Over the Monster: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: The Boxing Bulletin for Boxing Fans!

Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter

Source: Yahoo!
Magic comes in zeros.
This is the moment all of Red Sox Nation has been waiting for. The "he's the real deal" kind of moment that only the best play-writes in Hollywood could concoct. Yet tonight the only person performing mastery was Clay Buchholz.

In Buchholz's second career major league start, he performed what no other Boston Red Sox rookie has ever done by throwing a no-hitter. It was the third no-hitter in the majors this season and the first Red Sox no-hitter since Derek Lowe performed the feat in 2002. Although Buchholz allowed three walks, I still consider his performance tonight as perfect as perfect can be.

Buchholz's weapon of choice was his changeup. His fastball maxed out around 94 m.p.h., but his changeup (clocked around 78 m.p.h.) is what got the batters swinging off their back foot. The changeup is what made the batters dumbfounded, finding themselves staring at strike three. His curveball was also effective late in the counts.

I think Buchholz found his groove in the 8th inning when he started painting the edges of the plate with his changeup. From that point on, I personally felt like he was going to keep zeros on the board. Another important factor in the no-no was that he never shook off his catcher Jason Varitek, at least for what viewers saw. As long as Buchholz kept throwing whatever Varitek showed for fingers, he was going to be OK.

This game is obviously big for Buchholz himself, but I think this is going to be a huge boost to the ballclub. The whole team was behind Buchholz, throwing their body out on the line (case in point: Dustin Pedroia's fantastic hit-saving play in the 7th) for a potentially great rookie. This is the type of game that will push the Sox into the post-season.

This no-hitter did more than give the Red Sox a victory. It may give the Red Sox a ring come October.

0 recs  |  Comment 32 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Wow!  Congratulations to Clay.  I know all of you think I am a buzzkill, but I am truly happy for this kid.  It was funny, he did not know how to react.  If we can get Lester to get his contol issues, well under control...lookout.  This kid looks 12, weighs maybe 150 lbs, but you gotta feel good for him!

Anyone hear Beckett after the game saying, "he did better than Schilling!!"...it was amusing.  BTW, what about Ellsbury, huh?  Looked pretty good, again!

Congrats Clay!  Now, we just need the deadbeat bats to wake up as we got one hell of a pitching staff.

by cblesz on Sep 1, 2007 11:30 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Deadbeat bat?
18 runs in the last two games!
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Really?  I am beginning to think Matzushocka is a "little slow".  I am sorry, I guess I am not allowed to criticize ANYTHING Red Sox, then feel good about one of our young guns doing well.  Sorry.  You know what, call me an SOB as you wish or whatever other name you want.  I now live in So. Cal...watch EVERY game....probably more than you do.  And, I WAS jumping up and down in celebration.  Just because we criticize our players does not give you the right to call us "non-fans".
Bucholtz is our future, of which I feel good about.  It is the current team I have issues with.  Do you need us to speak slower for you?  Do I need your permission before I express myself?

by cblesz on Sep 1, 2007 11:57 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Yep, I'm slow ya got me:) At least this no hitter is a small glimpse of sunshine as our doom comes closer!! We will soon be out of first place because we suck! Theo sucks! Tito Sucks! The Sox suck! Damn it we need to do better than having the best record in baseball whatsa matta with these bums huh? Goodnight sweet pants! Ive gotta go put on my helmet and wait for the bus in the morning. Ahh dang it I dont have school on sundays!

by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 12:08 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
CB, you've had your say. We appreciate your keeping the debate running, but right now, those of us who didn't write off the Sox for no good reason would like to celebrate the impressive achievement w/out your input.

by Bill Heffernan on Sep 2, 2007 12:13 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Thanks for your input Bill.  Since you are not the boss, I will ignore you.  Since you seem to be directing the discussion, what direction would you like the discussion to go?

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Dude, is there any way we can convince you not to talk down to us, especially when we're telling you that your criticism of a FIRST PLACE team has no merit? I hardly get to watch every game, but I check the box scores, and your assertion of "deadbeat bats" holds no water: 18 runs in 29 hits in the past two games alone. Did you also forget about the CWS series last weekend? Can I also point out that we've got the 5th best team AVG, the 4th most runs, and more doubles than any other team? So, on what do you base your assertion that we've got "deadbeat bats"?
What would Dogbert do?

by panzermensch on Sep 2, 2007 8:20 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Look.  Any of my comments that "talk down to you" is a result of the rest of you talking down to me..."idiot", "bandwagoner", "know nothing"...etc.  So, dish it out but you gotta be able to take it.  As far as I am concerned, my input is welcome on this blog or any blog.  If I choose to type comments here, as a Sox fan I should be able to.  And, Mr. Heffernan, who made you the commissioner of baseball who says I cannot enjoy this?

By the way guys...those monstrous 18 runs you are atalking about?  They came against a pathetic bullpen and a starter who has a 7+ era.  How did we do against good pitching again?  Hmmmm, just last week.  I cannot remember?  I remember specifically saying we had no problem scoring runs against bad pitching...it was the good pitching that we had trouble with.  By the way...how did those 8 runs Friday work out?

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Sure.  How many of our thunderbats have an average greater than .270?

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
cblesz has been around this 'blog for a long while. He's not all rainbows and sunshine, but he's not all thunderclouds either. Let's start over, shall we?

Let's try to be respectful of one another, despite differences of opinion. Matsushocka can be "slow" if he wants to be, and cblesz can criticize the Sox if he wants to.

"You know you're having a bad day when the fifth inning rolls around and they drag the warning track." - Mike Flanagan, Baltimore Orioles pitcher, 1992.

by SoxDevil on Sep 4, 2007 10:01 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Agree...stones only get thrown from me when I am throwing them back...

by cblesz on Sep 4, 2007 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Criticizing the Sox isn't
the issue. Making oneself into the story is.

by Bill Heffernan on Sep 4, 2007 4:20 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Criticizing the Sox isn't
Bill...please get over yourself, pal.   Geez.  if you have something intelligent to say, by all means use the diary section to the right.

by cblesz on Sep 5, 2007 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Simply amazing. Even more amazing? I could've been off of work tonight and actually watched it, but chose not to. ...crap.

And obviously, that's quite less amazing.

Kudos to Buchholz. Let's let this be a momentum-builder. Also, great contributions from the other kids (Ellsbury and Moss) tonight as well. Couple of good (if not amazing catches) from Moss, and of course Ellsbury's 2-run 2B.

by Allen Chace on Sep 1, 2007 11:36 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Where do you fit him into the postseason roster?
Beckett, Schilling, Dice-K, and Wakefield are your starters (if you even need four, one of the AL slots could need only three starters in the first two rounds).
Is he the seventh inning guy?

Now that I think about it, can he even qualify for the postseason roster if he's a September call up?  Doesn't someone on the 25 man need to be DL'd?

"If you're in love with the game, you can't turn it on and off like a light. It's something that runs so deep it takes you over." ~Billy Martin.

by jscape2000 on Sep 2, 2007 7:45 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
He can qualify if he is on the 40-man roster before September 1st.  Players who are on the 25-man roster are sometimes left off the post-season roster.  They don't have to be DL-ed.  Jimy Williams left Wake off in 1999, and I'm sure there are other examples.
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
My wife, while watching last night's highlight reel [which she rarely does], and seeing DP's extraordinary 7th inning play: "[uniform number] 15. Is that his age?"
What would Dogbert do?

by panzermensch on Sep 2, 2007 8:24 AM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
And now, for today's game (9/2):

A&B: Another no-hitter. Just kidding. Actually, Youk doubles twice.

by RSNexile on Sep 2, 2007 12:18 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A&B: 9/2/07

A&B: Lester has at least two 1-2-3 innings; Ortiz gets at least 2 hits

by MassGal on Sep 2, 2007 12:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

A&B: 9/2/07
A&B: Lowell extends his hitting streak
I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Done talking about deficiencies
Alright.  I am done criticizing the Red Sox.  I will stop bringing up the topic and hope we can distance ourselves a bit further against the Yankees.  I truly hope we can get to the playoffs and do well...I really do.  I just get bummed when we start to lose ground and the national media has an orgasm over the Yankees.

You can believe me or not but I am probably one of the biggest Sox fans around.  I want nothing more than for them to win.  So, until the postseason (of which I hope they are in), I will stop with the negativity...OK I will at least try.

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 12:33 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Done talking about deficiencies
If it helps you psycologically to vent about frustrations with this team, then by all means keep it up.  I think suggestions about things being wrong with this team is just a sign of living in the real world.

BTW, did anyone here stop to think that bringing in new blood like this kid Buckholz was a management move prompted by the sliding that had obviously begun.  If such moves lead to success, then that is a great result from internal or external criticism, and is far superior than doing nothing and letting the team just continue to fade away.  Think about this people!!

I for one wish that management would bring in many more young players NOW to replace Drew and other none productive hitters!

by NG on Sep 2, 2007 12:58 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Done talking about deficiencies
BTW, did anyone here stop to think that bringing in new blood like this kid Buckholz was a management move prompted by the sliding that had obviously begun.

Check the calendar, NG.  Every team in baseball must be "sliding" because they've all expanded their rosters, as they do every season on September 1st.  

I gotta go 'cause I'm probably definitely gonna nod out again.

by Drugs Delaney on Sep 2, 2007 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Done talking about deficiencies
I understand this/that.  However, there is a difference between seating them on the bench for "just in case" situations and playing them the first thing as starters.  I commend Red Sox management for doing the latter because it seemed quite obvious as of Friday night that strong corrective and motivational actions were in order if Red Sox hopes for a playoff shot (nevermind win) were going to materialize.  Besides the DIRECT added playing boost provided by the youngsters, the actions fire a warning shot across the bow of the SS Lugo and SS Drew and SS Crisp, such actions which are long overdue IMO!

by NG on Sep 2, 2007 4:14 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
I dont think they care because mlb contracts are guaranteed, as you may or may not know. I cant never quite tell between you and the cb guy...After all you say you understand the Sept 1st call ups, but the prior post didnt appear to indicate that:) Sox win again weare DOOMED !!!

by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 4:52 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
What in God's name does that mean?  You just cannot let it go?  Did you read my post that I was going to drop the negative posts?  Apparently, you do not want me to as you keep trying to stir the pot...

But again, you are a baseball genius, I forgot.

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 5:19 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
No, I am slow. I am not a genius.

by Matzushocka on Sep 2, 2007 6:34 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz throws no-hitter
Takes a big person to admit it...

by cblesz on Sep 2, 2007 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Clay Buchholz comes via Pedro draft pick
I didn't realize until reading an article today that we got Buchholz with a draft pick gained as compensation for the Mets signing Pedro.  It demonstrates the outstanding judgement Epstein has not only in signing new talent, but in knowing when to let go of fading stars.

by pfilios on Sep 2, 2007 9:32 PM EDT reply actions   0 recs

Re: Clay Buchholz comes via Pedro draft pick
Yeah, look at Pedro now (as I say that, he makes his '07 debut today)

by Randy Booth on Sep 3, 2007 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over The Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything regarding the Boston Red Sox organization. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.
Start posting about the Red Sox »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Rorscach_small
The Adventures of Statman: Attack of the Scioscier
Rorscach_small
RED SOX VS. YANKEES (TEAM OF TEH TWO CENTURIES = 1900 TO 2100) - JUST THE FACTS

Recent FanPosts

Military-explosion-20799_small
Bay to the Yankees? Holliday to the Red Sox?
Small
Jason Bay rejects Sox offer
Small
Damon may not sign with yanks....scary
Small
Baseball Prospectus' Top 11 Red Sox Prospects
Small
Wagner could accept Arbitration
Redsoxlogo_small
Free Agents
Img587561916661595
Top 15 high school MLB draft prospects
Life_is_brighter_after_guinness_small
Sox, Wakefield Agree to 2-year/$5 Million Contract
Chewbacca_pitch_red_sox_small
Who is your daddy and what does he do?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

N32606527_32219358_6072_small Randy Booth

Editors

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Authors

Zissou551_small SoxDevil

Helmet_icon_small bs.uf15bosox9bears23

Pedroia_small ltrain2

Red_seat_small USG

Small soxstats