Schilling GONE for good?
by Alex being Alex on Feb 7, 2008 2:49 PM EST
6 comments
Hey Guys it looks like our rotation is taking new form.
Take a look at this herald article.
http://bostonherald.com/sports/baseball/red_sox/view.bg?articleid=1071967&srvc=sports&positi on=0
I don't necessarily think this is that bad for us. Leaving us with this rotation.
Beckett
Dice K
Wake
Lester
Bucholz
I like that rotation however I think that we will look to keep Clay's inings down to start this season.
Roto world mentions Bartolo Colon and other NON OPTIONS.
Do we need to make a move now or can we go into camp with this pitching staff?
0 recs |
6 comments
Email
Print
Comments
Options by FA/Trade?
I do think we should get someone else, though--someone who's a bit more dependent than Tavarez. After all, our April schedule means playing against the A's, Jays, Tigers, Yankees, Indians, Yankees, Rangers, Angels, Rays, and Jays (in order--and another series against the Tigers within a week). Especially if Clay's to start the season in triple-a, which seems the logical thing to do, I hope we don't see Tavarez pitch every fifth day.
by Liza on Feb 7, 2008 5:21 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Schilling GONE for good?
by RSNexile on Feb 7, 2008 6:56 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Schilling GONE for good?
by 2004LoveAffair on Feb 8, 2008 6:04 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Schilling GONE for good?
As for nullification, it's a pretty high standard. I think the Sox would have to show that Schilling hid material information prior to his re-signing. I don't think it's the case - the Sox probably would've found the tear had they done a due diligence examination. Sort of like inspecting a house before you buy it.
by tommy.otm on Feb 8, 2008 7:33 PM EST up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Schilling GONE for good?
by Schulz on Feb 8, 2008 6:26 PM EST reply actions 0 recs
Re: Schilling GONE for good?
by Soxfan750 on Feb 9, 2008 12:44 AM EST reply actions 0 recs
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2009 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
