddy Sanchez has no place on this team. We already have a pretty good 2B.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 1, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Can Sanchez play SS though?

He might be worth the shot?

Big Numbers

by homerun013 on Jun 1, 2009 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

He has only put in significant games at SS once, in 2006 when he played 28 games there and was below average. If he could play SS, he would have done it more at this point.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

These Players Should Go for Some Great Prospects

David Ortiz: It was great while it lasted, but it was over the day Manny left. Other teams will still pay big for a marquee player who will generate attendance lagging at other ballparks.

Daisuke Matsuzaka: Can’t go more than 4-5 innings and can’t win a game. The acquisition was huge, but the scouting has proved less than accurate since Dice joined the team. Worth is unlimited in a trade.

Jed Lowrie (maybe): Will the wrist ever heal? Who knows? Let another team take the chance.

Rocco Baldelli: Probably worthless in a trade. Stupid for Theo & Co. to pick him up in the first place. Maybe can be traded as part of a package?

Julio Lugo (maybe): An underperformer who still has value. Give Nick Green a shot or keep him as backup and get rid of Lugo and Lowrie and bring in a marquee shortstop.

There are more great players who may become candidates for acquisition than are referenced in this article. Francona is loyal to players to the detriment of the team. I love Big Papi and respect all that he has done for the team, but he is done. Gotta go. These other players are, in one form or another, either dead wood or accidents waiting to happen. Some of them (Ortiz, Matsuzaka, Lowrie, Lugo) have tremendous value in the marketplace and should command great prospects while reducing payroll or, at least, not raising it to Steinbrenner proportions. Just my thoughts. Feel free to disagree.

by SoxFan080869 on Jun 1, 2009 5:54 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Wrong

You are an idiot.
Why would anyone want Ortiz and with his horrible season and his 13 mil salary this year and next? The sox would literally have to bite all of that. You wouldn’t get any prospects out of it, but you would have to pay all of his salary for this year (and next year)
Dice-K was 18-3 last year with an ERA under 3 and was 4th in CY young voting. We should ship him off because he got hurt and had a couple bad outings. He has been on the DL for most of the season. Not trading him.
Baldelli was a great pick up. What did he cost the sox? We are paying him next to nothing and he can still play though the injuries suck.
As for everyone else you said, no one is trading them for prospects. Just not going to happen. I can’t even think of a NPB (Japenese) team that would trade for Lugo given his shittiness and 9 million dollar salary.
Most of the discussion here is about what big we can get for some prospects. Not the other way around. The only veteran that the sox would (and should) part ways with for prospects is Penny. He is reliable and would get an average prospect and he is short term so the sox wouldn’t lose anything.

by swallowtail on Jun 1, 2009 7:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So you signed up for the site and the first thing you did was call someone as idiot. Nice to meet you too.

Also, MLB teams cannot trade with NPB teams. Just to let you know.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:48 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I realize

I was being sarcastic about Lugo. I was implying that his shittiness was even lower than the shittiness of NPB teams. Thank you for informing me of the rules. Thats nice of you.
I always read the site, but just started venturing into the comments. had to respond to that one. just had to.
Just being spicy for the sake of being spicy.

by swallowtail on Jun 2, 2009 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Idiot Responds

1. Re. Ortiz: Not every ball club has the luxury of selling out every game. There is still a perception by some that Ortiz’s best years are not behind him. He didn’t start to suck until Manny left. Injury or no injury, Papi’s “problems” are not entirely physical. He is still considered a “draw” to some clubs and a deal might be reached that is not as bleak as your post suggests.

2. Your point about Dice-K is well taken. However, what good is he to the team when he cannot last past a few innings and his “couple of bad outings” have been costly to the club. There is no doubt that he could supply the team with high level prospects in a trade.

3. I respectfully disagree with your Baldelli analysis, especially when you take out the salary issues. Nothing for nothing always equals nothing. I submit that he adds little to the roster.

4. You may be correct about Lugo. Again, we are talking about someone who adds little or nothing to the team currently and, as you correctly point out, we are paying him nearly $10 Million for his presence on the team.

5. The prospects may be the best thing we have going for us. Our farm system is second to none and I would be very cautious about giving away our future for some bigs. If it is possible, and you may be correct that it just is not, we should be trying to rid ourselves of some of our high salary / low performance players for guys with proven or potential success.

6. Your proposition about Penny only makes sense b/c he is, as you point out, short term. I like him and I have been pleasantly surprised by his performance to date. However, I disagree with the proposition that we can get an average prospect for Penny in trade. I don’t recall much of a bidding war when we picked him up. He stays because at best it’s a wash if we trade him, at worst a bad trade that will only reduce the depth of the pitching staff.

You made some great points in your post and I stand corrected on some of my ideas, but by opening with “you are an idiot” you reduce the strength of your good arguments. Last time I checked, we are both after the same things — another WS ring and not sacrificing the promise of additional titles in the years to come in our attempts to win a world series this year.

by SoxFan080869 on Jun 1, 2009 7:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Okay, first, use the "reply" button. Thanks.

Second, a lot of your ideas would be like shooting ourselves in the foot.
#Papi isn’t gonna draw many fans when he’s this bad.
#DiceK will be good for the rest of the season – no reason to abandon several wins for prospects.
#Baldelli is brilliant against LHP, and should get stronger as he conditions his body to deal with his issues.
#Lugo needs to be DFA’d when Lowrie comes back – Green could be traded much easier because he’s cheaper and a rental.
#We have more than enough prospects to build for the future while trying to win it all now.
#Penny will get us at least a B prospect – he’s a good 3-4 pitcher that is a cheap rental.
And the best way to deal with name-calling is to ignore it. Why can no one remember that sticks and stones break your bones, but words will never hurt you?

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 1, 2009 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wonder why that didn't format.

Maybe I needed a space between the pound sign and the sentences.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 1, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

No offense man, but those are some terrible, idiotic ideas.

You have an idealistic view of the Sox and MLB. The “old days” etc… That stuff doesn’t happen anymore.

Your points are written and read, but not pursued. Lets not talk about trading Cy Young caliber pitchers.

Friendship is like peeing on yourself: everyone can see it, but only you get the warm feeling that it brings.

by sox-inda-south on Jun 1, 2009 10:15 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Let's not call DiceK a "Cy Young caliber pitcher" either.

Last year was the product of a lot of luck – he’s good, but not as good as he appeared to be last year.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 2, 2009 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

+1

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 2, 2009 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Penny

has been great this year, but I just think that, at some point, Theo and co. are going to want to jettison him to make room for Smoltz/Buchholz (you could even throw Bowden in there, depending on how high you are on the kid).

I think under normal circumstances, you’d be right that the team shouldn’t trade a player like Penny. But since he’s only on a cheap one year deal and will probably fetch a good amount, plus the fact that the team needs to clear a spot because of their starting depth, in this instance they should trade him.

Unfortunately, I don’t think he’ll be a particularly interesting piece to either of the teams that have the guys I really would want for this team: Cleveland (Martinez) and Washington (Johnson).

by SouthShoreSox on Jun 1, 2009 8:04 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

And what about Buster Olney proposal of a trade between the Red Sox and Phillies?

He proposes that the Sox trade Brad Penny to Philly for young shortstop Jason Donald.

Donald is younger 24, is solid defensively, and would be the perfect complement to [Jed] Lowrie in the years ahead. He is a good prospect, but there are questions about how much he’ll hit in the big leagues. Penny is a good pitcher with experience, and there are questions about whether he’ll be able to stay healthy. These would be moderate solutions for both teams, and Thursday night, one rival evaluator — who is not involved in any Red Sox-Phillies conversations, and is merely speculating from the outside — thought the notion of a Penny-Donald trade discussion was reasonable.

The only Red Sox fan in a country where nobody cares about basball!

by radiohix on Jun 1, 2009 8:56 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Hmm...

I wouldn’t have expected a SS for Penny – I was thinking a pop bat.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 1, 2009 9:39 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I read that Olney blurb.

I’d do that deal. I don’t see Penny getting us a power bat – he’s only valuable to a contender, and not too many contenders have big bats to spare

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Jun 1, 2009 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why do we need a Carter/Bailey kinda guy when we have Carter and Bailey?

by Randy Booth on Jun 1, 2009 11:28 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he is a legit prospect. Not really a Bailey/Carter.

But I doubt we will get much fro Penny anyway.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:58 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was reading recently that the Phillies are going to be going for something a little better than Penny. (Peavey, Cliff Lee, Bedard etc.) But maybe they go for someone like Penny too, I dunno.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:55 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HanRam

I am going to throw this out there and I expect to get a lot of resistence on both sides (not enough to get him and also giving up too much).

I think Theo should go now to the Marlins b/f somebody else does and offer Buchholz, Bard, Lugo and tons of cash (throw in a minor league IF if you need to) for Hanley Ramirez. It may not even be enough and he may not be available (although I would hazard a guess that just about anybody wearing a Marlins uni is available at some point during every season) but if Theo can pry HanRam away from the Marlins, it would solve the SS position debacle he started as soon as he let OCab go after the ’04 WS win. And, Ramirez adds legit 30 hr power and 30 stolen base potential to boot from the SS position.

I know it is a lot, but I think HanRam is worth it and would love to see him in a Sox uniform (again).

by gunny86 on Jun 1, 2009 10:00 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

No.

Theo’s not going to sell the farm for one guy – ever. Not even Pujols. Even if Mickey Mantle came up again, he wouldn’t do it.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 1, 2009 10:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not nearly enough to get him.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 12:59 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

HanRam

Would start at Ellsbury, Buch, Lars. Beyond that we’d probably need to add 2 or 3 more legit prospects such as Kalish and Bard. By that point the deal wouldn’t be worth it from our perspective.

by Gnick on Jun 2, 2009 5:08 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

The farm would still contain

In the Hanley trade scenario I presented, the farm would still contain Lars, Bowden, Reddick, and a few others. Buchhy is a lot to give up and Bard throws 99 mph heat (pretty straight heat in the games I have seen so far). They need a bat and they need a SS (I do agree with Mazz there – SS, DH, and CF have been light in the hitting dept). Hanley is one of the top 10 players in mlb today. Take a chance and get a SS and a hitter in the same deal.

by gunny86 on Jun 1, 2009 10:13 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

It will take Buch, Bard and Lars at least.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

best / most reasonable player available

let’s go back to Pittsburgh and get a “young” CF. Yup we got Ellsbury, and let’s keep him too. But our outfield is still short a good RF. I’m not nor ever have been impressed with JDD. So, with a 4th outfielder you could use any of them as DH (much better #‘s than Ortiz) and let the other 3 hold down the OF duties. So let’s go after Nate McLouth. He’s 28, hits lefty, plays all 3 OF positions, got some pop (like 25-30 HR), K’s alot less Ortiz or Drew, got some speed (20+ SB/ almost never gets caught) and hits around 265. What would them want for him, don’t know, but it’s the best at the lowest cost to the Sox i can find.

by pizdof on Jun 1, 2009 10:44 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I don’t see Drew going anywhere until his contract is up. He’s been a solid — maybe not great — right fielder for the Red Sox. He fits the lineup perfectly.

by Randy Booth on Jun 1, 2009 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Resigned

He just resigned with the team this offseason for a few years (not sure how long exactly), I truly think that Pitt is making an effort to keep their young players for a change. In a couple years they may actually be decent if those young pitchers hold it together. I think it would be a little pricey (not as much as some other players names) to get McLouth. Adam LaRoche would be easier to get.

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Jun 2, 2009 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Surprise

McLouth has been traded to the Braves for 3 prospects. I thought for sure he was going to be the first one they’ve held onto for a long time. Well it appears that the Pirates have given up this year, anything we should pick up at the yard sale?

"We are not normal, We are Legends. People will tell their kids about us." - Deon Butler before Ohio State Game 2008.

by Rogue Nine on Jun 3, 2009 8:36 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

well we should have "yard saled"

McLouth !!!! they took 3 kids for him. how about reuniting the Braves 1-2 punch ???? Glavine is a free agent as of today. >>>> and i guess Atlanta will “take that 25-30 POP”

by pizdof on Jun 3, 2009 9:12 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

25-30 is "some" pop?

I’d take 15-20 from Ells if he promised us “some” pop.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 2, 2009 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ortiz and Ells

Papi’s dropoff is not normal. A great hitter doesn’t simply forget how to hit. I’m sure the Sox have been studying the tapes, but i wonder if Papi has developed some eyesight problem. I think we owe it to him to try to figure out why he has had this catastrophic crash in seeing pitches (late on the fastball, early on the change) instead of merely getting rid of him.
Ells is another problem. He’s a lousy lead-off hitter who doesn’t get on base enough, a decent but not outstanding center fielder, and a player whose strength, his speed, is likely to diminish quickly. I don’t know why we didn’t keep Coco instead.
Kotsay is not a major league DH. Drew has the OBP to bat second, but he doesn’t get enough hits to move Pedey to third. If we can’t get Ortiz back on track, we’re in trouble. None of the usual suspects—Martinez, Cust, Holliday, etc—can replace him. I don’t think we can count on Tek and Bay to continue their heroics all season. Vizquel isn’t the SS he used to be,and he can’t cover for Lowell’s problems going to his left. Our best bet, assuming that the starting pitching will return to form, is to package Lugo and a prospect for an outfielder, bring up Anderson, and try him at first/DH to spell Lowell (Youk to third). And hope that when Lowrie gets back he’s the second coming of Pedroia; he sure looked like it in spring training. If we’re in the top five in OBP, ERA, and defensive efficiency, I like us a lot.

by 81fried on Jun 1, 2009 11:48 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A lot of problems with this:

1. Ells is not a problem. The way he is utilized is the problem. He should be down in the order against lefties (.274 obp this year) but is fine leading off against righties (.364 OBP). I know we Sox fans love to overvalue former players, but lets be real about Coco. He was never a better hitter for the Sox than Ells is right now.

2. Lugo cannot be packaged for anything, ever. Stop (not just you) suggesting that anybody will take Lugo in a trade. The only way would be if we paid all of his contract, but even then its unlikely we would get anything in return.

3. Lars has no been great in AA this year. What makes you think he is ready for the majors?

4. I agree to give Lowrie a shot. But I don’t need him to be Pedroia. If he can be a young Julio Lugo, I will be very, very happy.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 1:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hate this..

I wanted us to sign Dunn in the off season and everyone poo-poohed the idea, now I’m looking like an effing genius.
Sh*t, I’m still smarting from the fact we didn’t trade for Santana when we had the chance….

by sydneysox on Jun 2, 2009 1:26 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

If we had trade for Dunn...

we all assumed we would get rid of Lowell. If that happened we would have been in the same situation as now.

And we would have had to give up Lester, Buch and Ells for Santana. That does not look like a good deal still.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 2, 2009 1:37 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

This whole discussion would nearly be moot.............

If Jed Lowrie were healthy. Theres no doubt in my mind that the first piece of flotsam that we need to unload is Julio Lugo…..Offensively, He’s mediocre. Defensively, he’s a walking bobble….He causes so many errors other infielders error as well.

by il revrunde on Jun 2, 2009 1:51 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

What About Hanley?

Why is no one on earth mentioning him? am i correct in saying that our two problems are stability at shortstop and the the lack of production from Papi? well why not kill two birds with one stone, get an elite shortstop who can take over the three hole or hit clean up. I would give up buchholz, delcarmen, and kalish. oh, and lugo.

by revived0103 on Jun 2, 2009 5:14 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Dealing with Detroit: Marcus Thames

Here’s one out of left field, literally: Marcus Thames. Thames can mash, has a game suited for the green monster, and can spell Ortiz at DH while Big Popup figures it out. He also doesn’t fit in the Tigers’ plans, who have been rotating young talent (Clete Thomas, Ryan Raburn, and Josh Anderson) while Thames recovers from an injury. (He’s had 6 hits and a walk in his last two games for Toledo). Also, the Tigers will have Carlos Guillen back at some point.

What would it cost? Mark Wagner would be who the Tigers want, and might even be willing toss in a not-quite-as-far-along catching prospect to make it happen.

by David S770 on Jun 2, 2009 11:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Thames has a career OBP of .302

He’s not exactly the prototypical Red Sox hitter.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Jun 2, 2009 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

That's what I was thinking...

Never thought of him as anything but a free swinger. If we could somehow get Granderson or Inge, I’d be overjoyed.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 2, 2009 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

not likely

Grandy isn’t moving; think ‘Cabrera’ only less likely. Inge could be had if there were someone (ideally with functioning hip joints) to take his place at third in Detroit.

by David S770 on Jun 2, 2009 7:09 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Lugo, Green, Bailey, etc.

Take your pick of our lame replacement level guys.

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Jun 2, 2009 11:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

With everything wrong with the Sox, we are still in 2nd place!!

If Ortiz was hitting his weight, and Beckett and company were pitching to the standard we are used to seeing, then we would be in first by six games. In my opinion, Theo isn’t going to do much if we continue to stay near the top of our division. No one is going to give us a big bat for Penny. I’m not sure you touch our kids, unless you bring in supreme talent. Beckett is aging, and at the end of a contract. Daisuke is solid, but not our ace. Lester is going to be our workhorse. Four and five can be argued for the next couple of years. Getting rid of Buch and Bowden would be a mistake imo. Starting pitching is very hard to come by, and lets not forget the division we play in is stock piled with great young pitching.

When they dug up Big Papi's jersey in Yankee stadium did they happen to find his swing with it!

by Bowdawg on Jun 3, 2009 12:29 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

I agree about holding onto our pitching.

But if Papi doesn’t show significant signs of improvement this month, Theo will look to replace him via trade.

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Jun 3, 2009 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Look for a dirty Sanchez....

I think Pittsburgh would consider trading Freddy Sanchez if the Sox covet another infielder who can play Shortstop. He is on par with Lowrie as a glove but hits more consistently. Sanchez was always a gamer in the Sox organization playing through nagging injuries and like and he is a simply a BETTER player than Jason Donald will ever be.
The key to the Sox’ SS woes is not to upgrade the glove at the expense of the offense. As someone said, they are around #4 in the League for SS offense and they should try to stay in that range and find a way to move Lugo. Lowrie & Sanchez would do fine with Green back on the AAAA shuttle where he spent most of his career waiting for an injury.
Sanchez also gives the Sox a chance to DH Lowell on occasion as Freddy can play several infield positions.

by Butch Hobson's elbo chips on Jun 3, 2009 1:38 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Can Sanchez play SS on a regular basis?

I think of him more as a second baseman.

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Jun 3, 2009 9:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

For the present need, YES

Sanchez ideally isn’t a guy to play 100+ games at SS in the Majors, but he was a full time Shortstop in college and throughout his trip through the Red Sox minor league system at every level. He plays on a team that possesses no-hit/great glove Jack Wilson so the Pirates use him elsewhere because of the offensive advantage he gives them at 2B.
     
Lowrie is returning in a month or less, so the Sox need a glove better than Green or Lugo and Sanchez is better than both of them at present. His bat could be an asset to the Sox whether he fills in at SS or he spells Lowell at 3B. This a .300 career hitter who can pound out doubles at a solid rate and can play 3 infield positions.

by Butch Hobson's elbo chips on Jun 4, 2009 2:22 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ya but

now he’s 32, and he last played SS in 2006, for 26 games. Pretty hard to shift back over three years later, I would think.

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Jun 4, 2009 9:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah.

I do not think Freddy Sanchez is an option for the Sox at SS right now. If we are going to trade, why not just trade for someone who plays SS full time?

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 4, 2009 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Return of the mole ...

um..he’s 31. That is the same age as teammate Jack Wilson…both were born in late December, 1977. What is “pretty hard” to do is watching Green & Lugo bastardize the position on a nightly basis when Sanchez is a better fielder than both of them. Sanchez was a life long Shortstop until reaching the majors and ended up moving to 2B/3B because of Jack Wilson’s superior glove in Pittsburgh. The Sox are looking for a better ballplayer not a defensive wizard to play fill in at SS. One of the best Red Sox defensive SS ever was intentionally replaced by no other than Julio Lugo by this same Sox administration because the front office values more than just defense at the position. Having played 2B and 3B more than Shortstop since reaching the Majors doesn’t preclude Freddy Sanchez from filling in at that position at this point in his career. The Red Sox aren’t going after Rollins, Reyes types. They only want to upgrade from the 30yr old journeyman currently floundering in the position.

Past this month, the Red Sox already have a young shortstop that they like and he is ahead of schedule on his rehab. Other than JJ Hardy, not one “full time” SS who can hit his weight has even been rumored to Boston. Hardy is the starting SS for a 1st place team that already lost it’s starting second baseman for the season. I still like Hardy if that scenario evers plays out.

Sanchez is currently outhitting both Cust & Holliday (2 DH candidates names that are being thrown around) as well as outslugging Nick Johnson (another name being thrown around to upgrade the corner IF problem by moving Youk to 3B).
With Lowrie’s pending return, the Sox should be interested in someone who can give them more options, not Less. Either Hardy or Sanchez can do that for them on the left side of the infield.

 

by Butch Hobson's elbo chips on Jun 5, 2009 2:26 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

It is a question of cost.

Let’s say that Freddy Sanchez would be league-average defensively (he is a little above league average at 2B for his career, so that is probably generous). He is a solid hitter and we could expect something like a .750 OPS. This makes him a good player with significant value. However, we have someone like that in our system; his name is Jed Lowrie.

As long as the Sox think that Lowrie will come back healthy, I do not see any reason to give up players and pay Fredd Sanchez (or JJ Hardy) $8M next year when we have Jed Lowrie. You seem to understand that at one point in your post, but you still want to get these guys? And pay them and give up prospects for a month of production before Lowire gets back? I do not get it.

"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw

by BTLove on Jun 5, 2009 3:21 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because there are two distinct issues to solve.

1) Having a better ballplayer than Green or Lugo to play SS now.
2) Being able to get Mike Lowell OFF the field as much as possible throughout the Summer whether he is rested more regularly or just given more opportunities to DH. The culmination of injuries Lowell had has crippled his defense and it’s only going to get worse the more wear & tear he puts on it.

Sanchez can play 3B when Lowrie returns giving the Sox TWO defensive upgrades over their present situation and allows them to keep Youkilis at 1B.

(In the JJ Hardy situation, Lowrie would probably be the one to fill in at 3B. If they get a 1B like Nick Johnson, conventional wisdom has Youkilis moving to 3B. Larry Bowa’s nephew is another player that could help the Sox if he stayed healthy in Boston.)

by Butch Hobson's elbo chips on Jun 5, 2009 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

left handed bat

 Do you think Branyan from Seattle could be an option if Ortiz keeps sliding.

by leftyute on Jun 3, 2009 2:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over The Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything regarding the Boston Red Sox organization. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rorscach_small
The Adventures of Statman: Attack of the Scioscier
Rorscach_small
RED SOX VS. YANKEES (TEAM OF TEH TWO CENTURIES = 1900 TO 2100) - JUST THE FACTS

Recent FanPosts

Military-explosion-20799_small
Bay to the Yankees? Holliday to the Red Sox?
Small
Jason Bay rejects Sox offer
Small
Damon may not sign with yanks....scary
Small
Baseball Prospectus' Top 11 Red Sox Prospects
Small
Wagner could accept Arbitration
Redsoxlogo_small
Free Agents
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Life_is_brighter_after_guinness_small
Sox, Wakefield Agree to 2-year/$5 Million Contract
Chewbacca_pitch_red_sox_small
Who is your daddy and what does he do?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

N32606527_32219358_6072_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Helmet_icon_small bs.uf15bosox9bears23

Pedroia_small ltrain2

Red_seat_small USG

Small soxstats