Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: NHL Free Agency Coverage: NHL Rumors, NHL Signings & Trades


spread the word

Jason Varitek: Yay or Nay?

With all the excitement over the Yankees' moves, and over Teixeira speculation, we're moving away from what may be the most critical position for the Red Sox long-term - catcher. The Red Sox have a serious decision to make, and it starts with whether or not they want Jason Varitek.

From where I stand, Tek really erred when he decided not to accept arbitration. Coming off an atrocious year, and his second lost season in the past three, Tek's strategy should have been to accept arbitration. Then he could make more money than as a free agent, and hopefully rebuild his value for another run at free agency for 2010.

As it is now, the market for Tek appears almost non-existent. The Tigers grabbed Gerald Laird, the Reds traded for Ramon Hernandez. And if a team wanted a veteran catcher, they'd probably prefer Ivan Rodriguez, who wouldn't cost first round draft picks.

If Jason Varitek can't work something out with the Red Sox, Boras is going to have to start marketing him in Japan. As much as Varitek-san would love the land of the Rising Sun, I think he'd prefer to not deal with a new league, new language, new pitching staff, and a new greatly reduced salary.*

With practically no other teams bidding for his services, Varitek has basically zero leverage. If he comes back to Boston, it'll be on Theo's terms. Our front office is not immune to sentimentality - witness the $4 million 2008 contract for Mike Timlin - but I hope in this case it won't be the driving factor. In this case, Theo should be able to hold Tek to a one-year deal, either as the primary starter or as part of a platoon with someone younger or better defensively (i.e. Cash).

On a one-year deal for less money, say $4 million, Varitek may be a legitimate option. The pitching staff likes him, and he hits lefties well (2008: .863 OPS). He's just one season removed from a good 2007 (.787 OPS). There is the possibility that he bounces back, especially if his struggles were more psychological (i.e. he got divorced) than physical.

However, I would prefer that Theo begins auditions for Who Wants to Catch the Red Sox sooner rather than later. Tek's defense has become underwhelming (18.8% caught-stealing percentage), and as a hitter he struggled to make contact all year long (2008: .220 / .313 / .359). It's unrealistic to expect much of an improvement at age 37, especially for a catcher. I'd rather bring back Kevin Cash, who plays good defense, guns down runners (26.9% CS%), and can catch Wakefield, than Tek, who is misfiring on all cylinders.

So here's my proposal:
1) Trade for a top catching prospect (preferably Teagarden, Salty, or Brian Anderson). Give him 60-75% of starts.
2) Bring back Kevin Cash, have him catch Wakefield and the remaining starts.
3) Have Dusty Brown / George Kottaras waiting in the wings should the prospect struggle or go down to injury.

What say you OTM? Do you approve? And more importantly, do you want Jason Varitek back for 2008?

*Baseball players in Japan make substantially less than their American counterparts. This is part of the reason that coming to the U.S. can be so appealing.

Poll
Should Jason Varitek be on the Red Sox for the 2009 season?
Yes. He should be the starting catcher.
93 votes
Yes. But he should be in a platoon or be the backup.
92 votes
No. He's too old, and coming off a terrible season. Give someone else a shot.
58 votes
I refuse to submit to this tyrannical tri-partite poll. Ron Paul for catcher!!!!@!
12 votes

255 votes | Poll has closed

0 recs | Comment 17 comments | Share on Facebook Digg!

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Over the Monster

Game 52: Dice-K looking sharp

Jun 2009 by Randy Booth - 15 comments

Comments

Display:

you are way off base

catcher’s role is more than throwing out runners at 2nd

he learns the hitters, makes adjustments, calls the right pitches

few catchers do

he cannot hit. most catchers are poor hitters. would not be a big deal if not for the OTHER holes in hitting line-up, especially DH, CF, SS and, most of the time, RF

put some rookie behind the plate, and watch your pitching staff “inexplicably” turn to shit

by Frank Malzone on Dec 14, 2008 1:53 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Except

That by the time catchers hit the Major Leagues, you figure they probably can do all of that given some time. Otherwise “rookies” like Maeur awhile back would have suddenly turned “their pitching staffs to shit” in their first full season. Which doesn’t seem to have happened. Not to mention the fact that rookies have a chance to get better, while Tek is basically not going to hand you any sort of breakout season here. It’s hard to fight age unless your skillset is basically ageless (e.g. Jamie Moyer).

The fact that he cannot hit is compounded by the fact that his defense is getting worse. There are poor defenders at C that hit the tar out of the ball; there are also very good defense catchers that don’t feature that much of a bat — there are very few that suck at both.

by manifestus on Dec 15, 2008 4:28 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The divorce thing is what many female Sox fans are hoping was the issue.

[source: My mom and every other decent Sox female fan I know]

They want him to come back, and they want a shot at kidnapping Heidi Whatney (dugout reporter for NESN, Varitek’s chick). I know that several of the guys on here want in on that plan as well, but for Heidi-only purposes. [shame on y’all :)]

Can he come back for a lower salary if it means being loyal to the team in Wake-like terms, and abandoning Boras’s advice? I think we should:

-try to bring back Tek, have him start 60% of games (most likely Dice-K, Lester, and the mysterious #5 starter).

-let Cash come back and catch Wake

-bring in/up the Future Catcher of the Boston Red Sox (FCBRS) and let them catch Beckett, and finish off a few of the other starts when the game is out of reach.

The FCBRS would learn to catch a pitcher with some of the best stuff in the game (Beckett), have a chance to catch a lot of relief pitchers (along with another great pitcher – Paps), and be under the wings of a great pitcher’s catcher AND a great basepath-managing/knuckleball catcher.

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Dec 14, 2008 2:19 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

3 Catchers is a waste

of salary and bench flexibility. No good reason to do this.

by BTLove on Dec 14, 2008 11:55 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

At this point

bench flexibility is the bigger issue. I agree with you though.

by Schulz on Dec 15, 2008 6:01 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It'll work out somehow.

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Dec 15, 2008 7:42 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cash won't be back.

Yeah he can catch the knuckle, but he can’t hit for beans. Both Kottraras and Brown can catch the knuckle, Theo and Tito will give those guys chances before they bring back Cash.

by drabidea on Dec 14, 2008 3:13 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Can he hit for Chicken Parm?

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Dec 14, 2008 3:52 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What will happen.

Theo will trade for a catching prospect only if he can get a fair deal (NOT Salty for Buch). Theo knew he needed a catcher last year too, he didn’t pull the trigger then because nothing good was available. He will do the same this year. No other team is going to sign Tek because they don’t want to give up 2 draft picks. The sox will get Tek at a cheap deal and Kottraras or Brown will be the back up.

by drabidea on Dec 14, 2008 3:17 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Teagarden for Buch seems fair to me.

Just not to Theo or the Rangers GM, who’s prolly asking for Pedroia and Lars to go with Buch.

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Dec 14, 2008 3:53 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're kidding

You actually think that?
The Rangers GM isn’t an idiot. MVP + Stud pitching prospect for stud catcher. Great deal.

by Charger567 on Dec 14, 2008 9:21 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think he was exagerrating

I think we know we won’t give them Buch for Salty, it the word that we are willing to give them Buch for Teagarden?

by BTLove on Dec 14, 2008 11:57 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Buch is off-limits supposedly.

And that seems to be the common issue with other GM when they try to make deals with us.

Clutch: A measurement of how much better or worse a player does in high leverage situations than he would have done in a context neutral environment. http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/glossary/

by bs.uf15bosox9bears23 on Dec 15, 2008 7:44 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Trade for Salty, or Teagarden AND sign Bard.

by matzushocka45 on Dec 14, 2008 10:20 PM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why Bard?

He can’t catch the Knuckle? Why not give Kottraras or Brown the job?

by drabidea on Dec 15, 2008 8:54 AM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m of the belief we should no longer carry a catcher who is exclusive to Wake. I hate using 2 roster spots for one guy.

by matzushocka45 on Dec 16, 2008 7:22 AM EST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

2 roster spots for one guy

Is fine, so long as that one guy is actually worth the two roster spots. Wakefield isn’t exactly a rotation ace, or even close these days. That makes it a bit ridiculous at that point … but oh well.

by manifestus on Dec 16, 2008 12:12 PM EST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the 2007 World Series Champions, the Boston Red Sox.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rorscach_small
Bay NOT an All-Star

Recent FanPosts

Red_seat_small
Minor Lines 7/3 -- Ok, you can look again.
Small
Tito Does It Again
Capitalshug_opta_small
My first Fanpost: Nick Green's nickname
Red_seat_small
Minor Lines 7/2 -- Avert Your Eyes
Roberts_beats_jeter_2004_small
Going to the game tomorrow
Red_seat_small
Minor Lines 7/1 -- All Drama Aside
Img_1588_small
Gotta Love this game
Red_seat_small
Minor Lines 6/30 - Because There Were No Major Lines Today
Small
WTF?

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

Red_sox_game_41206_026_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Pedroia_small ltrain2

Red_seat_small USG

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports