Season Over: Angels Sweep Sox as Papelbon Blows Up
The Sox offense came alive for the first time in the series, but it wasn't enough. Down 6-4 in the 9th, the Angels rallied, scoring three runs off of Jonathan Papelbon in the 9th inning, and completed the sweep with a 7-6 win over the Red Sox.
A blow-by-blow dissection of the game seems somehow inconsequential right now. Buchholz was solid, giving up 2 runs in 5 innings. Daniel Bard cleaned up a bases-loaded, 0 out situation in the 6th inning giving up only 1 run on a double play, and pitched a clean 7th inning striking out 2. J.D. Drew, Dustin Pedroia, Victor Martinez, and Mike Lowell delivered in key situations, with Pedroia's 2-run double putting the Sox on the board and J.D.'s homer putting the Sox up 5-1.
But in the end it would come down to the back-end of the bullpen—the part that was supposed to be reliable—giving up the game. Billy Wagner gave up a double and a walk before Terry Francona called on Papelbon for the final 4 outs. Papelbon didn't deliver. A single to Juan Rivera scored both of Wagner's baserunners in the 8th, and in the 9th Papelbon—who had never given up a postseason run--absolutely blew up with 2 outs, giving up a single, a walk, a double, and an intentional walk to bring Vladimir Guerrero to the plate with the bases loaded, 2 outs, and a one run lead. Guerrero singled to center, the Sox went down in order in the 9th, and their season was over.
For the Red Sox, it will be a long offseason with plenty of questions. What to do about Jason Varitek, who holds a $3 million player option but can't seem to really play baseball anymore. Or David Ortiz, the aging slugger who hasn't been the same since 2007, and is only getting worse. Jason Bay is a free agent, the Shortstop position continues to be a giant question mark, and their once strong bullpen seems to need some serious reworking.
The story of the 2009 Red Sox will be one of a good team that couldn't get the job done in the postseason. For Sox fans, this is nothing new—it was the story so many times during the 86-year drought. But now we expect more out of this team—certainly more than the performance we received this October—and Theo Epstein will need to have an active offseason to meet our expectations.
March is only 141 days away.
0 recs |
163 comments
|
Comments
i posted this in the last thread ... but im reposting here cause im very curious
is that the last straw for you guys on papelbon? i mean he seems to say the wrong stuff and blow games like that … so is this it for him fanwise??
also , im curious what you guys think you need next year? starting pitching you got, do you think they make a huge run for mauer, like teixeira money?? get a bat and an unbelievable catcher?
by blindmole on Oct 11, 2009 4:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Paps
I don’t even have to look at the stats, but Paps blew less saves than Fuentes this year. Paps was better than Fuentes in every important stat.
And he hasn’t “said the wrong stuff” in awhile. I can’t even remember the last time he made a comment to the media that was blown up.
The only way he really goes out is if Daniel Bard is given the closer job, therefore Paps is traded or whatever. But really, Sox fans can’t complain too much — he blew this game, yes, but that shouldn’t change the fact he had a pretty good year and a career.
by Randy Booth on Oct 11, 2009 4:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True
But it sure as hell changes a lot if he still asks for the highest contract in baseball like he’s wanted.
by Justin_Bobo on Oct 11, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I want to test the market.
But I’m not demanding a trade. If we don’t get someone desperate for a closer willing to overpay, we hold onto him.
As bad as this game was…as much as it hurt…he’s still been very good.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But he has been declining a bit it seems in the past few years.
I’d be willing to bet that we keep him one more year and maybe look to trade him next offseason.
That said, if someone offered us a great package for him, I wouldn’t cry if he left.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems so
I know that he has been lights out as usual this year, but it seems to a lesser extent. Of course less than amazing is still pretty amazing.
Any thoughts on why Bard didnt come out to finish the 8th? Does Papelbon have a hard time going more than an inning?
by backtocali on Oct 11, 2009 5:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1.
There are at least 25 teams who would trade their closer for Papelbon in a nanosecond. But we’re not trading unless someone offers something SERIOUSLY valuable (i.e. All-star for All-star).
And Bard’s not yet ready to be the closer of a team like the Red Sox (though ask me again at next year’s trading deadline).
by dsharp on Oct 11, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It never fails when your usually reliable closer blows a game he is the first one every fan is ready
to throw overboard. And Paplebon no less, one of the most feared closers in the game.
The 2009 Pregame Picks Winner and Iron Man of Halos Heaven.com
by 44FAN on Oct 11, 2009 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Check our conversations around midseason. Even earlier.
This has been a serious topic of discussion for a while just because he’s not the same as ‘07 Papelbon, and he’s almost certainly not going to be resigned after his arbitration years are over. It’s not Sox fans jumping the gun (well, it is in some cases), this is a well-debated issue.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If yuo don’t want him anymore we can trade. You can have Fuentes, after all he leads (snikcer) the AL (snicker) in saves. (whoop-de-do). we’ll be more than happy to throw a halo n the head of Paps.
by firebird81 on Oct 11, 2009 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Let the trollwars begin...
Gratulation to the Angels, the clear better team in this series won.
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 4:31 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
It's the Yanks vs. Angels vs. Whoever Trollwars!
Who will win? There can be only one!
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A fitting was to go.
That series sort of perfectly summed up the year. First, no offense on the road. Then the offense picks up enough to actually win a game and the defense and pen (Paps) blows it. Was Abreu’s 8th inning ball in play ruled a double? That was a horrible play by Youk, and then later Pedroia blows a clear double play ball (with Morales running no less)-so a 5-2 lead becomes a 5-4 lead. Then with the seemingly important insurance run, Paps sill blows it with 2 outs. All year nothing was in sinc-if the offense was humming the pen would blow it. I would bet that our supposed “great” pen blew more big late inning leads than any other playoff team (save maybe Philly). Otherwise the offense was impotent and the defense was spotty all year.
Angels more than deserved it. Despite the HH trollery, I will be an Angel fan, it least for the ALCS.
by Buzzy on Oct 11, 2009 4:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Oh, c'mon we weren't that bad, were we?
Just like every post-season game that has had a Boston uniform in it, I never thought it was over until the last out was recorded, regardless of the score. The tough offense was stymied by a clutch pitching bout by the Angels, and when the pitching faltered, the offense picked it up.
As Torii Hunter said, “Don’t leave the stands late in the game; the offense always has something cooking.”
We’re just glad we finally took a game, let alone a series, from the Boston behemoth, and we’ll look forward to facing you next year as a competitive and dominating team.
by shiftyeyedgoat on Oct 11, 2009 5:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Did I suggest the Angels were bad?
not at all. I have contended all along that they are a very good team. I felt far less confident this time out than in 07 (when I had not doubt) and last year (when I was pretty confident). Part of my doubt this year was because the Angels finally had a strong offense and were thus a significantly better team than the past versions, but also because in a lot of ways the Sox were really a messy team this year.
Put it this way-this is a team that twice blew 5 run leads to the Royals after 6 innings, a 3 run lead in the 9th to the As, and blew a 10-1 lead to Baltimore with 7 outs to go. Thus, these kind of meltdowns hardly seem surprising when it actually happens to a good team.
Good luck next round, I am pulling for your team.
by Buzzy on Oct 11, 2009 6:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is it possible to be a really objective fan??
Does the word fan preclude being objective enough to see and admit things that you do not wish to see. Misleading with statistics and immediately using troll assignments for folks that may actually be more objective fans is too prominent around here, but maybe that is the nature of the fan beast. It is not my nature.
For me, this season has solidified at least 2 concepts:
—First is a lighthearted one. The Seattle Mariner barometer may be real. If the Sox cannot win the season series against Seattle, they will definitely not make the WS and likely will not make the playoffs consistently.
—Concepts like team chemistry, team balance, ability to hit the better pitchers, and winning on the road are more easily observed by just watching all the games, and getting lost in stats that you wish to use to overcome some obvious empirical weaknesses just won’t cut it .
Finally for my young friend bs.uf15bosox9bears23, I believe my prediction at the beginning of the year that the age of players like Wakefield would prevent them from finishing the season came true. If you agree, and in light of the other things I said in this post, here is a link to what I would want you to use for your logo, but I am just not sure about copyright issues. If you cannot use it because of copyright fears, at least look at it to get the gist.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/03/22/riddell1.jpg
by NG on Oct 11, 2009 5:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The failure came from ALL CORNERS--but not just because of age
Blaming Wakefield is an absolutely moronic move. I would blame Penny, Smoltz, Lugo, and Delcarmen FAR more than I would blame Wakefield.
I would also blame the mid-July swoon that basically killed any chance of winning the division.
But blaming Wakefield? Insanity.
by lone1c on Oct 11, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, and since Nick Green and Wakefield had basically the same problem
Can you really call it age-related? (And it’s basically a similar problem to the one that’s been bothering JD Drew, too.)
by lone1c on Oct 11, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Great Post, NG
You said it all in just a few paragraphs. Most people out here drank the Kool Aid all year and didn’t want to discuss obvious problems that this team clearly showed after the all star break. We were 20 games over .500 at the break and finished 28 games over at the end of the season. Not good. We scored 27 more runs than we did last year, but gave up 42 more than last year and finished with the exact same record. Our stats over the last three seasons have been pretty consistent across the board with the exception of Papi’s and Tek’s offensive decline. What this is telling me is that we simply aren’t putting a very talented team on the field when you look at the the other post season teams. And that definitely showed during this series.
This team needs a serious overhaul in every sense of the word. If their are big name players on the market we need to go after them and stop bragging about signing washed up pitchers for next to nothing. We have the payroll, so use it. This past off season was unsat in every way.
I don’t know the exact contract situations with Tek, Wake, Papi, Lowell and Drew, but they need to look seriously at what they plan on doing with them. The team Captain who can’t play at a high level anymore and a DH who hit in the .230s and wasn’t even hitting in the 3 or 4 spot in this series is never a good thing to have on your team. And I never saw what everyone was touting our bullpen about. I held my breath every time we used them. And in the end they were the reason we lost the series.
In the end this team needs to find its identity. It seems like their is no leadership in the clubhouse and no emotional leader among the players like Millar and Schilling were. And having said that you really need to start asking yourself if Tito is the right man for this job. Remember we fired Grady after he won 93 and 95 games and was one game away from the WS. I totally agreed with his firing, but I was a bit surprised at Tito’s hiring. He did nothing in 4 years in Philly. If we are going to put an above average talented team on the field- which is what we were this year- then we are going to need a more emotional leader. You need to look at some of the managers from the past who did great things with above average teams. Guys like Billy Martin in Oakland and his final years in NY; Tommy Lasorda in ‘88; LaRussa with the Chi Sox and in ’06 with the Cards; Zimmer with the ’89 Cubs. These were guys who could get the most out of their players and knew how to motivate. I don’t see Tito as being able to do that. He inherited a talented team and got more talent in ‘06. That talent is obviously dwindling. I really do believe that if we finish next year in the same fashion you’re going to need to look at the manager. I don’t want to see us be like the Braves and keep our manager around longer than we should. No hit on Bobby Cox, but that team needs to go in another direction. And maybe we do too.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 6:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
easy to say, but give me your reason why. You saw what has happened the past two years.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
why?
because what you say is always stupid. What you call a person like that, smart?
by Buzzy on Oct 11, 2009 7:32 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If you put all of his comments
chronologically next to your comments and answers for the season, and then look at the final result, well maybe stupid is too strong a word, but correct goes to him, IMO!
by NG on Oct 11, 2009 7:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
you are just as stupid as he is
please go ahead and pull up one of these examples, Einstein. The fact that Boston lost in the playoffs is not suprising-only one team wins the WS. In fact both you and 75 were constantly saying that the team wouldn’t even make the postseason. Please find on example where I or anyone else on this site claimed the Sox were fielding a particularly strong contender this year, or that the team did not have obvious flaws. On the other hand, you have repeatedly said truly stupid, stupid things (your confusion of the gambler’s falacy, your “1-pitcher per inning” idea, your seattle theory (which by the way was a claim as to viability of getting into the playoffs and so many others it is impossible to keep track of) and you just don’t get it. Arguing with you is like having a pissing match with an ape-only you will care that your leg gets wet with piss.
by Buzzy on Oct 11, 2009 7:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
We may be stupid, but
we were correct in our assessment of the weaknesses of this team. If you were realistic in your assessments, I must have missed that one, and I have been confusing you with those stats types that always come up with some crazy ratio to show how great this team was. Well it was not.
by NG on Oct 11, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of your assessments had us out of the playoffs altogether
So you’ll excuse me if I need a bit more to go on than the gut feelings of certain posters.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 10:55 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
NG
You rant and rave, and then try to show how you were right in hindsight. You are almost always wrong. Every year since you joined OTM mid-2007 was going to be another 2006. Yet the Sox made the playoffs each year, winning the WS in ’07 and losing the ALCS in ’08.
What you don’t understand is anything can happen in the playoffs. This FO’s philosophy is to built teams to win 95 games each year. They have been extremely successful. Since 2003, the Sox have won two WS and making the playoffs every year but one. That’s a best result of any team.
You and 75bandwagon should be very happy. Since the Sox lost in the ALDS, the two of you can somehow twist that result to show that you were right all along. But, no one here said this team would win it all. No one said it was a “great” team. Most felt this was a very good team that would make the playoffs. Once there, anything can happen. The Sox lost to a very good team. That happens in the playoffs.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Right
Yea your right i mean we all knew the Sox were a great team but we were not afraid to admit that there were some holes. Getting to the post season was all we needed because we knew once we were there we could pull out some magic. It just didnt happen this year, the angels were better and more focused. I can live with that
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 12, 2009 9:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
See my empirical post on your fanpost about being "hot".
However, I guess at this stage I am setting my team goal higher than you are. I am more like a NY Yankee fan in that respect in that I want to be in and preferably win the WS. Don’t set that as the goal, and you have to depend on miracles to then get there, which don’t happen too much. With that goal in mind and with a team that is rich enough to compete with the Yanks on buying talent, I believe my empirical assessments of weakness were true, and I think it is justifiable to post such weaknesses somewhere. Maybe not here however as you true fans can’t handle it too well. Maybe our goals are just different.
by NG on Oct 12, 2009 9:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We all want to win the WS every year
But it just doesn’t happen. We know we had weaknesses as a team, but what you don’t realize is that the Sox are not alone in that—every team does. The point is that once you’re in the playoffs it’s a crapshoot. We didn’t lose because of old catchers or some lack of chemistry or some bullshit, it’s because we had 3 bad games at the wrong time. It happens.
My problem with you is that you essentially called tails on a coin flip and when it came up tails used that as proof that you’re an infallible expert analyst when all you really do is pull bullshit out of your ass based on gut feelings and knee-jerk reactions to seeing V-Mart air mail a throw.
You talk about making empirical assessments of the team, but you manage to completely ignore the scientific process in doing so. You’ve essentially bastardized the word. Yes, you may go out there and say you see a team without “fire” or “chemistry” or whatever other bullshit buzzword you’ve decided to use for the day, but you can’t empirically demonstrate that any of that is worth half a damn. When it comes down to it, this team scored a ton of runs, gave up significantly fewer, and just lost 3 bad games. That’s all there is to it.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do you really believe that about only 3 bad games??
I watched just about every game, and the team I watched must NOT be the one you watched. Either that or you did not watch or your rose colored glasses were too deeply tinted! What about the last ?10 games with the Yanks, and what about the last 3 games with the Jays. Could you not see this coming even through your tinted glasses????
BTW, did the resting of the starters help??
Get real.
by NG on Oct 12, 2009 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Do I think we only had 3 bad games?
No, we had more, but so did every team. You seem to think every team not named the Red Sox is absolutely perfect. But what the season came down to was 3 final games where we just played bad. It’s bullshit to say you predicted this through anything other than random pessimism. You see the last 10 games with the Yanks, I see the first 8. You cherry pick the worst parts of our season, I point out we had a run differential well over 100 and won 94 games. My glasses aren’t rose colored, yours are just shit colored.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 10:49 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Disagree with a lot
Most here at OTM were hopeful and optimistic about the team, but most could admit to certain problems the team had throughout the year. Maybe it didn’t seem that way when you only regard how people responded to you, but you need to understand that you were proclaiming us out of the playoffs by the end of July. You can be critical of the team and still be optimistic. We won 95 games this year in the AL East. That’s been Theo’s goal for every season: build a team to get to the playoffs. We’re a good team, I’m sorry if you don’t believe that.
For contracts and such I highly suggest you use Cot’s Contracts as a resource: http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/
If you can’t be bothered to check that site to find out a certain player’s contract then I can’t help you with that.
Our bullpen was one of the best in the league, it just seemed to grow inconsistent and tired by the end of the year. RR, MDC, Bard, and others all had explosive debuts for the year, but became less effective as the season wore on. I hope when you said “I held my breath every time we used them” you really meant in the last week because if you meant throughout the year then I’m going to question your judgement about things. I’d also say Bard did a great job in the playoffs, and so did other members of our bullpen.
Finally, there is no way we get rid of Tito. We are not an above-average team, and I’m not quite sure where you get that from. We got swept out of the first round. That really sucks, but it doesn’t make us unworthy of being there. I think we’re better than the Twins and just about all of the NL teams in the playoffs this year. The Angels and Yanks were the only teams I saw as truly better than us this year.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We may have burned the bullpen out
because we depended too much on older, has-been pitchers. We also may not be conditioning our starters appropriately, but this I am not sure about.
I often hear from friends who say spend your money now because you cannot take it with you. To a point that may be part of the problem with the Sox. They have this money in reserve, I guess, but what are they waiting to spend it on?? This year has now gone.
by NG on Oct 11, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Once Again Reading What You Want To Read
I was clearly talking about the second half of the season. But if we are going to be content with just making the post season (which is what you seem to be talking about), then be prepared for disappointment in the post season if all we are going to do is finish second to the Yankees at the end of the regular season. They are an EXPLOSIVE club and we don’t come close to matching up with them (especially with them having home field advantage throughout the playoffs). They knew what they needed to do to get back on top and did it. Do you want to go back to the late 90s and 2003? I sure as hell don’t. We won it all in ‘07 because of home field advantage. Do you think we would have beaten Cleveland if games 6 and 7 were in their ball park? The wild card isn’t going to cut it as long as the Yankees and Angels continue to get better. And if we don’t make some serious changes in 2010 and 2011 then this is as good as it’s going to get. That was the point of what I was writing
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 7:11 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We're obviously going to make some changes
“Serious changes” is a variable statement. One man’s “serious” is another man’s “close-but-no-cigar”. What, to you, is a “serious” change? I’m genuinely curious, not trying to troll you.
However, I DON’T see us going back to the late 90’s and 2003. I think we WILL improve, it’s just to the extent of how much. But there is no Teixeira or Sabathia in this offseason, which means after getting someone for LF and a back-up catcher, we’re looking specifically at trades here, and I’m not willing to completely empty our farm system to completely rehaul our line-up.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are so wrong
The only thing a GM can do is try to get to the postseason and have 3 very good Starters. Theo did that. I truly believe Lester is better than Lackey and Beckett is better than Weaver and Kazmir and Buchholz might be even. So our starting pitching was slightly better on paper. And our overall winning chances were around 52% if you believe Beyond the Boxscore.
And there wont be a major overhaul, because the core of our team is young and under contract for years. We have a hole at SS, but the market for SS is very thin and getting Hanley Ramirez is impossible (or atleast not worth what you have to give). Given the big contract Lowell (12M) and Ortiz (12.5M) have they will be back next year because they have zero trade value. Bay is becoming a FA and will very likely be resigned at a couple of millions more a year. Our rotation is Lester, Beckett, Buchholz, Matsuzaka and X. X could be Wake or some guy like Penny last year, injured guys with lots of potential (eg Rich Harden). The FA market this year is very thin. Lackey on pitching side and Holliday and Bay on the hitting side being the big names. So we only have trades. I could see us getting JJ Hardy for very little and Lowrie being the Utility infielder. Or i could see the Sox in a huge Blockbuster trade including players like Adrian Gonzalez or Felix Hernandez (while HanRam as stated before seems almost untouchable).
I’d love to get Chone Figgings (Type B) but i doubt the Red Sox will have a 12M bench player in Lowell. Although he likely wont repeat his fantastic 5.9 WAR season, he is a sure bet to be a better player than Lowell and one of my major concerns is our poor defense he is a great 3b (UZR: 11.8).
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 7:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The core of our team is young?
Returning players ages next year: Varitek 38; Lowell 36; Ortiz 34; Drew 34; Wakefield 43 (maybe 42).
You were obviously talking about Youkilis and Bay 31; Ellsbury and Pedroia 26
We’ve got some old dudes on our team and I didn’t even mention Saito 40; and Wagner 39.
Once again, this is how old they will be next year.
We are going to feel the effects of our dismal off season moves.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
it sure is
Lester, beckett, buchholz, matsuzaka, bard, ramirez, papelbon? Varitek (is not a starter next year), Wake (likely career over).
Ortiz and Lowell most likely have the last years with the sox. Wagner and Saito wont be with the Sox either most likely while both where pretty good despite their age.
This is simply not the offseason to make big moves giving Red Sox contracts and 2010 FA (ever heard of Joe Mauer? ).
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 8:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We don't even know if 'Tek. Wake, and Wagner will be back next year.
So it’s a bit early to proclaim our team as that old.
Drew is 34 but still one of the most productive members on our team. If you expect or want him to go I can’t disagree enough.
Ortiz and Lowell will be in the last year’s of their contracts.
Most of our starting pitching is still young, including Beckett, Dice-K, Buch, and Lester all under 30. MDC, Bard, Paps, RR, and those who came in later like Bowden and Richardson are all young. Lowrie’s young but unproven.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Now
Now maybe we’ll see some needed changes.
by Old Fan on Oct 11, 2009 6:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What about Jason Bay?
He is gonna want a fat check, no?
by Vlad Dracul on Oct 11, 2009 6:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
and he struck out 162 times this year
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 6:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is worth mentioning.
Bay is looking a TON like Adam Dunn with a little better fielding and a little worse OBP. As much as I’d be happy to have Adam Dunn at DH—especially over the long lost Papi—I don’t want him in LF.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 8:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn
I believe he wants to play in the field. Now as an Angel fan, I wouldn’t mind the Red Sox doing that, but his D would be the worst ever.
by Angels2004 on Oct 12, 2009 12:47 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
nice try boys, but it's our time this year.
let’s do it again next year?
Thank you, Nick Adenhart. You will always be remembered. #34
by howiestheman on Oct 11, 2009 6:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would count on it (this being your year)
but at this stage I am hoping at least you are partially right…
by Buzzy on Oct 11, 2009 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Please Angels beat the MFY
VARITEK MUST GO
Brandon Webb in 2010
by gizmosandy on Oct 11, 2009 6:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Trade Dice-BB and Bucholtz to the Mariners for King Felix.
Management might balk at seeing their Japanese “treasure” go but they’ll have 2 other players if they really think they need to give the Yamatos their dog-and-pony show.
Bucholtz will be hard to part with but I can’t see any team trading Felix in for a package who’s centerpiece is Matsuzaka, even if it is Seattle. Racial preferences to satisfy the Japanese fans can only go so far, and the Mariners are stuck with Ichiro and Johjima anyway.
Felix will not sign with the Mariners; the Mariners know that.
There’s no way anyone can screw up a deal like this, although it’s no guarantee that the Red Sox are the ones to close it out.
The Red Sox simply have to avoid underrating [and under-bidding] Felix Hernandez. Meanwhile, Red Sox management must avoid overrating Bucholtz (who does have a good but not great future as a starter) and especially Matsuzaka (who will remain popular for being Japanese but is an overrated starter and has become a clubhouse cancer).
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't watch a lot of BOS games but...
Matsuzaka sure seems a bit complacent after scoring his WS title in 07
Is that the sentiment many BOS fans share?
by Vlad Dracul on Oct 11, 2009 6:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wouldn't know because I'm a Yankees fan
Actually, I’m a fan of their organizational structure as much as their team on the field.
It’s one of the reasons I’m invested in them (literally).
Financially, the Red Sox have more disposable income in this and coming year’s cash flows (think of it as the R&D expenditure in some tech companies) to get Felix and ensure they can keep him. They are certainly in a better position than the Yankees.
And the Red Sox would be fools to allow another team, especially my team, to steal Felix.
I don’t see the Yankees getting Felix.
But then, the Red Sox never saw stealing Tex from them either.
Again, while getting Felix wouldn’t please me as a Yankees man, I’m also a fan of the business itself. And, at any rate, Felix is leaving Seattle anyway and he deserves to be on a good team. Currently, he gets treated like a “suketto” on Kenji Johjima’s Mariners.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 6:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're thinking of the 2008 Mariners
A lot has changed in Seattle over the last year.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not that much.
There was a serious disagreement between Felix on the one hand and Wakamatsu/Johjima on the other.
Felix embarrassed Wakamatsu when he won that rather public argument (public to insiders anyway), and Wak ended up having to get face-saving help from the writers.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I now remember you as the Yankees fan that was trolling Lookout Landing earlier in the year, so that explains a lot
But, no. That whole Wak/Felix argument was made out by the media to be a lot more important than it was, but the fact remains the Felix pitched significantly better afterwords. As for Kenji, he has completely fallen out of grace with the new regime (unfairly), and he’s getting up there in years. Everyone, including Felix, knows he’s not going to be on this team much longer, and his time as the full time starter is over.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You don't much do you?
Been getting your information from watching television and the rest of the media?
The dispute was principally over the organization’s attitude towards its pitching staff (not just Felix) and that spilled over into Johjima’s status.
The entire league knows about it, and it’s a joke that the Mariners let it go that far.
The word is that Felix ended up practically ordering Wakamatsu to make Rob Johnson his catcher after the Angels game. Felix stormed Wak’s office (actually, nobody knows if it was the office or if Felix tracked his manager down).
The chasm became so wide that Felix threatened that he wouldn’t even CONSIDER staying with the Mariners. If you know anything about negotiations, you know that this is one way for a player to kill a team’s bargaining power in a trade.
It became “public”.
Bottom line, after that meeting (in which the media put out the lie that Wak “chewed out” Felix) Wakamatsu had no choice but to relent and give Felix his personal catcher.
This isn’t a secret; I heard about it a day after it happened and I’m no longer a part of the Mariners.
Even an idiot like you should be able to confirm what really happened; take a look at the Felix’s game lineups:
After the supposed meeting in which Wak “put Felix in his place” – roaring laugh – Johjima NEVER CAUGHT FELIX EVER AGAIN.
This after Wakamatsu publicly stated that he would never allow his pitchers (read: Felix Hernandez) to have a personal catcher (read: Rob Johnson).
Wakamatsu lost [and lost badly]. The Mariners [and Felix] did great damage to their ability to negotiate a favorable trade.
The media [and the Mariners] worked overtime to cover-up Wakamatsu’s mistake.
And only the ignorant (read: people like you) fell for it – hook, line, and sinker.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Marienrs only chance to keep Felix for the next 5 years...
is to rely on the incompetence of every GM in baseball.
Granted, there are some real thumb-suckers out there, but the chances of the Mariners keeping Felix are close to nil.
They have nobody but themselves to blame.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're spewing out info that I can't verify, because it's never been public to people who aren't "insiders" like you are, apparently
So I can’t really argue with it. I’m not an insider by any means – I go on what I’m able to read and see. The fact that you’re calling me an idiot because of that is comical at best.
You also, being the type of person you are showing yourself to be, are not someone who I’m going to trust for your word. After all, the only things I have to go off of are a) your word b) the fact that you have trolled lookout landing and c) the fact that you are insulting me for ridiculous reasons. I’m going to walk away from this argument before you reduce it even further to name calling and other insults.
And no, none of these events you’ve said to be “public” are. The furthest it got in the public media was Felix requesting Rob Johnson to be his personal catcher because he and Kenji couldn’t get on the same page, and Wak obliging.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I already gave you the relevant public verification.
Don’t blame me if you’re too afraid to see it.
Granted, it’s easier for me to ignore the media hype because I already know what I’m looking for, especially having worked for your team in the past [and gotten a few tips from people who still work in baseball dumbass].
You want me to give you information from the “sports media”?
Fine.
The Mariners media like Lookout Landing are gushing over Wakamatsu because he “called out Felix Hernandez” after a bad game against the Angels (which Johjima caught). They claim that his “trip to the manager’s office” is what spurred him on to an incredibly successful run.
Really?
Aside from the fact that it was Felix who demanded that meeting (again I have no idea if it occurred in that office nor do I care), along with several other details that don’t fit your narrative, you’re right, a person like you would have no idea if I’m telling the truth.
So how about using your own brain to research the following instead of having the media do your thinking for you?
If Wakamatsu won that argument “in the Manager’s Office”, what happened the very next day after that meeting (which was after the Angels game that Johjima caught)?
Answer: Kenji Johjima lost his job.
You can confirm it just by looking at the lineups (which I already told you to do) of every game Felix pitched in after the meeting occurred.
Why was Johjima banished immediately after the “meeting in the office”? (There were other players and Mariner employees who witnessed part of it which is why I seriously doubt it happened exclusively “in the Manager’s office”)
Why did Kenji lose starting job after Wakamatsu stated THROUGHOUT THE SEASON up to that point that he would not allow his pitchers to have personal catchers (aka, Felix would not be allowed to pitch to Rob Johnson) and that Johjima was the starting catcher?
Why did Rob Johnson catch every game Felix pitched in after the meeting occurred (go to ESPN to look up his games if you want since it’s obvious you get your information from second-rate websites run by third-rate reporters)?
This isn’t rocket science.
This isn’t a secret.
The Mariners know it, the players know it and every GM and Front Office who’s looking to sign Hernandez (including Theo Epstein) knows it.
Hell, a SOCCER FAN should be able to figure this one out.
Or are you naturally brain-dead like the administrator for Lookout Landing, a guy who couldn’t find his dick unless a sportscaster told him he didn’t have one.
by Terrekain on Oct 12, 2009 2:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mariners fan here - there's absolutely no chance in hell that's close to enough for Felix
We have an intelligent smart office now, but I don’t think even Bavasi would have taken a deal like that.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Smart office? Front office*
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:08 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps....
and perhaps not.
You have to realize that the entire league knows that Felix won’t stay with the Mariners.
That knowledge is power no matter what Felix says to try to help his own team (the Mariners) negotiate.
It’s a bad bluff.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not positive Felix is going to re-sign, but for you to say "the entire league knows that Felix won’t stay with the Mariners." is ridiculous
He’s stated how much he loves playing in Seattle as recently as this year – and if that doesn’t mean much, there’s also the fact that there has to be a reason he decided to sign with the M’s in the first place, despite us offering less money than other teams. He’s going to be a rich man one way or another, and he’s as likely to re-sign with Seattle as anyone.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Is Seattle gonna put up CC money?
Then he is gone. Either Seattle pays Felix the money that CC got and more or the Red Sox and Yankees will have a bidding war over him.
No way his agent is stupid enough to allow him to sign an extension. Felix is gone.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 11, 2009 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Players tell their agents what to do, not the other way around
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Find me a credible example of some player telling his agent
to turn down the chance to be the highest paid player at his position and ill concede the point.
Stop the insanity. Will Felix be a Mariner…Maybe, but not unless Seattle pays him CC money.
NO agent would ever let Felix sign an extension.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 12, 2009 5:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And even if you're right, and we are forced to trade him, it's going to take a lot more than Buchholz and Daisuke
Felix is a 23 year old, who’s already an ace (and might have a Cy Young award on his resume), with 2 years left on his contract. Compared to what he’s worth, that package is chump change
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Felix Hernandez is Boston's for the taking.
Apparently, you have no idea how much the personal preferences of a player can effect the negotiations.
Boston fans should know this all too well because I can guarantee you that Mark Texeira did NOT pick the Yankees over the Red Sox over a “measly” $10 million which have not even been adjusted to current dollars after time value is added.
He chose New York for personal reasons.
Think about that.
How many millions is the irritation that the Mariners cause Felix worth to him?
How many players does the Mariners bad management cost them?
The entire league is coming up with their estimates right now.
by Terrekain on Oct 11, 2009 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
All signs, publicly available ones at least, point to Felix loving it in Seattle.
You clearly know nothing about the Mariners – either that or you’re stuck in the Bavasi regime. Unless you have some personal ties to Felix or his agent, which I’m sure you don’t, you’re just another person, making up shit, claiming to know what he’s talking about. I’m finished now.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ive got 162 million dollars that says Felix is moving out of Seattle soon.
There is no way Seattle can pay CC money and that is what King Felix’s agents knows he will get if he DOES NOT sign an extension. So why would Felix sign for less money to stay in a team that never makes the playoffs?
Felix will break the bank and only the Red Sox and Yankees have the money to do it….
Seattle is not stupid enough to do what Toronto and Minnesota did…wait too long and get pennies on the dollar for a stud.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 11, 2009 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You're right, they aren't stupid enough to wait if they can't sign him soon
But the new FO has done this year exactly what Felix wants to be done. They’ve built a team that’s ready to contend in the very near future – that coupled with the fact that Felix loves playing in Seattle is going to be big. They aren’t going to sign him to a 7 year contract, as that’s a stupid thing to do with any pitcher, but they do have the money to give him a fat, 3-4 year deal.
My Mariners blog - SodoMojo Twitter Feed, Fuck the fucking Angels!
by gregrabble on Oct 11, 2009 10:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think you are dreaming here
He demands a 7 year contract and someone is gonna give him a 7 year contract. I also wouldn give shit about him saying: I love playing in Seattle! What else he is expected to say when asked? Thats what every player says, it means jack shit.
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 10:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why demand a 7-year contract.
if he really wants to leave?
Believe me, Felix and his agent know what his fair market value is, and based on that, he’d be willing to take a shorter contract(3-4 years) to buy out his remaining arb years, plus 1-2 of what would be his initial FA years, for market value or slightly less, knowing that he can continue to add to his resume over that period, then break the bank when he’s 27 or 28 and hitting FA for the first time.
(i.e. Take a 3-4 year contract this offseason, then wait for an all out bidding war in a few years.)
I could really see this happening. Not 100% certain, but 95% :)
by jimolson3 on Oct 12, 2009 1:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If he breaks the bank now (which he can) he can get 2 massive contracts.
1 for the next 7 years, and then another at ~30. People are much more willing to give massive contracts to 30-year-olds than 34-year-olds.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ths'll be the last time I say it
Felix does not like it in Seattle.
The Mariners treated him like a suketto before they discovered too late that he’s worth more than Johjima (an absurd goof on their part).
And “German Red Sox Fan” is correct; what he’s saying to the media is pure fluff, probably a gimme for Wakamatsu caving and losing face throughout the baseball world.
Felix DID get his way with the manager so it’s only natural that he pretend there’s no hard feelings (and it also looks professional for the next team that he’s auditioning for).
As for whether the next team will feel that Felix is a problem because he took on his manager, the general feeling is that, while teams do not generally look kindly at showing up a manager, this particular case is an exception.
Wakamatsu clearly crossed the line by forcing an incompetent catcher (who can’t even speak to Hernandez) on the club Ace, let alone the entire pitching staff. Racial preferences favoring Johjima [also a big managerial faux pas] clearly played a part in that, especially because Kenji isn’t exactly a Mauer or Posada.
Bottom line: the economics, the politics and the already immutable reality are that “King Felix” will not sign with the Mariners.
And nobody in baseball, not even the old-school managers like Scocia and Torre (well, Leyland might, and he might not), will hold his pwnage of Wakamatsu against him.
Seattle is making a big show of “making it a priority” to sign Felix but it’s Kabuki fiction – just like the fiction that Wakamatsu “called out” Felix after the Angels game.
If Mariners fans like gregrabble want to pretend that Felix will sign with Seattle, let them.
While they’re at it, they can start rationalizing why Felix loves the Mariners but still won’t sign with them – since even they must know that they’re full of it.
by Terrekain on Oct 12, 2009 1:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The hope you have is admirable
but the probability you ignore makes you annoying.
VARITEK MUST GO
Brandon Webb in 2010
by gizmosandy on Oct 12, 2009 7:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
+1
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
What?
Come on, so you think the probability of Felix looking at what CC made off FA and trying to orchestrate a deal to a team that will pay him $162 million or just wait for FA is lower than Felix taking a hometown discount to a team that has not made the playoffs since he has been on the team and has a history of not paying big time possible FAs?
No way, I completely disagree.
Felix is GONE, there is too much money left on the table if he signs and extension and every agent, even the crappy ones know Felix is gonna break the bank.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 12, 2009 5:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
BUT they cannot pay him....
so moot point.
My argument is simple: Felix wants to be the highest paid pitcher in baseball….Unless Seattle is willing to do that, he is gone. He might not end up in Boston, but unless Seattle pays him his money, he will not be a Mariner.
Unless you have some secret inside information about Felix’s love for Seattle and seafood, I just don’t see why he will do something that every other FA does.
Was CC any different? He wasn’t happy playing for the Brewers? He did not state over and over again he wanted to play in California and lobbied the Dodgers and Angels in the off season to sign him?
Whats so different about Felix that makes you believe he will go against the tide?
by SoxAcumen on Oct 12, 2009 5:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Curious - For any BOS fans who were watching in a pub or public place.
Was the place falling apart when Pap blew it or was it pretty subdued moment?
by Vlad Dracul on Oct 11, 2009 6:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
just calm down
Yeah, I’m as dejected as anyone else, but the facts are …
1) We weren’t going to go on beating the Angels forever
2) Papelbon wasn’t going to be perfect forever (see Mariano Rivera, 1997 and what he did for the 3-4 years after that)
3) Now this FORCES us to get better for 2010
Yes, spring is 141 days away and we’ll be right back in the Hunt for a Red Sox October in 2010 … count on it
by redsoxjoey on Oct 11, 2009 6:39 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
We need a youthful injection of impact offense
VARITEK MUST GO
Brandon Webb in 2010
by gizmosandy on Oct 11, 2009 6:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
GODDMAMN PISS AND HELL.
That’s all I got right now.
That…and Canadian Thanksgiving is RUINED.
Goddamn that DeMarlo Hale.
by Bloggy on Oct 11, 2009 7:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Still the Best
The Sox are still baseball’s BEST team this season, no matter what other team goes on to win the WS. But even the best teams still can – and do – lose a game or two. Or three. Also, keep in mind what the Angels must have felt these past few postseasons. Especially a good Angels team (with Mark Teixeira) that won 100 games last year, but lost to last year’s best team (Sox) in baseball.
History books: The Yankees beat up the Royals in the ALCS three straight years (1976-1978), until the Royals finally turned the tables on NY in 1980. It just goes to show: Sooner or later…the tide turns.
by Daniel G on Oct 11, 2009 7:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The Sox are still baseball’s BEST team this season, no matter what other team goes on to win the WS.
You’re joking, right?
Denial. Not just a river in Egypt.
"I think my motivation is to see the other guys in the clubhouse. They’re contending for the playoffs, and when I see that it gets into my body. I play like it’s the playoffs too" —Memlo
by zknower on Oct 12, 2009 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's not all bad Sox fans
Now you can troll the Yankee boards freely!
by GMan83201 on Oct 11, 2009 8:06 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Whoops
-But what do you guys see as the top 3 needs for the squad this offseason?
-Wagner+Bard or Papelbon?
-Wake or Tek retiring?
by qthaballa on Oct 11, 2009 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Top 3 needs are SS, C, LF
Martinez may stay at C instead of shifting to 1B, in which case the 3rd need is a 5th SP or 3B.
by dsharp on Oct 11, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I dont think
i can agree more. a little more balance on the base paths wouldn’t hurt instead of having mainly Ells and someone else just on occassion
by qthaballa on Oct 12, 2009 6:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Some good comments in here
by some thoughtful posters, who obviously care about the Red Sox and are intelligent enough to discuss the good-and-bad about the team in a mature manner. Too bad there are a couple of immature posters who can only name-call and use profanity, instead of talking like an adult.
Let’s trust Theo and the Sox brain trust, (and John Henry’s wallet, if need be) can make the right moves, without letting sentiment get in the way, and make us even a better team next year.
by ccthemovieman on Oct 11, 2009 8:46 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
:-)
LOL
Keep pumpin, ain't worried bout nuttin
Busters thought we was frontin, so reload and keep dumpin
Keep Sleeping on Orlando...
by BS Patrol on Oct 11, 2009 9:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sox never seemed to get things to click this season.
overall a good season, but no real break out seasons for anyone. No career years for any players and too many issues kept the Sox from playing at the level they needed too to beat the Yanks and Angels.
Looking forward to 2010 and hopefully taking the positives, Buchholz, V-Mart, Ellsbury into the next season.
Gammons is already running it about a possible Ben Sheets signing…I dont know if I want another guy coming off injury longshot…but nice thought.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 11, 2009 9:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
missed on Smoltz, so-so on Penny, hit on Wagner
It’s worth a shot. We’ll need a 5th SP given Wake’s unknown status – both now and later even if he starts the year healthy.
by dsharp on Oct 11, 2009 9:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We need power at the plate as well as pitching
Bay had 36 homers and 119 RBIs, but he also struck out 162 times. Ortiz is pretty much finished. He’ll be a year older and slower and won’t be on roids. I might be a little contradictory here because we did score 27 more runs than last year, but we gave up 42 more runs than last year. We no longer have the 3-4 punch in the line up. And Ellsbury needs to be consistent enough to be the lead off hitter at all times.
I think that Beckett is starting to show signs of wearing down. He’s not the dominant guy who was out there in ‘07. A very bad second half along with back trouble down the stretch got me very concerned. Who knows how Wake will respond to off season back surgery. Dice K is not and never will be worth the money we paid for him. Lester needs to be consistent all year if he plans on being an elite starter (I still don’t think he’s quite there yet). Bucholtz needs to beef up and show that he can pitch an entire season without serious incident (arm fatigue in ’07?).
And the obvious questions about the bullpen need to be addressed. I like what the Yankee fan said about not giving up on Rivera after he imploded in the ’01 WS and the ’04 ALCS. I think Pap will do what he needs to do in the off season.
And we need every day players at their positions. Specifically, moving Youk between first and third. He is no third basement and this will screw up his chances of winning a gold glove if he isn’t at first all the time.
I think we may end up having an ‘06 type year because we still have players under contract who are pass their primes, but we can’t get rid of them (Ortiz and Lowell). Lowell’s numbers were pretty much identical to last year after his hip surgery, but that was because he didn’t play as much and we all know what happened with Ortiz.
I’m hurting pretty bad right now. I love this team more than anyone knows. I know that a lot of what I say is emotionally charged and sometime knee jerk, but I base it on what I see when I’m watching the games. This team just never jelled like it should have. It really came a part after the all star break. When we slumped we slumped really bad. And losing 8 of the last 14 was no way to end the season. Regardless of what past teams have done down the stretch you need to go into the post season with momentum.
Let’s get ’em next year
I still like you, buzzy
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 10:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
More Power?
We were 4th this season in HR behind the Yankees, Rangers and Phillies despite have a “negative” HR Park. Ortiz btw was leading the league in HR from June 5th (something like that to lazy to look it up) till season end. With the second half he had you just have to go with him again next year. The much greater question is Lowell indeed, especially his atrocious defense. He basically has zero range now. Chone Figgins like stated above would be an option i just dont see the Red Sox benching Lowell with his 12M salary.
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 10:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Huge disagree.
Everyone has their ups and downs. The fact is that we’ve been looking at Ortiz’ high points and saying “He’s back!” Hot streaks are non-sustainable, Ortiz is next-to-done, and we can’t accept such mediocre production from the purely offensive DH slot.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 10:56 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not saying Ortiz is the Superstar he once was.
But you cant trade him: he has 0 value. He makes 12.5M next year which is about 10% of the Sox payroll (we are allready eating Lugos 9.5 M next year). So there is only one possibility: He is our DH next year. Be realistic there is no better solution within the organisation and the payroll is needed to resign Bay (or Holliday) and some other players.
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 11:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Like you said behind the Yankess and Rangers
We need to be in FRONT of them. We need to bring more power to the plate than the Yankees. That’s how you win the AL East. Once again, the wild card isn’t going to cut it. And if the Rangers and Rays hadn’t imploded like they did we might not have even have made the post season. As for Ortiz, everyone knows what he did from June on, but think how much better this team would have been if could have done that all year. I watched him go 0 for 7 in a 12 inning game at Annaheim early in the year ( I live in Orange County and have to put up with Angel fans all the time). I agree better late than never, but that’s what he’s getting paid to do. Once again. we’re going to be stuck with older, slower players for at least one more year.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 10:51 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
That's not necessarily possible.
Again, $200 million. We’re not going to be spending that.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 10:53 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If we spend that much on Free Agents this winter, I'll be surprised
Concerned and surprised, especially considering the quality of players this offseason can’t compete with last year.
For a year in which they missed the playoffs and therefore had to make a big splash in order to compete, the Yanks sure did hit the jackpot on that one.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 10:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Exactly
I agree completely. But did we really compete this year? At least the way we were supposed to? I don’t think so. Our ‘04 and ’07 teams were power teams. We could score a lot of runs and get the clutch hits when we were behind. For that fact last year’s team was much the same. As for this year the first half slump of Ortiz, Varitek’s offensive collapse and Bay’s 162 strkeouts, and Ellsbury’s inconsistency at lead off had much to do with our offensive woes. Hell, maybe this was just an unfortunate year. I really thought we had the team to go all the way. The starting pitching had much to do with it too. It’s not good when you have Tazawa starting for you and then you have to go out and sign Paul Byrd.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Absolutely do I think we competed this year
Just because we played crappy baseball in the playoffs and got swept doesn’t mean I think we didn’t compete. We were the best team in the league in the first half, but health issues and inconsistency hurt us going into the second half.
You say Lester isn’t an ace yet, and I disagree. You say Dice-K isn’t worth the money we paid him. Next year he’s only making $8m. I think he can sustain much of that value. Beckett can get streaky but he’s always been that way, and he was an ace for a good part of the year along with Lester. Buch has thrown more this year than he ever did in the majors since. Another year of experience and he can be just as good if not better.
With some tweaks and some upgrades without messing with our core we can absolutely do better next year. I really believe this.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Exactly
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.
by Drugs Delaney on Oct 12, 2009 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The we'll be like the Sox of old and playing for the wild card every year and never having home field advantage in the playoffs.
It’s that simple.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 10:56 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Except that we did beat the Yankees in 2004 and 2007 even with lowered payrolls.
The key is to have better young talent, smarter rosters, etc. Not to just out muscle them.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 10:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yankees have huge issues in the off season as well
Their team will not look the same next season. In all likely hood, Damon and Matsui are gone and they have to figure out what to do with their rotation + Joba. Posada is probably on the same road as Tek, but he will probably become the DH.
Angels have to make decisions as well and its very likely Abreu will get seriously paid and not be an Angel next season.
Red Sox could very well win the AL East.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 12, 2009 5:47 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
But right now we don’t have that and it doesn’t look like we’ll be having it for a couple more seasons.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 10:58 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get this
HOW exactly don’t we have better young talent for a few more seasons? You seem caught up on Lowell and Ortiz, and while their presence on the roster is annoying, they’re not going to stop us from winning.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 11:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lester & Buchholz > Hughes & Joba
Bard > Any of their young relievers
Ellsbury > Melky (We’ll see on Gardner…I think his defense is a blip)
Pedroia > Cano (Deeeefense)
And our farm system >>>> Yankees farm system in depth and in top-talent.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 11, 2009 11:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
agree
Robertson is having slightly better stats than Bard. So that point is not true
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 11:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not true on the farm system
The Yankees stopped selling off their top prospects for overpaid, over-the-hill FAs a few years ago so their farm system is now the highest rated in the majors.
Not to mention every one of their minor league teams went to their respective league championship games.
by GMan83201 on Oct 12, 2009 12:25 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Their farm system is the highest rated in the majors by whom, exactly?
Last year they were ranked behind the Sox by both BA and KLaw.
I wasn’t aware that the rankings were out already. Yes, Montero had a great year, and Lars had a bad year, but if you think that’s enough to catapult the Yanks system from mid-range to #1 you’re sadly mistaken.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 12, 2009 12:32 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Highest rated in the majors? What a joke. You have Austin Jackson, Jesus Montero, and...that's about it.
The only reason they go to their championship is because they’re stocked with older guys who will never progress past their current level. The Yankees have done better recently than in the past, that only moves them up from the bottom of the pack to maybe towards the middle of the pack. If either Jackson or Montero busts, that’s a big hit to the Yankees system. Lars has a bad year, though, and the Sox have Reddick and Kalish both emerging as great players while Ryan Westmoreland sits in the NYPL looking every bit a future All-Star.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 12:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They seemed to have this year....lol.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:10 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
OK....Eveyone throw it at me. What would you do with this team to make it better than it was this year? And I mean specifically and realistically.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:17 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I would:
1. Solve the LF vacancy, preferably with Holliday, who I think can stay in LF longer than Bay. But if Bay will sign a short contract and Holliday wants superstar money, go with the status quo.
2. Improve and strengthen the bench. Decline ’Tek’s option and hope he doesn’t pick up his end. I would hate to have to release him, but might have to. Get a back-up who can throw out some runners and can occasionally play more than a few games a week to give Victor some time off to rest.
3. Get a young power bat who can field without emptying the farm. Obviously hardest goal out of these, and we probably would have to give up a Casey Kelly and others, but oh well.
4. If Wake comes back, fine, if not, a reliable #2/#3 innings-eater is fine considering the rest of our rotation would be set with Beckett, Lester, Buch, and Dice-K.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good points
I don’t mind signing Bay. He’s a better fielder than Holliday and now has experience playing the Monster. Definitely need a better back up catcher than Kottaras or Dusty whateverhisnameis. I want to see what all of the fuss is about Lars Anderson. I believe he’s a first baseman. I’d be willing to trade him since Youk will be around for quite a while. I don’t want to see him moved to third on a permanent basis. Wake will probably be back because of personal career milestaones he wants to achieve.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Holliday has always been a better fielder than Bay.
Are you judging that by one Error? And didn we just saw today how poorly Bay still plays the monster?
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Good Point
We only got him because we needed a quick fix after getting rid of Manny.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:52 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How is Bay a better fielder than Holliday?
I’m guessing all you’ve seen of Holliday is that dropped ball in the NLDS, but the truth is that while he’s no Gold Glover, Holliday is definitely a better fielder than Bay. Bay has below average range and arm, Holliday is at least average on those.
And it’s George Kottaras and Dusty Brown. For a good resource on our farm system, try here: http://www.soxprospects.com/
You can read up on George, Dusty, and Lars, all in one place. Youk, while not being as good as a defender at third as he used to be, is more valuable there than first. I think making sure Youk has Gold Gloves is not a good enough reason to keep him at first if we have better options there.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 11:44 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
My big offseason splash:
Very unrealistic but nonetheless:
1. Go completly all out for Hanley Ramirez. I’d offer Buchholz, Westemoreland or Kelly, Bowden, Anderson (maybe even Papelbon but i think he is to expensive for the marlins although the have closer issues, if paps is traded make Wagner/saito the closer for 1 year and let Bard setup). The only untouchable is Bard. Now the farm is pretty empty i know but a future Hall of Famer for 5 years of his prime is worth it, especially since SS is our biggest hole. He most likely can stay SS for a while since his Defense has improved.
2. Sign Bay/Holliday (Crawford) which ever package of years and anual salary makes most sense.
3. Sign John Lackey to fill the hole of Buchholz and sign the usual injured guy (Harden, Webb, Bedard, Sheets just to name a few) as the 5. starter.
Our farm would be empty and our payroll would be 15-20M higher than this season, but since we were willing to spend it on Tex i think a 140ish payroll for the sox is realistic.
by German Red Sox Fan on Oct 11, 2009 11:21 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Offseason
I have to completely agree with scenario 1. The sox havent had a great shortstop since Nomar and we are in desperate need for one. Hanley is the real deal and he is going to get even better.
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 11, 2009 11:43 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He's also cheap (considering)
Which means that the Marlins can keep him for a few more years before he gets too expensive for them. I just do not see them trading him now. We all got a little too excited over one brief little phone conversation between Theo and the Fish.
DFA Beckett
by South Coast Ghost on Oct 11, 2009 11:46 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Manny
As much as a distraction as everyone made Manny out to be, he was our driving force in the post season. I mean think about it we had the all time hr leader during the post season hitting 4. All game pitchers had Manny in the back of their mind and knew they had to make pitches or Manny would come up and hurt them (which he often did). Manny is worth every penny any team pays him even if he did miss 50 games this year. He makes all his money in the post season and i miss seeing him in a Red Sox jersey
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 11, 2009 11:47 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thank You!!!!!
I was waiting for someone to bring up Manny. Simply put, we don’t win those World Series without him. And for all of the ’’experts’’ out there THAT IS UNDISPUTABLE!!!!!!….He is the greatest right handed hitter that I’ve ever seen play.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 11, 2009 11:50 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Welcome!
Everyone is always afraid to bring it up because Theo and the whole office made it seem like Manny leaving was a good thing and Bay was going to be great for the team. Well maybe gets along with the guys better but he doesnt have the same presence. MLB is a business and when you have a Manny you dont run him out of town.
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 11, 2009 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
PapelBOMB
On July 27th I posted the following…. and I hate to be right
Ok, so we were willing to listen to your utterly spastic and sophomoric post game interviews – which sounded like Rain Man describing how he buys his underwear at Kmart in Cincinnati.
We were willing to watch your Irish dancing after playoff series – but to tell the truth – its just because you were saving games – I mean don’t get us wrong – we knew you were a Moron the whole time – we knew we never would trust you to do the most simple of tasks – such as mailing a letter – we basically viewed you as a Savant who closed games like Raymond Babbit counted cards and toothpicks.
Well now that you suck – you are no longer worth of the Red Sox closers spot and you are no longer worthy of our indulgence.
As far as I am concerned you can jump on the Heap of other dumb shits from the State of Mississippi and go play in the Katrina Sand box with your fellow morons Brett Favre and Derk Turnbow – may as well add the currently Crippled Ben Sheets to the mix as well.
I wouldn’t be surprised if you were dealt before the deadline – you suck that bad – in fact if I were you I would thank my lucky stars that the Special Olympics doesn’t have Baseball as an event because to tell the truth – that is really where you are at.
So no hard feelings, but you are totally useless and if Tito puts you in a close game again – I would fire him.
Hey and whomever the moderators are of this – I am not trying to pimp myself – just trying to keep it real.
And right now I am really pissed especially after Okie threw one fucking pitch and got an out.
by www.SoxTherapy.Net on Oct 12, 2009 12:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
God forbid he has one bad game.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 12:22 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
One Bad game........
I must be the only on watching. ….. I posted that after several bad….closer by heart attack moments. …
by www.SoxTherapy.Net on Oct 12, 2009 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dude, minus the Special Olympics reference (a bit off color) that was funny as hell.
And it is ironic that Okijimer (Ala Rem Dawg) did get the third out with one pitch.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 12:36 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
In fact
Before I posted it my biggest concern was that it would be an insult to them…………I am not sure what it takes to be a closer, I just know that it seemed whatever it is, he lost it at that point, anyway time to move on. I still can not believe 2 Run lead, 2 outs, no one on…… well as someone earlier said. 141 or I Suppose at this point 140 days till next season.
by www.SoxTherapy.Net on Oct 12, 2009 12:44 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
But you bring up a couple of fair and valid points
We have had a problem all year with allowing runners on base with two outs (base hits and full count walks). Look ar how many RBI we gave up with two strike counts. And one of the weaknesses that I think Tito does posess is that he doesn’t manage his pitching staff very well. I’ve seen a bit of a trend with him leaving his pitchers in for one batter too many. I know that hindsight is 20/20, but you can’t help but think ‘’what if’’.
by 75bandwagon on Oct 12, 2009 12:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes I do
Hey I don’t have all the answers
But at least I know what questions to ask.
by www.SoxTherapy.Net on Oct 12, 2009 1:00 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Stupid Boston fans.. duh!!!!!!!!!!
Papelbon. man, what a reliever, he deserves more respect for a guy like that, what he’s done for the team. I don’t think that was the right thing to do at the time. Booing .. shit… bloody fans. I poop on red sox nation!!!!!!!!!
Period.
by Peoria-Bum on Oct 12, 2009 3:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Roid sucks
How are you gonna make fun of the Sox for takin steroids. Your third baseman was the ringleader of it all, and you had the most people on any team come up in the Mitchell Report. You could have said alot of things but that was just dumb
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 12, 2009 9:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Ah I forgot about the Mitchell Report. Whose board does he sit on? Also, the Big Puzzy gets a pass, my bad, thought we were talking about an even playing field.
Enjoy the sand your head is buried in.
by Yanks Rule on Oct 12, 2009 9:33 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
pass??
How did Papi get a pass, it came out and he had to face the press just like all of your Yankees did. Im not saying no one on the Sox took steroids im just saying it was dumb of a yankee fan to try and use that, when they had more people taking roids than any other team
by cnubsbl16 on Oct 12, 2009 9:39 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
“im just saying it was dumb of a yankee fan to try and use that, when they had more people taking roids than any other team”
Ok, so the key is the number of guys using and the fact that the Mitchell report is biased doesn’t factor into the equasion.
Thanks for clearing that up.
by Yanks Rule on Oct 12, 2009 9:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Mitchell or not
Arod, Pettitte and in the past Giambi and Sheffield admitted their use. And even though Clemens did not, I would expect that even you do not think he was clean when the Yankees won in 99, 2000. So, what is your point?
by Buzzy on Oct 12, 2009 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Ah come on Randy-
that is going too far with the policing.
by Buzzy on Oct 12, 2009 10:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I expect that was me.
And trolls will not be tolerated. I left the bits of his that had any merit, but if he’s just gonna call out the entire Boston area as “scumbags and cheaters” then I’m not gonna leave that be.
I assume that’s what you were talking about?
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I wanted at least
to see how he was going to answer the erased post. I thought it might be amusing.
by Buzzy on Oct 12, 2009 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It wasn't that good of a team
Really. It is a tribute to Terry, the best manager I have seen wear our uniform and I started watching them when Higgins and Jurges did that, that this team won 95 games and got into the postseason. Beckett is not what he used to be; neither is Papelbon. Daisuke chose Japan over the Red Sox. Mike Lowell—-as dedicated a ballplayer as we have seen here in many years—-is barely able to scrape by. Bay homered a lot, but did not hit the way we expected. J.D. came on too late. Ortiz is useless, particularly against lefties. Ells and Pedroia have batting averages that are misleading since neither did much on the road.
There were bright spots: Daniel Bard is one of them. Clay Buchholz may not be as emotionally a wreck as he appeared to be, but we are not out of the woods yet and VMart was a definite upgrade.
I do not think we “lost” Texeira, who just used us against NY (not that there’s anything wrong with that). If we approach the offseason with a clear head, without putting eggs in a basket which was going elsewhere, we can recover, I think.. The foundation is there and this management team has got us in the post season almost every year since they showed up.
I am happy not to get swept by NY which was a very strong possibility had we survived LAA.
by Barth on Oct 12, 2009 4:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I think it is important to try to figure out really how good could this team have been.
I actually agree that the team was not very good, so your premise about managements efforts may well be on track. However, listening to all the stat guys on this site, you would have to believe that maybe management was poor because all this talent did not gel together to win when it counts.
Is the management glass half full or half empty??
by NG on Oct 12, 2009 5:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Listening to all the stat guys on the site would tell you that small sample sizes (such as an ALDS)
does not provide enough opportunities to allow the numbers to return to their averages, and thus a hot or cold streak is capable of ruining any team at any time in the postseason.
by Ben Buchanan on Oct 12, 2009 5:59 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As for the Dice-K comment, I agree but let me ask you
would you choose the US over your professional team? I think most would say yes.
If the US Olympic committee came calling, most professional athletes would sacrifice their professional careers to play. WBC too Japan is the Olympics.
by SoxAcumen on Oct 12, 2009 5:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















