Jason Varitek: Yay or Nay?
With all the excitement over the Yankees' moves, and over Teixeira speculation, we're moving away from what may be the most critical position for the Red Sox long-term - catcher. The Red Sox have a serious decision to make, and it starts with whether or not they want Jason Varitek.
From where I stand, Tek really erred when he decided not to accept arbitration. Coming off an atrocious year, and his second lost season in the past three, Tek's strategy should have been to accept arbitration. Then he could make more money than as a free agent, and hopefully rebuild his value for another run at free agency for 2010.
As it is now, the market for Tek appears almost non-existent. The Tigers grabbed Gerald Laird, the Reds traded for Ramon Hernandez. And if a team wanted a veteran catcher, they'd probably prefer Ivan Rodriguez, who wouldn't cost first round draft picks.
If Jason Varitek can't work something out with the Red Sox, Boras is going to have to start marketing him in Japan. As much as Varitek-san would love the land of the Rising Sun, I think he'd prefer to not deal with a new league, new language, new pitching staff, and a new greatly reduced salary.*
With practically no other teams bidding for his services, Varitek has basically zero leverage. If he comes back to Boston, it'll be on Theo's terms. Our front office is not immune to sentimentality - witness the $4 million 2008 contract for Mike Timlin - but I hope in this case it won't be the driving factor. In this case, Theo should be able to hold Tek to a one-year deal, either as the primary starter or as part of a platoon with someone younger or better defensively (i.e. Cash).
On a one-year deal for less money, say $4 million, Varitek may be a legitimate option. The pitching staff likes him, and he hits lefties well (2008: .863 OPS). He's just one season removed from a good 2007 (.787 OPS). There is the possibility that he bounces back, especially if his struggles were more psychological (i.e. he got divorced) than physical.
However, I would prefer that Theo begins auditions for Who Wants to Catch the Red Sox sooner rather than later. Tek's defense has become underwhelming (18.8% caught-stealing percentage), and as a hitter he struggled to make contact all year long (2008: .220 / .313 / .359). It's unrealistic to expect much of an improvement at age 37, especially for a catcher. I'd rather bring back Kevin Cash, who plays good defense, guns down runners (26.9% CS%), and can catch Wakefield, than Tek, who is misfiring on all cylinders.
So here's my proposal:
1) Trade for a top catching prospect (preferably Teagarden, Salty, or Brian Anderson). Give him 60-75% of starts.
2) Bring back Kevin Cash, have him catch Wakefield and the remaining starts.
3) Have Dusty Brown / George Kottaras waiting in the wings should the prospect struggle or go down to injury.
What say you OTM? Do you approve? And more importantly, do you want Jason Varitek back for 2008?
*Baseball players in Japan make substantially less than their American counterparts. This is part of the reason that coming to the U.S. can be so appealing.
Comments
you are way off base
catcher’s role is more than throwing out runners at 2nd
he learns the hitters, makes adjustments, calls the right pitches
few catchers do
he cannot hit. most catchers are poor hitters. would not be a big deal if not for the OTHER holes in hitting line-up, especially DH, CF, SS and, most of the time, RF
put some rookie behind the plate, and watch your pitching staff “inexplicably” turn to shit
by Frank Malzone on
Dec 14, 2008 1:53 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Except
That by the time catchers hit the Major Leagues, you figure they probably can do all of that given some time. Otherwise “rookies” like Maeur awhile back would have suddenly turned “their pitching staffs to shit” in their first full season. Which doesn’t seem to have happened. Not to mention the fact that rookies have a chance to get better, while Tek is basically not going to hand you any sort of breakout season here. It’s hard to fight age unless your skillset is basically ageless (e.g. Jamie Moyer).
The fact that he cannot hit is compounded by the fact that his defense is getting worse. There are poor defenders at C that hit the tar out of the ball; there are also very good defense catchers that don’t feature that much of a bat — there are very few that suck at both.
by manifestus on
Dec 15, 2008 4:28 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The divorce thing is what many female Sox fans are hoping was the issue.
[source: My mom and every other decent Sox female fan I know]
They want him to come back, and they want a shot at kidnapping Heidi Whatney (dugout reporter for NESN, Varitek’s chick). I know that several of the guys on here want in on that plan as well, but for Heidi-only purposes. [shame on y’all :)]
Can he come back for a lower salary if it means being loyal to the team in Wake-like terms, and abandoning Boras’s advice? I think we should:
-try to bring back Tek, have him start 60% of games (most likely Dice-K, Lester, and the mysterious #5 starter).
-let Cash come back and catch Wake
-bring in/up the Future Catcher of the Boston Red Sox (FCBRS) and let them catch Beckett, and finish off a few of the other starts when the game is out of reach.
The FCBRS would learn to catch a pitcher with some of the best stuff in the game (Beckett), have a chance to catch a lot of relief pitchers (along with another great pitcher – Paps), and be under the wings of a great pitcher’s catcher AND a great basepath-managing/knuckleball catcher.
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on
Dec 14, 2008 2:19 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
3 Catchers is a waste
of salary and bench flexibility. No good reason to do this.
by BTLove on
Dec 14, 2008 11:55 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
At this point
bench flexibility is the bigger issue. I agree with you though.
by Schulz on
Dec 15, 2008 6:01 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It'll work out somehow.
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on
Dec 15, 2008 7:42 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Cash won't be back.
Yeah he can catch the knuckle, but he can’t hit for beans. Both Kottraras and Brown can catch the knuckle, Theo and Tito will give those guys chances before they bring back Cash.
by drabidea on
Dec 14, 2008 3:13 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Can he hit for Chicken Parm?
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on
Dec 14, 2008 3:52 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What will happen.
Theo will trade for a catching prospect only if he can get a fair deal (NOT Salty for Buch). Theo knew he needed a catcher last year too, he didn’t pull the trigger then because nothing good was available. He will do the same this year. No other team is going to sign Tek because they don’t want to give up 2 draft picks. The sox will get Tek at a cheap deal and Kottraras or Brown will be the back up.
by drabidea on
Dec 14, 2008 3:17 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
Teagarden for Buch seems fair to me.
Just not to Theo or the Rangers GM, who’s prolly asking for Pedroia and Lars to go with Buch.
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on
Dec 14, 2008 3:53 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You're kidding
You actually think that?
The Rangers GM isn’t an idiot. MVP + Stud pitching prospect for stud catcher. Great deal.
by Charger567 on
Dec 14, 2008 9:21 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think he was exagerrating
I think we know we won’t give them Buch for Salty, it the word that we are willing to give them Buch for Teagarden?
by BTLove on
Dec 14, 2008 11:57 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Buch is off-limits supposedly.
And that seems to be the common issue with other GM when they try to make deals with us.
Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/
by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on
Dec 15, 2008 7:44 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Trade for Salty, or Teagarden AND sign Bard.
by matzushocka45 on
Dec 14, 2008 10:20 PM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m of the belief we should no longer carry a catcher who is exclusive to Wake. I hate using 2 roster spots for one guy.
by matzushocka45 on
Dec 16, 2008 7:22 AM EST
reply
actions
0 recs
2 roster spots for one guy
Is fine, so long as that one guy is actually worth the two roster spots. Wakefield isn’t exactly a rotation ace, or even close these days. That makes it a bit ridiculous at that point … but oh well.
by manifestus on
Dec 16, 2008 12:12 PM EST
up
reply
actions
0 recs















