Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Odds On Peyton Manning's Next Home Includes Three Teams

From Top To Bottom: Marco Scutaro In Boston's Lineup

Every single at bat that Marco Scutaro had with the Blue Jays in 2009 was in the leadoff spot. That's a pretty impressive feat considering he made 680 plate appearances.

Let that streak come to an end, though, when Scutaro's name is penciled into the Red Sox's lineup come Opening Day.

Star-divide

Terry Francona is a big fan of Jacoby Ellsbury. Such a big fan, in fact, that he really wants to see Ellsbury in the leadoff spot for the Red Sox for good. That's where Ellsbury started in 2009 and that's where he ended. But he wasn't there the entire time.

On May 31, Francona dropped Ellsbury from the leadoff spot to the eight-hole. His .332 on-base percentage just wasn't cutting it. After trips up and down the lineup, including in the leadoff spot on the rare occasion, Ellsbury was back at No. 1 for good on July 20. The OBP went up to .343 -- a solid 11 point increase. He finished the season with a .355 OBP -- plus 12 more points. Not too shabby.

And that is where Ellsbury is going to stay. Marco, you're going to need a new spot.

While I think it's a tad too early to talk about what the 2010 lineup should look like, you know, considering we don't even have a left fielder yet (any Jeremy Hermida supporters out there?), we can get a rough idea. Let's pretend the Red Sox sign Jason Bay or Matt Holliday. It's a crazy idea, I know, but we could figure a lineup that looks similar to this:

  1. Ellsbury, cf
  2. Pedroia, 2b
  3. Martinez, c
  4. Youkilis, 1b
  5. Ortiz, dh
  6. Bay/Holiday, lf
  7. Lowell, 3b
  8. Drew, rf
  9. Scutaro, ss

This is a lineup that's pretty interchangeable. One through three is locked, but Youkilis, Ortiz and Bay could all be flip-flopped if Tito wanted. Lowell and Drew is also a toss up, but historically Tito likes to bat Lowell ahead of Drew.

So it's not a real mystery: Scutaro goes from leadoff man to No. 9 hitter. It's not that he's a bad hitter, it's just that this is the only place for him. Except, well, when Jason Varitek is in the lineup. Then expect to see Scutaro bat eighth.

Scutaro will also likely "spell" Ellsbury in the leadoff spot when he has his days off. I think Francona would be more willing to do that than move Pedroia or Drew to leadoff. Hopefully that's the case. I love Pedroia and Drew, but both, in my opinion, seem to do better in the two-hole.

I like Scutaro in the 9-hole, though. He's the "second leadoff man," as some people like to say. It's a good OBP to have at the bottom of the order, if he produces anywhere near Bill James's prediction of .350. If Scutaro gets on and Ellsbury can't hit him around, Pedroia, Martinez and Youkilis will have their shots. I can see Scutaro scoring a lot of runs this season.

Speaking of hitting, I'll probably dissect this in its own post, but I expect a lot of doubles out of Scutaro in 2010. He had 35 with the Jays last year. With The Monster so close, I think Scutaro could be a rack in 40-50 doubles if he plays 150+ games. I'll take that.

Where do you see Scutaro in the Red Sox's lineup?

Poll
On a typical night, where will Marco Scutaro hit in the Red Sox's lineup?
No. 9 -- no better place to put him
319 votes
No. 8 -- Francona will surprise us a bit
116 votes
No. 1 -- Francona will REALLY surprise us
62 votes

497 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

9th

UNLESS Ellsbury regresses OBP-wise and Scutaro maintains his from last year.
Also if Tek is in, for instance.

USG

by Ben Buchanan on Dec 4, 2009 7:31 PM EST reply actions  

Agreed

9th except in cases of emergency (ie Tek’s catching that day)

DFA Beckett

by South Coast Ghost on Dec 4, 2009 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Is it grammatically correct?

That apostrophe looked weird to me.

Manny ain't the only bad man.

by tommy.otm on Dec 4, 2009 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Looks good to me.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 4, 2009 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

exactly

There’s a chance Scutaro could be there at some point in the season, but it will be because Ellsbury has been struggling, Ellsbury will definitely start there

by wolf9309 on Dec 4, 2009 7:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Drew has got to be higher than 8th

He’s the second best hitter on team behind Youk.

by Gnick on Dec 5, 2009 3:02 AM EST reply actions  

After "team"?

I guess so. Not that I think anyone woulda noticed.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 5, 2009 7:00 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah

Because with the comma it’s implying that what I’m saying is the second best hitter on the team while hitting behind Youk, instead of being the second best to Youk.

by Gnick on Dec 5, 2009 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

That makes sense.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 5, 2009 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

like

i like this better 1. Ells 2. DPed 3. HRam 4. Youk 5. Vmart 6. AGonz 7. Bay/Holliday 8. JD
9. Ortiz/Lowell
yada yada….i’m on crack…..but Theo could make it happen if he had the nutz!!

by wdogg72 on Dec 5, 2009 12:29 PM EST reply actions  

no

it’s just silly. ridiculous. Florida is not going to trade Hanley now, certainly not before the all-star break. Florida is a team that yes, does trade off all their star players when they get expensive, but they are also a team that competes quite well and has somewhat of a chance next year, so they are going to take their team to the all star break, and possibly trade him (if there’s a ridiculously large offer) if they are out of competition.

It’s not all up to Theo. This isn’t video game trading. The other teams have a say in it as well. Florida, with their new ballpark coming, is not in a great hurry to trade away their stars right before they move. I’m sure that if Theo offered our entire farm system plus maybe Buchholz they’d trade away Hanley right now, but anything that would bring him in would absolutely cripple our organization for years to come.

I ignored Adrian Gonzalez because to get both Hanley and Adrian Gonzalez, we would have to trade away both our ENTIRE farm system plus the cheap parts of our current roster.

yes, you well might be on crack, but more likely you have no clue how baseball works.

by wolf9309 on Dec 5, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

yada yada

for a bunch of bleeding heart liberals…….you sure are conservative

by wdogg72 on Dec 5, 2009 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

what?

bleeding heart liberals? what?

Conservative? what? It’s not conservative, it’s trying to have a successful team in the long term, not just for a year.

Do you not understand that other teams decide whether they want to trade players and what they want to trade them for? Do you have any basis behind thinking what you’ve suggested is remotely possible? Do you just like trolling?

by wolf9309 on Dec 5, 2009 4:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Wolfman:

Click on his name.

Look at his photo.

Questions immediately become answered.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 5, 2009 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha!

I guess he wasn’t kidding when he said he was on crack……

"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko

by sox-inda-south on Dec 6, 2009 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

(calm, demeaning tone).....this isn't politics, this is baseball......

"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko

by sox-inda-south on Dec 6, 2009 9:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi

Retired Numbers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rollie_fingers_small SoxDevil

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Photo_small wolf9309