Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter

Magic comes in zeros.
In Buchholz's second career major league start, he performed what no other Boston Red Sox rookie has ever done by throwing a no-hitter. It was the third no-hitter in the majors this season and the first Red Sox no-hitter since Derek Lowe performed the feat in 2002. Although Buchholz allowed three walks, I still consider his performance tonight as perfect as perfect can be.
Buchholz's weapon of choice was his changeup. His fastball maxed out around 94 m.p.h., but his changeup (clocked around 78 m.p.h.) is what got the batters swinging off their back foot. The changeup is what made the batters dumbfounded, finding themselves staring at strike three. His curveball was also effective late in the counts.
I think Buchholz found his groove in the 8th inning when he started painting the edges of the plate with his changeup. From that point on, I personally felt like he was going to keep zeros on the board. Another important factor in the no-no was that he never shook off his catcher Jason Varitek, at least for what viewers saw. As long as Buchholz kept throwing whatever Varitek showed for fingers, he was going to be OK.
This game is obviously big for Buchholz himself, but I think this is going to be a huge boost to the ballclub. The whole team was behind Buchholz, throwing their body out on the line (case in point: Dustin Pedroia's fantastic hit-saving play in the 7th) for a potentially great rookie. This is the type of game that will push the Sox into the post-season.
This no-hitter did more than give the Red Sox a victory. It may give the Red Sox a ring come October.
0 recs |
32 comments
Comments
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Anyone hear Beckett after the game saying, "he did better than Schilling!!"...it was amusing. BTW, what about Ellsbury, huh? Looked pretty good, again!
Congrats Clay! Now, we just need the deadbeat bats to wake up as we got one hell of a pitching staff.
by cblesz on Sep 1, 2007 11:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Deadbeat bat?
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Matzushocka on Sep 1, 2007 11:35 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Bucholtz is our future, of which I feel good about. It is the current team I have issues with. Do you need us to speak slower for you? Do I need your permission before I express myself?
by cblesz on Sep 1, 2007 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Bill Heffernan on Sep 2, 2007 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by panzermensch on Sep 2, 2007 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
By the way guys...those monstrous 18 runs you are atalking about? They came against a pathetic bullpen and a starter who has a 7+ era. How did we do against good pitching again? Hmmmm, just last week. I cannot remember? I remember specifically saying we had no problem scoring runs against bad pitching...it was the good pitching that we had trouble with. By the way...how did those 8 runs Friday work out?
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Let's try to be respectful of one another, despite differences of opinion. Matsushocka can be "slow" if he wants to be, and cblesz can criticize the Sox if he wants to.
by SoxDevil on Sep 4, 2007 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by cblesz on Sep 4, 2007 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Criticizing the Sox isn't
by Bill Heffernan on Sep 4, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Criticizing the Sox isn't
by cblesz on Sep 5, 2007 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
And obviously, that's quite less amazing.
Kudos to Buchholz. Let's let this be a momentum-builder. Also, great contributions from the other kids (Ellsbury and Moss) tonight as well. Couple of good (if not amazing catches) from Moss, and of course Ellsbury's 2-run 2B.
by Allen Chace on Sep 1, 2007 11:36 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Beckett, Schilling, Dice-K, and Wakefield are your starters (if you even need four, one of the AL slots could need only three starters in the first two rounds).
Is he the seventh inning guy?
Now that I think about it, can he even qualify for the postseason roster if he's a September call up? Doesn't someone on the 25 man need to be DL'd?
by jscape2000 on Sep 2, 2007 7:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by panzermensch on Sep 2, 2007 8:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 12:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
A&B: Another no-hitter. Just kidding. Actually, Youk doubles twice.
by RSNexile on Sep 2, 2007 12:18 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A&B: 9/2/07
A&B: Lester has at least two 1-2-3 innings; Ortiz gets at least 2 hits
by MassGal on Sep 2, 2007 12:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A&B: 9/2/07
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Done talking about deficiencies
You can believe me or not but I am probably one of the biggest Sox fans around. I want nothing more than for them to win. So, until the postseason (of which I hope they are in), I will stop with the negativity...OK I will at least try.
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Done talking about deficiencies
BTW, did anyone here stop to think that bringing in new blood like this kid Buckholz was a management move prompted by the sliding that had obviously begun. If such moves lead to success, then that is a great result from internal or external criticism, and is far superior than doing nothing and letting the team just continue to fade away. Think about this people!!
I for one wish that management would bring in many more young players NOW to replace Drew and other none productive hitters!
by NG on Sep 2, 2007 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Done talking about deficiencies
Check the calendar, NG. Every team in baseball must be "sliding" because they've all expanded their rosters, as they do every season on September 1st.
by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Done talking about deficiencies
by NG on Sep 2, 2007 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 4:52 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
But again, you are a baseball genius, I forgot.
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 6:34 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Clay Buchholz comes via Pedro draft pick
by pfilios on Sep 2, 2007 9:32 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Re: Clay Buchholz comes via Pedro draft pick
by Randy Booth on Sep 3, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















