Blow up the Sox!
95 wins is not going to get it done. We need to Revamp the entire team or the Yankees are going to be our Daddy for the next 86 years. Seriously though, we are fine and just got flat at the wrong time. We are paying for not just giving Texiera 200 mil and getting that deal done. Now we are just going to have to pay Mauer 30 mil. after next year. And all the move Youk to third and get a power firstbaseman, I say that is nonsense. If anything, get a Figgins at third and move Lowell to DH. Who would you rather see at bat with a runner on second? No one can honestly say Ortiz. Lowell is a RBI machine and clutch. Papi is in severe decline. We will get Mauer after next season and there is your rotation at 1st,3rd and catcher. If you get Figgins, then the DH spot would be in the rotation for Mauer, Martinez, and Youk. Great versatility, and better speed. And if Wake doesn't want to come back then we need to sign Lackey so the MFY don't. A poor time to have a few bad games is all that happened and I say we are going to be fine. Resign Bay, Wagner and Saito- get Figgins and let Lowrie have his shot ( he will hit at least .235 for less money than gonzo) and hope we are hot at playoff time next year. Anyone who is so doom and gloom, sell me your season tickets, throw away your pink Boston hat and be a Yankee fan, You won't be missed.
Also, If not Bay then who? Abreu would be a great option for 2 years and cheap. Less HR but obp and deep counts plus a rocket for an arm in the outfield. Or how about ....... I can't even type his name, but the beard and Jesus look would be fun to see. Not many options and Bay is solid fit in the clubhouse already so why mess with it? I am glad I am not Theo.... He now officially has the toughest Job in New England.
0 recs |
56 comments
Comments
First, Tex was never a realistic option
He certainly SEEMED to be, but then it turned out his wife was lobbying for NY all along. It wasn’t money that kept him from Boston.
Second, Holliday. The problem with Bay is that he’s a shit defender and can’t hit breaking balls, which is a very exploitable weakness for good pitchers.
by USG on Oct 12, 2009 11:01 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tex
If we came out of the box at at 200mil/8 years he is a Red Sox. The wife crap is PR. Boras is a genius and we should have ponied up the dough. The Sox got caught trying to just bid a tad higher to the next team and the yankees came in late and didn’t jerk around. Holliday didnt put up such great #’s in Oakland and it seems the pressure in the playoffs got to him. But I think they are interchangeable so take the cheaper one.
the difference between a yankee stadium hot dog and a Fenway frank is that they dont sell yankee dogs in October anymore.
by fishfarmr on Oct 12, 2009 3:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
$200 million/8 years?
That was more than he got with the Yankees. Why would we overpay and overbid by so much right from the start? There was no need for it. I guess if you start off every FA negotiation wildly overbidding you will get your man but you’ll also have a very inflated budget with little to no financial flexibility.
We have no idea what happened when Henry and the others few out to see Tex personally. Maybe he told them he just didn’t want to play for us. Maybe he told them that he was going to give the Yanks a chance to outbid whatever we put out there. I don’t know, you don’t know, no one knows but the people that were there. Whatever the reason, Theo and company didn’t think Tex was either going to sign with us or be worth the contract it would have taken.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 12, 2009 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also
If you believe Teix, he want to come to NY. The MFY would have matched the Sox’ offer. In order to get Teixeira, the Sox would have to vastly overpay him. That’s just not smart.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tex and Bay
I still think that Tex would have gone to the Sox for more money. It’s always about the money. And that short right field at Fenway would have been amazing for him.
In response to Bay. I did some checking last night (couldn’t sleep for obvious resons). 162 strikeouts this year. I’m still up in the air over wether we should sign him or not. I guess I’m still what he did last year in the post season.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree about Bay
I know the common knowledge is that he can’t hit breaking balls, but if you check his numbers this year you will see that we was 1.6 runs above average against the CB and 5.2 against the slider. The fact that he struck out 162 is meaningless, strikeouts are not a bad thing for a hitter, here is a list of guys who struck out more than 130 times this year:
Mark Reynolds
Ryan Howard
Adam Dunn
Brandon Inge
Carlos Pena
Jayson Werth
Mike Cameron
BJ Upton
Shin-Soo Choo
Dun Uggla
Russell Branyan
Brad Hawpe
Adam LaRoche
Curtis Granderson
David Wright
Evan Longoria
Matt Kemp
Prince Fielder
Justin Upton
Jhonny Peralta
Notice something? Most of those guys are very very good hitters.
by Gnick on Oct 13, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Strikeouts are very bad for a hitter.
They are the worst possible outcome of an AB. While that doesn’t necessarily mean everyone who strikes out is bad, it does mean they would be better if they struck out less.
by USG on Oct 13, 2009 10:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I strongly disagree
A strikeout is not the worst outcome of an AB, a double play, or even triple play, would be worse. Secondly, the reason many of those guys have so many strikeouts is because of their excellent plate discipline, which leads to more 2 strike counts, which inevitably leads to more strikeouts. Look at the guys who strike out the least often:
Yadier Molina, Yuniesky Betancourt, Dusty, Polanco, Eckstein, Alberto Collaspo, Miguel Tejada, Carlos Lee, Pierskynski, and Erick Aybar. You know what the common link between those guys is? Terrible plate discipline. Of those guys, only one had a walk rate of over 10%, and that was Pedroia at 10.6%, many of the rest of them were in the 3-7% zone.
by Gnick on Oct 14, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
GIDP/GITP is ridiculously situational.
As a batter, the single worst thing you yourself can do is fail to put the ball in play. You can’t talk about King “saving the double play”, that’s not how it works. The fact is that for a player X% of balls in play will go for hits, and 0% of strikeouts will. And while I agree that striking out very little does tend to correlate to crap discipline, there are a bunch of guys who can walk without King quite so much as them, and they tend to be the true top-tier players.
by USG on Oct 14, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice try!
The Twins will pay Mauer next year whatever he asks. The only player the Angels will part with next year will be Vladdy….and you can have him if you like. John Lackey may also be on the outs, but we will definitely negotiate with him until the very last moment. To think you’ll even have a chance at Figgy…well, you’re just dreaming. Figgy is a franchise player, everyone knows that, including Angels management. He will be the 1st player resigned by the Angels. I’m thinking that the Halos will sign Abreu for a 2-4 year contract. He’ll continue to play right field for a season and then settle in to the DH spot quite nicely.
So, I’m sorry to rain on your parade, but you should really start looking elsewhere for players. Have a nice day!
by KnotholeBartender on Oct 12, 2009 11:09 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Actually
Figgins is a good player but I would not overpay for him. He is a good fielder, but he is not young, and in many ways had an outlier year. He had never been more than a 3.2 WAR player in his career, but this year he was 5.9. I doubt that at 31 (going on 32) that is going to be a trend. On the other hand, he is a type B free agent, so I would think teams will be agressive going after him. Abreu, Vlad, Lackey and Chone are all FAs. I expect that Vlad is gone, but I am sure that the Angels will try to keep the other 3, and that will cost.
The Angels are a very good team, but ytou should not overvalue these guys either. Guys like Lackey, Figgins and Abreu are really not in their prime anymore. All are still good players, but for example Lackey was far better by fielding independent metrics in 05-07 then he has been in 08/09.
by Buzzy on Oct 12, 2009 11:18 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
reality
you could only pony up 130mil for texiera, what makes you think your front office will spend on your guys now? Also, I said “like figgins” as in, I would take a defense and speed guy over a power third baseman. And if Theo really wants him, he will out spend you. I only take lackey to keep him from the Yanks. And Minnesota didn’t spend on Torri and Santana, How are they going to compete with the Sox giving 26-30mil? Hometown guy? It’s all about the money.
the difference between a yankee stadium hot dog and a Fenway frank is that they dont sell yankee dogs in October anymore.
by fishfarmr on Oct 12, 2009 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
correction
power firstbaseman
the difference between a yankee stadium hot dog and a Fenway frank is that they dont sell yankee dogs in October anymore.
by fishfarmr on Oct 12, 2009 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You lost me at "RBI machine" and "clutch"
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 1:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
RBI machine is slightly valid
In that while his OBP is relatively low, he’s one of the few guys on our time who has a good deal come from average AND has some modicum of power.
He’s still not really all that good anymore, and the Sox would be wise to look into replacing him with a better bat or glove if they can
by USG on Oct 12, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ortiz or Lowell with one out and a runner on 2nd?
No way you pick ortiz
the difference between a yankee stadium hot dog and a Fenway frank is that they dont sell yankee dogs in October anymore.
by fishfarmr on Oct 12, 2009 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Depends on who the pitcher is.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Oct 17, 2009 3:24 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Well if we’re talking about “clutch” I’ll take Ortiz’s lifetime 29.55 WPA over Lowell’s 3.06.
by Gnick on Oct 13, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Infield questions
Lowrie is not the answer. I don’t want an injury prone SS batting .235. We already have a DH that can do that. I never thought he was the answer at SS even before his wrist problems. Keep Gonzo if we have to, but I like the possibility of Tejada for maybe 2 years. Good offensive numbers this year in Houston and even though he’s 35 years old he still played in 158 games this year. I still don’t like the idea of moving Youkilis to third and I think we might be stuck with Lowell at the left corner for another year. That’s going to mean having a decent back up catcher when Lowell is going to need a day off and that’s going to have to come internally because no free agent catcher is going to sign on to be a back up. But maybe I’m wrong.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 4:15 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Tejada is not the answer for SS
Simply because he can’t really play SS that well. He’s bad defensively and he’s getting older. It’s important to note a player’s defense and include that in their value along with their offensive production.
I would also think, when you look at the quality of FA catchers this year, you could get someone to catch 2 games a week as a back-up.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 12, 2009 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He can't be all that bad. He's been a starter wherever he's gone.
And in the end I’m about offense and run production. We haven’t had any offensive consistency from the SS position since Nomar (and that went away after his wrist injury). This isn’t the dead ball era. If you want to win the East you have to beat the Yankees. And if you want to beat the Yankees you have to score runs. That’s how we won it in ‘04 and ’07. We put together teams that were suited to beat the Yankees. In the case of those teams it was pitching. That’s why we got Schilling and Foulke in ‘04 and got Beckett in ’06. We already had a potent offense. And I realize that we weren’t THAT bad offensively this year, but we were terrible against the better teams in the league. The more offense you have the better off you’re going to be.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's exactly the way bad GMs of go-nowhere teams think.
Defense is incredibly important, and Tejada is awful on defense
by USG on Oct 12, 2009 6:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree
If we’re going to have a weak hitting SS his name better be Ozzie Smith.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 6:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why on earth would you ignore defense?
If you give up runs, it’s a bad thing. The end.
by USG on Oct 12, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
For his career, he's a -4.4 runs defender.
Combine that with his aging, and you have a very bad defensive player very soon.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Oct 17, 2009 3:27 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You just can't ignore Defense, especially when it comes to a position like SS
Hell, why not just sign Adam Dunn to be your starting SS? That’s a whole lot of offensive production from a SS!
It just doesn’t work like that. SS is a very important defensive position, and I’m confident to say we won’t have Miguel Tejada as our starting SS next year, especially considering he’s already said he’d like to go come back to the Astros as their 3B because he knows he’s no longer a SS.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 12, 2009 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Whatever you guys say
When we have a sorry ass .230 hitting dumbass playing for us you’ll know what I’m talking about. You have to score more runs than the other team.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 11:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do
And one way to do that is to take away runs from the other team with good defense and good pitching.
It’s not just about mashing more runs than the other team.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 13, 2009 12:50 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
You’re being willfully ignorant if you don’t think defense is incredibly important.
by USG on Oct 13, 2009 1:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The total package
You guys sound like Tejada is the worst of all of the available FA SSs. Far from it. It’s not like he’s a member of the Bad News Bears. He’s a damn good SS and has a great bat. And I won’t apologize for wanting more offense.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 13, 2009 3:11 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
No, seriously, he's an awful SS if we're talking fielding.
He’s not even that good offensively. He’s been a <800 OPS player the last few years and only rebounded from a dismal 2008 thanks to a much higher BABIP. He’s not a good option.
by USG on Oct 13, 2009 4:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You shouldn't apologize for wanting more offense
But it’s about adding offense without taking away from other positive things, like defense.
Look at it this way, Tejada is old, something you didn’t seem to like in the other thread. He’s only going to decline as he gets older. He’s already bad defensively, do you want another Lugo?
Not to mention that he wouldn’t solve our problem of hitting on the road and not just at Fenway. Away from Minute Maid Stadium he hit only .283/.313/.395 Not exactly providing timely offense on the road.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 13, 2009 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That "sorry ass .230 hitting dumbass" had a f'd up wrist for most of the sample size you're measuring.
Improved wrist = improved batting. Combine that with solid defense, and you have an above-average SS.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Oct 17, 2009 3:31 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox won't be blown up for a number of reasons
(1) Contractual obligations. The Sox simply aren’t going to eat the $24-$25 million owed to Papi and Lowell just to make some fans happy. If they are paying those two players, they aren’t going to get another high-priced player to platoon at 3B or DH. Tek is a different story. He is only due $3 million next year. I can see the Sox eating that and signing another catcher.
(2) There really isn’t anything good out there via free agency. The top FA out there are Lackey, Abreu, Figgins, Holliday, and Bay. I expect the Sox to re-sign Bay. Figgins will be 32 next year, and he really doesn’t hit like a corner IF. I think the Sox won’t be interested. Abreu will be 36 and is poor defensively. I’d expect the Sox to pass. Lackey will want $13-$15 million. I can’t see Theo going after Lackey, unless his proce comes down. Bay is the most likely FA because he would just cost money. The others would cost money and picks.
(3) Forget about Mauer. He is going to stay in Minnesota. Mauer is a local boy, and the Twins will give him what he wants. They already paid Nathan and Morneau big money. By the time Mauer is a FA, the Twins will have shed enough payroll to sign Mauer. I can’t see Minnesota opening a new stadium and letting the face of their franchise walk.
(4) The Sox aren’t going to re-sign Wagner. He wants to be a closer because he wants to reach 400 saves. The Sox brought him here as a rental. They’ll pocket the draft picks and let him walk. The only way Wagner stays in Boston is if no other team wants him to close, and his price comes down.
The Sox’ biggest decisions will be whether or not to re-sign Bay, what to do about SS, and what to do about Tek.
I think they’ll sign Bay. He is simply the best fit for the team. He is likely to be cheaper than Holliday, who has Scott Boras as his agent. Also, Bay won’t cost the Sox draft picks.
I hope they let Gonzo walk. It would be foolish to pick up his $6 million option. He simply isn’t worth that kind of money. If Gonzo will accept a $1 million plus incentives contract, the Sox should think about bringing him back. I think the medical reports on Lowrie will dictate what they’ll do. If the Sox doubt Jed’s health going forward, expect them to make a trade for someone like JJ Hardy, who is younger and better than Gonzo.
Catcher will be the toughest decision. I don’t think the Sox want VMart to catch more than 80 games. He tends to wear out at catcher, and his defense isn’t great. In my opinion, if the Sox are going to have VMart catch, they should get rid of Tek and find a catcher who can throw runners out. None of the available catchers figures to be a great hitter. But Tek sucks. There are two interesting names out there, who may be Type B FA: Rod Barajas and Brian Schneider. Barajas isn’t a great hitter, but he has some power (19 HR this year). More importantly, he can throw. Barajas threw out 34% of potential base-stealers. That’s not a fluke, as he has averaged 34% over his career. Schneider is a much worse hitter, but he also can throw. Schneider had a 34% CS. Over his career, he has thrown out base-stealers at a 38% rate. For reasons I don’t understand, the Sox have always valued Tek. However, Tek has little value. He can’t hit and his defense isn’t good. Barajas and Schneider aren’t great, but they’re a huge improvement over Tek—andf they won’t cost much in picks.
I’m not sure the Sox will make a big splash this off-season. There simply aren’t any great players out there. I think it’s foolish to expect other teams to just hand their best players over to the Sox. And, while this season’s end was disappointing, let’s not forget that the Sox had the third-best record in baseball. Lowell and Papi will be playing for contracts next year. The off-season will allow Mikey to heal. Maybe his mobility will improve enough to allow his defense to be, at least, average. I’m less worried about Ortiz. Papi started slowly, but over the final four months of the season he hit very well. Since June 1st (363 AB), Ortiz hit .264 AVG/.356 OBP/.548 SLG (.904 OPS). In that period, he played 104 games (98 starts) and hit 27 HR and had 81 RBI. That’s a pace for 41 HR 123 RBI over 155 games. Ortiz got off to a slow start because of a wrist injury. He figures to be better next year. Having VMart for the whole year means that the Sox have options next year at 1B/3B/DH that they didn’t have early this year.
Also, let’s not forget that other teams have issues too. The Angels may lose one or more players: Lackey, Figgins, or Abreu (I think they let Vladdy walk). The MFY have age issues and they want to cut payroll. This year everything went right for them. Four 35+ year old players over-performed. Swisher, who wasn’t even supposed to start (remember Nady?) had a career year. The MFY could field the same team next year with very different results.
Don’t expect Theo to gut the team just because they lost in the ALDS. His philosophy is to build teams that are capable of winning 95+ games and getting into the playoffs. Once there, anything can happen. This is the correct approach. Unlike past Sox oprganizations, this one is in it for the long haul. They have a great FO and great coaching staff. They know what they’re doing.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 5:50 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
You obviously spent a lot of time on this post!
I like and agree with most of what you wrote, BUT (there is always a BUT) letting Gonzo walk because it would be foolish to pick up his $6 million option, well I might have to disagree with that one. If I knew he could hit like he did since coming over to the team, well then that is a no brainer for me. Keep him! Even if his hitting goes down, his fielding (especially after the likes of Lugo) makes me quite happy to see him over there in the SS position. The guy can field that position as it is suppose to be played, and again after Lugo and others, I like that!
by NG on Oct 12, 2009 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NG
why on earth do you think he would continue to hit like he did with the Sox? Wouldn’t you think that a better indicator of his hitting for next year would be his career numbers, not the 2 months he was with the Sox? And even if he magically did hit like that, he is still just an average hitter for a short stop with those numbers at best. Someone like Hardy (or for that matter Lowrie if he can stay healthy) will hit better and be as good in the field.
by Buzzy on Oct 12, 2009 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Anyone can have a great month
Nick Green hit even better in April than Gonzo did in September, but he’s not the solution at shortstop either, not if we want someone who is above average both at bat and in the field.
by RSNexile on Oct 13, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"makes me quite happy"
All in favor of converting NG’s respiratory system to run on laughing gas?
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Oct 17, 2009 3:33 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Tek
I could also see the Sox eating Tek’s $3M and not signing another catcher. Martinez can be the starter, and Kottaras is an adequate if lackluster backup. The real problem is that, as you point out, there aren’t really any good options in free agency. If Theo can sign Mauer after next season, great. Otherwise, I think we’re going to need to hit the lottery in the draft.
by RSNexile on Oct 13, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That's possible as well
Although Kottaras can’t throw that well. Basically, I think the Sox need a catcher to split time with VMart (to keep VMart from wearing out). I’m not sure Kottaras is a good fit as a platoon catcher. The Sox have a catcher with a good arm in their system, Mark Wagner. But, he’s pretty bad offensively. And Luis Exposito, their best catching prospect, is probably a year or more away.
I think Barajas or Schneider > Kottaras. The only problem in getting them is the cost: their salary, plus Tek’s salary. I just can’t see the Sox eating Tek’s contract and then handing the job to Kottaras or Wagner. Hopefully, Theo will be creative and come up with somebody good that nobody thought was available.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 13, 2009 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't you think it was a bit much
to give Tek this continuing option in his latest signing? I mean didn’t they see this all coming EASILY last year. Why did they bind him for more than just his salary this year period??
by NG on Oct 13, 2009 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I didn't want him re-signed, and said so at the time
I also didn’t like the options built into the contract. Unfortunately, there aren’t many good options at catcher. Exposito may pan out in the long run, but he isn’t ready now.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 13, 2009 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because it got him to resign.
They kinda needed SOMEONE back there.
@bs_uf15bosox9be 12 pieces of bacon, a Red Bull, and go get 'em; Learn to use SB Nation
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Oct 17, 2009 3:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Wagner has actually been pretty good offensively historically.
He’s always struggled when he’s moved up, but that’s pretty typical of all players.
For the league he started the year with…
2006: .301/.386/.456
2007: .318/.406/.533 (LANCASTER WARNING)
2008: .219/.304/.363
2009: .301/.410/.477
2008 obviously hurt his stock, but he had to adjust to AA right away since he wasn’t moved up during 2007. I mean, if we’re going to write off promising prospects because of a bad year at AA, excuse me while I go tell SoxProspects to drop Lars Anderson off the top-20.
by USG on Oct 13, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"and be as good in the field."
Well this is the key question is it not?
I think the Sox brought Gonzo back because few play that position better, and management knew they needed at least a great fielder if they could not have both a great fielder and a great hitter at SS. From what I saw of Gonzo’s defensive play, there are few better!
by NG on Oct 12, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
They brought him back because Green was falling back to Earth in a hurry and making a ton of errors all-of-a-sudden.
His range is just not impressive.
by USG on Oct 12, 2009 11:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Gonzo's hands are very impressive
But his range is declining and next year he’s a year older and his range will likely decline even worse over time.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 13, 2009 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I highly doubt that we will get Mauer. I think he will probably stay in Minnesota.
"It would have been a nice idea if you could run through the postseason without losing. I don't think it's realistic."
--Terry Francona
by BoldandBrash on Oct 12, 2009 11:13 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
From a Yankee fan...
I understand wounds are still fresh and people are eager to find out what went wrong with their team, but being a Yankee fan and being forced to watch the red sox over the years all I can say that the only thing lacking on this 09 red sox is some serious pop…seriously. Forget the defense, bullpen, starters…they are all just fine, enough to give you a competitive team – on a budget. The one-two punch that were Manny and Papi is a thing of the past and it may take years, maybe decades, to find another one just like that. The ownership needs to get ready to spend some serious dough, but wisely, not on the likes of Smoltz, Penny, Colon…pitching you guys already have, you need some big bats. If not this offseason, maybe the next one. You need to quit hating on Papelbon, he just peed his legs, period because he is human, you can’t go on for 50 post-season innings without eventually giving up runs. And please stop recycling old-glory, has-been ‘aces’. It will only put you guys behind like in the last regular season. And I’m pretty sure the Rays will probably rebound next season and it might get a bit crowded atop the AL East.
by spiritcrusher on Oct 14, 2009 12:28 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The defense was awful and not at all OK.
And “pop” is the most overvalued ability on the market. Besides which we had the 2nd highest team SLG in the league (4th in ISO) to, of course, you guys. The reason we lost this postseason is because we played 3 bad games. That’s all.
by USG on Oct 14, 2009 1:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
95 wins are fine...
The Sox are in the equivalent of “the Group of Death” of World Cup Soccer groupings, just they have to do it every year, instead for a couple of weeks every four years. If they make the playoffs, then the year’s planning is a success. The 2009 season had pretty much four AL East team in contention before Toronto dropped off before all star break, and Tampa Bay falter.
Second, teams have to react differently in the playoffs than in the regular season. The Sox starting pitching just didn’t live up to sort of dominance that is needed for stave off any big leads.
I think there has to be changes for the Sox in the off season, because no team can rest on their laurels from the previous season, and they need to constantly twitch and be ahead of the curve with players that looked are on the decline.
by superferret on Oct 16, 2009 9:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















