Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Raiders' GM Begins The Purge

Don't sign A-Rod!

Clap-clap clap-clap-clap.

Do we need to get a petition together?  

Star-divide

I know there's already a diary on this, but I wanted to include a poll that reflects my sentiments.

Poll
Who would be the worst potential signing for the Red Sox?
Alex Rodriguez
22 votes
Osama bin Laden
5 votes
Fidel Castro
1 votes
OJ Simpson
3 votes
That annoying guy who cuts you off on the highway while on his cell phone
7 votes

38 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 10 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
The Sox can't sign that annoying guy who cuts you off on the highway while on his cell phone. He's already under contract to the MFY.

by RSNexile on Oct 30, 2007 10:01 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
And last I heard the Yanks aren't exersizing that option cuz they found someone that fulfills that purpose and more, "that guy who cuts you off while on the cell phone, then looks at you like it was your fault that he almost ran into you"

by Realistic on Nov 1, 2007 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
Wait a minute -- I thought that was a player option, not a team option, and A-Rod already opted out!

by RSNexile on Nov 1, 2007 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
I think a Castro signing would be quite apropos for the Sox. It helps them reach out to the student population that buys Che Guevera shirts, one of the few untapped revenue streams. They can hoist banners across Fenway saying "The AL East is Red." Larry Lucchino could call a press conference, take off his shoes (in the process revealing his Red Socks) and bang them against the table while denouncing Yankee Imperialism. They could even get access to Cuban baseball players, without the trouble of them defecting. This move would also pave the way for favorable relations between Red Sox Nation and the Chinese government.

by 0157H7 on Nov 1, 2007 11:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
  Of all the players we could ever get please
 do not be foolish enough and Poor eough to
 sign the loser A-choke....

by MaineSox on Nov 2, 2007 7:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
Well, with the light shined that boras and a-rod arent talking to any team that isnt prepared to offer at least 350 million dollars, iv pretty much changed my mind on a-rod. The team that signs him for 10 years is setting themselves up for terrible grief. A-rod is trying to hold baseball hostage, and all teams should just pass on the 350mil 10 year deal until arod and boras are willing to come back to earth.

by spinz on Nov 2, 2007 10:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
I think Boras is trying to set up a posting system for free agents -- that $350M is for the right to negotiate with A-Rod, because he thinks A-Rod is seven times as valuable as Dice-K, for whom the Sox paid $51M for negotiating rights. The contract will also be about $350M, so the total price tag is around $700M.

For that, I hope the MFY re-sign him. We wouldn't see them back in the playoffs for a generation.

by RSNexile on Nov 3, 2007 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
gotta figure that dice-k, clemens, and soriano has caused this....I really hope this backfires on boras/arod

by spinz on Nov 3, 2007 5:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Re: Don't sign A-Rod!
Boras has this idea that ARod generates more revenue for a team because he's such a media fixation.  There is some truth in that, but I don't think it's $350M worth.  Also, I know baseball teams are businesses, but if you had two players that you could sign for the same money, but player X would generate more revenue while player Y would win more games, who would you sign?

As fans, we would say player Y, but I think for baseball owners it might come down to "how much more money?"  I think in the long run, an owner who isn't perceived to be putting the success of his team over other considerations is going to lose a lot of potential revenue.  

by RickD on Nov 4, 2007 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to Over the Monster, an SB Nation community that delivers news and analysis while encouraging discussion regarding everything Boston Red Sox. OTM was founded Feb. 22, 2005.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Jddrew_small
OTM Fantasy Baseball-post 2

Recent FanPosts

School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been continued: 2010-2011 offseason
Small
The Red Sox and the luxury tax
Silence_small
Alfredo Aceves and Red Sox agree at $1.2 million
Danny_and_shuttle_small
Matt Garza Is Fair Compensation For Theo Epstein
School-of-adventure_print_small
What might have been: A revisionist look to the 2009-2010 offseason.
School-of-adventure_print_small
Dustin Moseley
Old-patriots-logo_small
Free Agent SPs Not Named Oswalt, Jackson
Small
Attempt at objectivity - position players
Small
An interesting note on Aviles

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Red_seat_small Ben Buchanan

Twitter_eb_2_small Marc Normandin

Authors

Lowrie__1234972975_0178-1_small lone1c

Jddrew_small gizmosandy

Pedoria1_small Mattsullivan

Baghead-1_small Matthew Kory

Photo__2__small BrendanOToole

Cee_small Cee Angi

Retired Numbers

20136_562469370037_32603605_33253497_5601129_n_small Randy Booth

Master_shake_small Allen Chace

Rollie_fingers_small SoxDevil

Rorscach_small 0157H7

Red_sox_logo_small Logan Lietz

Photo_small wolf9309