Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Ohio State And Florida Target 2013 Receiver Recruits

Let's Try This Whole Lineup Thing Again

There's been a lot of discussion about the lineup voting, which Randy started yesterday. [See here for more.] While I would never question the will of the voters, which we as citizens of the internet prize above all else, there were some complaints about the fairness of the results. After careful study and diligent review, I believe a solution has been found that will address everyone's issues. So, in the spirit of democracy, I'm going to relaunch the poll, to better reflect the will of the people.

Vote away!

Poll
Who should bat leadoff for the Boston Red Sox in 2009?
J.D. Drew
14 votes
J.D. Drew
14 votes
J.D. Drew
16 votes

44 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Ha. I'm going to find a way to utilize the next-to-last tag again.

"Are you a real doctor, or a doctor like Dr. Pepper is a doctor?"

by Allen Chace on Feb 20, 2009 2:35 AM EST reply actions  

Oh, and the second Drew is clearly superior.

"Are you a real doctor, or a doctor like Dr. Pepper is a doctor?"

by Allen Chace on Feb 20, 2009 2:36 AM EST up reply actions  

LOL

Funny that it’s a tie right now.

"Hey we got a lot in common here... I'm gonna rape you"

by MerryGoByeBye on Feb 20, 2009 1:00 PM EST reply actions  

It's understandable.

The choices are SO GOOD, I wish I could vote for ALL OF THEM!

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Feb 20, 2009 1:41 PM EST up reply actions  

You can also say that

Even against only himself, there’s no way Drew is going to win a poll.

"Hey we got a lot in common here... I'm gonna rape you"

by MerryGoByeBye on Feb 20, 2009 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd believe it.

Our intangible readers, like Tony La Russa, are intangibly voting for intangible options. There must be about a thousand intangible votes out there for David Eckstein or Mr. Cellophane himself, Derek Jeter.

"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.

by 0157H7 on Feb 20, 2009 3:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Lineups

I think it’s better to vote on a whole lineup rather than piece by piece. As I see it these are our three best options.

A.
1. Ells; 2. Ped; 3. Papi; 4. Youk; 5. Bay; 6. Drew; 7. Lowell; 8. Lowrie; 9. Tek

B.
1. Ells; 2. Ped; 3. Youk; 4. Papi; 5. Bay; 6. Drew; 7. Lowell; 8. Tek; 9. Lowrie

C.
1. Drew; 2. Ped; 3. Youk; 4. Papi; 5. Bay; 6. Lowell; 7. Ells; 8. Lowrie; 9. Tek

I would be fine with B or C

by Schulz on Feb 21, 2009 3:10 PM EST reply actions  

i agree

but voting piece by piece is so much more fun

by Tippecanoe on Feb 21, 2009 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I do

And I realize that it applies to Youk least of all. My main concern was that Bay and Lowell back to back, but it’s not that big of an issue. Your lineup makes perfect sense, as I’ve said I’d rather have Papi cleanup, but I guess it doesn’t make a big difference. I think it’s been proven statistically somewhere that lineup order doesn’t really matter, and the only guideline should be to insert your hitters in order of decreasing abilities. Although I would argue that there are some exceptions.

by Schulz on Feb 23, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Why put Ells ahead of Lowrie?

Wouldn’t C be better as Drew—MVP—Papi—Youk—New Guy—Mikey—Jeb—Ells—Corpse?

by lone1c on Feb 24, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions  

Because Ellsbury is an excellent distraction on the basepaths.

Pitchers are more likely to throw heat in an attempt to keep Ellsbury on 1B.

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Feb 24, 2009 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Because Lowrie isn't very powerful

He isn’t likely to hit a homer at any given moment, so it would be beneficial to have a base-stealer in front of him for him to drive in. And I’m done with this lineup discussion, because we all know that unless Ellsbury sucks in spring, he’ll lead off, followed by Dustin, Youk/Papi, Papi/Youk, Bay, Drew, Lowell, Lowrie/Tek, Tek/Lowrie.

by Schulz on Feb 24, 2009 2:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Why not have three at the front, two on either side in a kind of pincer formation, and the other two on horseback?

Frankly, I find lineup talk a tad tedious. The way to maximise productivity, and to ensure we score 900 runs over the course of the season, is to do a Tonya Harding on Lugo and Varitek.

"no1 has time to read your long comments, are you writing a book?"

by britsoxfan on Feb 22, 2009 11:58 AM EST reply actions  

I can imagine it too

Unfortunately, it looks like Lugo was trying to play Tonya instead of Nancy:

http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/gallery/02_22_09_sox?pg=6

(Jed Lowrie (left) had to jump out of the way of the three-year-old son of his competition for the shortstop’s job, young Julio Lugo (right), as he took part in wind sprints.)

Not cool using your kids to whack the competition. . . .

by lone1c on Feb 23, 2009 8:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually, I think . . .

. . . he looks like a mash-up between Jason Bay and Jon Lester in the sit-down photo, and more like Mark Kotsay in the one with Lugo, Jr.

by lone1c on Feb 24, 2009 12:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jddrew_small
OTM Fantasy Baseball-post 2

Recent FanPosts

School-of-adventure_print_small
Carl Crawford's offensive woes.
Small
Pedroia vs Cano
I_want_to_believe_small
Dwight Evans = Hall of Famer
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been continued: 2010-2011 offseason
Small
The Red Sox and the luxury tax
Silence_small
Alfredo Aceves and Red Sox agree at $1.2 million
Danny_and_shuttle_small
Matt Garza Is Fair Compensation For Theo Epstein
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been: A revisionist look to the 2009-2010 offseason.
School-of-adventure_print_small
Dustin Moseley
Old-patriots-logo_small
Free Agent SPs Not Named Oswalt, Jackson

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi