My plan for the Sox this offseason
This plan is around pitching and defense: Most of you know that the Mariners made a huge turn this season and from a team with a losing record to one with 85-77, their process? Run prevention!
The M's have the best defense in baseball, they're sporting an 85.5 UZR!! Obviously, this top notch defense helped their pitching staff to lead the AL in ERA, take a look at their starters ERA and compare it with their respective FIP, It's the best way to understand the impact of the fielders:
|
Starters |
ERA |
FIP |
|
2.49 |
3.09 |
|
|
2.64 |
3.80 |
|
|
Ryan Rowland-Smith |
3.74 |
4.20 |
|
4.91 |
5.07 |
|
|
2.82 |
3.55 |
You can check the rest of the pitchers here, The results are the same: The defense is making the M's pitchers post numbers superior to their true talent level. That's the route that I want my team to take. We know where the problems are: The Red Sox fielders were terrible this year posting a team UZR of -16.3 due in big part to the 2 butchers patrolling center and left field and Mike Lowell defense at 3rd base:
Ellsbury UZR/150: -18.6
Bay UZR/150: -11.2
Lowell UZR/150: -14.4
The Lineup:
First step would be to ship Lowell to a team looking for a 3rd baseman (Phillies did like him) and eating a portion of his salary for a mid level prospect like Trevor May. If he can't play third, we could ship him with cash to the Mets to be their 1st baseman and receive a prospect like Jeurys Familia. After that, I would like the FO to sign Adrian Beltre to a 3 years 7 millions/year deal so we could bring his superior defense to Fenway, his bat should be fine too when he leaves the cavernous Safeco Field (Check out this if you don't believe me).
For LF, I would like the team to sign Matt Holliday but not at a steep price: A 6 years at 18 millions/year should be the final offer! If another team wants to pay more (which I think they will), let them have him. And let's sign Mike Cameron to a one year deal at 10 millions to play CF and shift Ellsbury to LF where he plays some terrific defense.
Catcher: Victor Martinez
1st baseman: Kevin Youkilis UZR/150 15.2
2nd baseman: Dustin Pedroia UZR/150 10.6
Short Stop: Jed Lowrie UZR/150 32.0 (Small sample size but you got the idea that bs.uf's boy is a solid defender)
3rd Baseman: Adrian Beltre UZR/150 21.0 (I told you he's amazing with the leather!)
Left Fielder: Jacoby Ellsbury UZR/150 30.3 (Those are 2008 numbers where he played 58 games, obviously those numbers will regress but he'll remain a solid fielder like Crawford)
Center Fielder: Mike Cameron UZR/150 10.3
Right Fielder: JD Drew UZR/150 15.7
That's a stellar defensive team that will prevent a LOT of runs and will keep the payroll at the previous years level: So we can let the kids (Kalish and Reddick) continue their learning process in AAA and we could go after the big fish (You know who I'm talking about right?) next season after unloading all the bad contracts.
Starting Pitchers:
I would like to make a trade with the Marlins for Ricky Nolasco, now I know that their long term deal negotiation with Josh Johnson have come to an end but the price should be VERY high and I don't want to drain the whole farm for a pitcher with a TJ surgery in his resume. Nolasco on the other hand is an awesome pitcher who's high ERA (5.06) don't tell his true value (3.35 FIP) because of bad luck and fielding ( acoording to UZR, the Marlins are the 3rd worst fielding team in the NL which led to BABIP as high as .336) which should drive his price down: I think that a Kotchman/Kelly package could get the deal done.
Imagine a rotation of Beckett/ Lester/ Buckhholz/ Matsuzaka and Nolasco (with Wakefield) playing in front of the best defensive team in baseball!!!! You have evreything you want in it: Youth, depth and cost control, plus you have Tazawa and Bowden waiting in the wings.
To restock the farm and replace the Kelly "loss", I would like that our FO signs Noel Arguelles who defected with Aroldis Chapman and who came in at No. 10 on Keith Law's list of the top 50 FAs:
Arguelles is 19 and already pitches with a solid-average fastball, although before he defected he had worked as high as 91-94 and will probably return there once he's throwing on a regular schedule again. His changeup projects better than his curveball, with the change a potentially plus pitch. What everyone notices about Arguelles is his body -- loose, lean, athletic, with good projection.
If he was an American high school or junior college player, he'd be a solid first-rounder with a chance to be a top-10 guy and would probably be a $4 million bonus baby. As a free agent, he should easily double that
Bullpen:
I would like to take a flyer in signing Kelvim Escobar as low risk-high reward kind of deal and promoting Dustin Richardson.
Bench:
I would like to make a trade with the D'Backs for Connor Jackson (If they choose to tender him), who could play LF and 1st base and kill LHPs in the process: A Doubront/Lentz can get the deal done.
As an utility infielder, I would like to sign Gonzalez to a one-year deal, if not I would love having Omar Vizquel or Adam Everett.
That's my plan, any thoughts?
3 recs |
109 comments
Comments
Why sign Cameron if you already have Holliday? I like Beltre, I also think we should take a shot at Ben Sheets as a low risk high reward guy and I think we should take a look at Harden if the price is right.
by A Guy on Nov 22, 2009 8:12 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I said that
I would like to have Holliday but I don’t think that a 108 millions over 6 years will get the deal done because someone else (NY teams) will outbid us!
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 22, 2009 8:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
this comment is funny. You have absolutely nothing smart to say, so you just bitch about the yankees. when in all reality, if you had half of a brain, you would realize the only way the yankees would consider bidding on halladay, is to drive up the price for the red sox, like every other team in baseball does to their rivals. If you really think that the yankees would sign halladay, or consider the mets a serious threat to outbid you. Youre an idiot.
by PolishMiracle on Nov 25, 2009 4:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, its not like the Yankees have ever outbid the Sox for a player,
oh, wait: Teixeira, Damon, Contreras, Pavano, Mussina all come to mind immediately. Actually, I don’t think the Sox have ever outbid the Yankees on a FA that both teams wanted.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 25, 2009 4:47 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that's not quite the same
That was on a closed posting fee, which was justified more of for gaining japanese fans to help merchandising, etc. than as a cost for the player.
by wolf9309 on Nov 29, 2009 12:49 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
As Wolf says, not the same at all.
That process was entirely different than the free agent process.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 29, 2009 3:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
and the reason we overbid in the posting process was so we might have a chance to sign a top player without competing against the Yankees for the signing.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 29, 2009 3:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
"Youre an idiot"
Hix talked about Holliday and the likelihood of losing a bidding war against the Yanks. You call him names and start talking about bidding on “Halladay,” stating the Yanks wouldn’t have interest except to drive up the price.
While its unclear whether you meant to talk about Holliday or Halladay, its pretty obvious you don’t know what you are talking about. The Yanks have a vacancy in LF and lots of money coming off the books in Damon and Matsui. Of course they’d be interested in the best available LF. As for Halladay, he’s the best pitcher in baseball. If the Yanks have an achilles heel its the lack of depth in their rotation. Why the hell wouldn’t they be interested in Roy Halladay?
Smarter trolls, please.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 25, 2009 5:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yanks will back the Wells Fargo truck up..
To pay Jeter in 2011. They might as well change there team name and uniforms if they don’t resign him So the Yanks believe it or not have some limitations. Right now the jabbering is the Sox or the Yanks have to take Wells in any trade. No one wants that 107 million dollar bust. Yanks will snag Bedard, Lackey and Huff and make a run at Damon.
If the sox traded for Halladay, and had to take Wells contract too.. Good bye Pap and Vmart in 2011..
by NJHEAT on Dec 4, 2009 11:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Was this a response to me?
If any Halladay trade is conditioned on moving Wells, then the Jay either aren’t getting anything of value in return or they aren’t making a deal. They’ll make a deal. They could get 4 or 5 solid prospects for Halladay – basically the pick of any system – or they can keep him, finish fourth, and then get two draft picks. The smart money says they’ll move him.
And no doubt, Jeter will retire a Yankee. But he won’t be getting much of a raise at age 38. Same with Posada, and Pettite. The Yanks could take on Holliday or Halladay’s salary, no problem, especially after letting Damon and Matsui walk.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Dec 5, 2009 12:38 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like all these people saying things like Buchholz+ Kelly+ taking on Wells' contract
I wouldn’t take wells+halladay in exchange for nothing
by wolf9309 on Dec 5, 2009 9:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Although
I will say I hadn’t really considered Jeter’s future. He can’t have more than a couple season left as an “adequate” SS, and since 3B and 1B are occupied through the end of Obama’s second term, he’ll likely have to move to the outfield – probably LF, since CF and RF are more specific skills sets. So maybe the Yanks will hold off adding a bigtime LF, to keep it open for Jetes’ eventual migration.
But then again, I don’t really think of the Yanks as being too “forward thinking.”
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Dec 5, 2009 12:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
how is that
bitching about the yankees? They’re the ones that need a left fielder that are likely to have the money available to outbid the Sox. It’s just a statement of fact…
by wolf9309 on Nov 25, 2009 5:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Time for rude Polish jokes, for the retarded troll
"Hating the New York Yankees is as American as apple pie, unwed mothers and cheating on your income tax." -- Mike Royko
by sox-inda-south on Nov 27, 2009 7:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
i was thinking about making a joke about the pesky pol
but now you took the wind out of my sails.
by wolf9309 on Nov 27, 2009 7:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why is that so ridiculous?
If the Yankees decide not to resign Damon, Holliday is probably the first place they will look. Also, he was just trying to correct someone who misread his post. No need to ridicule him.
-1!
by Schulz on Nov 29, 2009 12:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hallyday =/= Holliday => You're an idiot. Oh and about the rest of the argument, all I can say is this

"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 29, 2009 6:16 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You sir are an idiot...
first things first, he’s talking about holliday not Halladay. There is a difference =P
And yes I KNOW the yankees would LOVE to have Holliday.
~SHaFF!~
by SHaFF87 on Dec 6, 2009 10:05 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
you would give up kelly and kotchman for nolasco?
I don’t think Kelly will go anywhere for anyone that isn’t a huge superstar already, the FO absolutely loves that kid. Nolasco seems good, and would improve if he wasn’t pitching in front of little league style, but I’m not sure he’s good enough we’d want to give up Kelly- as he probably has a much higher ceiling as a pitcher and we aren’t desperate for a great pitcher (though would love another one…)
I do agree with most of what you’re saying. I think Beltre could be very interesting and might not be too expensive after a down year. His bat is way too much of a question mark though for me to see him replacing Lowell without the offense improving somewhere else- while you’re right that he’d probably improve playing 81 games at Fenway, last year his home/away slits weren’t anything to write home about- an OPS of .717 away vs. .646 home. I think he’d definitely be worth the gamble if we have Bay or Holliday in Left field next year, but Cameron’s bat, while good, is not the same level as either of those two guys.
So I could see moving Lowell and getting Beltre with Holliday/Bay or I could see keeping Lowell if we decide they’re too pricey and getting Cameron, but probably not both.
I agree Philly is probably a good fit for Lowell, if they want to take the chance he’ll recover. They could use a solid Right-handed bat to step in there and don’t really require a ton of speed from their lineup (as they’re already pretty fast)
Omar was my absolute favorite UI idea, I think he’d be perfect. Unfortunately it looks like he’s gonna be wearing white sox instead of red ones next year. Barring that, hopefully they can work something out with gonzo.
I definitely agree that we need to figure out defense, that left side of the field pretty much killed us all year between lowell/bay/lugo/green(though he actually got pretty good at it, he struggled for the first while)
by wolf9309 on Nov 22, 2009 9:40 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like Kelly A LOT
I think he could be a very good pitcher in 2-3 years but he’s still a prospect who have thrown 100 innings at A and A+ ball. He’s peripherals aren’t crazy good: Although he doesn’t walk a lot of people (4.9% and 3.9% BB/PA), he doesn’t strike out a ton neither (7.01 K/9). He has an elite Ground ball rate at 55% in Low A and 51% in High A against a competition much older than him but he’s still a prospect that if you can ship with an expandable player (Kotchman) to get Ricky the great, you pull the trigger: Because he’s young (he’ll be 27 next month), cheap, strike out tons of people (9.49 K/9) doesn’t walk that much (2.14 BB/9) and he can be Pedro-esque sometimes.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 6:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Hix
I think you’re correct that the Sox have to improve their run-prevention. An OF of Ells, Cameron, and Drew is intriguing. However, I’m not sure the Sox can afford to sign Cameron, Betre, and eat Lowell’s contract.
Right now, the Sox have about $115 million tied up in payroll. They probably want to keep their payroll where it usually is, between $125 and $130 million. Lowell will be hard to move because teams don’t know whether or not his mobility will improve. Unless the Sox eat $8+ million on Lowell, why would anyone want him—and, more importantly, why would the Sox want $18 million or so in payroll tied up in players on other teams? Wagner is due $1 million (option buyout). Boston is still paying for Lugo, etc. Even if Beltre signs for $5 million, you’d have to add what the Sox would eat for Lowell. That makes Beltre too expensive.
Also, why wouldn’t a team like the Phillies just sign Beltre rather than take a risk on Lowell? Or why wouldn’t they just sign Figgins? Lowell will be very hard to move. Teams will likely want to see how he plays first. And, if Lowell becomes valuable to other teams, he’ll also be valuable to the Sox.
My guess is the Sox will wait and see how the market for Bay and Holliday develops before making any moves. If they lose out on both, then Theo will get creative.
That said, nice job, Hix. I think you’ve definitely mapped out a very viable way the Sox could off-set losing out on Holliday (or Bay).
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 22, 2009 9:59 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks DD
I thought about the points you mentioned before writing this post and it looked to me that: All this plan could “cost” us around 135-140 millions which is high but I prefer taking that route than paying Holiday 20 millions and another 5-8 millions to sign an injury prone pitcher to give the team some depth (Ricky the great is entering his 2nd year of arbitration) which combined with the raise of salaries of Youk, Lester, Pedey, Paps and MDC could take us to 140-150 millions territory.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 1:50 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Apparently, the Sox are shopping Lowell around and are willing to pay 6 millions of his contract
According to Rosenthal:
the Red Sox have been shopping Mike Lowell and willing to pay up to half of his salary. They speculate on who the Red Sox might be thinking of bringing that requires Lowell to be gone. My best guess would be Adrian Beltre. Perhaps they are laying the groud work for a Adrian Gonzalez move, but that just seems too complicated and also seems like something that they would complete without already having moved Lowell. Basically, Adrian is good enough and the deal has such a low probability that they would take a “figure it out later” approach with Lowell. Beltre is much easier to plan and get a read on if you are the Red Sox as to whether he’ll be obtainable. Theo gets his fixation on players and does what he has to do inorder to get them once they become available. He doesn’t always get his man, but Beltre is certainly someone he’s had interest in previously.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 1:54 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I saw that
I think the Sox will have to eat more than $6 million to move Lowell. Otherwise, Lowell is a necessarily a cheaper option than Beltre or Figgins.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 2:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
If they were willing to pay so much to Teixeira
they can certainly afford eating Lowell’s salary. I think we’re overestimating the amount Boston would have to pay to move him – he’s still, offensively at least, one of the top thirdbasemen in the game.
"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.
by 0157H7 on Nov 23, 2009 2:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Times are different now
And Henry’s business is hurting.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 2:40 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But not
The red sox part of the business. Henry is a real businessman and I would be shocked if he is dumping any personal money into the team as opposed to using red sox/nesn profits for the team.
I’d be very surprised if this really impacted the team. My thought is he wouldn’t invest the money in the first place if te team was not bringing in enough money to support it.
by wolf9309 on Nov 23, 2009 3:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
What wolf said
Henry is obviously not in such poor financial straits as to sell his equity stake in the Sox, and he hasn’t severely curtailed spending.
About one year ago, everyone knew that the 2009 economy was going to suck. Lehman Bros. and Bear Stearns had collapsed, Freddy and Fannie had basically been nationalized, AIG was getting a massive bailout. People around MLB expected revenue to be down. And yet the Sox still offered a ridiculous sum to Teixeira. I don’t think their payroll is limited by anything other than Theo etal.’s desire to be efficient.
"It's just a tiny little nick, but it hurts when I get champagne in there."
- Jason Bay, on getting spiked scoring the winning run in ALDS Game Four.
by 0157H7 on Nov 23, 2009 4:05 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox' payroll is (and will be) limited by a number of things
Market size, stadium size, debt on the ballclub, the economy, etc. Only the MFY can spend recklessly—and, it seems, the economy is hurting them too. Since 2002, when the new ownership took over, the Sox have only had a payroll over $130 million twice (they’ve only been over $125 million three times).
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That is garbage and your own made up propaganda DD
You make it sound like we are the Pirates. They have plenty of $$ to spend, if they didn’t Tex would not have got the offer he did last season. They pick and choose where they spend, but don’t make it sound like they are in the poor house or restricted greatly. Some fans like yourself just don’t like our team to spend the $ so you can say we did it through the farm when/if we win.
You need to realize in these modern baseball times we are more like the MFY than the Royals when it comes to spending, and that’s not a bad thing no matter how you or anyone else wants to spin it. You play to your advantage when you have one, and the Red Sox hold an advantage over most of the league.
I agree we cannot outspend the MFY, but we can certainly do a pretty damn good job in our own right.
Release Jason Varitek before ST is over !
Do not pay Jason Bay !!
Trade Buchholz !!!
by gizmosandy on Nov 23, 2009 6:19 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Having limits doesn't make them the Pirates or Royals. It's just a fact.
Since 2003, the Sox have averaged $67 million less per year on payroll than the MFY. Only one team has ever spent more than $150 million on payroll. What does that tell you, Gizmo? From 2004 to 2007, the Sox were the number 2 payroll in baseball. Even then, their top payroll was $143 million (2007), which was cut by $10 million the following year.
People like you are either unable to see facts in front of them, or you willfully refuse to see them. The Sox play in the smallest stadium by seating capacity. They have few luxury boxes. They have spent a lot of money renovating the stadium to maximize it’s potential. The team sold for $700 million in 2001. Do you think that has been paid off yet? If you do, guess again. That’s part of the Sox’ operating costs.
Which part of a payroll between $120 and $130 million makes the Sox a poor team? Who said spending was wrong? When have I advocated any kind of cap? Some fans, like you, believe that high-priced, long-term contracts have no consequences. The Sox have played to their advantage—and one of their advantages is being able to assess talent, set a price, and stick to it.
Even teams with money have to be smart. All teams have budgets. The Sox have been very successful for a while because they operate within their limits and spend smartly.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 7:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes
and one thing Sandy.
Last year the Royals were closer to us in both absolute and percentage salary than we were to the Yankees. By far.
People remember the Manny-sized contracts but we have not signed any since Theo took over. We did offer one to Teixiera, but they are really few and far between. We are a high payroll team, but one that has some specific constraints. Add to that the fact that all teams are pairing payroll in this economy. Even the Yankees, and I think we should realize that the Sox are not just going to throw the bucks around.
by Buzzy on Nov 23, 2009 7:39 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Well thought out and makes a lot of sense. We would definitely take a step back offensively, but that is clearly not your point.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 23, 2009 12:32 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I like this plan
I consider myself more on the side of people who’d rather let next year be a bit of a down year while waiting for prospects rather than overpaying Bay or Holliday. This plan seems like the way to compete the best while doing that.
by BigRedDog42 on Nov 23, 2009 1:05 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
I don't think its necessary.
We really do not need to take a step back. We can win 95 games next year without over-extending ourselves too much financially.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 23, 2009 1:23 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget that Jed's offense would definitely be an improvement over Shortstops R' Us from last season.
So we could afford a small drop at other positions while still remaining at the same level.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 23, 2009 12:58 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
+1
The loss of Bay offense could be compensated by: Lowrie offensive production, V-Mart full season at the Catcher position, Ortiz producing at his 2nd half level, run prevention and the best pitching staff in the majors.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 1:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Basically what I said about the Papi-wanting-another-30-homer-guy story.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 23, 2009 5:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Good post
I was actually thinking the same thing regarding Cameron/Beltre. I posted the Cameron thought on Yawkey Way Academy, and was thinking Beltre this morning when the Sox said they would eat half of Lowell’s salary for next year. Funny thing about Beltre is that he has been a pretty good hitter over his contract with the M’s on the road. I doubt we would lose much offense there vis-a-vis Lowell, and if he is healthy his glove is a big plus over what we saw from Lowell in 09. Cameron/Bletre will be cheaper than Holliday or Bay, tie us up for fewer years and probably make us a better team at the same time.
by Buzzy on Nov 23, 2009 1:06 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Thx Buzzy (OMG, this post is appreciated by the 3 posters that I admire the most:)
All this time that I spent reading fangraphs, USS Mariners, THT…is giving some results I guess ;)
Actually I dipping into the numbers and working on an EPIC piece that I’ll post later this week (If my work and family matters allow me to) . I hope you guys will like it.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 2:07 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not sure Cameron/Beltre is cheaper than Bay or Holliday, because you have to factor in Lowell
Let’s assume you can get both players cheaply, for about $5 million. That’s $10 million for both. Ken Rosenthal said that the Sox would be willing to eat half of Lowell’s contract, about $6 million. I think they’ll have to eat more. Why would a team want Lowell at $6 million when they could sign Beltre for around that much or Figgins for maybe a little more? My guess is the Sox would have to eat at least $8 million in order to move Lowell.
But, for argument’s sake, let’s say the Sox move Lowell and eat half the contract. Then, the cost of Beltre/Cameron is $16 million or so. I’m guessing that is more than Bay will make, and may be more than Holliday ends up with. Right now, the market doesn’t look good. The Mets, Giants, and Cubs have said they’re not in on either player. And the Angels have publically said they aren’t interested in Holliday (Boras hangover from last year).
Beltre and Cameron are a huge upgrade defensively over Lowell and Ellsbury. And, Ellsbury is much better than Bay. However, there are downsides:
(1) The Sox will have $15+ million paid out to players not on their team. That could hurt the Sox’ payroll flexibility for next year.
(2) Cameron is 37-years old. Will he sign for 1-year, or would the Sox risk a multi-year contract? Assuming a short contract (say 1-year), will Reddick be ready by then or will there be another OF hole to fill after 2010?
I think ultimately, it comes down to cost. Personally, I’d like to see the Sox sign Holliday if he isn’t too expensive. Holliday solves a long-term OF problem. Cameron is a short-term solution. Also, while I love Beltre’s glove, I hate his bat. There are some who feel Beltre would be better away from Safeco. However, he never walks (4.1% last year/7.1% career), and he swings at everything (36.8% O-swings last year/30.1% career). I think cost will determine the outcome.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 2:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I see your point
and agree. I think it would be close in terms of pure $$ for next year, but much less in the way of long term money.
by Buzzy on Nov 23, 2009 2:38 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You’re thinking in terms of single-year costs. The total investment in Holliday or Bay is for many, many years. For Figgins, I would think it would also take at least three years. Lowell has only one year remaining on his contract for whomever trades for him. Beltre would also take multiple years.
In terms of money, I think this team is going to have to absorb a temporary bump in payroll until Lowell/Ortiz/Lugo come off the books next year.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 23, 2009 2:41 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
This year’s FA 3B class is better than next year’s:
Garrett Atkins COL
Wilson Betemit CWS
Jorge Cantu FLA
Eric Chavez OAK *
Pedro Feliz PHI
Bill Hall SEA *
Brandon Inge DET
Maicer Izturis LAA
Mike Lowell BOS
Melvin Mora BAL
Nick Punto MIN *
Scott Rolen CIN
Ty Wigginton BAL
There isn’t likely to be much available at 3B next year. Why would a team take one year of Mike Lowell at $6 million (again, assuming the Sox only pay half), and have a hole at 3B in a year, when they could get Beltre or Figgins who are younger and could sign for more than one year? The reasons the Sox want to move Lowell are the same reasons why he won’t be all that attractive to other clubs—unless the Sox eat considerably more than half the contract.
$15+ million in dead costs is a lot for any club to eat. That’s not to say the Sox can’t. It would have to depend on the return. And, it would hurt them for next year—maybe more than the cost of a Holliday or Bay.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 6:06 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm a firm believer
in the lack of intellect of Omar Minaya.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 6:15 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know how he still has a job
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Nov 23, 2009 6:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
what kind of weird world is it
where Kevin Towers gets fired and Omar still has a job?
by wolf9309 on Nov 23, 2009 6:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He must have some nasty secret about one of the Wilpon family.
A tape or something like that, otherwise I don’t see any explanation.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 6:35 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
We need either a stud 1B through trade (not likely)
or one of Figgins/Beltre @ 3B.
Release Jason Varitek before ST is over !
Do not pay Jason Bay !!
Trade Buchholz !!!
by gizmosandy on Nov 23, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Decisions are based on marginal costs, not total costs.
What I mean is that the Sox have already spent a certain amount of money (around $115M) for next season. In order to improve, they will likely be spending an additional $15-$25M. The way that they allocate those resources will not be based on where they have already spent money. If eating some of Lowell’s money is the best way to improve this team, they ought to do it no matter that they are already carrying $9M in dead contracts.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 24, 2009 4:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Holliday
6yrs/18m for Holliday? There’s no way the Sox would make any deal like that. They don’t give six-year contracts — period.
The Beltre deal is also pretty steep it seems, to me. Beltre plays great defense and his bat would be solid, but the Sox would have to do some major reworking to get it done (like Drugs said about).
Cameron is good, but will probably be snatched up by someone somewhere that has many more holes in the outfield than the Sox do.
by Randy Booth on Nov 23, 2009 5:10 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Holiday
6yrs/18m for Holliday? There’s no way the Sox would make any deal like that. They don’t give six-year contracts — period.
FYI, in 2007 the Sox signed the then 32 years old JD Drew to a 5 year contract, Holliday will be 30 years next year and posses a very comparable skill set, so I don’t see how you are so sure about that!
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 5:29 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that seems like about what he'll get
somewhere. There are worse deals out there, but the Red Sox don’t typically have a history of signing people for that much time/money unless it’s a superstar/the best player who will be available at their position for the forseeable future- i.e. Manny or Teix. Holliday is a very, very good player with amazing marketing, just not that type of talent. Personally, I’d like to see them take Holliday, it just seems counter to their usual strategy to put that much time/money in a player.
I do think that he’ll probably get that deal somewhere.
by wolf9309 on Nov 23, 2009 6:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
What did they offer Teixeira? I’m pretty sure they were willing to go 6 years with him.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 23, 2009 8:13 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
superstars have different rules
Holliday isn’t quite the same level.
by wolf9309 on Nov 23, 2009 8:20 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Randy is saying that there's no way the sox will offer any player a 6 year deal
Which is wrong because they’ve offered Drew (a player with a similar skill set) a 5 years contract till his age 37.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 8:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
well true
I took it as a little good natured hyperbole. Obviously your Manny’s and your Tex’s get exceptions, but the question is just if Holliday’s value is enough to be one of those exceptions. I don’t think so, but I would really love to have Holliday. As such, my hope for the sox offseason is that Henry wins Powerball and decides to splurge the money on a Holliday contract. Or just that he is willing to commit significantly more money for a long time.
I prefer Powerball.
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 1:12 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh Sh***!!
24h after I posted my plan, and one part of it is already gone!!

"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 8:13 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
That's been rumored for several days, Hix.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 23, 2009 9:37 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea of bucking up our defense.
But the thought of having to watch Beltre hit over the next few years is absolutely terrifying.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 23, 2009 10:32 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Try to think that
You’ll “have” to watch this or this
Man defense is SO underrated!
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Nov 23, 2009 11:18 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I like defense.
I’m willing to go all glove, weak stick at SS. But 3B is another story.
Consider, in Beltre’s five years in Seattle, he’s had OBPs of .303, .328, .319, .327, and .304.
.304.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 12:59 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Meh.
Bill James has him at a little below average next year at .329. Combine that with hitting in Fenway with good protection around him, and he may fare a little better.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 23, 2009 11:24 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Some third basemen more valuable than Adrian Beltre in 2009, by WAR
Brandon Inge
Andy Laroche
Kevin Kouzmanoff
Martin Prado
Juan motherfuckin Uribe
I repeat
Juan Motherfuckin Uribe
Scott Rolen
Michael Young
Casey Blake
Yes, he’s good with the leather. Good enough to be the 20th best third basemen in baseball last year.
4 years, $36-40 million just screams “Lugo” to me.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 12:53 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
doesn't scream lugo to me
he was good with bat, never amazing with glove.
4 years, $36 million is definitely too much though, I would love him but for less. Not sure what he’s likely to get, I haven’t paid attention. Is that what’s rumored?
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 1:14 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He also had a busted nut, IIRC.
So he only played about 3/4 of the season.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 3:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
true
anyone that gives him a contract should require him to wear a cup as part of it…
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 9:26 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
He says wearing a cup hurts his range.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 9:31 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
At which point one of the more violent guys on our team comes up and gives him a good "range test."
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
personally
I’d rather hurt my range then my testicle. But I guess we all prioritize differently.
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 6:42 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
It's not so much the testicle for me.
It’s the time lost while injured. Yeah, it’d hurt like hell, and you’d lose some ability to have children, but the pain is only temporary, and you can always adopt.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 8:12 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh
and notice Bill James projects Beltre to rebound with a nifty .321 OBP.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 1:04 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm sure Youk or Dusty would love to introduce him to the concept of waiting for your pitch.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 3:02 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
You are not looking at the numbers properly.
No one is saying Beltre is a great offensive player. However he is basically the same hitter as Mike Lowell when healthy. Here are his road OPSs in the last 4 years:
06-0.805,
07-0.858,
08-0.862,
09-0.717.
The last year (09) he has an injury which hindered his playing time and hitting, but given he is 5 years younger than Lowell and it is not a difficult injury to recover from, it is not likely a big deal. Here are Lowell’s road OPSs over this time
06-0.866,
07-0.767,
08-0.823,
09-0.713.
Away from cavernous Safeco Beltre has been better offensively than Lowell has away from cozy Fenway. They are very similar offensively-low OBP moderate slugging players. You are also cherry-picking Beltre’s WAR-his WARs before that:
10,2.5,4.6,3.0,4.1. Lowells:0.5,3.4,5.3,3.2,1.2. They are similar, but Beltre is 5 years younger and at this stage is better.
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 5:55 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
So five years of OBP is a cherrypick, but four years of road OPS is not?
Is that something they teach at Vorpy camp?
;D
“it is not a difficult injury to recover from”
He actually had two injuries last year, a shoulder injury and the ball in the nuts. His shoulder surgery was the second in two years, so apparently he didn’t recover from the first shoulder injury very well. Despite being “30” his body seems to have been breaking down, and the shoulder surgeries seem to have sapped his pop. Factor in his stocky build (5-11, 222), his not wearing a cup because it hurts his range, and that he signed from the DR at “14” and I have major questions as to whether he’s going to decline defensively as well.
Beltre v. Lowell is a false comp. The talk is not of trading Beltre for Lowell straight up, but of eating Lowell’s salary so that we can give Beltre X millions over X years.
But even comparing the two, Beltre’s career OBP is .325, Lowell’s career OBP is .343. Last year, Lowell had a .337 OBP, versus Beltre’s .304. .304. Don’t make me go back in the archives and find the discussions regarding the high correlation between OBP and runs.
The only valid comp between the two players, other than both being RH third basemen, is that Lowell also sucked the year before coming to Boston, and managed to turn his career around. We would be taking a huge chance to expect Beltre to do the same, at least for the kind of money/years he’ll likely demand.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 9:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Er
I looked at the rod OPS for several reasons, all logical:
a)Safeco is a very bad hitter’s park; Fenway is a very good hitter’s park.
b)I don’t have home/road wOBA splits (maybe they are on fangraphs and my Luddite ways have made it difficult for me to locate). Given that otherwise I would prefer to use OPS to OBP (others may argue here and I would be glad to), then combined with (a) this makes complete sense. You do realize that Fenway completely inflates home OPS and home OBP? There is no foul ground and flyouts from RHBs are hits.
c)How is he continually breaking down? He was a 4+ WAR player in…08! Lowell has not cracked that in 2 years. Lowell has bested 4 WAR one time in the last 5 years, Beltre has been a 4 WAR player 2 of the last 3 years.
The Lowell/Beltre comp IS what is the valid comp since we are trying to upgrade the team and need to look at realistic options, not how we are going to trade for Evan Longoria. It all depends on how cheaply and for how many years the contract would be. I have a feeling we can get a guy like that on a deep, deep discount. If not, I am fine hoping Lowell can stay in the lineup and move side to side at 3rd. Can you give me a better option? And please don’t say move Youk to 3rd, we were down that road last off season. Youk is a bad 3b and that will only lead to more DL time for a guy who is already spending a lot of time there.
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 9:37 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Two shoulder surgeries in two years = worrisome.
Maybe not “breaking down,” but certainly gives me pause.
So Beltre’s road OPS from age “27” through “30” compares favorably to Lowell’s in his declining phase, when he too has been battling injuries. Not exactly high praise.
Beltre’s agent is Scott Boras, who I’m sure has a nice glossy booklet explaining how SafeCo deflated his numbers, how his road wOBA was stellar, how he compares favorably to Lowell, and how he was worth $75 million over the last five years and therefore is due $75 million over the next five. Not that he’ll get that money, but I’m wary of committing even $10 million a year to a guy with Miguel Tejada’s body.
I’d go for a short term fix at 3rd. Maybe sign Marco Scutaro (who played there a lot in 2008), or trade for Scott Rolen. Or stick with what we’ve got, hope Lowell’s range comes back a bit and use Lowrie and Youk at third too.
Not ideal, but better than me having to bookmark this thread to roll out when Beltre’s got a .290 OBP with two years, $20 million left on his contract.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 9:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe
if Beltre=too expensive, then no thanks. I fully agree on that. But:
-———————————————————————————————————————————————————
I’d go for a short term fix at 3rd. Maybe sign Marco Scutaro (who played there a lot in 2008), or trade for Scott Rolen. Or stick with what we’ve got, hope Lowell’s range comes back a bit and use Lowrie and Youk at third too.
-———————————————————————————————————————————————————
No thanks on these either. I will take my chances with Lowell, and hope his mobility bounces back a bit.
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 10:01 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Also
…should I have bookmarked our discussions last off season when you argued that Teixiera was a significantly better offensive player than Bay is (even though the numbers show them to be basically the same) :)?
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 10:07 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I wish you had
I believe I called for Tex to beat Bay in OPS+ by at least ten points. He beat him by 15.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 24, 2009 4:14 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Wait till
they properly adjust for the “new” Yankee stadium in the “+” part of the calculation instead of taking a multi-year average :). Since you like these “cherry picked” comparions:
Bay (Road):0.904
Tiexiera(Road):0.882
Only half the sample and not park factor needed! Hmm…
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 5:21 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Statcorner
has this year’s adjustment for park that does not include old Yankee stadium data.
Bay wOBA+ 118
Tex wOBA+ 119.
Hmm. Huge difference.
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 7:09 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Ahem
Funny, I don’t seem to recall any qualifications on our bet – I thought it was OPS+, plain and simple.
But if the bet was wOBA on Thursdays versus LH pitchers named Joe, you might have won…
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 25, 2009 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No
because the OPS+ listed in DR.com is NOT the OPS+ for Teixiera. It is based on data including park factors from the old YS. The number on BR.com will change when they incorporate this, and for sure they will not be spaced by 10 or more points. When this is updated for 09, I will come looking for my beer!
by Buzzy on Nov 25, 2009 4:22 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Link please.
I take my beer bets seriously.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 25, 2009 4:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Here you go:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/about/parkadjust.shtml
First the new Yankee Stadium PF has not been computed, and for this year (its only year) I think they are just being released. The OPS+ for Teixeira, as I lined how baseball reference does it, is based on a 2/3 year average, meaningless for Tex as he never played for the Yankees in the old Yankee stadium. That is why the data makes no sense (see Damon’s OPS+).
You can see this by going to Statcorner-all park factor data for Yankee players are 100% neutral, presumably because they don’t have the data. thys each column is 100 (thus even my wOBA+ comparison is wrong, and I think will look even worse when this is updated). I bet you can guess how this will play out when the true park factors are used.
by Buzzy on Nov 25, 2009 5:10 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Question
In 2009, the Yanks scored 460 runs at home versus 455 on the road, and allowed 359 runs at home versus 394 on the road.
I’m no stathead (that BR page makes my head hurt), but given the relative home-away performance of the Yanks pitchers and hitter, I think you may be overstating the difference the new Yankee Stadium makes.
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 25, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
The "question" being
am I wrong?
Manny ain't the only bad man.
by tommy.otm on Nov 25, 2009 5:26 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Meh.
Like we’ve said below, the HR/FB factor is sky high. So what you’ve pointed out may be the result of better competition on the road, the jet-lagged games on the West Coast, etc.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 25, 2009 8:31 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
From what I remember,
the new Yankee Stadium is not an exceptionally good run scoring environment (pretty equal to Fenway), but is a great place to hit HR’s (as you point out). Fenway, on the other hand, depresses HR’s, instead turning outs into singles and doubles.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 25, 2009 8:48 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
And, given that Teix is a power hitter, that should drop his OPS+, right?
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 25, 2009 9:03 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
No
you might be right, and may win the beer bet afterall. I have now the park factor data for all hitting outcomes. The new stadium greatly inflates HRs and BBs, but deflates 2bs and 3bs. Singles are the same as Fenway. I now have to crunch the numbers for what a 1 year OPS+ would be. Tex might win by more than 10 points. I will make the post soon and give the methodology so you can check.
by Buzzy on Nov 25, 2009 9:25 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Accurate Park Factors take years to compile, or is OPS+ based on yearly Park Factors. I don’t know.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 25, 2009 5:00 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
I've got you guys:
http://www.overthemonster.com/2008/12/16/695268/teixeira-to-make-choose-be#10833265
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 8:08 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
How about
if Bay is within one point of wOBA+? Do I get the beer? The OPS+ will be changed when the park factor data is modified…
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 8:27 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Patience.
HR/FB park factors were just released on THT. Give it time.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 24, 2009 8:53 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
That was a good link.
and they have new Yankee Stadium at 130 for HR/FB. Crazy.
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 25, 2009 2:06 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
certainly an offensive downgrade
and really needs to learn to take a walk, but his offense will increase a lot playing at fenway 81 games instead of safeco and by not being injured. We’re talking easily a 4 or 5 WAR player, which iswhich is much more production than Lowell will give us, but there is a much greater chance that Lowell will regress more, as he’s older and his hip injury is less likely to fully recover.
I don’t know how much this is true and how much is PR but I remember when Beltre had his shoulder injury reappear, his doctor said that when people have that surgery, there is about a 10-15% chance they will need it a second time, but then should be able to be 100%. Again may not be true, and shoulder injuries are always worrisome. I would love to have his defense, but not if it’s too expensive (i.e. if we can get someone to cover enough of Lowell’s salary that what we pay Beltre+what we are covering for Lowell is about equal to Lowell’s full salary) and only if he’d agree to a clause that would void the contract if he spent too much time on the DL. Seems unlikely, we probably won’t end up with him.
chances are we end up just hoping for the best for Lowell- who knows, his mobility may improve.
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 11:19 AM EST up reply actions 0 recs
But Tommy makes a very good point:
Beltre=Boras. That porbably ends that possibility.
by Buzzy on Nov 24, 2009 12:45 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
that's a decent point
But just because his marketing machine is so powerful that he’ll probably get way more than he’s worth. I think the sox won’t hesitate to work with Boras if he has the right players.
by wolf9309 on Nov 24, 2009 1:02 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Why does everyone love Holliday?
His career stats are ballooned by playing in Denver all of it. He’s not that good. His defense is suspect and his power away from Denver isn’t that impressive. He’s a good, solid player but not a superstar. As far as I’m concerned Bay is a better choice simply because we know he can hit AL pitching. Holliday was horrible in the AL last year plus he has stated he’d rather play for the Mets or Yankees than the Sox. Add to that his agent is Scott Boras and whoever signs him will have to pay through the nose. He’s not worth it.
by Jillian on Nov 26, 2009 1:25 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Why do you keep saying the same thing over and over?
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Nov 26, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
“Holliday was horrible in the AL last year.”
If we’re judging a player based on a two month stretch, let’s see:
Matt Holliday AL OPS+: 120
Jason Bay June/July OPS+: 90
"Ninety percent [of my salary] I'll spend on good times, women, and Irish whiskey. The other ten percent I'll probably waste."
-Tug McGraw
by BTLove on Nov 26, 2009 1:30 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Damn
This plan is slowly goin’ into pieces: Arguelles signs with the Royals.
"That was a lot of fun… You just keep pounding balls into the gap. The one thing you don’t want to do is hit a home run. That’s a rally-killer." Jeff Francoeur
by radiohix on Dec 6, 2009 3:27 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Apparently the Sox are showing interest in Cameron
And you’re getting closer.
by wolf9309 on Dec 10, 2009 9:33 AM EST reply actions 0 recs

by 



















