Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: College Football Preseason Top 25 Rankings

Winter Meetings, Day Three Recap: Mike Lowell Making Things Fun

Another day at the winter meetings means another day with no news.

Some news, actually, but nothing significant. No signings, no trades. Not even a great quote here or there. Nevertheless, here are the rumors floating around the Interwebs.

Mike Lowell might be traded.

See what happens when I try to write up posts in advance?

Star-divide

RED SOX RUMBLINGS:

Twitter / Ken Rosenthal: Prelim agreement on Lowell ...

Yup, so that's the big news. If it goes through (and, as of this writing, it's still "preliminary"), this will be an interesting shakeup for the Sox. Where does Max Ramirez fit? He's catcher with a huge bat, one that fits perfectly in the Sox system (hits for power and gets on base at an amazing clip). But can he stay behind the plate? Will he be in the bigs in 2010? Either the Sox will season him a little in AAA, or he could DH a little bit, play a little catcher. Maybe he'll be the backup catcher and the Sox will dump Jason Varitek. That's a possibility, too.

But, as of now, a deal is not official. Let's remember that. So who will play third? Well, thanks for asking!...

BostonHerald.com - Sources: Red Sox interest in Beltre significant

It could be that guy, but who really knows? Adrian Beltre would probably hit quite well in Fenway Park. And he is perhaps the best defensive third baseman in baseball, so this is a nice fit. The only thing that doesn't fit is the contract. Word is his agent, Scott Boras, wants a similar contract to the one he last signed. That would be in the $12 million per year range. That may be a little pricey. But the Sox have a decent history with Boras, so that could come down.

Bradley one (explosive) possibility - Extra Bases - Red Sox blog

I hope we can just laugh at this now. Everyone was when the rumor happened, anyway.

BostonHerald.com - Source: 3 other teams besides Red Sox in on Bay

Angels, Mariners and ... Mets? They're rumored to be in on Matt Holliday, but the other rumor is that they have no money to spend. Funny how that works. I'm sure there are a handful of other teams that Bay could land with, but nothing seems too obvious.

NON-RED SOX RUMBLINGS:

Rangers Trade Pitcher Kevin Millwood To Orioles - SB Nation

An interesting move, but it makes a lot of sense considering...

Report: Rich Harden To Sign With Texas Rangers, Pending Physical - SB Nation

...they wanted to make room for this guy. Good deal for the Rangers when it's all said and done. Harden has a lot of potential and even Chris Ray could work his way back to being a solid reliever with closer potential. I have a feeling it'll be hard to watch the Sox face Harden this year.

Brewers Staying Busy During Winter Meetings, Sign Pitchers Randy Wolf, LaTroy Hawkins - SB Nation

Two nice pickups for the Brew Crew. Seems to me that they want to compete this year. Good for them. I hear C.C. Sabathia is on the market. Nah, not true. Sorry to get your hopes up, Brewers.

Rays close to trading for Rafael Soriano

Another bullpen arm to compete with in the AL East. Soriano pitched well for the Braves, but how will that translate to the American League?

Fast Eddy keeps going: Astros ink Brandon Lyon - The Crawfish Boxes

A former Sox going to a team managed by a former Sox. Poetry in motion, for sure. The deal is worth $15 million over three years. This isn't a bad deal for a bonafide closer, but the job certainly isn't his at this point. Maybe he could win it in the spring.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Some of us have known

for a while by just watching the on field performances of the last year that the Sox needed a big rehab, and now it begins. Good! I am glad Randy anyway has joined the reality crowd, but maybe a few others will leave the rose colored glasses crowd to see reality.

Anyway, I doubt the partially rebuilt Sox can compete too well in one year, especially with the Yankees buying up all the best talent, but I am glad the process has begun!

by NG on Dec 10, 2009 8:18 AM EST reply actions  

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Dec 10, 2009 9:17 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Score.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 10, 2009 9:49 AM EST up reply actions  

Ha ha ha...

…well met.

You’re wrong…but still.

Galactus does as he pleases. Because Galactus is drunk.

by Bloggy on Dec 11, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I like the potential of Max Ramirez

But trading Lowell and giving up $9m @ 3b, well can make 3B an expensive position depending on what they do.

They could move Max to first and see how he does there, with Youk going to 3rd. Doesn’t make sense to move V-mart out of C.

They could sign Beltre or trade for Cabrera @ 3rd. From what Boras is holding out for with Beltre – I’d rather move on Cabrera and his $14m then go for Beltre for $12m and picks.

I’m not sure if Cabrera would be motivated by or hate the passion of Boston, but part of me thinks he’s got to be tired of losing.

Ellsbury could be attractive to the Tigers now as part of that deal – and while I like Jake, CF is a position full of talent right now, and he’s not at the elite end of it.

Cabrera, provided he could be motivated correctly, would be a bonafide middle order bat for 3-4 years at least. Eventually replacing Papi @ DH. OOOH exciting!

by JonnyNYC on Dec 10, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

cabrera?

He’s not $14 million. He’s between $20-$22 million for the years up to 2015. Big difference. You mean Miguel Cabrera right? He’s not a 3rd baseman, that would involve youk going to 3rd.

Defensively, youk/beltre corners destroys pretty much any other possible combination. Cabrera/Youk would probably be better in all- and destroy offensively, but would be pretty expensive in dollars for a long time and in prospects.

by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

Right Miggy " I hit my Wife and I'm fat"

With a fat contract. Sorry I went of what he made this year, didn’t look to the escalation of the deal in future years.

Offensively Youk/Beltre is below average for corner infielders though, so if they are going for Beltre, then I would like to see them go all out for Holliday as well.

And if that’s the case, it’s actually better then Cabrera still, because you are giving up draft picks, not actual talent, yet. Not idea to give up picks, but not the worst thing either

by JonnyNYC on Dec 10, 2009 9:51 AM EST up reply actions  

offensively

Beltre looks much better when you get him out of Safeco.

Career .826 OPS on road vs .727 OPS at Safeco & Chevez Ravine (Dodger stadium). Or in tOPS, the numbers are 112 vs 88.

Pretty huge gap and that’s across 3569 road PAs and 3308 home PAs, so its very real.

Basically, his offensive stats have has really taken it on the chin by playing in those two parks.

He should be a solid bet to put up mid-20s HRs and around 40 doubles in Fenway, which would not be ‘below average’.

by mmmmm on Dec 10, 2009 2:14 PM EST up reply actions  

yup

god knows they’ve got a long way to go to really compete after this god-awful 95-win season

by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 9:19 AM EST up reply actions  

But we got smushed

In October, and looked shaky for an awful large part of the season. Beltre is a surefire improvement over Lowell in every way, even if this is a rebuilding year.

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 11:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Huh?

you are using a 3 game sample size to judge the season? Thats not a good idea. There is no reason that this should or will be a “rebuilding” year. Sure, we should try to improve and get younger, every year. Next year we will be better and younger than the 95 win 09 team.

by Buzzy on Dec 10, 2009 12:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Look

Even before the 3 game series, which is obv a very small sample size, we were not playing well against any of the good teams. We had the massive regression to the mean against the Yankees, and had to have some “assistance” from an ump to take down the Angels at Fenway. This wasn’t a team built for a deep run into the playoffs.

We will eventually have to face the Yankees if we want to win a WS, do you think this club can take them down?

http://www.virtualfenway.com

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 12:19 PM EST up reply actions  

sure

we swept the yankees first half of the year. Just sayin. Anything can happen. I would be amazed if half the yankees players performed half as well as they did this year next year.

by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 1:00 PM EST up reply actions  

important point

the red sox were the victims of some small-number statistical events that went the other way – i.e. ‘bad luck’.

The team offense collectively slumped during the mid-season losing streak against the Rays and the Yankees that first put them in a whole. People forget how close most of those games were – if they get just a single clutch hit in that first extra inning game that wasted a great Lester pitching performance and totally taxed the bullpen – that totally changes the way the rest of those two series plays out.

Just a tiny handful of hits – made by opponents and NOT made by the Red Sox – made for huge swings in the standings this season.

Unfortunately , that’s baseball. But it reinforces wolf9309’s point that the gap between the Red Sox and the Yankees wasn’t THAT huge.

Statistically, our offense overall was fine and competitive – overall not a real drop off from the last couple of years. But it slumped badly as a team in a couple of very noticeable stretches and that is what a lot of folks remember.

Our pitching was overall very good – especially once Smolz was out of the picture and after Buchholz and Dice-K came back strong.

Our defense was definitely a problem in a few spots and that hurt us compared to 2008.

by mmmmm on Dec 10, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Yankees

Last year the Yankees had only a 35 total run differential advantage over the Red Sox-basically equating to an estimate of 3 wins. To do that they had career performances out of a huge number of aging players, and expected but excellent performances out of the younger guys. Damon, Jeter, Matsui, Rivera and Posada played far beyond their years. They had no major injury save missing ARod for 5 weeks and Wang. Even last year if you ran that season many times it is not close to a lock that they are standing at the end.

by Buzzy on Dec 10, 2009 2:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually

The MFY’s run differential was only +26 better than the Sox last year. The MFY scored 43 more runs than Boston and allowed 17 more runs.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Dec 10, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

And ... +1

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Dec 10, 2009 2:43 PM EST up reply actions  

i have no idea how posada had the year he had

isn’t he 38? catchers don’t have that kind of year at his age. makes me wonder about what supplements he’s taking. the yankees will be clearly worse next year when these guys come down to earth.

by revived0103 on Dec 10, 2009 3:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Sign Adrian Beltre

I’ve changed my mind, and actually think we should sign Beltre to a 2-3 year contract, maybe even for 4. If we can get him for anything under what Figgins received, I think he could be a bargain. He has great away numbers, and is a dead-pull righty. He’s consistently listed as the best 3b by the fielding bible, near the top by UZR, and has been very reliable.

If we can parlay his crappy ’09 into an undervalued contract (even up to 4/32), we should go for it. With Ortiz going off the books next season, we can still acquire a power-hitting 1B for the DH spot.

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 11:41 AM EST reply actions  

I don't see him getting a bigger contract than Figgins

Who else is looking for his service?

To zobrist; verb – to overlook the superiority of a person or object based on misleading sensory or conversational factors. e.g. "My teacher totally zobristed me on that paper – I’d included all the points he asked for but I didn’t drone on about Grover Cleveland enough. He’s totally biased towards Cleveland. What’s worse is that Danny Dukowski got an A, and his prose style is terrible. He’s a total Victorino." deadspy3 - Amazin' Avenue

by bloodysock04 on Dec 10, 2009 11:50 AM EST up reply actions  

The Figgins contract was dumb

I’m not sure I’d spend 4/36 on Beltre. But that will probably be the minimum to sign him from Boras’s point of view, and the maximum from the Sox’ standpoint. The fact is, once Lowell is gone, the Sox don’t have a lot of leverage. They’ll either have to sign Beltre or play a combination of Lowrie/Kotchman to make up Mikey’s offense.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Dec 10, 2009 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

If we don't get Beltre

Nick Johnson? Johnson’s a part time 1b onaconna being injured all the time, and so is Victor.

http://www.virtualfenway.com

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I would hope

that we wouldn’t pull the trigger on the Texas deal unless we had something concrete- like Boras had agreed to an offer we (nonpublicly) made to him. I think Beltre is a better option than Lowell at third, but I wouldn’t want to see Youk as opening day 3rd baseman unless we managed to get Gonzalez or someone of that caliber (highly unlikely!)

If we were stuck in a hole, I’d be fine with Johnson for a 1- or maybe 2-year deal for not too much money. Really last decent choice for me though, after keeping the corners we had last year.

by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Let's see if Lowell gets traded first

It hasn’t happened yet.

Getting another 1B is one way to go. But I don’t really like Youk at 3B. I don’t want VMart at 1B because I feel it’s best to limit Tek’s playing time.

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Dec 10, 2009 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

It could happen

I cannot see him signing for more than 4/36, can you?

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

Reply fail?

To zobrist; verb – to overlook the superiority of a person or object based on misleading sensory or conversational factors. e.g. "My teacher totally zobristed me on that paper – I’d included all the points he asked for but I didn’t drone on about Grover Cleveland enough. He’s totally biased towards Cleveland. What’s worse is that Danny Dukowski got an A, and his prose style is terrible. He’s a total Victorino." deadspy3 - Amazin' Avenue

by bloodysock04 on Dec 10, 2009 11:59 AM EST up reply actions  

Truly miserable fail

but I haven’t had coffee yet.

http://www.virtualfenway.com

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 12:08 PM EST up reply actions  

You mentioned coffee

Now I need it.

SB Nation's Boston Red Sox community:
OverTheMonster.com
Follow Randy on Twitter: @RCBooth

by Randy Booth on Dec 10, 2009 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Dunkies put

Pumpkin coffee back into hibernation until next Fall. I’m still trying to put my life back together.

http://www.virtualfenway.com

by Sean O on Dec 10, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I can't find it so maybe I made it up in my head

But I’m sure I saw he was only looking for a 3-year deal. I wouldn’t pay 4/36 for him, but 3/27, sure!

by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tardy_001_small
The negativity
Tatersox_small
I Demand Blood

Recent FanPosts

Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Minor League Rankings
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
It's Not Over Yet,  But....
Small
OTM Fantasy Football?
Tatersox_small
A Yahoo Fantasy Reminder
Small
2011 Roster/Lineup Formation
Spokedb_onblack_1600x1200_small
Portland SeaDogs Report
Small
TB vs. BOS series (Aug. 27-29)
T
Welcome to the 2010 Red Sox Playoffs! Starting early (August)? This may be as good as it gets.

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

ATLANTA - APRIL 22:  Omar Infante #4 of the Atlanta Braves celebrates after scoring against the Philiadelphia Phillies at Turner Field on April 22, 2010 in Atlanta, Georgia.  (Photo by Kevin C. Cox/Getty Images)

Albert Pujols, Joey Votto, And The Triple Crown Villains Who Plot Their Ruin

Washington Nationals' Nyjer Morgan, center, is led off the field after a brawl during the sixth inning of a baseball game against the Florida Marlins, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010, in Miami. (AP Photo/Wilfredo Lee) +4 updates

Nats, Marlins Brawl After Nyjer Morgan Charges Mound

Photo

Aroldis Chapman Touches 104, Earns First Win As Reds Rally Past Brewers

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Red-sox-yankees_small BerkshireFan

Photo_small wolf9309