Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Veterans Share Favorite Sports Memories

Marco Scutaro: Another Take

Ah ! well a-day ! what evil looks
Had I from old and young !

Instead of the cross, the Albatross
About my neck was hung.
-
Samuel Taylor Coleridge,
"The Rime of the Ancient Mariner" (1798)

These days, Theo Epstein might feel like he's carrying an albatross around his neck - a carcass composed of his abortive efforts to fill the shortstop position. The Scutaro signing, which Randy has optimistically analyzed over here, is an attempt to chuck the bird off his chest, but it seems likely to backfire, just as the Lugo and Renteria acquisitions did.

I've already detailed why I think Marco Scutaro is a bad signing. How his career numbers, on both offense and defense, were worse than Julio Lugo's when Theo signed him. But worst of all, it doesn't seem to fit the modern Red Sox strategy. [CLICK CONTINUE READING FOR MORE.]

Star-divide

Normally, Theo's moves seem to adhere to an overarching plan. If I had to give a name to that plan, it would be the "$100 million player development machine," which are Theo's words. The farm system feeds the team, providing inexpensive, talented players like Youkilis, Lester, Pedroia, and Ellsbury; some prospects are traded to bring additional talent in (see Victor Martinez, Josh Beckett deals). The Red Sox use their superior financial resources to sign their draft picks, to pursue international talent (Matsuzaka, Tazawa, maybe Chapman?), to resign their home-grown players (extensions for Youk, Pedey, Lester), and to fill occasional needs with good free agents (Drew). Additional money is spent on short-term, low-risk, high-reward moves, in the model of the Smoltz, Penny and Saito signings last year. Unlike the Yankees, who these days build around free agents, the Sox build around their farm.

Where does Scutaro fit in this model? Considering that the Front Office is signing him off a career year, as a Type A free agent, he's definitely not a value acquisition. He's not an underrated player like J D Drew that deserves a long-term commitment. Furthermore, by signing Scutaro, the Sox are giving up a first round draft pick, which could conceivably have produced the next Clay Buchholz or Casey Kelly (or the next unimpressive player like Jason Place).

There are two conclusions we can draw from this signing. First, the Front Office doesn't have much confidence in Lowrie. Even if he's only making $6 million (I think it'll be higher, at $7 or $8 million) Scutaro will block Lowrie. Considering that Lowrie, in limited play, seems better defensively (9.7 UZR in 549.2 innings at SS, good for a 27.0 UZR / 150 games) than Scutaro, this is probably a bad thing. Second, Theo must be feeling some pressure to make a move at SS; otherwise he would not sign a player coming off a career year who costs a 1st round draft pick. This pressure might be from people within the organization (Henry, Luchhino), or without (fans anxious for a big move). It might be so that Theo feels he'll have some stability at the position, even if he's paying through the nose for it.

In closing, I hate this move. It reeks of panic and desperation, and is completely out of keeping with both the Red Sox organizational philosophy, and the wisdom of economics and baseball. That said, good luck, Mr. Scutaro, and feel free to prove me wrong. Go (get Holliday) Sox.

Poll
Is the Scutaro signing a good move?
Yes. He'll make the team better.
269 votes
No. It is the wrong man, for the wrong price, at the wrong time, for the wrong reasons.
138 votes
Vote Undecided / Unsure in 2010!
82 votes

489 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I hated him until I saw the deal and thought about it more

He provides a ton of flexibility. His plate discipline seemed improved over last year, and no reason to assume that he will suddenly lose that (he revamped his stance and batting approach last year). He’s only $5 million a year, which doesn’t preclude Lowrie from getting a shot at short, with Scutaro as a backup. I think they’ll both see time there. It’s only for 2 years, not a big commitment. For the 3rd year, we will have to pay $1.5 million to let him go, but only another $1.5 million over that if we decide to keep him as a utility guy (and he still wants to be here).

Really a pretty good signing. We’ll see in a while which draft pick he gets. I’ll still be a bit upset if he gets a first rounder, but I don’t think that’ll happen, and anyways, the deal is a small enough commitment that I won’t be as pissed as I would have been if he’d gotten the deal people were hypothesizing and first rounder.

I think it’s a good solution for now.

by wolf9309 on Dec 4, 2009 11:00 AM EST reply actions  

You beat me to the punch

I was just about to post his contract terms. Given the dollars, I think it’s a great signing.

by Schulz on Dec 4, 2009 11:03 AM EST up reply actions  

The option

I think Olney made a typo on twitter that MLBTR corrected.

The option is $6MM club option, $3MM player option, $1.5MM buyout (similar to Varitek’s contract).

by Schulz on Dec 4, 2009 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

yeah

a $6 MM Player Option and a $3 Million Club option makes no sense at all. That’s what I assumed.

by wolf9309 on Dec 4, 2009 11:12 AM EST up reply actions  

I agree

in the sense that the deal is short, and not overwhelmingly expensive. Scutaro is a good utility player. The thing I don’t like is the fact that he is not a very good everyday player and I think there were better options for less for everyday players. It is nice to have the flexibility, but at 12+million for 2 years with the blockage potential and the pick I still don’t like it.

by Buzzy on Dec 4, 2009 11:13 AM EST up reply actions  

What are the options?

This is a good move. There are times when the realities of a market force you to change your philosophy. Lowrie is going to get ABs, playing some SS and some 3B. We have a competent SS for a couple years, a good young backup who, if he proves himself, can take over the position full time… and we have a 19 year old with tons of potential in the minors. Adding a decent SS isn’t as exciting as trading for Hanley, but it will do the trick. And by the time spring training starts, I doubt that we will have given up a first rounder. Theo is planning to pick up others, and the draft impact will be far less.

by greggb on Dec 4, 2009 11:21 AM EST reply actions  

I woke up this morning and saw the news

that we signed Scutaro and i didnt like it. So i looked up some stats on him and i love his patience, if his approach has really changed and he can keep that patience i dont think he will drop that badly as many people predict he will. Now that we have information about the contract i like it even more, i think the contract is a very fair one and given that Gonzo would have cost atleast 3 Mio a year, I much rather have Scutaro, especially cause Gonzos second half was a bigger fluke than Scutaros year in my eyes. He doesnt block Lowrie and we have a solid SS should Lowrie not be healthy or if he doesnt perform well.
If we now back that Scutaro signing up with signing Holliday i will even be more happy.

by German Red Sox Fan on Dec 4, 2009 11:25 AM EST reply actions  

I don't think you can count on that

he is reasonably patient, but his walk rates have fluctuated a lot in his career. However, the more I calm down over this, the better I am feeling…

by Buzzy on Dec 4, 2009 12:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Me, too.

I’m glad I waited before voting in the poll. ;)

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 4, 2009 12:31 PM EST up reply actions  

the second sentence in my post is missing an if

So i looked up some stats on him and i love his patience, if his approach has really changed and IF he can keep that patience i dont think he will drop that badly as many people predict he will.

So i guess thats the way i meant it. Basically im not counting on it but i dont feel as bad as i felt when i first read we have him, especially given the moderate contract.

by German Red Sox Fan on Dec 4, 2009 12:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Our team is better than it was on the last day of the 2009 season

and we had no other options.

Miguel Cabrera IS the solution to our problems.
Release Jason Varitek before ST is over !
Do not pay Jason Bay !!
Trade Buchholz !!!

by gizmosandy on Dec 4, 2009 11:31 AM EST reply actions  

exactly

A deal for Hanley is simply not going to get done. Scutaro is a good fit into our lineup simply because we have no one else. Dont say Lowrie because Scutaro has proven to be a better player. he signed for 2 years…once those years are up the hope is that Iglesias will be the shortstop. This is a good short term fix in my opinion

by cnubsbl16 on Dec 4, 2009 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

How so?

Lowrie in 08 was close to Scutaro last year, and otherwise better than any other year Scutaro has ever had. It was a half year, but you cannot argue that a full year of 08 Lowrie is not better by far than Suctaro in an average year. Lowrie’s success in the minors shows that this was most likely not a fluke, and in fact his numbers would have been better if not for his sore wrist. So you are just plain wrong. You can argue that Lowrie is now damaged and might not reach the potential he had before the injury, but otherwise, forget it.

by Buzzy on Dec 4, 2009 3:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Lowrie is fragile, end of story.

He cannot stay healthy. There are plenty of guys in MLB or any other sport who have potential but can’t go long without getting hurt, so they become useless.

Miguel Cabrera IS the solution to our problems.
Release Jason Varitek before ST is over !
Do not pay Jason Bay !!
Trade Buchholz !!!

by gizmosandy on Dec 4, 2009 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

?

he has had one injury that was mismanaged (he should have had surgery after 08). He was hurt once in the minors and never in college. By this logic, every player is fragile. Stop being so impatient.

by Buzzy on Dec 4, 2009 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Well it's pretty clear the front office has lost some faith as well.

I’d say he will get dealt.

Miguel Cabrera IS the solution to our problems.
Release Jason Varitek before ST is over !
Do not pay Jason Bay !!
Trade Buchholz !!!

by gizmosandy on Dec 4, 2009 7:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I don't think so

in any case we need someone as a backup infielder. Whether it’s Jed or Scutaro, either would be great at it. Jed is not just better but much cheaper than any other UI option we have right now. Plus his trade value is probably pretty miserable since (because of the injury) he hasn’t gotten to prove himself in the majors.

by wolf9309 on Dec 4, 2009 7:51 PM EST up reply actions  

obviously the fact that he is hurt has something to do with y hes not an option. He had a horrible year last year face the facts….varitek was more productive and i think a monkey might have been able to hit better than him. Scutaro was the best that Theo could do, and i dont know y everyones complaining

by cnubsbl16 on Dec 6, 2009 12:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Red Sox philosophy

Considering I am reading “Feeding the Monster” currently (almost done, hope to finish tonight), part of me feels like Scutaro DOES make sense.

Sacrificing a pick for a guy coming off a career year isn’t a Theo-esque move; we know that. But, in a way, isn’t this still a low-risk, high-reward type of deal?

Scutaro’s contract is pretty good considering HE WAS THE BEST FREE AGENT SHORTSTOP IN BASEBALL. The crop was bad, of course, but it doesn’t mean that statement is false.

Everyone expects Scutaro to regress. Everyone expects Scutaro to not play like 2009. But what if Theo doesn’t?

Maybe Theo is banking on the fact Marco is a) going to a new, hitter-friendly ballpark where the Monster is an invitation for doubles and dents, b) going to a perennial contender which excites EVERY player, no matter who they are and c) finally feeling like a major part of the puzzle, something he has NEVER been. All of these could come together and make Marco Scutaro play as good or better in ’09.

In a sudden 24 hour shift, I am excited for Scutaro. I am excited to see what he brings to the table. I think he’s going to be our kind of guy.

SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow Randy on Twitter: @RCBooth

by Randy Booth on Dec 4, 2009 2:19 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 7
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 6

Recent FanPosts

010_small
OTM Simpson Analogues
Pedroialazers2_small
The possibility of trading Kevin Youkilis
Moar_bacon_small
PSA vs. OTM Fantasy Smackdown Update
Small
The Curious Case of Daniel Nava
Rsz_ashleyspade_small
Top Red Sox Prospects
Einstein_small
OTM Fantasy: Week 5
Small
Mariano Rivera and TS Elliot and maybe Robert Frost
Small
Rivera has torn ACL

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi